Colonoscopy Clinical Trial
Official title:
Multi-center Pivotal Clinical Trial to Compare the Safety and Effectiveness of Procedural Sedation in GI Endoscopy: A Computer-Assisted Personalized Sedation (CAPS) Device Versus Current Standard of Care
Verified date | December 2010 |
Source | Ethicon Endo-Surgery |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | United States: Food and Drug Administration |
Study type | Interventional |
Patients routinely receive sedation during a colonoscopy or upper endoscopy (esophagogastroduodenoscopy; EGD) procedure. Propofol is a sedative that can be used during these procedures. The purpose of this study is to determine if this CAPS device enables a physician/registered nurse (RN) team to safely and effectively administer propofol sedation during colonoscopy or EGD procedures relative to current sedation practices.
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 1000 |
Est. completion date | October 2007 |
Est. primary completion date | October 2007 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | Both |
Age group | 18 Years and older |
Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: - = 18 years old - Able to comprehend, sign, and date the written informed consent form - English as primary language - Undergoing a non-emergent EGD or colonoscopy - Have taken nothing by mouth for a minimum of 6 hours prior to the study procedure - American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Class I, II or III Exclusion Criteria: - Allergy or inability to tolerate study medications or components of study medications - Investigator anticipates greater than 45 minute procedure time due to known anatomical difficulty - Currently using a fentanyl patch - History of diagnosed sleep apnea - History of diagnosed gastroparesis - Baseline oxygen saturation < 90% (room air) - Pregnant or nursing females - Body mass index (BMI) = 35 - Participation in a clinical trial within the past 30 days. |
Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Open Label, Primary Purpose: Screening
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
United States | Charlottesville Medical Research | Charlottesville | Virginia |
United States | The Cleveland Clinic Foundation | Cleveland | Ohio |
United States | Fayetteville Gastroenterology Associates, PA | Fayetteville | North Carolina |
United States | Nashville Medical Research Institute | Nashville | Tennessee |
United States | Digestive Health Specialists | Tacoma | Washington |
United States | Metropolitan Gastroenterology Group, PC | Washington | District of Columbia |
United States | Digestive Health Specialists, PA | Winston-Salem | North Carolina |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Ethicon Endo-Surgery |
United States,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Area Under the Curve for Oxygen Desaturation (AUCDesat) | AUCDesat measures desaturation as a function of incidence, magnitude, and duration. AUCDesat is the difference between the threshold and actual oxygen saturation measured every second. The total area below the 90% threshold is summated to determine AUCDesat in units of seconds*percent. | From administration of initial drug dose until subject recovered from effects of sedation | Yes |
Secondary | Duration of Deep Sedation/General Anesthesia | Duration of Modified Observers Assessment of Alertness and Sedation (MOAA/S)score of 0 or 1 MOAA/S is a scale of numbers ranging from 0-5, 5 being defined as being awake or minimally sedatied, and 0 defined as being at the deepest level of sedation (general anethesia). The mean MOAA/S score was the sum of each subject's scores during the procedure divided by the number of non-missing scores. | From first dose until subject recovered from effects of sedation | No |
Secondary | Patient Satisfaction | Patient Satisfaction with Sedation Instrument (PSSI) is a scale measuring patient satisfactin with the sedation they received. This validated scale consists of 16 questions that are scored and converted to a 0-100 scale, where 100 represented the most satisfied. | 24-48 hours post sedation | No |
Secondary | Clinician Satisfaction | Clinician Satisfaction with Sedation Instrument (CSSI) is a scale measuring the clinician satisfactin with the sedation they delivered. This validated scale consists of 16 questions that are scored and converted to a 0-100 scale, where 100 represented the most satisfied. | Post procedure | No |
Secondary | Recovery Time (From Sedation) | Recovery time- time for patient to reach first of two consecutive MOAA/S of 5 from the time scope was removed. | from "scope out" until first of two consecutive MOAA/S scores of 5 | No |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT04101097 -
Training and Validation of Models of Factors to Predict Inadequate Bowel Preparation Colonoscopy
|
||
Completed |
NCT03247595 -
Testing How Well Magnesium Citrate Capsules Work as Preparation for a Colonoscopy
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04214301 -
An Open-Label Preference Evaluation of BLI800
|
Phase 4 | |
Withdrawn |
NCT05754255 -
Comparison of High-flow Oxygen With or Without Nasal Positive Airway Pressure (PAP) During Propofol Sedation for Colonoscopy in an Ambulatory Surgical Center
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT02484105 -
Comforting Conversation During Colonoscopy: A Trial on Patient Satisfaction
|
Phase 4 | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT02264249 -
Residual Gastric Volume in Same Day Versus Split Dose and Evening Before Bowel Preparation
|
N/A | |
Terminated |
NCT01978509 -
The Affect of Low-Volume Bowel Preparation for Hospitalized Patients Colonoscopies
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01964417 -
The Comparative Study Between Bowel Preparation Method
|
Phase 3 | |
Recruiting |
NCT01685970 -
Comparison of Same-day 2 Sachets Picosulfate Versus High Volume PEG for Afternoon Colonoscopy
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT01518790 -
Short Course, Single-dose PEG 3350 for Colonoscopy Prep in Children
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT00748293 -
Achievement of Better Examinee Compliance on Colon Cleansing Using Commercialized Low-Residue Diet
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT00779649 -
MoviPrep® Versus HalfLytely®, Low-VolUme PEG Solutions for Colon Cleansing: An InvesTigator-blindEd, Randomized, Trial
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT00671177 -
Clinical Evaluation of Water Immersion Colonoscopy Insertion Technique
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT00380497 -
Pico-Salax Versus Poly-Ethylene Glycol for Bowel Cleanout Before Colonoscopy in Children
|
Phase 4 | |
Recruiting |
NCT00160823 -
Impact of a Self-Administered Information Leaflet on Adequacy of Colonic Cleansing for in-Hospital Patients
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT00314418 -
Patient Position and Impact on Colonoscopy Time
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT00390598 -
PEG Solution (Laxabon®) 4L Versus Senna Glycoside (Pursennid® Ex-Lax) 36mg and PEG Solution (Laxabon®) 2L for Large Bowel Cleansing Prior to Colonoscopy
|
Phase 2/Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT00427089 -
Comparison of 2L NRL994 With NaP Preparation in Colon Cleansing Prior to Colonoscopies for Colon Tumor Screening
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT00209573 -
A Study of AQUAVAN® Injection Versus Midazolam HCl for Sedation in Patients Undergoing Elective Colonoscopy
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT05823350 -
The Effect of Abdominal Massage on Pain and Distention After Colonoscopy
|
N/A |