Class II Division 1 Malocclusion Clinical Trial
Official title:
A Three Dimensional Comparative Evaluation of Distal Movement of Entire Maxillary Dentition Using Infrazygomatic Crest Miniscrews and Zygomatic Miniplates: A Randomized Clinical Trial
The main objective of this study is to quantify the distal movement of maxillary central incisors and molars achieved with infrazygomatic miniscrews in comparison with zygomatic miniplate anchorage.
Premolar extraction treatment with multibracketed system and reinforced anchorage has been a
common modality for correcting maxillary incisor crowding or class II malocclusion due to
maxillary protrusion in nongrowing patients. Treatment of class II malocclusion without
extraction frequently requires distalization of maxillary molars into class I relation by
means of extraoral or intraoral forces.
Extra oral headgear traction is the oldest and most commonly used method to correct class II
buccal segment relationship by restricting the forward growth of maxilla and /or distalizing
the maxillary molars. This distalizes not only 1st molar but also maxillary 1st and 2nd
premolars via transseptal fibers. Headgear is seldom an option in adults due to aesthetics
and compliance concerns. The disadvantages of extra-oral appliances have motivated many
investigators to develop the mechanics of intraoral molar distalization.
Various intraoral non-compliance appliances like magnets, distal jet, jones jig, pendulum
appliance etc. have been used to distalize the maxillary molars. However, in these
appliances, anchorage loss characterized by protrusion of maxillary incisors and an increase
in overjet is seen. Also, considerable amount of relapse occured when the distalized molars
were used as anchorage for the retraction of anteriors and premolar teeth.
Absolute skeletal anchorage available 24 hours a day is an alternative method for molar
distalization. It provides stationary anchorage for various tooth movements without the need
for active patient compliance and with no undesirable side effects. Inter radicular
miniscrews placed between the roots limit the amount of distalization possible as they come
in contact with surrounding roots during tooth movement. Also, proximity of miniscrews to the
roots may lead to failure of screw anchorage.
Infrazygomatic crest is a site for miniscrew placement. It has been used successfully to
provide skeletal anchorage for en-masse anterior retraction, canine retraction, and intrusion
of maxillary posterior teeth. Anatomically, it is a pillar of cortical bone at the zygomatic
process of maxilla. It has two cortical plates - sinus floor and buccal cortical plate. This
allows for bicortical fixation and contributes to better primary stability of miniscrew. A
thicker bone allows greater miniscrew biting depth and more osseous contact . A new method
for maxillary dentition distalization with miniscrews implanted in the infrazygomatic crest
(IZC) region was proposed by Lin. There is no interference with tooth movement by miniscrews
placed here and the technique is easy to master .
Miniplates are also fixed at a distance from the root apices, and therefore do not interfere
in tooth movement. Their placement and removal however requires a more invasive surgical
procedure than those of miniscrews. Until now, there have been only few clinical studies
involving group distalization of posterior teeth. Thus little information is available
regarding the type of tooth movement that occurs, its limitations and post treatment
stability.
Sugawara et al reported that the maxillary 1st molars were moved to the distal by
approximately 4mm at crown level by miniplate anchorage. However inconsistent sampling
comprising of class I, class II and class III malocclusion failed to throw light on the
clinical applicability and treatment planning. Also in this study 2nd molars were extracted
in some patients while 3rd molars were extracted in others which might have led to different
rates of tooth movement. This study was evaluated on lateral cephalogram in wide-open mouth
thus studying the tooth movement in two dimensions only.
Wu X et al(11) reported that mesiobuccal cusp of maxillary 1st molar crowns were moved to the
distal by approximately 3.15mm and distobuccal cusp by 2.8mm with miniscrews implanted in the
infrazygomatic crest (IZC). However, no attempt was made to evaluate the distalization effect
on 2nd molar. Though this study was evaluated with 3D reconstruction module from Cone Beam
Computed Tomography, this study did not evaluate the root resorption occuring during
treatment.
So far, most distalization studies have used 2-dimensional lateral cephalograms. The
disadvantages of this approach include confounded images caused by superimposed anatomic
structures and a lack of right and left side information. Although cone-beam computed
tomography (CBCT) has disadvantages that include higher doses of radiation, higher cost, and
limited availability, these limitations are overcome by the huge amount of data that is
provided without distortion or superimposition.
No prospective randomized clinical trial has been carried out on distalization of entire
maxillary dentition so far. Also, to the best of our knowledge, no study to evaluate
distalization of entire maxillary dentition with Infrazygomatic crest miniscrews in
comparison with zygomatic miniplates has been conducted till now.
The purpose of this randomized clinical study is to make a detailed comparison of
distalization of entire maxillary dentition using miniscrews implanted in infrazygomatic
crest with those of zygomatic miniplates in non-growing patients using Cone Beam Computed
Tomography.
MATERIALS AND METHOD Ours is a prospective, non-pharmacological, single blind, randomized
clinical study to make a detailed comparison of distalization of entire maxillary dentition
using miniscrews implanted in infrazygomatic crest with those of zygomatic miniplates in
non-growing patients using Cone Beam Computed Tomography. The present study will be conducted
in the Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, in conjunction with
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, P.G.I.D.S., Pt. B.D.Sharma University of Health
Sciences, Rohtak. The study will be carried out after the institutional approval obtained
from the ethical committee.
SOURCE OF DATA The sample size consists of 42 subjects selected from the patients attending
the regular Out Patient Department at the Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial
Orthopaedics for orthodontic treatment.
TARGET SAMPLE SIZE A sample size of 17 per group for the present study was calculated to
detect a clinical difference of 2.3 mm with a standard deviation of 2.3mm (effect size 1.0)
at 80% power and 95% confidence interval. To compensate for 20% dropouts the final sample
size was calculated to be 21 per group.
