Validation of a Novel Sham Cervical Spinal Manipulation Procedure

Chronic Neck Pain Clinical Trial

Official title: Validation of a Novel Sham Cervical Spinal Manipulation Procedure.

Status Completed

Clinical Trial Summary

Primary hypotheses:

Ho1: In chronic neck pain patients, randomly treated with either a "sham" or "real" cervical manipulation procedure, the probability of perceiving a Real Manipulation Procedure is equal to the probability of obtaining a Real Manipulation Procedure, AND, Ho2: Spinal tenderness will remain unchanged following the treatment procedure for both groups.

Secondary (null) hypotheses:

1. Neck pain, cervical ranges of motion and paraspinal EMG responses to pressure pain will remain unchanged in both groups;

2. there will be no differences between groups with respect to 2a) neck joint cavitations and 2b) forces across the cervical spine measured during the manoeuvres.

Clinical Trial Description

1. Develop a randomized controlled clinical trial design to optimize the testing of the effects of a sham vs real cervical manipulation.

2. Use novel modifications of both a sham a real manipulation to create "procedures" designed to optimize group equivalence in the RCT design. Then, evaluate the accuracy of 'patient post-treatment perception of treatment type' versus actual administered treatment (primary outcome #1).

3. Quantitatively evaluate group differences in local soft-tissue tenderness by algometry (primary outcome #2), as well as changes in self-reported neck pain, ranges of motion, myoelectric responses in selected neck muscles and forces imparted during the procedures.

4. Evaluate the occurrence of neck joint cavitation during the manoeuvres comprising these procedures. ;

Study Design

N/A

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Chronic Neck Pain

• NCT number: NCT00978094
• Study type: Observational
• Source: Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College
• Status: Completed
• Phase: N/A
• Start date: February 2009
• Completion date: October 2010