Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT04335318
Other study ID # AI01
Secondary ID
Status Completed
Phase N/A
First received
Last updated
Start date May 1, 2020
Est. completion date October 1, 2020

Study information

Verified date April 2021
Source Wuerzburg University Hospital
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The objective of this study is to compare the polyp detection rate (PDR) of endoscopists unaware of a commercially available artificial intelligence (AI) device for polyp detection during colonoscopy and the PDR of endoscopists with the aid of such a device. Moreover, an extensive characterization of the performance of this device will be done.


Description:

Recently, there have been remarkable breakthroughs in the introduction of deep learning techniques, especially convolutional neural networks (CNNs), in assisting clinical diagnosis in different medical fields. One of these artificial intelligence (AI) devices to diagnose colon polyps during colonoscopy was launched in October 2019. Its intended use is to work as an adjunct to the endoscopist during a colonoscopy with the purpose of highlighting regions with visual characteristics consistent with different types of mucosal abnormalities. It is essential to know whether deep learning algorithms can really help endoscopists during colonoscopies. Several studies have already addressed this issue with different approaches and results. However, one common drawback of these type of Machine vs Human retrospective studies is endoscopist bias. It is usually generated because of human natural competitive spirit against machine or human relaxation because of AI-reliance. This can have an effect in the overall results. The investigators perfomed colonoscopies with the use of a commercially available AI system to detect colonic polyps and recorded them during clinical routine. Additionally from March 2019 - May 2019, 120 colonoscopy videos were performed and captured prospectively without the use of AI. In this study, the investigators plan to retrospectively compare those two video sets regarding the polyp detection rate, withdrawal time and polyp identification characteristics of the AI system.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 230
Est. completion date October 1, 2020
Est. primary completion date August 31, 2020
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 18 Years and older
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria: - Colonoscopies for Polyp detection Exclusion Criteria: - Colonoscopies for Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD). - Colonoscopies for work up of an active bleeding

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Device:
AI-assisted colonoscopy
Colonoscopies performed with assistance of an AI tool that highlights the areas that are susceptible to be a polyp.

Locations

Country Name City State
Germany Universitätsklinikum Würzburg Würzburg Bayern

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Wuerzburg University Hospital

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Germany, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Polyp detection rate comparison Number of polyps detected divided by number of colonoscopies 45 minutes
Primary Mean withdrawal time comparison Mean withdrawal time comparison 45 minutes
Secondary AI-Polyp bounding boxes - True Positive Evaluation 2 approaches: frame by frame analysis and temporal coherence analysis 45 minutes
Secondary AI-Polyp bounding boxes - False Positive Quantitative Evaluation 3 approaches depending on window-time detection 45 minutes
Secondary AI-Polyp bounding boxes - False Negative Evaluation Number of by bounding box missed polyps 45 minutes
Secondary Reaction Time Analysis Comparison time of polyp detection in a human vs machine approach 45 minutes
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT03272945 - Linked-color Imaging for the Detection of Colorectal Flat Lesions N/A
Recruiting NCT06062095 - Computer Aided Diagnosis (CADx) for Colorectal Polyps Resect-and-Discard Strategy N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT02688699 - Additive Hemostatic Efficacy of EndoClot After EMR or ESD in the Gastrointestinal Tract Phase 4
Active, not recruiting NCT03962868 - Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection (ESD) Versus Endoscopic Mucosal Resection (EMR) for Large Non Pedunculated Colonic Adenomas: a Randomized Comparative Trial N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT05776381 - The Impact of a Patient Decision Aid on Treatment Choices for Patients With an Unexpected Malignant Colorectal Polyp Phase 2
Recruiting NCT04157803 - Accuracy of aCETIC Acid to Predict Histopathology of Colonic Polyps N/A
Completed NCT03758872 - CUFF-assisted Colonoscopy vs Standard Colonoscopy
Recruiting NCT05870332 - Nationwide Study of Artificial Intelligence in Adenoma Detection for Colonoscopy
Completed NCT03690297 - Linked Color Imaging (LCI) for Colorectal Adenoma Detection N/A
Recruiting NCT04149184 - Computer-aided Detection Device in Standard Colonoscopy N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT03865537 - Cold Snare Endoscopic Mucosal Resection Trial N/A
Recruiting NCT05099432 - The CARMA Technique Study N/A
Withdrawn NCT04778566 - Evaluating the Cologuard Test for Use in Lynch Syndrome
Withdrawn NCT01372696 - Endoscopic Characteristics of Colonic Tumours N/A
Recruiting NCT05322993 - Improving Polyp Detection Rate by Artificial Intelligence in Colonoscopy N/A
Completed NCT03121495 - Study on Second Forward View Examination in the Right Colon N/A
Completed NCT03344055 - Endocuff-assisted Colonoscopy vs Standard Colonoscopy on Adenoma Detection Rate N/A
Recruiting NCT06063720 - Effective Withdrawal Time and Adenoma Detection Rate
Completed NCT06426745 - Split-dose Versus Single-dose Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy N/A
Recruiting NCT04220905 - Endoscopic Resection of Large Colorectal Polyps: An Observational Cohort Study