Chronic Low-back Pain Clinical Trial
— STOPS-BanglaOfficial title:
Implementation of the Specific Treatment Of Problems of the Spine (STOPS) Approach in Bangladesh: A Prospective Sequential Comparison
NCT number | NCT05880212 |
Other study ID # | HEC22334 |
Secondary ID | |
Status | Recruiting |
Phase | N/A |
First received | |
Last updated | |
Start date | August 1, 2023 |
Est. completion date | June 2026 |
The goal of this implementation trial is to evaluate the clinical outcomes associated with usual physiotherapy care compared to individualized physiotherapy in accordance with the Specific Treatment of Problems of the Spine (STOPS) approach in patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP). The main questions it aims to answer are: - Is the STOPS approach more effective than usual care physiotherapy among patients with CLBP? - Is STOPS physiotherapy cost-effective compared to usual physiotherapy care for patients with CLBP. - Does STOPS training improve the quality of care among Bangladeshi physiotherapists?
Status | Recruiting |
Enrollment | 154 |
Est. completion date | June 2026 |
Est. primary completion date | December 2024 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years to 65 Years |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: Physiotherapists: Qualified physiotherapists and physiotherapy assistants in Bangladesh who are involved in low back pain management and working in either or both trial settings will provide the treatment in phases 1 and 3. To be eligible, physiotherapists and physiotherapy assistants must be willing to participate in all phases of the trial (Phases I, II, and III). They must have completed the organised STOPS training course led by the original Australian developers (Jon Ford and Andrew Hahne), where the assessment and treatment protocols will be taught in Phase II. Patients: 1. A primary complaint of either: 1. low back pain, defined as pain between the inferior costal margin and the inferior gluteal fold with or without referral into the leg(s) or 2. referred leg pain, defined as predominately unilateral posterior leg pain extending below the knee, or anterior thigh pain, with or without back pain 2. Duration of the current episode of primary complaint lasting for greater than 3 months (chronic stage of the injury) 3. Aged between 18 and 65 (inclusive) 4. Fluency in English or Bengali sufficient to complete questionnaires and to enable understanding of the intervention 5. Agreeing to refrain from other interventions wherever possible for the 10-week treatment period of the trial, aside from consultations with medical practitioners, medication, and any exercises already being undertaken Exclusion Criteria: Physiotherapist: Not willing to participate in the study for all 3 phases. Patient: 1. Red flag pathologies such as active cancer under current treatment, risk of spinal fracture, signs of potential infection, and major systemic inflammatory disease. 2. Signs of cauda equina syndrome based on bladder or bowel disturbance and/or imaging 3. Current pregnancy, or childbirth within the last 6 months, as this could impair the ability to undertake exercises, and could also cause back and leg symptoms that are not related to the subgroups under investigation 4. Spinal injections within the last 6 weeks, as we wish to study treatment effects independent of the effects of injections 5. Any history of lumbar spine surgery, as there is already considerable research evaluating the efficacy of post-surgical rehabilitation programs 6. A pain intensity score of less than 2/10 on the numerical pain rating scale due to low severity. 7. Minimal activity limitation, evidenced by a baseline ability to perform ALL of (walk, sit, and stand for one hour or more and no sleep disturbance at night), as we wish to exclude people with low severity. 8. Inability to walk safely, such as severe foot drop causing regular tripping, as the interventions in the trial include walking for most participants. 9. Planned absence of more than one week during the treatment period (such as holidays). |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Bangladesh | Uttara Adhunik Medical College Hospital | Dhaka | Uttara |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Mohammad Ali | Hasna Hena Pain, Physiotherapy and Public Health Research Center (HPRC), La Trobe University |
Bangladesh,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Other | Physiotherapists' self-confidence in low back pain management | Practitioner Self-Confidence Scale. Scored 4-20 where higher scores indicate worse self-confidence towards clinical management of low back pain (worse outcome). | After 26 weeks of phases 1 and 3. After the completion of phase 2 training | |
Other | Physiotherapists' implementation behaviour | Implementation behaviour questionnaire (DIBQ-t) will be used. The questionnaire includes 26 items, with each item rated on a 5-point Likert scale. A total score from 0-100 is derived, with higher scores indicate stronger implementation behaviours. (better outcome) | At the end treating the usual care group, and again at the end of treating the individualised (STOPS) physiotherapy group. | |
Other | Physiotherapists' experiences | Physiotherapists' experiences with implementing usual care and STOPS physiotherapy will be assessed via qualitative semi-structured interviews. | At the end treating the usual care group, and again at the end of treating the individualised (STOPS) physiotherapy group. | |
