Colonoscopy Clinical Trial
— COLDiSOfficial title:
A Prospective Randomized Controlled Monocentric Study Comparing Digital Sedation Versus Intravenous Sedation Among Patients Undergoing Colonoscopy
NCT number | NCT04465383 |
Other study ID # | OC08 |
Secondary ID | |
Status | Terminated |
Phase | N/A |
First received | |
Last updated | |
Start date | June 25, 2020 |
Est. completion date | December 21, 2021 |
Verified date | September 2022 |
Source | Oncomfort |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
This prospective Randomized Controlled Trial will evaluate efficacy, safety, and pharmacoeconomic outcomes in patients undergoing colonoscopy with either Digital Sedation using the Aqua© module of the Oncomfort device (Sedakit TM) or the standard of care, intravenous sedation with propofol. The Aqua© module is designed for sedation and management of pain and anxiety related to medical and surgical procedures.
Status | Terminated |
Enrollment | 90 |
Est. completion date | December 21, 2021 |
Est. primary completion date | September 20, 2021 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | Accepts Healthy Volunteers |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years and older |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: - Age of 18 years or older - Indication for screening or diagnostic colonoscopy under conventional IVS (propofol) - Provision of written informed consent Exclusion Criteria: - Scheduled dilation - Active Crohn Disease - Low auditory acuity that precludes use of the device - Low visual acuity that precludes use of the device - Head or face wounds precluding use of the device - Schizophrenia - Dizziness - Water/sea phobia - Non-proficiency in French or Dutch (research language) |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Belgium | Hôpital Erasme | Brussels |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Oncomfort | Erasme University Hospital |
Belgium,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | To confirm the feasibility of using digital sedation in colonoscopy (stage 1) | cecal intubation rate, rate of rescue sedation | Day 1 | |
Primary | To demonstrate adequate performance of colonoscopy using digital sedation (stage 2) | cecal intubation rate, rate of rescue sedation | Day 1 | |
Secondary | To compare patient experience in both arms | Measure of satisfaction by Likert scale (0 to 5), pain by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS 0 to 10), anxiety by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS 0 to 10), comfort by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS 0 to 10), Preferred type of sedation, Recall of the procedure, Experienced side effects/ AE | Day 1 & Day 2 Follow-up call | |
Secondary | To compare measures of colonoscopy performance in both arms | Compare Cecal intubation rates, Adenoma detection rates, Withdrawal time,Total duration of colonoscopy, Total duration of sedation,Total length of stay in procedure room,Total length of stay in recovery room,Total length of stay in hospital | Day 1 | |
Secondary | To assess the need for rescue sedation in the experimental arm | Proportion of patients with cecal intubation without rescue sedation in the experimental arm, Frequency of use of intravenous sedation (propofol) and of complete interruption of digital sedation | Day 1 | |
Secondary | To compare use of sedation medication in both arms | Average (per patient) total doses of sedation medication per arm | Day 1 | |
Secondary | To assess gastroenterologist and anesthesiologist satisfaction in both arms | Measure of satisfaction by Likert scale (0 to 5) and of perceived facilitation or impediment of the procedure by Digital Sedation as measured by Likert scale (0 to 5) | Day 1 | |
Secondary | To assess gastroenterologist and anesthesiologist stress in both arms | Measure of stress by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS 0 to 10) | Day 1 | |
Secondary | To compare physiologic measures in both arms | Oxygen saturation (minimal observed during procedure), MBP (min/max.), Heart rate (min/max) | Day 1 | |
Secondary | To assess difficulty or ease of the procedure in both arms | Number of abdominal manipulations and patient mobilizations | Day 1 | |
Secondary | To compare the safety in both arms | Frequency and type of AEs and SAEs, Frequency and severity of episodes of desaturation and of HR/ MBP changes | Screening, Day 1 & Day 2 Follow-up call |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT04101097 -
Training and Validation of Models of Factors to Predict Inadequate Bowel Preparation Colonoscopy
|
||
Completed |
NCT03247595 -
Testing How Well Magnesium Citrate Capsules Work as Preparation for a Colonoscopy
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04214301 -
An Open-Label Preference Evaluation of BLI800
|
Phase 4 | |
Withdrawn |
NCT05754255 -
Comparison of High-flow Oxygen With or Without Nasal Positive Airway Pressure (PAP) During Propofol Sedation for Colonoscopy in an Ambulatory Surgical Center
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT02484105 -
Comforting Conversation During Colonoscopy: A Trial on Patient Satisfaction
|
Phase 4 | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT02264249 -
Residual Gastric Volume in Same Day Versus Split Dose and Evening Before Bowel Preparation
|
N/A | |
Terminated |
NCT01978509 -
The Affect of Low-Volume Bowel Preparation for Hospitalized Patients Colonoscopies
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01964417 -
The Comparative Study Between Bowel Preparation Method
|
Phase 3 | |
Recruiting |
NCT01685970 -
Comparison of Same-day 2 Sachets Picosulfate Versus High Volume PEG for Afternoon Colonoscopy
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT01518790 -
Short Course, Single-dose PEG 3350 for Colonoscopy Prep in Children
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT00748293 -
Achievement of Better Examinee Compliance on Colon Cleansing Using Commercialized Low-Residue Diet
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT00779649 -
MoviPrep® Versus HalfLytely®, Low-VolUme PEG Solutions for Colon Cleansing: An InvesTigator-blindEd, Randomized, Trial
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT00671177 -
Clinical Evaluation of Water Immersion Colonoscopy Insertion Technique
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT00380497 -
Pico-Salax Versus Poly-Ethylene Glycol for Bowel Cleanout Before Colonoscopy in Children
|
Phase 4 | |
Recruiting |
NCT00160823 -
Impact of a Self-Administered Information Leaflet on Adequacy of Colonic Cleansing for in-Hospital Patients
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT00390598 -
PEG Solution (Laxabon®) 4L Versus Senna Glycoside (Pursennid® Ex-Lax) 36mg and PEG Solution (Laxabon®) 2L for Large Bowel Cleansing Prior to Colonoscopy
|
Phase 2/Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT00314418 -
Patient Position and Impact on Colonoscopy Time
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT00209573 -
A Study of AQUAVAN® Injection Versus Midazolam HCl for Sedation in Patients Undergoing Elective Colonoscopy
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT00427089 -
Comparison of 2L NRL994 With NaP Preparation in Colon Cleansing Prior to Colonoscopies for Colon Tumor Screening
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT05823350 -
The Effect of Abdominal Massage on Pain and Distention After Colonoscopy
|
N/A |