Intravenous Nalbuphine Versus Intravenous Dexmedetomidine for Conscious

Status Not yet recruiting

Clinical Trial Summary

The aim of this study is to compare the sedative, analgesic effect and hemodynamic changes due to dexmedetomidine and nalbuphine during elective colonoscopy.

Clinical Trial Description

Colonoscopy can be performed for the screening of cancer, adenomas, and polyps, for the assessment of known or possible bleeding, and for the evaluation of possible causes of abdominal pain, gastrointestinal symptoms, and/or changes in bowel habits. colonoscopy is associated with discomfort and sometimes pain. At present, the commonly used methods are the intravenous injection of propofol, etomidate, ketamine, and other drugs to make the patient's unconscious. The disadvantage is that the patient cannot cooperate during the examination (e.g., for changing position), and medical staff is needed to assist in turning over the patient, if necessary. This may compress the patient's stomach and abdomen, which may cause gastric reflux and aspiration, which may cause pneumonia, with morbidity and even mortality. Nalbuphine hydrochloride is a mixed agonist-antagonist opioid with a duration of action of approximately 3-6 hours. It is chemically related to both the agonist analgesic oxymorphone and the antagonist naloxone, and acts as an antagonist at the μ receptor and as an agonist at the κ receptor, resulting in analgesia and sedation with minimal effects in the cardiovascular system. Any slight RD that occurs would be restricted by a ceiling effect. Dexmedetomidine, a new drug, is highly selective α2-adrenergic receptor agonist. It possesses hypnotic, sedative, anxiolytic, sympatholytic, and analgesic properties without producing significant respiratory depression. It also reduces both anesthetic and opioid analgesic requirements during the perioperative period. It has an impressive safety margin,and it may be suitable for conscious sedation during painful procedures. ;

Study Design

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

Colonoscopy

Clinical Trial Details

NCT number	NCT05689242
Study type	Interventional
Source	Assiut University
Contact	omar AB abulfadl, bachelor's
Phone	0021069909234
Email	omarabulfadl1@gmail.com
Status	Not yet recruiting
Phase	Phase 4
Start date	March 2023
Completion date	December 2024

View Details

See also
Status	Clinical Trial	Phase
Completed	`NCT04101097` - Training and Validation of Models of Factors to Predict Inadequate Bowel Preparation Colonoscopy
Completed	`NCT03247595` - Testing How Well Magnesium Citrate Capsules Work as Preparation for a Colonoscopy	N/A
Completed	`NCT04214301` - An Open-Label Preference Evaluation of BLI800	Phase 4
Withdrawn	`NCT05754255` - Comparison of High-flow Oxygen With or Without Nasal Positive Airway Pressure (PAP) During Propofol Sedation for Colonoscopy in an Ambulatory Surgical Center	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT02484105` - Comforting Conversation During Colonoscopy: A Trial on Patient Satisfaction	Phase 4
Active, not recruiting	`NCT02264249` - Residual Gastric Volume in Same Day Versus Split Dose and Evening Before Bowel Preparation	N/A
Completed	`NCT01964417` - The Comparative Study Between Bowel Preparation Method	Phase 3
Terminated	`NCT01978509` - The Affect of Low-Volume Bowel Preparation for Hospitalized Patients Colonoscopies	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT01685970` - Comparison of Same-day 2 Sachets Picosulfate Versus High Volume PEG for Afternoon Colonoscopy	Phase 3
Completed	`NCT01518790` - Short Course, Single-dose PEG 3350 for Colonoscopy Prep in Children	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT00748293` - Achievement of Better Examinee Compliance on Colon Cleansing Using Commercialized Low-Residue Diet	N/A
Completed	`NCT00779649` - MoviPrep® Versus HalfLytely®, Low-VolUme PEG Solutions for Colon Cleansing: An InvesTigator-blindEd, Randomized, Trial	Phase 4
Completed	`NCT00671177` - Clinical Evaluation of Water Immersion Colonoscopy Insertion Technique	N/A
Completed	`NCT00380497` - Pico-Salax Versus Poly-Ethylene Glycol for Bowel Cleanout Before Colonoscopy in Children	Phase 4
Recruiting	`NCT00160823` - Impact of a Self-Administered Information Leaflet on Adequacy of Colonic Cleansing for in-Hospital Patients	Phase 3
Completed	`NCT00390598` - PEG Solution (Laxabon®) 4L Versus Senna Glycoside (Pursennid® Ex-Lax) 36mg and PEG Solution (Laxabon®) 2L for Large Bowel Cleansing Prior to Colonoscopy	Phase 2/Phase 3
Completed	`NCT00314418` - Patient Position and Impact on Colonoscopy Time	N/A
Completed	`NCT00209573` - A Study of AQUAVAN® Injection Versus Midazolam HCl for Sedation in Patients Undergoing Elective Colonoscopy	Phase 3
Completed	`NCT00427089` - Comparison of 2L NRL994 With NaP Preparation in Colon Cleansing Prior to Colonoscopies for Colon Tumor Screening	Phase 3
Completed	`NCT05823350` - The Effect of Abdominal Massage on Pain and Distention After Colonoscopy	N/A

Clinical trials are conducted in a series of steps, called phases - each phase is designed to answer a separate research question.

Phase 1: Researchers test a new drug or treatment in a small group of people for the first time to evaluate its safety, determine a safe dosage range, and identify side effects.
Phase 2: The drug or treatment is given to a larger group of people to see if it is effective and to further evaluate its safety.
Phase 3: The drug or treatment is given to large groups of people to confirm its effectiveness, monitor side effects, compare it to commonly used treatments, and collect information that will allow the drug or treatment to be used safely.
Phase 4: Studies are done after the drug or treatment has been marketed to gather information on the drug's effect in various populations and any side effects associated with long-term use.

Intravenous Nalbuphine Versus Intravenous Dexmedetomidine for Conscious Sedation in Patients Undergoing Colonoscopy

Clinical Trial Summary

Clinical Trial Description

Study Design

Related Conditions & MeSH terms