Morning-Only 4 L PEG vs Split Dose Prep for Afternoon Colonoscopies,

Status Completed

Clinical Trial Summary

Comparison of quality of preparation of colonoscopy in patients taking same day 4L preparation vs. 4 L split dose preparation in patients scheduled for an afternoon colonoscopy procedure.

Clinical Trial Description

The aim of colorectal cancer screening is to reduce mortality. This can be effectively achieved by colonoscopy with direct visualization of the entire colon to detect preneoplastic lesions such as adenomatous polyps. Bowel preparation quality is critical for the accuracy of colonoscopy, time required to complete the procedure and its success. On the other hand, poor quality of bowel preparation was shown to be associated with a lower adenoma detection rate. Prior studies have shown that time of colonoscopy is one of the major factors influencing bowel preparation quality with the afternoon colonoscopies being notable for a high failure rate. This failure rate is related to poor bowel preparation quality. Given that, the number of afternoon colonoscopies performed is still high due to the increased need for colonoscopies. Therefore, it is suggested that improving the bowel preparation quality can reduce failure rate of afternoon colonoscopies. Several studies on split-dose bowel preparation have shown that it is superior to the conventional day-before regimen, in terms of preparation quality and patient's tolerability. Another study on split-dose bowel preparation also showed that it is associated with a better adenoma detection rate, better polyp detection rate and colonoscopy completion rate. There also have been few studies comparing same day dose vs. day-before for afternoon colonoscopies and showed that same day was superior to day before.There is no data comparing quality of preparation of colonoscopy in patients taking same day 4L preparation vs. 4 L split-dose preparation for an afternoon colonoscopy.

Using a 4L PEG-ELS solution, the investigators aim to evaluate the efficacy and patient's tolerability for the same day versus split-dose regimen. ;

Study Design

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

Colonoscopy

Clinical Trial Details

NCT number	NCT02643316
Study type	Interventional
Source	The Cleveland Clinic
Contact
Status	Completed
Phase	N/A
Start date	December 2015
Completion date	August 2019

View Details

See also
Status	Clinical Trial	Phase
Completed	`NCT04101097` - Training and Validation of Models of Factors to Predict Inadequate Bowel Preparation Colonoscopy
Completed	`NCT03247595` - Testing How Well Magnesium Citrate Capsules Work as Preparation for a Colonoscopy	N/A
Completed	`NCT04214301` - An Open-Label Preference Evaluation of BLI800	Phase 4
Withdrawn	`NCT05754255` - Comparison of High-flow Oxygen With or Without Nasal Positive Airway Pressure (PAP) During Propofol Sedation for Colonoscopy in an Ambulatory Surgical Center	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT02484105` - Comforting Conversation During Colonoscopy: A Trial on Patient Satisfaction	Phase 4
Active, not recruiting	`NCT02264249` - Residual Gastric Volume in Same Day Versus Split Dose and Evening Before Bowel Preparation	N/A
Terminated	`NCT01978509` - The Affect of Low-Volume Bowel Preparation for Hospitalized Patients Colonoscopies	N/A
Completed	`NCT01964417` - The Comparative Study Between Bowel Preparation Method	Phase 3
Recruiting	`NCT01685970` - Comparison of Same-day 2 Sachets Picosulfate Versus High Volume PEG for Afternoon Colonoscopy	Phase 3
Completed	`NCT01518790` - Short Course, Single-dose PEG 3350 for Colonoscopy Prep in Children	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT00748293` - Achievement of Better Examinee Compliance on Colon Cleansing Using Commercialized Low-Residue Diet	N/A
Completed	`NCT00779649` - MoviPrep® Versus HalfLytely®, Low-VolUme PEG Solutions for Colon Cleansing: An InvesTigator-blindEd, Randomized, Trial	Phase 4
Completed	`NCT00671177` - Clinical Evaluation of Water Immersion Colonoscopy Insertion Technique	N/A
Completed	`NCT00380497` - Pico-Salax Versus Poly-Ethylene Glycol for Bowel Cleanout Before Colonoscopy in Children	Phase 4
Recruiting	`NCT00160823` - Impact of a Self-Administered Information Leaflet on Adequacy of Colonic Cleansing for in-Hospital Patients	Phase 3
Completed	`NCT00390598` - PEG Solution (Laxabon®) 4L Versus Senna Glycoside (Pursennid® Ex-Lax) 36mg and PEG Solution (Laxabon®) 2L for Large Bowel Cleansing Prior to Colonoscopy	Phase 2/Phase 3
Completed	`NCT00314418` - Patient Position and Impact on Colonoscopy Time	N/A
Completed	`NCT00427089` - Comparison of 2L NRL994 With NaP Preparation in Colon Cleansing Prior to Colonoscopies for Colon Tumor Screening	Phase 3
Completed	`NCT00209573` - A Study of AQUAVAN® Injection Versus Midazolam HCl for Sedation in Patients Undergoing Elective Colonoscopy	Phase 3
Completed	`NCT05823350` - The Effect of Abdominal Massage on Pain and Distention After Colonoscopy	N/A

Clinical trials are conducted in a series of steps, called phases - each phase is designed to answer a separate research question.

Phase 1: Researchers test a new drug or treatment in a small group of people for the first time to evaluate its safety, determine a safe dosage range, and identify side effects.
Phase 2: The drug or treatment is given to a larger group of people to see if it is effective and to further evaluate its safety.
Phase 3: The drug or treatment is given to large groups of people to confirm its effectiveness, monitor side effects, compare it to commonly used treatments, and collect information that will allow the drug or treatment to be used safely.
Phase 4: Studies are done after the drug or treatment has been marketed to gather information on the drug's effect in various populations and any side effects associated with long-term use.

Morning-Only 4 L PEG vs Split Dose Prep for Afternoon Colonoscopies, Endoscopist-Blinded Prospective Study

Clinical Trial Summary

Clinical Trial Description

Study Design

Related Conditions & MeSH terms