Class II Malocclusion Clinical Trial
Official title:
Carriere Motion Appliance in The Treatment of Class II Malocclusion Using Different Methods of Anchorage Control (Cone Beam Study)
Carriere Motion appliance (CMA) was designed to correct a Class II molar relationship into a Class I relationship by distalizing the whole posterior maxillary segment by means of class II elastics and mandibular anchorage. To revoke the adverse effects of CMA with class II elastics, we can use the CMA to distalize the maxillary posterior segment with TADs anchorage using miniscrews. The aim of this study is to evaluate TADs anchored CMA vs. conventionally anchored CMA for distalization of the maxillary buccal segment.
Status | Recruiting |
Enrollment | 20 |
Est. completion date | August 2024 |
Est. primary completion date | April 2024 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | Accepts Healthy Volunteers |
Gender | All |
Age group | 11 Years to 16 Years |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: - Adolescent patients aged 11-17 years. - Unilateral or bilateral Class II molar relationship. - Bilateral Class II canine relationship. - No history of previous orthodontic treatment. - No malformed teeth, impacted teeth and unerupted teeth. - No systemic disease. - Good oral hygiene. - No abnormal pressure habit. - No periodontal diseases. - No missing teeth in maxillary arch. Exclusion Criteria: - The need for extraction in the lower arch. - Posterior crossbite. - Presence of any craniofacial anomalies. - Patients with syndromes. |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Egypt | Alazhar university | Assiut |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Al-Azhar University |
Egypt,
Carriere L. A new Class II distalizer. J Clin Orthod. 2004 Apr;38(4):224-31. No abstract available. — View Citation
Rodriguez HL. Unilateral application of the Carriere Distalizer. J Clin Orthod. 2011 Mar;45(3):177-80. No abstract available. — View Citation
Wilson B, Konstantoni N, Kim KB, Foley P, Ueno H. Three-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography comparison of shorty and standard Class II Carriere Motion appliance. Angle Orthod. 2021 Jul 1;91(4):423-432. doi: 10.2319/041320-295.1. — View Citation
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Treatment duration | months | from date of appliance delivery to date of removal after reaching class I molar relationship (about 4-6 months) | |
Primary | Skeletal changes | degrees | from date of appliance delivery to date of removal after reaching class I molar relationship (about 4-6 months) ] | |
Primary | Dental changes | degrees | from date of appliance delivery to date of removal after reaching class I molar relationship (about 4-6 months) |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT05440526 -
the Mini-plate Anchored Herbst Appliance Versus the Dentally Anchored Fixed Functional Appliance
|
Phase 2/Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT06024382 -
The Effect of Low-level Laser Therapy on Functional Treatment of Skeletal Class II Patients
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05684510 -
Treatment of Mild Class II Malocclusion in Adult Patients With Clear Aligners Versus Fixed Multibracket Therapy
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05265416 -
Pain and Discomfort in Two Acceleration Methods of Canine Retraction
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02000557 -
Photographic Analysis of Soft Tissue Facial Profile in Patients With Class II Malocclusion
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05592977 -
Effect of Bilateral Distalization of Upper First Molars in a Group of Patients After Extraction of Maxillary Second Molars
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05227859 -
Which is Better Piezosurgery or LLLT in Accelerating Orthodontic Tooth Movement
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05555719 -
Dentoskeletal Effects of Two Different Fixed Functional Appliances for Correction of Class II Malocclusion: A Comparative Clinical Study
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT06116500 -
Effectiveness of Modified Functional Appliance With Expander
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT06209086 -
Effects of Skeletal Anchored Versus Incisal Capped Twin Block Appliance in Class II Malocclusion
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05466344 -
the Condylar Response of Mini-plate Anchored Rigid Fixed Functional Appliance Versus Dentally Anchored Semi-rigid One
|
Phase 2/Phase 3 | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT05166928 -
Effect of Upper Third Molar Extraction on Distalization Carriere Motion Appliance :A Prospective Clinical Study
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05652244 -
Evaluation of the Levels of Pain, Discomfort, and Functional Impairment With Two Techniques of Retraction
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT06308640 -
Evaluation of Maxillary Molar Distalization With Two Bone Supported Protocols Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05656898 -
Evaluation of the Levels of Pain and Discomfort and Periodontal Status Between Two Acceleration Methods of Upper Anterior Teeth Retraction
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05647720 -
Effect of Maxillary Third Molar Extraction vs. Non-extraction on Distalization of First Molars in a Group of Adolescent Patients
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT03863275 -
Analysis of Muscle Activity With Myofunctional Devices, Using Surface Electromyography
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT06209125 -
Evaluation of Skeletal and Dental Effect of the New Hybrid Aesthetic Functional Appliance
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05418413 -
The Use of an Esthetic Twin Block for Patients With Mandibular Retrusion
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05597748 -
Modified Herbst Approach to Improve Chin Projection
|
N/A |