Class II Division 1 Malocclusion Clinical Trial
Official title:
Evaluation of the Rate and Type of Orthodontic Tooth Movement When Injecting Platelet-rich Plasma During Mini-implant-based Segmented En-masse Retraction of Upper Anterior Teeth: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
Verified date | November 2023 |
Source | Damascus University |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
This study aims to assess the effect of PRP on the rate and type of OTM during en-masse frictionless retraction of maxillary anterior teeth using a segmental arch technique. Thirty adult patients exhibiting class II division 1 malocclusion requiring upper first premolar extractions followed by en-masse retraction will participate in the study. They will be randomly and equally distributed into the PRP group (G1) and the control group (G2). The injection of PRP will be performed pre-retraction. The rate of orthodontic tooth movement will be assessed clinically by measuring the extraction space with a digital caliper. The cephalometric radiographs will evaluate the type of OTM at the beginning of en-masse retraction (T0) and at the middle of en-masse retraction (T1).
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 30 |
Est. completion date | December 15, 2021 |
Est. primary completion date | September 12, 2020 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 16 Years to 27 Years |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: 1. age range between 16 and 27 years 2. Class II division I malocclusion in which extraction of upper first premolars is indicated 3. skeletal class II relationships (4°<ANB<10°), 4. Non-growing patients 5. No maxillary constriction 6. overjet >5 and <10 mm 7. normal overbite of 0-50% 8. normal anterior facial height 9. No systemic disease. Exclusion Criteria: 1. patients who have undergone previous orthodontic treatment 2. patients who need orthopedic surgery 3. moderate to severe anterior crowding (Disharmony Dento-Maxillary (DDM=3) 4. Poor oral hygiene, 5. long-term use of medical drugs, especially NSAIDs |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Syrian Arab Republic | Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Aleppo University | Aleppo |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Damascus University |
Syrian Arab Republic,
Al-Imam GMF, Ajaj MA, Hajeer MY, Al-Mdalal Y, Almashaal E. Evaluation of the effectiveness of piezocision-assisted flapless corticotomy in the retraction of four upper incisors: A randomized controlled clinical trial. Dent Med Probl. 2019 Oct-Dec;56(4):385-394. doi: 10.17219/dmp/110432. — View Citation
Al-Naoum F, Hajeer MY, Al-Jundi A. Does alveolar corticotomy accelerate orthodontic tooth movement when retracting upper canines? A split-mouth design randomized controlled trial. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014 Oct;72(10):1880-9. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2014.05.003. Epub 2014 May 14. — View Citation
Al-Sibaie S, Hajeer MY. Assessment of changes following en-masse retraction with mini-implants anchorage compared to two-step retraction with conventional anchorage in patients with class II division 1 malocclusion: a randomized controlled trial. Eur J Orthod. 2014 Jun;36(3):275-83. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjt046. Epub 2013 Jun 20. — View Citation
Angel SL, Samrit VD, Kharbanda OP, Duggal R, Kumar V, Chauhan SS, Coshic P. Effects of submucosally administered platelet-rich plasma on the rate of tooth movement. Angle Orthod. 2022 Jan 1;92(1):73-79. doi: 10.2319/011221-40.1. — View Citation
Gulec A, Bakkalbasi BC, Cumbul A, Uslu U, Alev B, Yarat A. Effects of local platelet-rich plasma injection on the rate of orthodontic tooth movement in a rat model: A histomorphometric study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2017 Jan;151(1):92-104. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2016.05.016. — View Citation
Khlef HN, Hajeer MY, Ajaj MA, Heshmeh O. Evaluation of Treatment Outcomes of En masse Retraction with Temporary Skeletal Anchorage Devices in Comparison with Two-step Retraction with Conventional Anchorage in Patients with Dentoalveolar Protrusion: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Contemp Clin Dent. 2018 Oct-Dec;9(4):513-523. doi: 10.4103/ccd.ccd_661_18. — View Citation
Ozaki H, Tominaga JY, Hamanaka R, Sumi M, Chiang PC, Tanaka M, Koga Y, Yoshida N. Biomechanical aspects of segmented arch mechanics combined with power arm for controlled anterior tooth movement: A three-dimensional finite element study. J Dent Biomech. 2015 Jan 8;6:1758736014566337. doi: 10.1177/1758736014566337. eCollection 2015. — View Citation
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Rate of retraction | Assessment will be performed clinically by measuring the change in the extraction space. The amount of distance being retracted in millimeters will be divided by the duration of retraction in months to estimate the retraction rate. | At the middle of the retraction procedure (the middle of closing the extraction space); this assessment time is expected to occur within 2 to 3 months and 3 to 4 months after the onset of retraction in the experimental and control groups, respectively | |
Primary | Change in incisors' positions | The position of the incisal edges of the upper incisors will be measured according to a reference plance. | First time point (T0): one day before the beginning of retraction. Second time point (T1): in the middle of extraction space closure (expected to be within 2-3 months in the exp. group and 3-4 months in the control group). | |
Primary | Change in position of the root apex of the incisor vertically (UIA-v). | This variable represents the distance between the upper root apex and X reference plane (line drawn from ANS to PNS which is called the palatal plane SPP). Lateral cephalograms will be taken, and this variable will be measured in millimeters. | First time point (T0): one day before the beginning of retraction. Second time point (T1): in the middle of extraction space closure (expected to be within 2-3 months in the exp. group and 3-4 months in the control group). | |
