View clinical trials related to Chronic Low Back Pain.
Filter by:The aim of the study is to evaluate the efficacy of Disci/Rhus toxicodendron. comp.® in patients with chronic low back pain compared to waiting list group, or placebo.
This study will test an experimental drug called OROS® hydromorphone hydrochloride (HCl) (NMED-1077), a once daily opioid analgesic that can relieve pain. A large number of clinical studies have been conducted to test this drug. OROS hydromorphone HCl is currently approved in both the US and Europe to treat chronic pain. The purpose of this study is to compare OROS hydromorphone to placebo to see if it is safe and efficacious.
The purpose of this study is to determine the effectiveness of Chiropractic management for treatment of chronic lower back pain in older adults.
CINS is a large multicentre study which aims to test out the effect of 4 different interventions, namely a brief cognitive intervention (BI), a more extensive cognitive behavioural intervention (CBT), and 2 different nutritional supplementations (seal oil and soy oil) in a population of chronic low back pain patients sicklisted for 2-10 months.
Prior studies showed contradictory results about the best type of TENS in chronic pain pathology. Therefore we want to evaluate the efficacy assessment of TENS on patients with chronic low back pain or chronic lumbo-radiculalgia. The functional ability score is evaluated by the Roland scale at 6 weeks.
This project is to assess the effectiveness of the use of magnets in reducing chronic lumbar pain. I understand that I will wear a flex pad (magnet) during waking hours and keep daily Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain scores to determine if wearing this device will reduce my constant pain. I understand that there are no adverse side effects known from the use of these magnets other than irritation at the site. The identical inactive pads (sham/placebo) have been supplied for use as controls. I will be randomly assigned into one of two groups and I agree to remain blinded as to the specific type of device that I will receive, i.e. active vs. placebo. Dr. Weintraub (principal investigator) will remain blinded throughout the study. I also agree to not break the blind. Dr. Weintraub has stated that as a result of my cooperation and ability to complete the study, I will be guaranteed to either keep my specific device or receive a specific known "active" device gratis. This currently sells commercially for $60.
This study will assess the efficacy and the duration of efficacy of Botulinum toxin A (Botox®) injected into the lumbar paraspinal muscles for reducing pain and disability in subjects suffering from chronic low back pain of six months duration or longer and arising from an identifiable muscle strain injury or back trauma. The treatment modality and techniques used are based on a successful prior 4 month open-labeled pilot study done by this research group, but will employ a prospective double-blind, randomized, cross-over design to control for any placebo or mechanical trigger-point injection effects. Subjects will also be assessed for a longer duration to better define the duration of efficacy.
Surgical methods offered to patients with chronic low back pain are controversial. In addition, new and expensive treatment methods like total disc replacemet (TDR) are a challenge for the health care services. At present, ongoing randomized studies in both Europe and USA are comparing TDR to fusion. However, to our knowledge, no randomized trials have compared TDR to non-surgical treatment. The aim of the present study is to evaluate the effect of a comprehensive and structured non-surgical treatment with TDR surgery in patients with chronic low back pain and localized degenerative disc changes. Main hypothesis: There is no difference in treatment effect between surgery with lumbar total disc prosthesis and a multidisciplinary rehabilitation program measured by Oswestry Disability Index after 1 and 2 years. Secondary hypothesis: There is no difference in cost - effectiveness between surgery with lumbar disc prosthesis and a multidisciplinary rehabilitation program after 1 and 2 years.
The primary purpose of this study is to determine the effectiveness of two psychological techniques in chronic low back pain patients treated in hospital pain clinics. The techniques are: cognitive behavioral treatment and mindfulness based stress reduction (MBSR). This is a multiple site project in which patients come from 16 different pain clinics throughout Spain. The control group is formed by patients under usual medical treatment at pain clinics. The two intervention groups also receive usual medical treatment at pain clinics plus one psychological therapy treatment. The sample size is 330 subjects.
The purpose of this study is to determine whether acupuncture is effective and safe in the treatment of chronic LBP.