Other | Treatment effect modifier: Pain type | Pain type (categorised as nociceptive, neuropathic, or nociplastic dominant pain) is being pre-specified as a potential treatment effect modifier on the primary outcome measures. It is hypothesised that patients with neuropathic pain will derive additional benefit of STOPS physiotherapy over usual care. | Effect modifiers are measured at baseline, and their potential impact determined on outcomes at week 5, 10, and 26 | |
Other | Treatment effect modifier: Disability | Disability (measured using the Oswestry Disability Questionnaire - score from 0-100%) is being pre-specified as a potential treatment effect modifier on the primary outcome measures. It is hypothesised that patients with higher disability scores will derive additional benefit from STOPS physiotherapy over usual care. | Effect modifiers are measured at baseline, and their potential impact determined on primary outcomes at week 5, 10, and 26 | |
Other | Treatment effect modifier: Prognosis (Orebro short-form screening questionnaire) | Prognosis (measured on the 0-100 Orebro short-form) is being pre-specified as a potential treatment effect modifier on the primary outcome measures. It is hypothesised that patients with higher Orebro scores will derive additional benefit from STOPS physiotherapy over usual care. | Effect modifiers are measured at baseline, and their potential impact determined on primary outcomes at week 5, 10, and 26 | |
Other | Treatment effect modifier: Duration of symptoms | Duration of symptoms (measured on a continuous scale in weeks) is being pre-specified as a potential treatment effect modifier on the primary outcome measures. It is hypothesised that patients with higher duration of symptoms will derive additional benefit from STOPS physiotherapy over usual care. | Effect modifiers are measured at baseline, and their potential impact determined on primary outcomes at week 5, 10, and 26 | |
Other | Mediator analysis: pain self-efficacy | Mediator analyses will determine the potential mechanisms of action for the individualised (STOPS) physiotherapy, with the following potential mediator identified a-priori:
Does pain self-efficacy (measured on the 0-60 pain self-efficacy scale) mediate the effect of individualised physiotherapy on primary outcomes |
Change in pain self-efficacy from baseline to 10 weeks and 26 weeks | |
Other | Mediator analysis: inflammatory symptoms | Mediator analyses will determine the potential mechanisms of action for the individualised (STOPS) physiotherapy, with the following potential mediator identified a-priori:
Does inflammation (measure on the 0-4 clinical inflammation scale) mediate the effect of individualised physiotherapy on primary outcomes |
Change in clinical inflammation score from baseline to 10 weeks and 26 weeks | |
Primary | Activity limitation | Oswestry Disability Questionnaire (ODI). Measured from 0-100% with lower scores meaning less disability. | Primary endpoint will be 26 weeks post-enrolment. | |
Primary | Back Pain Intensity | 0-10 numerical pain rating scale, average over the previous week. Lower scores indicate a better outcome. | Primary endpoint will be 26 weeks post-enrolment. | |
Primary | Leg Pain Intensity | 0-10 numerical pain rating scale, average over the previous week. Lower scores indicate a better outcome. | Primary endpoint will be 26 weeks post-enrolment. | |
Secondary | Work hours missed | Number of work/housework hours missed during the past 7 days (continuous scale from 0 to 50). Lower score indicated less hours missed (better outcome) | 5, 10, and 26-weeks post enrolment | |
Secondary | Work productivity | 0-10 numerical rating scale of how much pain affected work productivity in the last 7 days. Score 0-10, with lower scores indicating less interference with work productivity. | 5, 10, and 26-weeks post enrolment | |
Secondary | Short-Form Örebro Musculoskeletal Pain Screening Questionnaire (ÖMPSQ-SF) | The total score ranges between 1 and 100, with higher scores indicating a worse outcome. | 5, 10, and 26-weeks post enrolment | |
Secondary | Health-related quality of life (EQ-5D-5L) | Utility scores will be calculated from the EuroQOL-5D-5L, with scores ranging from -0.148 to 0.949 (higher scores indicate better quality of life) | 5, 10, and 26-weeks post enrolment | |
Secondary | Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scales - DASS-21 | The DASS-21 measures symptoms of stress, anxiety and depression, with a total composite score ranging from 0-63 with higher scores indicating more severe symptoms of distress. | 5, 10, and 26-weeks post enrolment | |
Secondary | Pain Self Efficacy | Pain Self Efficacy Questionnaire (PSEQ). A raw score is presented with a range from 0 - 60, where high scores indicate greater levels of confidence in dealing with pain (better outcome). | 5, 10, and 26-weeks post enrolment | |
Secondary | Pain Catastrophizing | Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS). The score ranges from 0 to 52. A higher score denotes more catastrophizing (worse outcome) | 5, 10, and 26-weeks post enrolment | |
Secondary | Sleep quality | Insomnia Severity Index (ISI-7). Score ranges from 0 to 28, with higher scores indicating worse sleep quality (worse outcome) | 5, 10, and 26-weeks post enrolment | |
Secondary | Central Sensitisation symptoms | Central Sensitisation Inventory (CSI-9). Score ranges from 0 to 36, with higher scores indicating more symptoms indicative of potential central sensitisation | 5, 10, and 26-weeks post enrolment | |
