Colonoscopy Clinical Trial
Official title:
Use of Diphenhydramine as an Adjunctive Sedative for Colonoscopy in Patients Chronically on Opioids
NCT number | NCT01967433 |
Other study ID # | DAASIPCO |
Secondary ID | |
Status | Completed |
Phase | Phase 4 |
First received | |
Last updated | |
Start date | December 2013 |
Est. completion date | July 2018 |
Verified date | March 2020 |
Source | University of Oklahoma |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
To access the efficacy of adding diphenhydramine as adjunct to improve sedation and to reduce the amount of standard sedatives used during colonoscopy in patients on chronic opioids.
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 120 |
Est. completion date | July 2018 |
Est. primary completion date | March 2018 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years to 64 Years |
Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: - Patients aged 18-64 years undergoing screening, surveillance, diagnostic and therapeutic colonoscopy - Patient on chronic opioids defined as at least 5 mg of morphine or its equivalent at least 3 days per week for more than 3 months Exclusion Criteria: - Inability to execute informed consent - Allergy to Diphenhydramine, fentanyl or midazolam - Known or suspected pregnancy - Endoscopic procedure without sedation - Patient scheduled to have other endoscopic procedures on the same day - Prior alimentary tract surgery - Severe cardiopulmonary disease (ASA IV) - Monoamine Oxidase Inhibitors (MOI) use within 2 weeks of procedure |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
United States | Veterans Affairs Medical Center | Oklahoma City | Oklahoma |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
University of Oklahoma |
United States,
Abraham NS, Fallone CA, Mayrand S, Huang J, Wieczorek P, Barkun AN. Sedation versus no sedation in the performance of diagnostic upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: a Canadian randomized controlled cost-outcome study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2004 Sep;99(9):1692-9. — View Citation
Bergeron P, Enns J, Delima L, Dupuis JY, Wynands JE. Effects of routine premedication for cardiac catheterization on sedation, level of anxiety and arterial oxygen saturation. Can J Cardiol. 1995 Mar;11(3):201-5. — View Citation
Cook PJ, Flanagan R, James IM. Diazepam tolerance: effect of age, regular sedation, and alcohol. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1984 Aug 11;289(6441):351-3. — View Citation
Hirsh I, Vaissler A, Chernin J, Segol O, Pizov R. Fentanyl or tramadol, with midazolam, for outpatient colonoscopy: analgesia, sedation, and safety. Dig Dis Sci. 2006 Nov;51(11):1946-51. Epub 2006 Sep 29. — View Citation
Hofmeister EH, Egger CM. Evaluation of diphenhydramine as a sedative for dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2005 Apr 1;226(7):1092-4. — View Citation
Husain Z, Hussain K, Nair R, Steinman R. Diphenhydramine induced QT prolongation and torsade de pointes: An uncommon effect of a common drug. Cardiol J. 2010;17(5):509-11. — View Citation
Keeffe EB, O'Connor KW. 1989 A/S/G/E survey of endoscopic sedation and monitoring practices. Gastrointest Endosc. 1990 May-Jun;36(3 Suppl):S13-8. — View Citation
Peña LR, Mardini HE, Nickl NJ. Development of an instrument to assess and predict satisfaction and poor tolerance among patients undergoing endoscopic procedures. Dig Dis Sci. 2005 Oct;50(10):1860-71. — View Citation
Roach CL, Husain N, Zabinsky J, Welch E, Garg R. Moderate sedation for echocardiography of preschoolers. Pediatr Cardiol. 2010 May;31(4):469-73. doi: 10.1007/s00246-009-9622-z. Epub 2010 Jan 3. — View Citation
Tu RH, Grewall P, Leung JW, Suryaprasad AG, Sheykhzadeh PI, Doan C, Garcia JC, Zhang N, Prindiville T, Mann S, Trudeau W. Diphenhydramine as an adjunct to sedation for colonoscopy: a double-blind randomized, placebo-controlled study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2006 Jan;63(1):87-94. — View Citation
Zubarik R, Ganguly E, Benway D, Ferrentino N, Moses P, Vecchio J. Procedure-related abdominal discomfort in patients undergoing colorectal cancer screening: a comparison of colonoscopy and flexible sigmoidoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol. 2002 Dec;97(12):3056-61. — View Citation
* Note: There are 11 references in all — Click here to view all references
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Dosage of Fentanyl | Moderate sedation (using the American Society of Anesthesiologists definition of maintaining purposeful response to verbal or tactile stimulation, adequate ventilation requiring no airway protection, and maintenance of cardiovascular function) was then achieved using incremental doses of the combination of intravenous midazolam (1 mg) and fentanyl (25 µg) given every 2 to 3 minutes. To minimize any crossover, additional diphenhydramine was not permitted. | From induction (first dose of sedative) to end of procedure | |
