Chronic Migraine Clinical Trial
— Tx360Official title:
Use of the Tx360 Nasal Applicator for Transnasal Sphenopalatine Ganglion Block in the Treatment of Chronic Migraine: A Double-blind Placebo-controlled Study
Verified date | January 2018 |
Source | Tian Medical Inc. |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
Migraine imposes a substantial burden on patients in terms of diminished daily functioning, quality of life, and financial loss. Pain severity and duration correlates with reduced measures of daily functioning, and overall health status. The sphenopalatine ganglion (SPG) has been implicated in a variety of cephalalgias. This has been well represented in the literature dating back over a century. Access to this structure can be gained via a small area of mucosa just posterior and superior to the tail of the middle turbinate on the lateral nasal wall. At this aspect, there is no bony boundary to the SPG. Blocking the SPG using local anesthetics relieves pain. Unfortunately, many current interventions are cumbersome, invasive, and expensive. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of the Tx360™, a new nasal applicator device, in the treatment of head and face pain and to examine the economic implications. The Tx360™ is a single use device designed to deliver a topical local anesthetic to the specific area of mucosa associated with the SPG. A total of 42 study participants will be accepted into this double-blind placebo-controlled study. 28 will receive SPG blocks using a 0.3 mL of a 0.5% solution of Marcaine delivered by the Tx360™ while 14 will receive a placebo of saline substituted for the Marcaine. Both patient sets will also be given a piece of lemon hard candy as a taste distractor. Participants must have a chronic migraine history with over 15 symptomatic days per month over the past three months. The treatment plan consists of six weeks of treatment, two times per week. Short and longer term assessments will be retrieved and analyzed as detailed in the Study Design.
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 41 |
Est. completion date | February 2014 |
Est. primary completion date | February 2014 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years to 80 Years |
Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: 1. Is male or female, in otherwise good health, 18 to 80 years of age. 2. Has history of chronic migraine (with or without aura) according to the criteria proposed by the Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society for at least 3 months prior to enrollment. 3. Has onset of migraine before age 50. 4. Is able to differentiate migraine from any other headache they may experience (e.g., tension-type headache). 5. Is not currently taking a migraine preventive or has been taking preventive for at least 30 days prior to screening and agrees to not start, stop, or change medication and/or dosage during the study period. 6. If female of childbearing potential, agrees to use, for the duration of the study, a medically acceptable form of contraception as determined by the Investigator. 1. Complete abstinence from intercourse from 2 weeks prior to administration of study drug throughout the study, and for a time interval after completion or premature discontinuation from the study to account for elimination of the study drug; or, 2. Surgically sterile (hysterectomy or tubal ligation or otherwise incapable of pregnancy); or, 3. Sterilization of male partner; or, 4. Intrauterine device with published data showing lowest expected failure rate is less than 1% per year; or, 5. Double barrier method (i.e., 2 physical barriers OR 1 physical barrier plus spermicide) for a least 1 month prior to Visit 1 and throughout study; or, 6. Hormonal contraceptives for at least 3 months prior to Visit 1 and throughout study. 7. Has pain presentation in frontal, temporal, ophthalmic, maxillary, mandibular, facial, or intraoral location. Exclusion Criteria: 1. Is male or female, in otherwise good health, 18 to 80 years of age. 2. Has history of chronic migraine (with or without aura) according to the criteria proposed by the Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society for at least 3 months prior to enrollment. 3. Has onset of migraine before age 50. 4. Is able to differentiate migraine from any other headache they may experience (e.g., tension-type headache). 5. Is not currently taking a migraine preventive or has been taking preventive for at least 30 days prior to screening and agrees to not start, stop, or change medication and/or dosage during the study period. 6. If female of childbearing potential, agrees to use, for the duration of the study, a medically acceptable form of contraception as determined by the Investigator. 1. Complete abstinence from intercourse from 2 weeks prior to administration of study drug throughout the study, and for a time interval after completion or premature discontinuation from the study to account for elimination of the study drug; or, 2. Surgically sterile (hysterectomy or tubal ligation or otherwise incapable of pregnancy); or, 3. Sterilization of male partner; or, 4. Intrauterine device with published data showing lowest expected failure rate is less than 1% per year; or, 5. Double barrier method (i.e., 2 physical barriers OR 1 physical barrier plus spermicide) for a least 1 month prior to Visit 1 and throughout study; or, 6. Hormonal contraceptives for at least 3 months prior to Visit 1 and throughout study. 7. Has pain presentation in frontal, temporal, ophthalmic, maxillary, mandibular, facial, or intraoral location. |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