Secondary | Inflammatory symptoms | The 4-item clinical inflammation score will measure low back-related inflammatory symptoms. Scores range from 0 to 4, with higher scores indicating more inflammatory symptoms (worse outcome) | 5, 10, and 26-weeks post enrolment | |
Secondary | Treatment Credibility | Treatment credibility questionnaire. Scored 0-10. A higher score indicates greater confidence in the treatment (better outcome). | 5, 10, and 26-weeks post enrolment | |
Secondary | Healthcare utilization | A patient diary will be used to track healthcare service utilization, imaging, and medication. These are recorded descriptively. | 5, 10, and 26-weeks post enrolment | |
Secondary | Participant adherence with treatment | Participant adherence with treatment will be determined via a self-administered 0-10 rating scale, with higher scores indicating greater adherence with treatment (better outcome). | 5, 10, and 26-weeks post enrolment | |
Secondary | Global rating of change | Global change will be measured on a 7-point scale ranging from "very much worse" to "very much better". Scores range from 1-7, with a higher score indicating greater improvement. | 5, 10, and 26-weeks post enrolment | |
Secondary | Satisfaction with treatment | Participants will rate their satisfaction with physiotherapy treatment on a 5-point Likert scale, with ratings from "very satisfied" to "very dissatisfied". | 5, 10, and 26-weeks post enrolment | |
Secondary | Adverse events | Adverse effects events (harmful or unpleasant) will be recorded descriptively in the therapists clinical notes. | 5, 10, and 26-weeks post enrolment | |
Secondary | Qualitative interviews | Semi-structured interviews relating to the patient's experiences with the Usual care and STOPS physiotherapy will be conducted. | 10 weeks post-enrolment | |
Secondary | Pain severity | Brief Pain Inventory. Average of the four pain severity items, scores range from 0-10, lower scores indicate less pain severity. | 5, 10, and 26-weeks post enrolment | |
Secondary | Pain interference | Brief Pain Inventory. Average of the seven pain interference items, scores range from 0-10, lower scores indicate less pain interference. | 5, 10, and 26-weeks post enrolment | |
Secondary | Back Pain Intensity | 0-10 numerical pain rating scale, average over the previous week. Lower scores indicate a better outcome. | 5, 10 and 52-weeks post enrolment | |
Secondary | Leg Pain Intensity | 0-10 numerical pain rating scale, average over the previous week. Lower scores indicate a better outcome. | 5, 10 and 52-weeks post enrolment | |
Secondary | Activity limitation | Oswestry Disability Questionnaire (ODI). Measured from 0-100% with lower scores meaning less disability. | 5, 10 and 52-weeks post enrolment |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Recruiting |
NCT05963451 -
Brain, Psychological and Epigenetic Determinants for Optimizing the Treatment of Chronic Low Back Pain
|
||
Completed |
NCT04283370 -
A Study Protocol Comparing a Home Rehabilitation Program Versus e-Health Program in Low Back Pain
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04824547 -
Evaluation of Long-Term Continuity of Exercises in Low Back Pain Individuals
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04046419 -
In Turkish Version "Health Care Providers and Impairment Relationship Scale (HC-PAIRS)"
|
||
Completed |
NCT04399772 -
COgNitive FuncTional Therapy+ for Chronic Low Back paIn
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05780021 -
Motivational Support Program in Chronic Low Back Pain After Multidisciplinary Functional Rehabilitation
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04555278 -
Combining Non-invasive Brain Stimulation and Exercise to Treat Low Back Pain
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04530071 -
Evaluation of Safety, Tolerability, and Efficacy of CordSTEM-DD in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT06080464 -
Clinician Satisfaction With the VERABANDâ„¢
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT06347328 -
The Benefits of Posterior Joint Infiltration in Chronic Low Back Pain
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT04940715 -
Efficacy of Passive Joint Mobilization vs Mobilization With Movement on Pain Processing in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT04683718 -
A First in Human Feasibility Study to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of the BIOTRONIK Prospera SCS System With HomeStream Remote Management
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05724160 -
Using Non-Weightbearing Stationary Elliptical Machines for Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT06030128 -
Core Stabilization Exercise Therapy in Chronic Lower Back Back Management in Community Dwelling Older Adults
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05846087 -
Mobile App-delivered Sleep Therapy (SleepFix) for Individuals With Chronic Low Back Pain and Insomnia
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT05396014 -
The BEST Trial: Biomarkers for Evaluating Spine Treatments
|
Phase 4 | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT06140862 -
Ankle Spine Syndrome "RAFFET Syndrome II
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05512338 -
Motivation and Adherence to Exercise Recommendations
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05021146 -
Essential Oil for Chronic Low Back Pain
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05690178 -
Deep Tissue Massage in Office Workers With Chronic Low Back Pain
|
N/A |