Posterior Nasal Nerve (PNN) Rhinitis Study

Chronic Rhinitis Clinical Trial

Official title:

Clinical Evaluation of Low Power Radiofrequency Energy Applied to the Posterior Nasal Nerve Area for Symptomatic Relief of Chronic Rhinitis

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT03727347
• Other study ID #: TP668
• Status: Completed
• Phase: N/A
• Start date: October 16, 2018
• Est. completion date: September 17, 2020

Study information

• Verified date: September 2020
• Source: Aerin Medical
• Contact: n/a
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

Evaluation of the Aerin Medical Device used for the treatment of chronic rhinitis

Description:

This is a non-significant risk, prospective, multi-center, non-randomized study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the Aerin Medical device (InSeca Stylus) when used to deliver radiofrequency (RF) energy to the posterior nasal nerve area to improve symptoms in those diagnosed with chronic rhinitis.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Completed
• Enrollment: 50
• Est. completion date: September 17, 2020
• Est. primary completion date: February 1, 2020
• Accepts healthy volunteers: Accepts Healthy Volunteers
• Gender: All
• Age group: 22 Years to 75 Years

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

1. Age 22 to 75 years (inclusively)

2. Willing and able to provide informed consent

3. Willing and able to comply with the subject-specific requirements outlined in the study protocol

4. Seeking treatment for chronic rhinitis symptoms of at least 6 months duration and willing to undergo an office-based procedure

5. Moderate to severe symptoms of rhinorrhea (rTNSS rating of 2 or 3 for rhinorrhea)

6. Mild to severe symptoms of nasal congestion (rTNSS rating of 1, 2 or 3 for congestion)

7. rTNSS score of greater than or equal to 6

8. Dissatisfaction with medical management, defined as usage of intranasal steroids for a minimum of 4 weeks without adequate symptom relief, as judged by the subject

Exclusion Criteria:

1. Anatomic obstructions that in the investigator's opinion limit access to the posterior nose

2. Altered anatomy of the posterior nose as a result of prior sinus or nasal surgery or injury

3. Active nasal or sinus infection

4. Moderate to severe ocular allergic symptoms (such as eye tearing [epiphora], itching [pruritus], or redness [erythema])

5. History of significant dry eye

6. History of any of the following: nose bleeds in the past 3 months, rhinitis medicamentosa, head or neck irradiation

7. Known or suspected allergies or contraindications to the anesthetic agents and/or antibiotic medications to be used during the study procedure session

8. Known or suspected to be pregnant, or is lactating

9. Participating in another clinical research study

10. Other medical conditions which in the opinion of the investigator would predispose the subject to poor wound healing, increased surgical risk, or poor compliance with the requirements of the study

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Chronic Rhinitis
• Rhinitis

Intervention

Device:
• InSeca Stylus
Low power radiofrequency energy delivery to the portion of the nasal cavity mucosa overlying the region of the posterior nasal nerve (the posterior middle meatus and posterior inferior meatus).

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
United States	Colorado ENT and Allergy	Colorado Springs	Colorado
United States	Fort Worth ENT	Fort Worth	Texas
United States	ENT and Allergy Associates of Texas	McKinney	Texas
United States	Advanced ENT and Allergy	New Albany	Indiana
United States	Piedmont ENT Associates	Winston-Salem	North Carolina

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
Aerin Medical

Country where clinical trial is conducted

United States, 

References & Publications (10)

Behrbohm H. The Dual Character of Nasal Surgery. In: Behrbohm H, Tardy MEJ, eds. Essentials of Septorhinoplasty. Stuttgart, Germany: Thieme; 2004

Dahl R, Mygind N. Anatomy, physiology and function of the nasal cavities in health and disease. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 1998 Jan 5;29(1-2):3-12. — View Citation

Geurkink N. Nasal anatomy, physiology, and function. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1983 Aug;72(2):123-8. Review. — View Citation

Greiner AN, Meltzer EO. Overview of the treatment of allergic rhinitis and nonallergic rhinopathy. Proc Am Thorac Soc. 2011 Mar;8(1):121-31. doi: 10.1513/pats.201004-033RN. Review. — View Citation

Halderman A, Sindwani R. Surgical management of vasomotor rhinitis: a systematic review. Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2015 Mar-Apr;29(2):128-34. doi: 10.2500/ajra.2015.29.4141. Review. — View Citation

Kirtane MV, Rajaram D, Merchant SN. Transnasal approach to the vidian nerve: anatomical considerations. J Postgrad Med. 1984 Oct;30(4):210-3. — View Citation

Quillen DM, Feller DB. Diagnosing rhinitis: allergic vs. nonallergic. Am Fam Physician. 2006 May 1;73(9):1583-90. Review. — View Citation

Rogers DF. Airway goblet cells: responsive and adaptable front-line defenders. Eur Respir J. 1994 Sep;7(9):1690-706. Review. — View Citation