United States | Michigan Head Pain & Neurological Institute | Ann Arbor | Michigan |
United States | Clinvest/A Division of Banyan Group, Inc. | Springfield | Missouri |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Tian Medical Inc. | Clinvest |
United States,
Boivie J. Chapter 48 Central post-stroke pain. Handb Clin Neurol. 2006;81:715-30. doi: 10.1016/S0072-9752(06)80052-7. — View Citation
Gronseth G, Cruccu G, Alksne J, Argoff C, Brainin M, Burchiel K, Nurmikko T, Zakrzewska JM. Practice parameter: the diagnostic evaluation and treatment of trigeminal neuralgia (an evidence-based review): report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology and the European Federation of Neurological Societies. Neurology. 2008 Oct 7;71(15):1183-90. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000326598.83183.04. Epub 2008 Aug 20. Review. — View Citation
Herrera Tolosana S, Fernández Liesa R, Escolar Castellón Jde D, Pérez Delgado L, Lisbona Alquezar MP, Tejero-Garcés Galve G, Guallar Larpa M, Ortiz García A. [Sphenopalatinum foramen: an anatomical study]. Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp. 2011 Jul-Aug;62(4):274-8. doi: 10.1016/j.otorri.2011.01.009. Epub 2011 Mar 22. Spanish. — View Citation
Kanai A, Suzuki A, Kobayashi M, Hoka S. Intranasal lidocaine 8% spray for second-division trigeminal neuralgia. Br J Anaesth. 2006 Oct;97(4):559-63. Epub 2006 Aug 1. — View Citation
Oluigbo CO, Makonnen G, Narouze S, Rezai AR. Sphenopalatine ganglion interventions: technical aspects and application. Prog Neurol Surg. 2011;24:171-9. doi: 10.1159/000323049. Epub 2011 Mar 21. Review. — View Citation
Oomen KP, Ebbeling M, de Ru JA, Hordijk GJ, Bleys RL. A previously undescribed branch of the pterygopalatine ganglion. Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2011 Jan-Feb;25(1):50-3. doi: 10.2500/ajra.2011.25.3550. — View Citation
Piagkou M, Demesticha T, Troupis T, Vlasis K, Skandalakis P, Makri A, Mazarakis A, Lappas D, Piagkos G, Johnson EO. The pterygopalatine ganglion and its role in various pain syndromes: from anatomy to clinical practice. Pain Pract. 2012 Jun;12(5):399-412. doi: 10.1111/j.1533-2500.2011.00507.x. Epub 2011 Sep 29. Review. Erratum in: Pain Pract. 2012 Nov;12(8):673. — View Citation
Rosenberg M, Phero JC. Regional anesthesia and invasive techniques to manage head and neck pain. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2003 Dec;36(6):1201-19. Review. — View Citation
Rusu MC. Microanatomy of the neural scaffold of the pterygopalatine fossa in humans: trigeminovascular projections and trigeminal-autonomic plexuses. Folia Morphol (Warsz). 2010 May;69(2):84-91. — View Citation
Siéssere S, Vitti M, Sousa LG, Semprini M, Iyomasa MM, Regalo SC. Anatomic variation of cranial parasympathetic ganglia. Braz Oral Res. 2008 Apr-Jun;22(2):101-5. — View Citation
Stankewitz A, Voit HL, Bingel U, Peschke C, May A. A new trigemino-nociceptive stimulation model for event-related fMRI. Cephalalgia. 2010 Apr;30(4):475-85. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2982.2009.01968.x. Epub 2010 Feb 1. — View Citation
Tepper SJ. A pivotal moment in 50 years of headache history: the first American Migraine Study. Headache. 2008 May;48(5):730-1; discussion 732. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2008.01117_1.x. — View Citation
Windsor RE, Jahnke S. Sphenopalatine ganglion blockade: a review and proposed modification of the transnasal technique. Pain Physician. 2004 Apr;7(2):283-6. — View Citation
Wood PB. Role of central dopamine in pain and analgesia. Expert Rev Neurother. 2008 May;8(5):781-97. doi: 10.1586/14737175.8.5.781. Review. — View Citation
Yang lY, Oraee S. A novel approach to transnasal sphenopalatine ganglion injection. Pain Physician. 2006 Apr;9(2):131-4. — View Citation
* Note: There are 15 references in all — Click here to view all references
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) | Compare Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) scores Before Procedure,15-Minute Post Treatment, 30-Minutes Post Treatment, 24-Hour Post Treatment for all 12 treatments (Marcaine vs. Saline). NRS is a likert scale ranging from 0-10 with 0 being no pain and 10 being worst possible pain. For each individual time point, all 12 treatments were averaged for that time point and a single value was used for comparison between the two groups. | 6 Weeks | |
Secondary | Change in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) | Compare percentage change in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) score from Before Procedure to 15-Minutes, Before Procedure to 30-Minutes, Before Procedure to 24-Hours After Procedure for all 12 treatments (Mean of all 12 treatments for each timepoint, comparing Group A to Group B). NRS is a likert scale ranging from 0-10 with 0 being no pain and 10 being worst possible pain. | 15 Minutes Post Treatment, 30 minutes Post Treatment and 24 hours Post Treatment, assessed up to 6 weeks | |
