Chronic Radiation Proctitis Clinical Trial
Official title:
Safety and Preliminary Efficacy of Umbilical-Cord-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells Injection for Chronic Radiation Proctitis
A Phase I/II study to evaluate the safety and preliminary efficacy of human umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stem cell injection for the treatment of chronic radiation proctitis.
Status | Recruiting |
Enrollment | 24 |
Est. completion date | May 2025 |
Est. primary completion date | May 2025 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years to 79 Years |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: 1. Fully understand and sign the informed consent form; 2. Age =18 years and <80 years; 3. Good physical condition (WHO performance status score 0-1); 4. Pathologically diagnosed with pelvic malignant tumors and received radiotherapy; 5. Diagnosed with chronic radiation proctitis after at least 6 months of endoscopic examination following the completion of radiotherapy and ineffective conventional treatment; 6. Screening period LENT-SOMA score =1; 7. Subjects and their spouses or partners have no plans for conception from screening to 6 months after the end of the trial, no plans for sperm or egg donation, and agree to use effective non-pharmacological contraceptive measures during the trial. Exclusion Criteria: 1. Patients with severe liver or kidney dysfunction during the screening period; 2. Patients with severe congestive heart failure or coronary artery disease during the screening period; 3. Patients with allergic constitution or severe systemic immune diseases; 4. Patients with active gastrointestinal bleeding or acute intestinal obstruction during the screening period; 5. Pregnant patients; 6. Patients with rectal stenosis or fistula formation requiring surgical treatment that limits endoscopic therapy; 7. Patients with a screening period LENT-SOMA score of 4; 8. Patients with tumor recurrence or metastasis; 9. Patients currently participating in other clinical trials at the time of screening or who have not been out of another clinical trial for less than 1 month; 10. Other situations deemed unsuitable for inclusion in this study by the investigator. |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
China | Jinling Hospital | Nanjing | Jiangsu |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Jiangsu Topcel-KH Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. |
China,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | The severity of adverse events after administration as assessed by CTCAE v5.0. | Adverse events are any unexpected medical occurrences in a participant that may not be directly caused by the trial intervention. Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 5.0 is a grading scale which can be utilized for adverse event (AE) reporting. It ranges from grade 1 (mild) to grade 5 (death related to AE) , and higher grade means the AE is more severe. | 28 days (1 month) | |
Primary | The incidence of adverse events after administration. | Adverse events are any unexpected medical occurrences in a participant that may not be directly caused by the trial intervention. | 28 days (1 month) | |
Secondary | The severity of adverse events after administration as assessed by CTCAE v5.0. | Adverse events are any unexpected medical occurrences in a participant that may not be directly caused by the trial intervention. Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 5.0 is a grading scale which can be utilized for adverse event (AE) reporting. It ranges from grade 1 (mild) to grade 5 (death related to AE) , and higher grade means the AE is more severe. | 112 days (4 month) | |
Secondary | The incidence of adverse events after administration. | Adverse events are any unexpected medical occurrences in a participant that may not be directly caused by the trial intervention. | 112 days (4 month) | |
Secondary | The recurrence of chronic radiation proctitis symptoms after administration. | The recurrence means that subjects who were previously cured or relieved are diagnosed again by the investigator, clinically, as having chronic radiation proctitis. | Day 112 (month 4) | |
Secondary | The deterioration of chronic radiation proctitis symptoms after administration. | The deterioration means that the symptoms of chronic radiation proctitis have worsened compared to baseline. | Day 112 (month 4) | |
Secondary | No improvement of chronic radiation proctitis symptoms after administration as assessed by LENT-SOMA score. | The Late Effects Normal Tissue/Subjective Objective Management Analytic (LENT/SOMA) is used for grading radiation therapy (RT)-induced side effects. It is graded on a 4-point scale ranging from occasional (score of 1) to refractory (score of 4), with a higher score indicating more severe disease. No improvement means no improvement of the score comparing to the baseline level. | Day 112 (month 4) | |
Secondary | No improvement of chronic radiation proctitis symptoms after administration as assessed by VRS. | The Vienna Rectoscopy Score (VRS) is a feasible and effective tool for detecting and classifying pathological changes in the rectal mucosa after radiotherapy (RT). It is graded on a 5-point scale, ranging from 0 to 5, with a higher score indicating more severe disease. No improvement means that the score does not improve compared to the baseline level. | Day 112 (month 4) | |
Secondary | No improvement of chronic radiation proctitis symptoms after administration as assessed by a semi-quantitative scoring system for radiotherapy-induced rectal pathological damage. | A specific scoring system that assesses the intensity of morphological features has been developed. The total score ranging from 0 to 10 , and a higher score indicates more severe disease. No improvement means that the score does not improve compared to the baseline level. | Day 112 (month 4) | |
Secondary | No improvement of chronic radiation proctitis symptoms after administration as assessed by a RTD grading scale. | The rectal telangiectasia density (RTD) grading scale ranges from 0 to 3, and a higher score indicates the disease is more severe. No improvement means that the score does not improve compared to the baseline level. | Day 112 (month 4) | |
Secondary | No improvement of chronic radiation proctitis symptoms after administration as assessed by VAS score. | The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) is commonly used to assess the intensity of a patient's pain, ranging from none to extreme. It is graded on an 11-point scale,ranging from 0 to 10,with higher scores indicating more severe pain. No improvement means that the score does not improve compared to the baseline level. | Day 112 (month 4) |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT01613534 -
Combined Therapy in Radiation Proctopathy
|
Phase 4 | |
Recruiting |
NCT03397901 -
Transverse Colostomy for Refractory Hemorrhagic Chronic Radiation Proctitis: a Prospective Cohort Study
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT04680195 -
Thalidomide in the Treatment of Chronic Radiation Proctitis With Intractable Bleeding
|
Phase 2 |