Chronic Migraine Clinical Trial
Official title:
A Randomized, Pilot Study to Evaluate the Tolerability of OnabotulinumtoxinA Plus Topiramate vs. OnabotulinumtoxinA Plus Placebo and Long Term Effect of Treatment on Cognitive Efficiency and Continuation of Care
Verified date | August 2020 |
Source | Cady, Roger, M.D. |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
The purpose of this study is to evaluate sustained tolerability, quality of life, and change in cognitive efficiency following treatment with OnabotulinumtoxinA and daily topiramate vs. OnabotulinumtoxinA and daily placebo (Group A vs. Group B).
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 20 |
Est. completion date | August 2014 |
Est. primary completion date | August 2014 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years to 65 Years |
Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: 1. must be outpatient, male or female, of any race, between 18 and 65 years of age. 2. if female of child bearing potential must have a negative pregnancy test result at the Screening Visit and practice a reliable method of contraception. A female is considered of childbearing potential unless she is post-menopausal for at least 12 months prior to administration of study drug, without a uterus and/or both ovaries or has been surgically sterilized for at least 6 months prior to study drug administration. Reliable methods of contraception are: Complete abstinence from intercourse from 2 weeks prior to administration of the investigational product. Throughout the study, and for a time interval (5 days) after completion or premature discontinuation from the study. History of bilateral tubal ligation Sterilization of male partner; or, Implants of levonorgestrel; or, Injectable progestogen, or, Oral contraceptive (combination therapy with ethinyl estradiol plus a progestin) with a placebo week every 1-3 months; or, Any intrauterine device (IUD) with published data showing that the highest expected failure rate is less than 1% per year (not all IUD's meet this criterion) in use at least 30 days prior to study drug administration; or, Spermicide plus a mechanical barrier (e.g., spermicide plus a male condom or a female diaphragm); or, Any other barrier methods (only is used in combination with any of the above acceptable methods) in use at least 14 days prior to study drug administration; or, Any other methods with published data showing that the highest expected failure rate for that method is less than 1% per year. 3. must have history of chronic migraine (with or without aura) according to the criteria proposed by the Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society (IHS) for at least 3 months prior to enrollment. 4. must be able to understand the requirements of the study including maintaining a headache Diary, and signing informed consent. 5. must be in good general health as determined by investigator. 6. if taking migraine preventive, must be on a stable dose of preventive medication for at least 6 weeks prior to screening. 7. must have daily access to internet for completion of online daily headache diary. Exclusion Criteria: 1. if female, is pregnant, planning to become pregnant during the study period, are breast feeding, or are of childbearing potential and not practicing a reliable form of birth control. 2. has headache disorders outside IHS-defined chronic migraine definition. 3. has evidence of underlying pathology contributing to their headaches. 4. has any medical condition that may increase their risk with exposure to OnabotulinumtoxinA including diagnosed myasthenia gravis, Eaton-Lambert syndrome, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, or any other significant disease that might interfere with neuromuscular function. 5. has profound atrophy or weakness of muscles in the target areas of injection. 6. has skin conditions or infections at any injection site. 7. has allergy or sensitivities to any component of the test medication. 8. has previously received onabotulinumtoxinA for migraine prevention. 9. has previously received topiramate. 10. who in the opinion of the investigator, has active major psychiatric or depressive disorders including alcohol/drug abuse. 11. meets International Headache Society criteria for Medication Overuse Headache with opioid or butalbital containing products. 12. who in the opinion of the investigator, is taking opioid or butalbital containing products more than once a week that could be contributing to a pattern of increased headaches or cognitive decline. 13. is planning or requiring surgery during the study. 14. has a history of poor compliance with medical treatment. 15. is currently participating in an investigational drug study or has participated in an investigational drug study within the previous 30 days of the screening visit. |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
