Class II Dental Caries Clinical Trial
Official title:
Clinical Comparison of Convetional Bulk-Fill Composite Resins and Thermoviscous Bulk-Fill Composite Resins in Class II Restorations
Verified date | February 2024 |
Source | Hacettepe University |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate the clinical performance of Class II restorations of a thermoviscous nanohybrid materials , of a bulk-fill composite resin, and of conventional nanohyribrid bulk-fill composite resins . Class II restorations will be performed in patients using three different restorative materials.And restorations will be evaluated using modified US Public Health Service criteria Resorations will be photograped and restorations will be evaluated for 6,12 months.
Status | Active, not recruiting |
Enrollment | 54 |
Est. completion date | June 15, 2024 |
Est. primary completion date | June 15, 2023 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | Accepts Healthy Volunteers |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years to 60 Years |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: - Healthy individuals without any systemic disease - Patients who is between 18 and 60 years old, - Patiens who brush their teeth 2 times a day - Voluntary individuals who have agreed to participate in the study and signed the illuminated consent form, who have been given initial periodontal treatment. Exclusion Criteria: - Women who are pregnant or breastfeeding - Patients with advanced periodontial disease - Patiens using a moving segmental prosthesis - Patiens who have maloclusions, - Patiens who have bruxism, - Patients with known allergies to resin-based restorative materials and binding agents |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Turkey | Hacettepe University | Ankara |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Hacettepe University |
Turkey,
Chesterman J, Jowett A, Gallacher A, Nixon P. Bulk-fill resin-based composite restorative materials: a review. Br Dent J. 2017 Mar 10;222(5):337-344. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2017.214. — View Citation
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Marginal Adaptation | Observers evaluated the restorations was performed using the modified United State Public Health Service criteria regarding marginal adaptation. Marginal adaptation was evaluated by an independent clinician. Visual inspection with a mirror was performed . Scores; Alfa: Closely adapted, no visible crevice. Bravo: Visible crevice, explorer will penetrate. Charlie: Crevice in which dentin is exposed | From baseline to 18 month | |
Primary | Marginal Staining | Observers evaluated the restorations was performed using the modified United State Public Health Service criteria regarding marginal staining. Marginal staining was evaluated by an independent clinician. Visual inspection with a mirror was performed . Scores: Alfa: No discoloration. Bravo: Discoloration without. Charlie: Discoloration with penetration in pulpal direction | From baseline to 18 month | |
Primary | Retention | Observers evaluated the restorations was performed using the modified United State Public Health Service criteria regarding retention rate. Retention rate was evaluated by an independent clinician. Scores: Alfa: No loss of restorative material. Charlie: Any loss of restorative material | From baseline to 18 month | |
Primary | Seconder caries | Observers evaluated the restorations was performed using the modified United State Public Health Service criteria regarding retention rate. Retention rate was evaluated by an independent clinician. Scores: Alfa: No caries present. Charlie: Caries present | From baseline to 18 month | |
Primary | Postoperative sensitivity | Observers evaluated the restorations was performed using the modified United State Public Health Service criteria regarding retention rate. Retention rate was evaluated by an independent clinician. Scores: Alfa: Not present. Bravo: sensitive but diminishing in intensity. . Charlie:constant sensitivity, not diminishing in intensity | From baseline to 18 month |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Not yet recruiting |
NCT04030117 -
Class II Restoration Using Bioactive Restorative Material vs Polyacid Modified Composite Resin in Primary Molars
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT06393270 -
5-year Clinical Follow-up of Restorative Materials
|
||
Not yet recruiting |
NCT06346795 -
Class II Restorations With High-Filled Flowable Composites
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05423639 -
Influence of Lateral Pressure on Sectional Matrix
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT06120868 -
Comparative Clinical Evaluation Between a Novel Self Adhesive and Conventional Bulk-fill Composites
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT05907928 -
Radiographic Evaluation of Adaptation of Universal Adhesives
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT06257108 -
Clinical Performance of Bulk-Fill Composite Using With Adhesives With or Without Chlorhexidine
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT06092567 -
Post-operative Sensitivity in Composite Restorations
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04943120 -
Clinical Evaluation of "Snow-plow"Technique Versus Bulk Fill Technique in Restorations of Class II Cavities
|
N/A |