Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Active, not recruiting

Administrative data

NCT number NCT05637021
Other study ID # 2022-014
Secondary ID
Status Active, not recruiting
Phase
First received
Last updated
Start date February 1, 2022
Est. completion date December 31, 2022

Study information

Verified date December 2022
Source Zhongshan Hospital Xiamen University
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Observational

Clinical Trial Summary

The goal of this observational study is to learn about Influencing factors of intestinal microecological changes before and after colonoscopy. The main questions it aims to answer are: - [question 1] The process of colonoscopic gas insufflation affects the intestinal microecology. Will the use of carbon dioxide gas insufflation can reduce the changes of intestinal microecology after colonoscopy? - [question 2] Can the appendix act as a reservoir for microorganisms to accelerate the recovery of intestinal microecology after colonoscopy? Participants will be asked to accept colonoscopy for once. Group 1(Control group) will be insufflated air during the colonoscopy; Group 2(Carbon dioxide group) will be insufflated carbon dioxide during the colonoscopy; Group 3(After appendectomy group) will be insufflated air during the colonoscopy. Since Group 1 is comparison group, the investigators will compare Group 2 to see if carbon dioxide gas insufflation can reduce the changes of intestinal microecology after colonoscopy. Meanwhile, compare Group 3 to see if the appendix can accelerate the recovery of intestinal microecology after colonoscopy.


Description:

Usually, gastroenteroscopy requires gas insufflation to expand the lumen to facilitate endoscopic insertion and detailed observation of the mucosa. In the past, the use of air as an insufflation gas in endoscopic operations was simple and inexpensive, but because its main component was nitrogen, it was difficult to be absorbed by the gastrointestinal mucosa. Therefore, the endoscopist often needs to fully aspirate the gas when the procedure is completed. However, studies have shown that about 50% of patients still complain of abdominal pain after colonoscopy, and 12% of patients still have severe abdominal pain even after 24 hours. In contrast, carbon dioxide (CO2) has been used in endoscopy of the digestive tract in recent years because it can be rapidly absorbed by the gastrointestinal mucosa, and has attracted the attention of endoscopists. The gastrointestinal mucosa absorbs CO2 at a rate 160 times faster than nitrogen. Because of this property, many people consider replacing air in endoscopic operations. Its potential value was first demonstrated in animal tests: the recovery time of intestinal lumen dilation and increased intraluminal pressure was significantly shortened after intestinal lumen injection of CO2 in rats. Meta-analysis showed no significant difference in safety, gas volume, or cecal intubation rate between the two groups for CO2 insufflation during colonoscopy, but less postoperative abdominal pain, abdominal distention, and less postoperative gastrointestinal exhaust in the CO2 group. The low postoperative pain score and low increase in abdominal circumference may be due to the rapid absorption of CO2 by the gastrointestinal mucosa, suggesting that residual gas after colonoscopy is the main cause of abdominal pain. CO2 is a non-flammable gas that is safe for electroresection and has been widely used in laparoscopic surgery. For patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) who require endoscopy, it is worth exploring whether the use of CO2 in endoscopy causes CO2 retention. In one study of 77 endoscopic participants with obstructive ventilation dysfunction and 308 endoscopic participants without concomitant obstructive ventilation dysfunction, there was no difference in end-tidal volume CO2 between the two groups, and the peak tidal volume CO2 peak was less than 60 mmHg in both groups, suggesting that endoscopic use of CO2 is still safe for people with concomitant obstructive ventilation dysfunction. The current study has found that the intestinal preparation of the colonoscopy, as well as the colonoscopy operation itself, has a certain impact on the intestinal microbiome, although this effect can be partially recovered over a period of time, but the current study has found that this change may also be permanent, but whether it will cause long-term metabolic, immune or clinical changes in the host is unknown. Compared with conventional air injection, CO2 may change less about the hypoxic environment of the intestine, thereby reducing the impact on the normal intestinal microbiome. Based on this hypothesis, the investigators will conduct randomized, controlled experiments to investigate the effects of conventional air and CO2 insufflation on the intestinal microbiome and metabolites. In addition, some studies have called the appendix a "reservoir" of gut microbes. First, the mucosal flora of the appendix is similar to the rest of the colon; Secondly, the fecal microbiota composition of mice changed after appendectomy. The appendix preserves a small amount of intestinal bacteria as "seeds", once the intestinal flora is imbalanced, the "seed bank" will be used for cultivation, when the appendix is removed, it is equivalent to the "seed bank" is destroyed, so once the intestinal flora is imbalanced, there may be a delay in the recovery of the intestinal microecology. Based on this hypothesis, the investigators will conduct controlled experiments to compare the intestinal microbiome recovery after colonoscopy in healthy people and people after appendectomy, and explore the impact of appendix on intestinal microbiome recovery. This study was a single-center study, and 20 cases were initially included in the control group, CO2 group and after appendectomy group.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Active, not recruiting
Enrollment 38
Est. completion date December 31, 2022
Est. primary completion date July 14, 2022
Accepts healthy volunteers Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Gender All
Age group 18 Years to 40 Years
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria: - Age 18-40 years old, gender is not limited, no underlying diseases; - BMI between 18.5-23.9 kg/m2; - Fecal Bristol score type III-IV in the past week; - No history of alcohol consumption or alcohol consumption equivalent to ethanol should not exceed 140g per week for men and 70g per week for women. - Add a criterion to after appendectomy group:Patients who underwent appendectomy in the Department of General Surgery of Zhongshan Hospital Xiamen University within 3 years. Exclusion Criteria: - Those who use antibiotics, antifungal drugs, antiviral drugs, probiotics, prebiotics, synbiotics and drugs that may affect the intestinal microecology within 1 month; - Those who have acute enteritis or chronic enteritis and other diagnosed chronic bowel diseases in the past 1 month; - Those who have digestive symptoms such as blood in the stool, constipation, bloating, abdominal pain, diarrhea and so on in the past 1 month - History of digestive surgery (including gastrointestinal polyp resection, gastrointestinal tumor surgery and diversion surgery, etc.).