Secondary | Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) | Compare 24-Hour After Procedure Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) score for 12 treatments (Mean of all 12 treatments for each timepoint, comparing Group A to Group B). PGIC is a likert scale ranging from 1 to 7 with 1 being very much improved and 7 being very much worse. | 30 minutes Post Treatment and 24 hours Post Treatment, assessed up to 6 weeks | |
Secondary | Modified Pain Characteristic Questionnaire | Compare Modified Pain Characteristic Questionnaire scores Before Procedure vs. 24-Hour After Procedure, Before Procedure vs. 1-Month Follow Up, and Before Procedure vs. 6-Month Follow Up (Mean of all 12 treatments for each timepoint, comparing Group A to Group B). The modified pain characteristic questionnaire is a series of 11 questions on a likert scale ranging from 0 to 10 with 0 being no pain or does not interfere and 10 being worst pain or completely interferes. Percentage questions range from 0 to 100. | Before Treatment, 24 Hours After Treatment, 1 Month Post Treatment, and 6 Months Post Treatment | |
Secondary | Migraine Headache Days | Compare change in the number of migraine headache days per month reported in Baseline Period Diary vs. Treatment Period Diary vs. Post-Treatment Period Diary. | 12 Weeks | |
Secondary | Acute Medications Usage | Number of acute medications used during Treatment period (6 weeks) and Follow-Up (4 weeks) (Group A vs. Group B). | 10 Weeks | |
Secondary | Adverse Events | Number of adverse events over the entire length of study (Group A vs. Group B). | 34 weeks | |
Secondary | Headache Impact Test (HIT-6) | Total Headache Impact Test (HIT-6) scores Pre-Treatment at Visit 2 vs. Post-Treatment (following final treatment), and at 1-Month Post-Treatment (Group A vs. Group B). HIT-6 is a series of 6 likert scale questions ranging from 1 to 5 with 1 being never and 5 being always. The HIT-6 answer options are weighted as follows: Never (1) = 6 points each, Rarely (2) = 9 points each, Sometimes (3) = 10 points each, Very often (4) = 11 points each, Always (5) = 13 points each. The total score for the HIT-6 ranges from 36 (subject answers all 6 questions as "Never") to 78 subject answers all 6 questions as "Always"), with higher total scores indicating more impact than lower scores, i.e., headaches cause greater impact on the subject's life. | 10 Weeks | |
Secondary | Overall Satisfaction | Satisfaction scores Visit 2 vs. following treatment (Treatment 12) and at 1-Month Post-Treatment (Group A vs. Group B). Satisfaction scores are a likert scale ranging from 1 to 5 with 1 being complete dissatisfaction and 5 being complete satisfaction. | 10 Weeks |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT05720819 -
Biofeedback-VR for Treatment of Chronic Migraine
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT06428838 -
Eptinezumab as an Adjunct to Standard of Care for Migraine in an Acute Emergency Context
|
Phase 3 | |
Recruiting |
NCT05517200 -
Pilot Study for a Machine Learning Test for Migraine
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT05891808 -
miR-155 Expression in Episodic and Chronic Migraine
|
||
Completed |
NCT02514148 -
Biobehavioral Physical Therapy Strategies Based on Therapeutic Exercise Applied to Chronic Migraine Patients
|
N/A | |
Enrolling by invitation |
NCT02291380 -
A Study to Evaluate Botulinum Toxin Type A for Injection(HengLi®)for Prophylactic Treatment of Chronic Migraine
|
Phase 3 | |
Withdrawn |
NCT02122744 -
RCT Versus Placebo of rTMSQP Over Visual Cortex for the Prevention of Chronic Migraine
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02122237 -
Cathodal tDCS in Chronic Migraine: Neurophysiological Study and Pilot Therapeutic Trial
|
Phase 3 | |
Recruiting |
NCT02202486 -
Investigation of the Blood-brain and Blood-dura Barrier Durin Migraine Attacks Using MRI
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01741246 -
Neuroimaging Studies of Chronic Primary Headaches Using Positron Emission Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01090050 -
Treximet in the Treatment of Chronic Migraine
|
Phase 4 | |
Recruiting |
NCT03507400 -
Introvision for Migraine and Headaches
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04161807 -
Efficacy and Safety of Nerivio™ for Acute Treatment of Migraine in People With Chronic Migraine
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03175263 -
OnabotulinumtoxinA Injections in Chronic Migraine, Targeted to Sites of Pericranial Myofascial Pain
|
N/A | |
Withdrawn |
NCT04353505 -
Intra-arterial Sphenopalatine Ganglion Block for Patients With Refractory Headache
|
Phase 1 | |
Completed |
NCT01667250 -
Non-Invasive Neurostimulation for the Prevention of Chronic Migraine
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01700387 -
A Study to Evaluate the Tolerability of Botox and Topiramate or Botox and Placebo and Effect on Cognitive Efficiency
|
Phase 4 | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT01135784 -
Study of MIGRA-ZEN RELIEF PLUS In the Treatment of Chronic Migraine Headache
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT01496950 -
Double-blind Randomized Clinical Trial of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Chronic Migraine
|
Phase 1 | |
Completed |
NCT00772031 -
NINDS CRC Chronic Migraine Treatment Trial
|
Phase 3 |