United States | Clinvest/A Division of Banyan Group, Inc. | Springfield | Missouri |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Cady, Roger, M.D. | Allergan |
United States,
Bootsma HP, Aldenkamp AP, Diepman L, Hulsman J, Lambrechts D, Leenen L, Majoie M, Schellekens A, de Krom M. The Effect of Antiepileptic Drugs on Cognition: Patient Perceived Cognitive Problems of Topiramate versus Levetiracetam in Clinical Practice. Epile — View Citation
Kim SY, Lee HW, Jung DK, Suh CK, Park SP. Cognitive Effects of Low-dose Topiramate Compared with Oxcarbazepine in Epilepsy Patients. J Clin Neurol. 2006 Jun;2(2):126-33. doi: 10.3988/jcn.2006.2.2.126. Epub 2006 Jun 20. — View Citation
Meador KJ, Loring DW, Vahle VJ, Ray PG, Werz MA, Fessler AJ, Ogrocki P, Schoenberg MR, Miller JM, Kustra RP. Cognitive and behavioral effects of lamotrigine and topiramate in healthy volunteers. Neurology. 2005 Jun 28;64(12):2108-14. — View Citation
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Subject Attrition Post Randomization | Count of subject attrition following randomization and reason for attrition (Consent withdrawn, Withdrawn due to adverse event, Lost to follow up) | Collected on Visit 2 (Day 29) through Visit 6 (Day 365) | |
Primary | Subject Global Impression of Change (SGIC) | Score on Subject Global Impression of Change at Visits 3-6 (Day 113 and 365). Likert scale ranging from 1-7, where 1 = extremely worse and 7 = extremely better. | Collected on Visit 3 (Day 113), Visit 4 (Day 197), Visit 5 (281), and Visit 6 (Day 365) | |
Primary | Physician Global Impression of Change (PGIC) | Score on Physician Global Impression of Change at Visits 3-6 (Day 113 and 365). Likert scale ranging from 1-7, where 1 = extremely worse and 7 = extremely better. | Collected on Visit 3 (Day 113), Visit 4 (Day 197), Visit 5 (281), and Visit 6 (Day 365) | |
Primary | Subject's Controlled Oral Word Association Test (COWAT) Score Percent Change Compared From Baseline to Visits 3-6 | The Controlled Oral Word Association Test (COWAT) is a measure of verbal fluency. Raw COWAT scores have a lower bound of 0 with no upper bound. Higher scores indicate better verbal fluency. COWAT score percent change from baseline will be reported. Positive change scores represent better verbal fluency compared to baseline. | Baseline, Visit 3 (Day 113) through Visit 6 (Day 365) | |
Secondary | Number of Headache Days | Number of Headache Days reported in 30-day Baseline Period and Treatment Period Months 1-12 | Baseline and Months 1-12 | |
Secondary | Headache Impact Test (HIT-6) Scores at Visits 2-6 to Measure Effect of Headache in Subject's Life | The Headache Impact Test (HIT-6) is a tool used to measure the impact headaches have on an individual's ability to function on the job, at school, at home and in social situations. The HIT-6 score range is from 36 to 78 with higher scores indicating greater impact (worse outcome). | Collected on Visit 2 (Day 29), 3 (Day 113), Visit 4 (Day 197), Visit 5 (281), and Visit 6 (Day 365) | |
Secondary | MEWT Simple Reaction Time Sub-test Score Percent Change Compared From Baseline to Visits 3-6 | The Mental Efficiency Workload Test (MEWT) is a cognitive functioning scale with four sub-scales (Simple Reaction Time, Running Memory Continuous Performance Task, Matching to Sample, and Mathematical Processing). Each sub-scale has a minimum and maximum values of 1 to 10, 1 indicates the poorest level and 10 indicates the best level of cognitive functioning. MEWT sub-scale score percent change from baseline will be reported. Positive change scores represent better cognitive functioning compared to baseline. | Baseline, Visit 3 (Day 113), Visit 4 (Day 197), Visit 5 (281), and Visit 6 (Day 365) | |
Secondary | MEWT Running Memory Continuous Performance Task Sub-test Score Percent Change Compared From Baseline to Visits 3-6 | The Mental Efficiency Workload Test (MEWT) is a cognitive functioning scale with four sub-scales (Simple Reaction Time, Running Memory Continuous Performance Task, Matching to Sample, and Mathematical Processing). Each sub-scale has a minimum and maximum values of 1 to 10, 1 indicates the poorest level and 10 indicates the best level of cognitive functioning. MEWT sub-scale score percent change from baseline will be reported. Positive change scores represent better cognitive functioning compared to baseline. | Baseline, Visit 3 (Day 113), Visit 4 (Day 197), Visit 5 (281), and Visit 6 (Day 365) | |