Study Design


Intervention

Other:
Carbon dioxide insufflated during colonoscopy
Carbon dioxide is insufflated to dilate the bowel lumen during colonoscopy.Record the amount of gas insufflated during colonoscopy.

Locations

Country Name City State
China Zhongshan Hospital Xiamen University Xiamen Fujian

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Zhongshan Hospital Xiamen University

Country where clinical trial is conducted

China, 

References & Publications (6)

Drago L, Toscano M, De Grandi R, Casini V, Pace F. Persisting changes of intestinal microbiota after bowel lavage and colonoscopy. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016 May;28(5):532-7. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000000581. — View Citation

Eckburg PB, Bik EM, Bernstein CN, Purdom E, Dethlefsen L, Sargent M, Gill SR, Nelson KE, Relman DA. Diversity of the human intestinal microbial flora. Science. 2005 Jun 10;308(5728):1635-8. doi: 10.1126/science.1110591. Epub 2005 Apr 14. — View Citation

Jalanka J, Salonen A, Salojarvi J, Ritari J, Immonen O, Marciani L, Gowland P, Hoad C, Garsed K, Lam C, Palva A, Spiller RC, de Vos WM. Effects of bowel cleansing on the intestinal microbiota. Gut. 2015 Oct;64(10):1562-8. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2014-307240. — View Citation

Masahata K, Umemoto E, Kayama H, Kotani M, Nakamura S, Kurakawa T, Kikuta J, Gotoh K, Motooka D, Sato S, Higuchi T, Baba Y, Kurosaki T, Kinoshita M, Shimada Y, Kimura T, Okumura R, Takeda A, Tajima M, Yoshie O, Fukuzawa M, Kiyono H, Fagarasan S, Iida T, Ishii M, Takeda K. Generation of colonic IgA-secreting cells in the caecal patch. Nat Commun. 2014 Apr 10;5:3704. doi: 10.1038/ncomms4704. — View Citation

