Colonoscopy Clinical Trial
Official title:
BLI800-303: An Efficacy Evaluation of 2 Different Bowel Cleansing Preparations in Adult Subjects
NCT number | NCT00856843 |
Other study ID # | BLI800-303 |
Secondary ID | |
Status | Completed |
Phase | Phase 3 |
First received | March 5, 2009 |
Last updated | October 15, 2010 |
Start date | February 2009 |
Verified date | October 2010 |
Source | Braintree Laboratories |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | United States: Food and Drug Administration |
Study type | Interventional |
To evaluate the safety and efficacy of BLI800 vs an FDA approved bowel preparation before colonoscopic examination in adult subjects.
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 136 |
Est. completion date | |
Est. primary completion date | May 2009 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | Both |
Age group | 18 Years and older |
Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: 1. Male or female outpatients who are undergoing colonoscopy for a routinely accepted indication. 2. At least 18 years of age 3. Otherwise in good health, as determined by physical exam and medical history 4. If female, and of child-bearing potential, is using an acceptable form of birth control 5. Negative urine pregnancy test at screening, if applicable 6. In the Investigator's judgment, subject is mentally competent to provide informed consent to participate in the study Exclusion Criteria: 1. Subjects with known or suspected ileus, severe ulcerative colitis, gastrointestinal obstruction, gastric retention, bowel perforation, toxic colitis or megacolon. 2. Subjects who had previous gastrointestinal surgeries. 3. Subjects with known or suspected electrolyte abnormalities such as hypernatremia, hyponatremia, hyperphosphatemia, hypokalemia, hypocalcemia, dehydration, or those secondary to the use of diuretics or angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors. 4. Subjects with clinically significant electrolyte abnormalities based on Visit 1 laboratory results. 5. Subjects with impaired consciousness that predisposes them to pulmonary aspiration. 6. Subjects undergoing colonoscopy for foreign body removal and decompression. 7. Subjects who are pregnant or lactating, or intending to become pregnant during the study. 8. Subjects of childbearing potential who refuse a pregnancy test. 9. Subjects allergic to any preparation components 10. Subjects who, in the opinion of the Investigator, should not be included in the study for any reason, including inability to follow study procedures. 11. Subjects who have participated in an investigational surgical, drug, or device study within the past 30 days. |
Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Single Blind (Outcomes Assessor), Primary Purpose: Treatment
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
United States | Long Island GI Research Group | Great Neck | New York |
United States | Indiana University Medical Center | Indianapolis | Indiana |
United States | Jupiter Research | Jupiter | Florida |
United States | Miami Research Associates | Miami | Florida |
United States | University of South Alabama | Mobile | Alabama |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Braintree Laboratories |
United States,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Efficacy: Percentage of Patients With Successful Preparations Based on a 4 Point Scale | Blinded colonoscopists rated cleansing quality as either Excellent, Good, Fair or Poor. Scores of Excellent or Good were considered Successful preparations. | 2 days | No |
Secondary | Assessment of Residual Stool - Cecum | The blinded colonoscopist rated residual stool in specific colon sections as Absent, Small, Moderate or Excess. | 2 days | No |
Secondary | Assessment of Residual Stool - Ascending Colon | The blinded colonoscopist rated residual stool in specific colon sections as Absent, Small, Moderate or Excess. | 2 days | No |
Secondary | Assessment of Residual Stool - Transverse Colon | The blinded colonoscopist rated residual stool in specific colon sections as Absent, Small, Moderate or Excess. | 2 days | No |
Secondary | Assessment of Residual Stool - Descending Colon | The blinded colonoscopist rated residual stool in specific colon sections as Absent, Small, Moderate or Excess. | 2 days | No |
Secondary | Assessment of Residual Stool - Sigmoid Colon/Rectum | The blinded colonoscopist rated residual stool in specific colon sections as Absent, Small, Moderate or Excess. | 2 days | No |
Secondary | Assessment of Residual Fluid - Cecum | The blinded colonoscopist rated residual fluid in specific colon sections as Absent, Small, Moderate or Excess. | 2 days | No |