INTERVENTION AND DESIGN OF STUDY. The main intervention in this prospective clinical study is
the placement of miniscrews at infrazygomatic crest/ zygomatic miniplates after initial
leveling and alignment of maxillary dental arch. The study consists of 2 groups with equal
allocation of subjects in each group.Group 1 (G1) :- This group will receive infrazygomatic
crest miniscrews bilaterally.Group 2 (G2) :-This group will receive zygomatic miniplates
bilaterally. Selection of subjects (patients meeting selection criteria).Treatment with
0.022" MBT preadjusted edgewise appliance. Maxillary arch will be stabilized with the help of
0.019" × 0.025" stainless steel.Randomized allocation to 2 groups-G1, G2. Pretreatment
diagnostic records including CBCT will be taken before placement of skeletal anchorage
devices (infrazygomatic crest miniscrews/ zygomatic miniplates).Maxillary 3rd molars will be
extracted, if present. Insertion of skeletal anchorage devices under LA as per the group
allocated. Hooks will be soldered on archwire used for stabilizing dentition.Ni-Ti closed
coil spring/e-chain will be used to apply force from the skeletal anchorage device to the
hooks on the wire.
Patient recalled at 4 weeks interval.Regular follow up of the patient will be done and
records including CBCT will be taken on achievement of class I molar relation bilaterally.
CBCT SPECIFICATIONS:During CBCT scan, patients will be instructed to maintain an upright
posture and bite on a CT guide plate so as to open the contact between maxillary and
mandibular dentition and stabilize the patient. The CBCT scans will be performed using CS
9300 CBCT machine at 85 kV, 4mA current, exposure time of 6.30 seconds, 17 x 6 FOV and voxel
size of 180 micro millimeter. All the scans will be performed by the same researcher.Another
Cone Beam Computed Tomography will be taken 2 years post retention.
DATA COLLECTION AND CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY ANALYSIS The investigator will record the
patients' name, address, contact number and other relevant case history records will be
taken. Cephalometric radiographs and Cone Beam Computed Tomography and will be recorded
before placement of zygomatic miniplates,on achievement of Class I molar relation bilaterally
and 2 years post retention for assessment of distalization. These records will be analyzed.
The relevant values will be entered in a predesigned format. Soft tissue profile changes
between pretreatment and post treatment will be assessed on lateral cephalogram and the
raters- orthodontist, laypersons,patients,parents and general dentists will assess changes in
facial appearance on a visual analog scale with profile photographs and comparison will be
done between the two groups. Patient perception will be assessed using questionare rating by
patient regarding various parameters at 1week, 2 weeks, 1 month and 6 months after the
placement of zygomatic miniplate or IZC miniscrew. Quality of life will also be assessed
using questionnaire rating by patient at pre-treatment, mid-treatment and post treatment.
Occlusal status changes between pre and post treatment will be assessed using PAR index(peer
assessment rating between 2 groups).
INFORMED CONSENT OF THE PATIENT A valid, informed written consent of the patient or parent/
guardian will be obtained from the patient before registering the patient in this clinical
study . Patient will be informed about all the theoretical risks and benefits of the
intervention under test .Risks and hazards of radiation during CBCT will also be explained to
the patient. The patient will be given 72 hours to discuss the study with his/her family and
take the decision regarding participation in the study.
;
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT04619446 -
Dentoskeletal Changes Produced by Growth Modification Appliances in Treatment of Skeletal Class II Malocclusion
|
||
Active, not recruiting |
NCT05171738 -
Distalization Via Skeletally-anchored Distaljet Appliance With Two Approaches of Micro-osteoperforations
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT00248014 -
Response of Individuals With Class II Malocclusion
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT01853995 -
Mechanism of Class II Correction With Fixed Lingual Mandibular Growth Modificator (FLMGM)
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT01853137 -
Fixed Lingual Mandibular Growth Modificator
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04814173 -
The Efficacy of Tow Mechanics for Total-maxillary-arch-distalization
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT03839303 -
Comparison Between Mini Implant Supported Appliance and Headgear in Treatment of Maxillary Excess in Growing Patients
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04847492 -
Evaluation of Upper Anterior Teeth Retraction Rate Assisted by Two Corticotomy Techniques
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT04810286 -
Prefabricated Versus 3D-Printing Myofunctional Appliances
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT03764189 -
Evaluation of Micro-osteoperforation on Rate of Maxillary En-masse Retraction
|
N/A | |
Terminated |
NCT00957489 -
A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial to Evaluate the Effectiveness of the Two Different Appliances in the Treatment of Class II Division 1 Malocclusion
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT04743258 -
Bilateral Premolar Extraction vs Distalization: A Randomised Clinical Trial
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05335824 -
The Effect of Autologous Platelet Concentrations on Orthodontic Treatment Time
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT06133361 -
The Effect of Platelet-rich Plasma on the Rate and Type of Orthodontic Tooth Movement
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05542745 -
Measuring Rate of Anteriors Retraction With Two Different Techniques
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05040945 -
Evaluation of the Levels of Pain and Discomfort Associated With Two Techniques of Corticotomy
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05928143 -
Patient Outcomes Associated With Two Accelerated Method of Retraction of Upper Front Teeth
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04316403 -
Laser-assisted Flapless Corticotomy in Accelerating Canine Retraction
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT03635463 -
Effect of Modified Twin Block in Skeletal Class II Growing Females With Mandibular Deficiency
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03467555 -
Evaluation of Distal Movement of Maxillary Dentition With Zygomatic Miniplates Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography
|
N/A |