Primary | Change in position of the incisal edge of the incisor vertically (UIE-v). | This variable represents the distance between the upper incisal edge and X reference plane. Lateral cephalograms will be taken and this variable is going to be measured in millimeters. | First time point (T0): one day before the beginning of retraction. Second time point (T1): in the middle of extraction space closure (expected to be within 2-3 months in the exp. group and 3-4 months in the control group). | |
Primary | Change in position of the root apex of the incisor horizontally (UIA-h) | This variable represents the distance between the upper root apex and Y reference plane (line perpendicular to SPP at lateral PT). Lateral cephalograms will be taken and this variable is going to be measured in millimeters. | First time point (T0): one day before the beginning of retraction. Second time point (T1): in the middle of extraction space closure (expected to be within 2-3 months in the exp. group and 3-4 months in the control group). | |
Primary | Change in position of the incisal edge of the incisor horizontally (UIE-h) | This variable represents the distance between the upper incisal edge and Y reference line. Lateral cephalograms will be taken and this variable is going to be measured in millimeters. | First time point (T0): one day before the beginning of retraction. Second time point (T1): in the middle of extraction space closure (expected to be within 2-3 months in the exp. group and 3-4 months in the control group). | |
Secondary | Change in the UI/SPP angle | This angle represents the inclination of the upper incisors (UI) relative to the palatal plane (or spinal plane SPP) in the sagittal direction. Lateral cephalograms will be taken, and this angle will be measured in degrees. | First time point (T0): one day before the beginning of retraction. Second time point (T1): in the middle of extraction space closure (expected to be within 2-3 months in the exp. group and 3-4 months in the control group). | |
Secondary | Change in the SNA angle | This angle represents the position of the upper jaw in the cephalometric analysis in the anteroposterior direction. Lateral cephalograms will be taken, and this angle will be measured in degrees. | First time point (T0): one day before the beginning of retraction. Second time point (T1): in the middle of extraction space closure (expected to be within 2-3 months in the exp. group and 3-4 months in the control group). | |
Secondary | Change in the ANB angle | This angle represents the spatial relationship between the upper and lower jaws in the cephalometric analysis in the anteroposterior direction. Lateral cephalograms will be taken, and this angle will be measured in degrees. | First time point (T0): one day before the beginning of retraction. Second time point (T1): in the middle of extraction space closure (expected to be within 2-3 months in the exp. group and 3-4 months in the control group). | |
Secondary | Change in Overbite | This variable represents The vertical overlap of the maxillary incisors over the mandibular incisors, measured relative to the incisal edges. Lateral cephalograms will be taken, and this variable will be measured in millimeters. | First time point (T0): one day before the beginning of retraction. Second time point (T1): in the middle of extraction space closure (expected to be within 2-3 months in the exp. group and 3-4 months in the control group). |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT04619446 -
Dentoskeletal Changes Produced by Growth Modification Appliances in Treatment of Skeletal Class II Malocclusion
|
||
Active, not recruiting |
NCT05171738 -
Distalization Via Skeletally-anchored Distaljet Appliance With Two Approaches of Micro-osteoperforations
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT00248014 -
Response of Individuals With Class II Malocclusion
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT01853995 -
Mechanism of Class II Correction With Fixed Lingual Mandibular Growth Modificator (FLMGM)
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT01853137 -
Fixed Lingual Mandibular Growth Modificator
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04814173 -
The Efficacy of Tow Mechanics for Total-maxillary-arch-distalization
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT03839303 -
Comparison Between Mini Implant Supported Appliance and Headgear in Treatment of Maxillary Excess in Growing Patients
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04847492 -
Evaluation of Upper Anterior Teeth Retraction Rate Assisted by Two Corticotomy Techniques
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT04810286 -
Prefabricated Versus 3D-Printing Myofunctional Appliances
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT03764189 -
Evaluation of Micro-osteoperforation on Rate of Maxillary En-masse Retraction
|
N/A | |
Terminated |
NCT00957489 -
A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial to Evaluate the Effectiveness of the Two Different Appliances in the Treatment of Class II Division 1 Malocclusion
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT04743258 -
Bilateral Premolar Extraction vs Distalization: A Randomised Clinical Trial
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT04191070 -
Distalization Using Infrazygomatic Crest Miniscrews and Zygomatic Miniplates: A Randomized Clinical Trial
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05335824 -
The Effect of Autologous Platelet Concentrations on Orthodontic Treatment Time
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05542745 -
Measuring Rate of Anteriors Retraction With Two Different Techniques
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05928143 -
Patient Outcomes Associated With Two Accelerated Method of Retraction of Upper Front Teeth
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05040945 -
Evaluation of the Levels of Pain and Discomfort Associated With Two Techniques of Corticotomy
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04316403 -
Laser-assisted Flapless Corticotomy in Accelerating Canine Retraction
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT03635463 -
Effect of Modified Twin Block in Skeletal Class II Growing Females With Mandibular Deficiency
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03467555 -
Evaluation of Distal Movement of Maxillary Dentition With Zygomatic Miniplates Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography
|
N/A |