Secondary | Assessment of Residual Fluid - Ascending Colon | The blinded colonoscopist rated residual fluid in specific colon sections as Absent, Small, Moderate or Excess. | 2 days | No |
Secondary | Assessment of Residual Fluid - Transverse Colon | The blinded colonoscopist rated residual fluid in specific colon sections as Absent, Small, Moderate or Excess. | 2 days | No |
Secondary | Assessment of Residual Fluid - Descending Colon | The blinded colonoscopist rated residual fluid in specific colon sections as Absent, Small, Moderate or Excess. | 2 days | No |
Secondary | Assessment of Residual Fluid - Sigmoid Colon/Rectum | The blinded colonoscopist rated residual fluid in specific colon sections as Absent, Small, Moderate or Excess. | 2 days | No |
Secondary | Subject Symptom Scores | Expected preparation related symptoms of Abdominal Cramping, Abdominal Bloating, Nausea and Overall discomfort were rated by each subject from 1 - 5 (1=none, 2=mild, 3=bothersome, 4=distressing, 5=severely distressing). | 2 days | Yes |
Secondary | Mean Change in Serum Chemistry (mg/dL) | Mean changes from Baseline to Post-preparation for the following analytes will be compared between treatment groups: blood urea nitrogen, calcium, creatinine, phosphorus. Baseline lab samples were allowed to be drawn within 15 days of the post-preparation (Visit 2) lab draw. | up to 15 days | Yes |
Secondary | Mean Change in Serum Chemistry (mEq/L) | Mean changes from Baseline to Post-preparation for the following analytes will be compared between treatment groups: bicarbonate, chloride, magnesium, potassium, sodium. Baseline lab samples were allowed to be drawn within 15 days of the post-preparation (Visit 2) lab draw. | up to 15 days | Yes |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT04101097 -
Training and Validation of Models of Factors to Predict Inadequate Bowel Preparation Colonoscopy
|
||
Completed |
NCT03247595 -
Testing How Well Magnesium Citrate Capsules Work as Preparation for a Colonoscopy
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04214301 -
An Open-Label Preference Evaluation of BLI800
|
Phase 4 | |
Withdrawn |
NCT05754255 -
Comparison of High-flow Oxygen With or Without Nasal Positive Airway Pressure (PAP) During Propofol Sedation for Colonoscopy in an Ambulatory Surgical Center
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT02484105 -
Comforting Conversation During Colonoscopy: A Trial on Patient Satisfaction
|
Phase 4 | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT02264249 -
Residual Gastric Volume in Same Day Versus Split Dose and Evening Before Bowel Preparation
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01964417 -
The Comparative Study Between Bowel Preparation Method
|
Phase 3 | |
Terminated |
NCT01978509 -
The Affect of Low-Volume Bowel Preparation for Hospitalized Patients Colonoscopies
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT01685970 -
Comparison of Same-day 2 Sachets Picosulfate Versus High Volume PEG for Afternoon Colonoscopy
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT01518790 -
Short Course, Single-dose PEG 3350 for Colonoscopy Prep in Children
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT00748293 -
Achievement of Better Examinee Compliance on Colon Cleansing Using Commercialized Low-Residue Diet
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT00779649 -
MoviPrep® Versus HalfLytely®, Low-VolUme PEG Solutions for Colon Cleansing: An InvesTigator-blindEd, Randomized, Trial
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT00671177 -
Clinical Evaluation of Water Immersion Colonoscopy Insertion Technique
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT00380497 -
Pico-Salax Versus Poly-Ethylene Glycol for Bowel Cleanout Before Colonoscopy in Children
|
Phase 4 | |
Recruiting |
NCT00160823 -
Impact of a Self-Administered Information Leaflet on Adequacy of Colonic Cleansing for in-Hospital Patients
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT00390598 -
PEG Solution (Laxabon®) 4L Versus Senna Glycoside (Pursennid® Ex-Lax) 36mg and PEG Solution (Laxabon®) 2L for Large Bowel Cleansing Prior to Colonoscopy
|
Phase 2/Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT00314418 -
Patient Position and Impact on Colonoscopy Time
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT00427089 -
Comparison of 2L NRL994 With NaP Preparation in Colon Cleansing Prior to Colonoscopies for Colon Tumor Screening
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT00209573 -
A Study of AQUAVAN® Injection Versus Midazolam HCl for Sedation in Patients Undergoing Elective Colonoscopy
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT05823350 -
The Effect of Abdominal Massage on Pain and Distention After Colonoscopy
|
N/A |