Secondary | MEWT Matching to Sample Sub-test Score Percent Change Compared From Baseline to Visits 3-6 | The Mental Efficiency Workload Test (MEWT) is a cognitive functioning scale with four sub-scales (Simple Reaction Time, Running Memory Continuous Performance Task, Matching to Sample, and Mathematical Processing). Each sub-scale has a minimum and maximum values of 1 to 10, 1 indicates the poorest level and 10 indicates the best level of cognitive functioning. MEWT sub-scale score percent change from baseline will be reported. Positive change scores represent better cognitive functioning compared to baseline. | Baseline, Visit 3 (Day 113), Visit 4 (Day 197), Visit 5 (281), and Visit 6 (Day 365) | |
Secondary | MEWT Mathematical Processing Sub-test Score Percent Change Compared From Baseline to Visits 3-6 | The Mental Efficiency Workload Test (MEWT) is a cognitive functioning scale with four sub-scales (Simple Reaction Time, Running Memory Continuous Performance Task, Matching to Sample, and Mathematical Processing). Each sub-scale has a minimum and maximum values of 1 to 10, 1 indicates the poorest level and 10 indicates the best level of cognitive functioning. MEWT sub-scale score percent change from baseline will be reported. Positive change scores represent better cognitive functioning compared to baseline. | Baseline, Visit 3 (Day 113), Visit 4 (Day 197), Visit 5 (281), and Visit 6 (Day 365) | |
Secondary | Subject Estimation of Compliance With Daily Study Drug | Subject estimation of compliance with daily study drug during the study period. Compliance ranges from 0% to 100% with higher percentages indicating greater compliance with study drug. | Collected on Visit 2 (Day 29), 3 (Day 113), Visit 4 (Day 197), and Visit 5 (281) | |
Secondary | Number of Non-Serious Adverse Events Between Groups | 13 Months (Visit 1 to Visit 6) | ||
Secondary | Subject's Migraine Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MSQ) Scores at Baseline, 3, 6, 9 and 12 Months to Measure Subject's Quality of Life | The Migraine-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MSQ) is a scale that measures the impact of migraine across three aspects: role function-restrictive (RR), role function-preventive (RP), and emotional function (EF). Possible scores on each sub-scale range from a 0 to 100 scale such that higher scores indicate better quality of life. | Baseline, Months: 3, 6, 9 and 12 |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT05720819 -
Biofeedback-VR for Treatment of Chronic Migraine
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT06428838 -
Eptinezumab as an Adjunct to Standard of Care for Migraine in an Acute Emergency Context
|
Phase 3 | |
Recruiting |
NCT05517200 -
Pilot Study for a Machine Learning Test for Migraine
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT05891808 -
miR-155 Expression in Episodic and Chronic Migraine
|
||
Completed |
NCT02514148 -
Biobehavioral Physical Therapy Strategies Based on Therapeutic Exercise Applied to Chronic Migraine Patients
|
N/A | |
Enrolling by invitation |
NCT02291380 -
A Study to Evaluate Botulinum Toxin Type A for Injection(HengLi®)for Prophylactic Treatment of Chronic Migraine
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT02122237 -
Cathodal tDCS in Chronic Migraine: Neurophysiological Study and Pilot Therapeutic Trial
|
Phase 3 | |
Withdrawn |
NCT02122744 -
RCT Versus Placebo of rTMSQP Over Visual Cortex for the Prevention of Chronic Migraine
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT02202486 -
Investigation of the Blood-brain and Blood-dura Barrier Durin Migraine Attacks Using MRI
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01709708 -
Use of the Tx360 Nasal Applicator in the Treatment of Chronic Migraine
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT01741246 -
Neuroimaging Studies of Chronic Primary Headaches Using Positron Emission Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01090050 -
Treximet in the Treatment of Chronic Migraine
|
Phase 4 | |
Recruiting |
NCT03507400 -
Introvision for Migraine and Headaches
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04161807 -
Efficacy and Safety of Nerivio™ for Acute Treatment of Migraine in People With Chronic Migraine
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03175263 -
OnabotulinumtoxinA Injections in Chronic Migraine, Targeted to Sites of Pericranial Myofascial Pain
|
N/A | |
Withdrawn |
NCT04353505 -
Intra-arterial Sphenopalatine Ganglion Block for Patients With Refractory Headache
|
Phase 1 | |
Completed |
NCT01667250 -
Non-Invasive Neurostimulation for the Prevention of Chronic Migraine
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT01135784 -
Study of MIGRA-ZEN RELIEF PLUS In the Treatment of Chronic Migraine Headache
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT01496950 -
Double-blind Randomized Clinical Trial of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Chronic Migraine
|
Phase 1 | |
Completed |
NCT00772031 -
NINDS CRC Chronic Migraine Treatment Trial
|
Phase 3 |