Secondary | Quality of Sedation | Quality of sedation will be accessed by the nurse and the physician at the end of procedure. Name: 10 point visual analogue scale Minimum score: 1 (worse) Maximum score: 10 (better) |
During the colonoscopy and 24 hours after discharge | |
Secondary | Duration of Procedure | Induction period (time from first dose of fentanyl to scope insertion), procedural time (time from scope insertion to scope out), and recovery time (time from scope out to discharge) were recorded by the nursing staff in their standard documentation. | Time from induction (first dose of sedative) to discharge | |
Secondary | Number of Participants With Adverse Events | Following adverse events will be recorded: (1)Hypoxia defined as O2 saturation less than 89% lasting for more than 30 seconds, (2)hypotension defined as systolic BP less than 90 mmhg and (3)use of reversal agents i.e Naloxone or Flumazenil | From induction (first dose of sedative) to discharge | |
Secondary | 24 Hour Follow up Pain Score | At 24 hr follow up patients were asked to rate the level of pain during the procedure using 10 point scale. 10 point visual analogue scale minimum= 0 (better) maximum =10 (worse) |
About 24 hours after the procedure | |
Secondary | Dosage of Midazolam | Moderate sedation (using the American Society of Anesthesiologists definition of maintaining purposeful response to verbal or tactile stimulation, adequate ventilation requiring no airway protection, and maintenance of cardiovascular function) was then achieved using incremental doses of the combination of intravenous midazolam (1 mg) and fentanyl (25 µg) given every 2 to 3 minutes. To minimize any crossover, additional diphenhydramine was not permitted. | From induction (first dose of sedative) to end of procedure | |
Secondary | 24 Hour Follow up Amnesia Score | Patient were also asked to rate amnesia on a 10 point scale 24 after discharge. minimum= 0 (worse) maximum =10 (better) | At about 24 after the procedure |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT04101097 -
Training and Validation of Models of Factors to Predict Inadequate Bowel Preparation Colonoscopy
|
||
Completed |
NCT03247595 -
Testing How Well Magnesium Citrate Capsules Work as Preparation for a Colonoscopy
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04214301 -
An Open-Label Preference Evaluation of BLI800
|
Phase 4 | |
Withdrawn |
NCT05754255 -
Comparison of High-flow Oxygen With or Without Nasal Positive Airway Pressure (PAP) During Propofol Sedation for Colonoscopy in an Ambulatory Surgical Center
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT02484105 -
Comforting Conversation During Colonoscopy: A Trial on Patient Satisfaction
|
Phase 4 | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT02264249 -
Residual Gastric Volume in Same Day Versus Split Dose and Evening Before Bowel Preparation
|
N/A | |
Terminated |
NCT01978509 -
The Affect of Low-Volume Bowel Preparation for Hospitalized Patients Colonoscopies
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01964417 -
The Comparative Study Between Bowel Preparation Method
|
Phase 3 | |
Recruiting |
NCT01685970 -
Comparison of Same-day 2 Sachets Picosulfate Versus High Volume PEG for Afternoon Colonoscopy
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT01518790 -
Short Course, Single-dose PEG 3350 for Colonoscopy Prep in Children
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT00748293 -
Achievement of Better Examinee Compliance on Colon Cleansing Using Commercialized Low-Residue Diet
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT00779649 -
MoviPrep® Versus HalfLytely®, Low-VolUme PEG Solutions for Colon Cleansing: An InvesTigator-blindEd, Randomized, Trial
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT00671177 -
Clinical Evaluation of Water Immersion Colonoscopy Insertion Technique
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT00380497 -
Pico-Salax Versus Poly-Ethylene Glycol for Bowel Cleanout Before Colonoscopy in Children
|
Phase 4 | |
Recruiting |
NCT00160823 -
Impact of a Self-Administered Information Leaflet on Adequacy of Colonic Cleansing for in-Hospital Patients
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT00390598 -
PEG Solution (Laxabon®) 4L Versus Senna Glycoside (Pursennid® Ex-Lax) 36mg and PEG Solution (Laxabon®) 2L for Large Bowel Cleansing Prior to Colonoscopy
|
Phase 2/Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT00314418 -
Patient Position and Impact on Colonoscopy Time
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT00427089 -
Comparison of 2L NRL994 With NaP Preparation in Colon Cleansing Prior to Colonoscopies for Colon Tumor Screening
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT00209573 -
A Study of AQUAVAN® Injection Versus Midazolam HCl for Sedation in Patients Undergoing Elective Colonoscopy
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT05823350 -
The Effect of Abdominal Massage on Pain and Distention After Colonoscopy
|
N/A |