Nagata N, Tohya M, Fukuda S, Suda W, Nishijima S, Takeuchi F, Ohsugi M, Tsujimoto T, Nakamura T, Shimomura A, Yanagisawa N, Hisada Y, Watanabe K, Imbe K, Akiyama J, Mizokami M, Miyoshi-Akiyama T, Uemura N, Hattori M. Effects of bowel preparation on the hu — View Citation

Wu J, Hu B. The role of carbon dioxide insufflation in colonoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Endoscopy. 2012 Feb;44(2):128-36. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1291487. Epub 2012 Jan 23. — View Citation

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary The intestinal microbiota composition Changes in the intestinal microbiome are observed by detecting the feces at the specific time point.Then, factors affecting the recovery of the intestinal microbiome are assessed based on their changes. Before bowel cleansing, after colonoscopy, 7?14 and 28 days after the treatment
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT04101097 - Training and Validation of Models of Factors to Predict Inadequate Bowel Preparation Colonoscopy
Completed NCT03247595 - Testing How Well Magnesium Citrate Capsules Work as Preparation for a Colonoscopy N/A
Completed NCT04214301 - An Open-Label Preference Evaluation of BLI800 Phase 4
Withdrawn NCT05754255 - Comparison of High-flow Oxygen With or Without Nasal Positive Airway Pressure (PAP) During Propofol Sedation for Colonoscopy in an Ambulatory Surgical Center N/A
Recruiting NCT02484105 - Comforting Conversation During Colonoscopy: A Trial on Patient Satisfaction Phase 4
Active, not recruiting NCT02264249 - Residual Gastric Volume in Same Day Versus Split Dose and Evening Before Bowel Preparation N/A
Completed NCT01964417 - The Comparative Study Between Bowel Preparation Method Phase 3
Terminated NCT01978509 - The Affect of Low-Volume Bowel Preparation for Hospitalized Patients Colonoscopies N/A
Recruiting NCT01685970 - Comparison of Same-day 2 Sachets Picosulfate Versus High Volume PEG for Afternoon Colonoscopy Phase 3
Completed NCT01518790 - Short Course, Single-dose PEG 3350 for Colonoscopy Prep in Children N/A
Recruiting NCT00748293 - Achievement of Better Examinee Compliance on Colon Cleansing Using Commercialized Low-Residue Diet N/A
Completed NCT00779649 - MoviPrep® Versus HalfLytely®, Low-VolUme PEG Solutions for Colon Cleansing: An InvesTigator-blindEd, Randomized, Trial Phase 4
Completed NCT00671177 - Clinical Evaluation of Water Immersion Colonoscopy Insertion Technique N/A
Completed NCT00380497 - Pico-Salax Versus Poly-Ethylene Glycol for Bowel Cleanout Before Colonoscopy in Children Phase 4
Recruiting NCT00160823 - Impact of a Self-Administered Information Leaflet on Adequacy of Colonic Cleansing for in-Hospital Patients Phase 3
Completed NCT00390598 - PEG Solution (Laxabon®) 4L Versus Senna Glycoside (Pursennid® Ex-Lax) 36mg and PEG Solution (Laxabon®) 2L for Large Bowel Cleansing Prior to Colonoscopy Phase 2/Phase 3
Completed NCT00314418 - Patient Position and Impact on Colonoscopy Time N/A
Completed NCT00209573 - A Study of AQUAVAN® Injection Versus Midazolam HCl for Sedation in Patients Undergoing Elective Colonoscopy Phase 3
Completed NCT00427089 - Comparison of 2L NRL994 With NaP Preparation in Colon Cleansing Prior to Colonoscopies for Colon Tumor Screening Phase 3
Completed NCT05823350 - The Effect of Abdominal Massage on Pain and Distention After Colonoscopy N/A