Chronic Plantar Fasciitis Clinical Trial
Official title:
The Effectiveness of Platelet Rich Plasma in Treatment of Chronic Planter Fasciitis
The present study was carried out on fifty patients with chronicunilateral PF. Patients were
recruited from Outpatient Clinic of Physical medicine, Rheumatology and Rehabilitation at
Mansoura University Hospital during the period from January 2016 to September 2016. Patients
were classifiedrandomly into two groups:the 1stgroup included 25 patients (20 females and 5
males) treated by local corticosteroid injectionand the 2ndgroup included 25 patients (20
females and 5males) treated by PRP injection.
We obtain an informed written consent from each participant sharing in the study. We take
approval on our study by the research board of faculty of medicine, Mansoura University,
code: MS/15.10.08.
:
The present study was carried out on fifty patients with chronicunilateral PF. Patients were
recruited from Outpatient Clinic of Physical medicine, Rheumatology and Rehabilitation at
Mansoura University Hospital during the period from January 2016 to September 2016. Patients
were classifiedrandomly into two groups:the 1stgroup included 25 patients (20 females and 5
males) treated by local corticosteroid injectionand the 2ndgroup included 25 patients (20
females and 5males) treated by PRP injection.
We obtain an informed written consent from each participant sharing in the study. We take
approval on our study by the research board of faculty of medicine, Mansoura University,
code: MS/15.10.08.
All patients were subjected to the following:
1- Complete history taking:
a. Personal history: with special stress on: i. Age and sex. ii. Occupation: occupation which
needs prolonged standing is a risk factor for PF.
b. Complaint: Taken in the patient's own words with special stress on disease duration. c.
Present history: i. Pain as regard onset, course, duration, provocative factors, relieving
factors, limitation of movement and diurnal variation.
ii. History of arthritis and joint affection. iii. History of other systems affections:
- Neurological symptoms: (muscle power and sensation of the lower limbs).
- Eye symptoms: (redness, ulcers and blurred vision).
- Gastrointestinal tract (GIT) symptoms: (diarrhea, heart burn and mucus in the stool).
- Urinary tract (UT) symptoms: (dysuria and frequency).
- Skin affection: (ulcers, erythema, papules and nodules). b. Locomotor system
examination:
- Of all joints with special stress on the ankle, subtalar andmidtarsal joint including:
i. Inspection: swelling, deformity and muscle wasting. ii. Palpation: hotness,
tenderness. iii. Range of motion: active and passive.
- Clinical examination of the heel:
- Inspection of any obvious deformities (pesplanus, pescavus and hallux valgus) and
skin changes (redness and swelling).
1. corticosteroid injection: Patients were put in the supine position. Injection
was done usingthe medial technique. Identification of the tenderest point of
the heel was done by palpation. Antiseptic solution was used to disinfect the
skin overlying theheel. Then1ml of 40 mg methylprednisolone acetate and 1 ml
of local anaesthetic as lidocaine 2% were injected into the plantar fascia by
a 22gauge needle. After injection, participants were advised to stay sitting
without foot movement for 15 minutes (Khan et al., 2014).
2. PRP injection:
It started with puncture of the vein and taking specific amount of autologous blood from the
participantnearly a sample of 20 ml of venous blood (Co AY, 2012).The blood sample was put in
a sterile tube containing an anticoagulant as sodium citrate.Then the blood sample
wascentrifuged for 15 minutes at 1800 rpmwhich leads to separation of the plasma at the top
layer from the packed RBCs at the bottom layer. The RBCs layer is removedthenanother
centrifugationwas done at 3500 rpm for 10 minuteswhich leads to formation of a more
concentratedplatelet layer after removal of PPP(Anitua et al., 2012).
Patients were put in supine position. Betadine was used to disinfect the skin of the heel. 1
ml of local anesthesitic (lidocaine) was injected;then, by the same syringe, 2.5 ml of PRP
was injected in the tenderestarea.After extraction of the needle, a bandage was puton the
injected area. The patient was kept in the supine position for twentyminutes and then
discharged (Say et al., 2014).
Somepatients may have minimal to moderate discomfort afterinjection that may continue for 7
days because PRP stimulates an inflammatory response. So, to control pain, patients
shouldapply ice on the heeland also modify activity as tolerated
;
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Recruiting |
NCT01614223 -
Autologous Conditioned Plasma (ACP) for Patients With Plantar Fasciitis
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT01981226 -
Sonoelastographic Changes After Low Energy Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy (ESWT) in Plantar Fasciitis
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03255655 -
Intense Therapeutic Ultrasound - Treatment for Chronic Plantar Fascia Musculoskeletal Pain Reduction
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT06348017 -
Frequency of Neuropathic Pain in Patients With Plantar Fasciitis
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT05868577 -
Infracalcaneal Peppering Injection Technique for Chronic Plantar Fasciitis
|
Phase 1 | |
Recruiting |
NCT05032300 -
Shear Wave Elastography Technology to Evaluate the Efficacy of ESW in the Treatment of Patients With Chronic Plantar Fasciitis
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05754697 -
IASTM Versus PRT in Patients With Chronic PF
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT00447876 -
Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Dysport® in the Treatment of Chronic Plantar Fasciitis
|
Phase 2/Phase 3 | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT05162144 -
Proximal Medial Gastriocnemius Recession for Chronic Plantar Fasciitis
|
N/A |