Does the Cap Increase the Finding of Polyps When Water Exchange Colonoscopy is Used

Colonoscopy Clinical Trial

— ASGE  

Official title:

Does the Addition of a Cap Improve the Adenoma Detection Rate During Water Exchange Colonoscopy

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Recruiting

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT03566615
• Other study ID #: ASGE 2016 International Award
• Status: Recruiting
• Phase: N/A
• Start date: July 1, 2018
• Est. completion date: January 31, 2023

Study information

• Verified date: October 2022
• Source: VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System
• Contact: Vivek Dixit, PhD
• Phone: 818-895-9426
• Email: vivek.dixit[@]va.gov
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

This is a study to compare two different, but normally, used methods of colonoscopy in patients that require a routine or repeat colonoscopy. There will be three arms in this study: WE water control, water plus Cap-1, and water plus Cap-2. The patient will prepare himself/herself for the colonoscopy as per normal instructions and he/she will be given the information for the study at that time so that he/she can make a decision to participate in the study. The control method will use water instead of air inserted into the colon. The study method will use a new accessory, a cap that will fit onto the end of the colonoscope plus water during the procedure. This study will also confirm if using the cap method with water is a better way of detecting polyps in the colon and possibly cancer.

Description:

This will be a multi-site, multi-national, unblinded investigators, prospective Random Control Trial (RCT). Randomization (WE, WE Cap-1, WE Cap-2) will be based on computer generated random numbers placed inside opaque sealed envelopes. The envelope (in pre-arranged order) will be opened to reveal the code when the colonoscopist is ready to insert the endoscope to begin the examination. This will be a comparison of two different methods with three arms (WE, WE Cap-1, WE Cap-2) to see which one is better at detecting adenomas.

Patients who are willing to participate will sign an informed consent before starting the colonoscopy procedure. Separate parallel randomization will be set up at each site, stratified by investigator and type of colonoscopy (screening or surveillance). Mode of sedation will include unsedated (China, US West Los Angeles VA), minimally sedated (Taiwan), on demand sedation (Italy, Czech Republic, US West Los Angeles VA), conscious sedation (US Sacramento VA and Palo Alto VA) or full sedation with propofol (Taiwan). Randomization (prepared by statistics consultant) will be carried out by the method of random permuted block design (based on computer generated random numbers) with variable block sizes of 3 and

6. Gender will be used as a stratification factor.

Control Method: One arm of the study will include sedated/unsedated colonoscopy with water (WE) as the control method. Residual air in the colon will be removed and water will be infused to guide insertion through an airless lumen. Infused water will be removed by suction, along with residual fecal debris, predominantly during insertion.

Study method: The other two arms entail the addition of a simple commercially available accessory to the colonoscopy device: Cap -1 (Disposable Distal Attachment) or Cap-2, fitted to the colonoscope per manufacturer instruction. The two arms include sedated/unsedated colonoscopy with either a Cap-1 plus water or Cap-2 plus water.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Recruiting
• Enrollment: 1630
• Est. completion date: January 31, 2023
• Est. primary completion date: December 31, 2022
• Accepts healthy volunteers: Accepts Healthy Volunteers
• Gender: All
• Age group: 50 Years to 75 Years

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

1. Male and female 50-75 yrs of age.

2. Positive screening for Fecal Immunochemical Test (FIT) or Fecal Occult Blood Test (FOBT).

3. Subjects willing to undergo routine screening and surveillance colonoscopy.

Exclusion Criteria:

1. Patients who decline to provide informed consent.

2. Patients known to have colonic obstruction, inflammatory bowel disease, or active GI bleeding requiring interventions.

3. Patients know to have prior history of severe diverticulitis/diverticulosis.

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Colonic Polyps
• Colonoscopy
• Polyp of Colon
• Polyps

Intervention

Device:
• CAP-straight
This study is to detect any differences in the detection rate of adenomas using straight caps that will be attached to the colonoscope and to compare it to the control method where no cap is used in the colonoscopy procedure.
• CAP-daisy
This study is to detect any differences in the detection rate of adenomas using daisy caps that will be attached to the colonoscope and to compare it to the control method where no cap is used in the colonoscopy procedure.

Other:
• water
using water instead of traditional air insufflation to help insertion

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
China	Xijing Hospital of Digestive Diseases	Xian
Italy	St. Barbara Hospital	Iglesias
Taiwan	Dalin Tzu Chi General Hospital	Chiayi City
Taiwan	Hualien Tzu Chi Hospital	Hualien City
Taiwan	Evergreen General Hospital	Taipei
United States	Sacramento VAMC, VA Northern California Healthcare System	Mather	California
United States	Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Healthcare System	Palo Alto	California

Sponsors (2)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System	University of California, Los Angeles

Countries where clinical trial is conducted

United States,  China,  Italy,  Taiwan, 

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	Adenoma detection rate	The proportion of individuals undergoing a complete screening colonoscopy who have one or more adenomas, or polyps, detected.	2 years
Secondary	Cecal intubation	Visualization of ileocecal valve/appendix orifice and the medial wall of the cecum with colonoscope tip touching floor of cecum	2 hours: Data collected during colonoscopy procedure
Secondary	Boston bowel preparation score	Three segments (Right, transverse, left colon), each with 0 to 3 (poor to excellent); total scores = sum (10 point scale)	2 hours: Data collected during colonoscopy procedure
Secondary	Cecal intubation time	Total time from insertion into the anus to arrival in the cecum	2 hours: Data collected during colonoscopy procedure
Secondary	Visual analogue scale (0=not satisfied, 10=very satisfied)	Patient satisfaction	2 hours: Data collected during colonoscopy procedure
Secondary	Willing to repeat	Visual analogue scale (0=not willing, 10=willing)	2 hours: Data collected during colonoscopy procedure