Schroer B, Pien LC. Nonallergic rhinitis: common problem, chronic symptoms. Cleve Clin J Med. 2012 Apr;79(4):285-93. doi: 10.3949/ccjm.79a11099. Review. — View Citation

Wallace DV, Dykewicz MS, Bernstein DI, Blessing-Moore J, Cox L, Khan DA, Lang DM, Nicklas RA, Oppenheimer J, Portnoy JM, Randolph CC, Schuller D, Spector SL, Tilles SA; Joint Task Force on Practice; American Academy of Allergy; Asthma & Immunology; American College of Allergy; Asthma and Immunology; Joint Council of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology. The diagnosis and management of rhinitis: an updated practice parameter. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2008 Aug;122(2 Suppl):S1-84. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2008.06.003. Review. Erratum in: J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2008 Dec;122(6):1237. — View Citation

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Other	rTNSS Responder Rate	The Reflective Total Nasal Symptom Score (rTNSS) is a patient self reported questionnaire of four nasal symptoms: rhinitis, nasal congestion, nasal itching and sneezing. Patients report their symptoms reflected or felt over the last 12 hours. Total scores can range from 0 to 12. A higher score indicates increased symptom severity.; Subjects who showed at least a 1 point improvement (decrease) in the reflective Total Nasal Symptom Score (rTNSS) were categorized as responders. An overall responder rate of at least 55% was expected.	Comparison of scores at Baseline and 12 weeks post procedure
Other	Change in rTNSS Over Time	Reflective Total Nasal Symptom Score (rTNSS) is a patient self reported questionnaire of four nasal symptoms: rhinitis, nasal congestion, nasal itching and sneezing. Patients report their symptoms reflected or felt over the last 12 hours. Total scores range from 0 to 12. A higher score indicates increased symptom severity.; The mean change in the rTNSS total score from Baseline to each follow up visit: 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 12 weeks, 26 weeks and 52 weeks post procedure will be recorded.	Baseline to each Follow Up Visit at 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 12 weeks, 26 weeks and 52 weeks post procedure.
Other	Change in rTNSS Individual Nasal Symptom Component Scores Over Time	Reflective Total Nasal Symptom Score (rTNSS) is a patient self reported questionnaire of four nasal symptoms: rhinitis, nasal congestion, nasal itching and sneezing. Patients will report their symptoms reflected or felt over the last 12 hours. Total scores can range from 0 to 12. A higher score indicates increased symptom severity.; Scores from each of the four components of the questionnaire (rhinorrhea, nasal congestion, nasal itching, and sneezing) will be evaluated at each follow up visit at 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 12 weeks, 26 weeks and 52 weeks post procedure. Individual component scores can range from 0 to 3, with a higher score indicating increased symptom severity.	Baseline to each Follow Up visit at 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 12 weeks, 26 weeks and 52 weeks post procedure
Other	Response on Aerin Quality-of-Life (QOL) Assessment Items	This Quality-of-Life (QOL) instrument is a 9-item patient self-reported questionnaire developed by Aerin Medical to gain understanding of the impact of chronic rhinitis on daily activities, feelings, symptoms and medication use. Each item had 5 possible answers to convey the following responses: very positive, positive, neutral, negative and very negative.; Section 1 asks "Please indicate how often you experience the following" for 6 items. For items 1, 3, 4 and 5, those who answered "never/rarely" were considered to have a positive (favorable) response. For questions 2 and 6, those who answered "frequently/very frequently" were considered to have a positive (favorable) response. Section 2 requests "Please indicate how often you use each of the following products to help you with your chronic rhinitis". For 3 items in this section, those who answered "never/rarely" were considered to have a positive (favorable) response.	The QOL was to be completed by the subject at baseline prior to the treatment procedure, and at the 12 week, 26 week and 52 week visits post procedure.
Primary	Change in Reflective Total Nasal Symptom Score (rTNSS)	Mean change in Reflective Total Nasal Symptoms Score (rTNSS) from baseline to 12 weeks post-study procedure. Improvement (12 week score - baseline score) is signified by a negative value.; The Reflective Total Nasal Symptom Score (rTNSS) is a patient self reported questionnaire of four nasal symptoms: rhinitis, nasal congestion, nasal itching and sneezing. Patients will report their symptoms reflected or felt over the last 12 hours. Total scores can range from 0 to 12. A higher score indicates increased symptom severity. This study will measure the mean change in the rTNSS total score from Baseline to 12 week follow up visit	Comparison of scores at Baseline and 12 weeks post procedure
Primary	Percentage of Participants With Treatment Related Adverse Events (Safety)	Characterization of the type and frequency of treatment-related adverse events reported during or following the study procedure. Subjects were asked about possible side effects or adverse experiences related to the study procedure at each follow up visit. Each event was documented and identified as to its relationship and level of relatedness to the study device and/or study procedure.; This measure includes any subject who experienced at least one event considered definitely, probably, or possibly related to the device or procedure.	At or following the study procedure, and up to the final study visit at 1 year.