Clinical Trial Details
— Status: Completed
Administrative data
NCT number |
NCT05044663 |
Other study ID # |
ILBS-Cirrhosis-43 |
Secondary ID |
|
Status |
Completed |
Phase |
|
First received |
|
Last updated |
|
Start date |
September 18, 2021 |
Est. completion date |
February 28, 2023 |
Study information
Verified date |
April 2023 |
Source |
Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, India |
Contact |
n/a |
Is FDA regulated |
No |
Health authority |
|
Study type |
Observational
|
Clinical Trial Summary
Patients with chronic liver disease (CLD) are at risk of developing clinically significant
portal hypertension (CSPH). In the Baveno VI consensus a new term "compensated advanced
chronic liver disease (cACLD)'' has been proposed to better reflect that the spectrum of
severe fibrosis and cirrhosis is a continuum in asymptomatic patients. Liver stiffness by TE
is sufficient to suspect cACLD in asymptomatic subjects with known causes of CLD. TE values
<10 kPa in the absence of other known clinical signs rule out cACLD; values between 10 and 15
kPa are suggestive of cACLD but need further test for confirmation; values >15 kPa are highly
suggestive of cACLD. Patients with a liver stiffness <20 kPa and with a platelet count
>150,000 have a < 5 % risk of having varices requiring treatment, and can avoid screening
endoscopy. SSM can also predict the presence of CSPH and varices requiring treatment. Some
studies have shown superiority of splenic stiffness over liver stiffness in predicting
varices requiring treatment likely attributable to the better performance of SSM compared
with LSM in more severe portal hypertension because it reflects better the hemodynamic
component of portal hypertension. However, there are few studies on NAFLD and most are on
viral hepatitis related cACLD. Moreover, very few studies are published on splenic stiffness
from Indian subcontinent. Similarly baseline HVPG is an important predictor of disease
progression patients of NAFLD related cACLD, but requires invasive hepatic vein
catheterization. Hence, we intend to do the study assessing diagnostic utility of splenic and
liver stiffness in predicting varices needing treatment in NAFLD related cACLD and compare
from other noninvasive markers and its correlation with HVPG.
Description:
Aim - to study the diagnostic accuracy of liver stiffness and splenic stiffness in predicting
esophageal varices needing treatment in patients of NASH related cACLD.
Primary objective:
To assess the utility of liver stiffness and splenic stiffness in making a composite score to
predict presence of esophageal varices needing treatment in patients of NASH related cACLD.
Secondary objectives:
1. To study the correlation of liver stiffness and splenic stiffness with grade of
esophageal varices.
2. To study utility of other noninvasive scores, such as Baveno VI criteria, expanded
Baveno VI criteria, LSPS (LS x spleen diameter / platelet ratio score), platelet count
to spleen diameter ratio (PSR), AST/ALT ratio, APRI, FIB-4, in predicting presence of
esophageal varices needing treatment in patients of NASH related cACLD.
3. To study utility of noninvasive tests in predicting presence of esophageal varices
needing treatment in patients of HBV or HCV related cACLD.
4. To study correlation of liver and splenic stiffness with HVPG and MELD score in patients
of NASH related cACLD.
(b) Methodology:
- Study population: Consecutive patients of NASH related cACLD (Liver Stiffness ≥10
kPa).
Consecutive patients of viral hepatitis (HBV / HCV) related cACLD during the study period
meeting the inclusion and exclusion criteria will be taken as control.
- Study design: An observational cross-sectional study
- Study period: 15 months
- Sample size with justification: This is a cross-sectional prevalence study. All the
patients meeting the inclusion and exclusion criteria during the period October 2021 to
December 2022 undergoing liver stiffness, splenic stiffness and upper gastrointestinal
endoscopy will be included in the study.
- Intervention: Patients of NASH related cACLD and controls (viral hepatitis related
cACLD) will undergo upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, liver and splenic stiffness
measurement, ultrasound abdomen, Doppler study and routine laboratory tests. Varices
needing treatment will be defined by Baveno VI criteria as medium or large size
esophageal varices or the presence of high-risk stigmata findings (red wale marks,
cherry red spots). HVPG will be done in the patients only if clinically indicated.
- Monitoring and assessment: Transient Elastography will be performed in morning hours
using the FibroScan apparatus (Echosens), which consists of a 5-MHz ultrasound
transducer probe mounted on the axis of a vibrator. The tip of the transducer (M-or XL
probe) will be placed perpendicularly in the intercostal space, with the patient lying
in dorsal decubitus position with the right arm in the maximal abduction. The operator
will choose a liver portion within the right liver lobe, at least 6-cm thick and free of
large vascular structures, and the gallbladder. Liver stiffness (LS) will be measured on
a cylinder of hepatic tissue of 1 cm of diameter and 4 cm of length. For assessing the
splenic stiffness (SS), the patient will be in supine position with left arm in maximum
abduction. Ultrasonography will be used to identify and locate the spleen parenchyma, to
choose the right place for SS measurement, and to measure the spleen diameter (long
axis). A median value of 10 successful acquisitions, expressed in kPa, will be kept as a
representative of the LS and SS measurements. The LS and SS measurement failure will be
recorded when no value will be obtained after at least 10 shots. The results will be
considered unreliable in the following circumstances: valid shots fewer than 10, success
rate < 60%, or interquartile range / LS >30 %. Liver and splenic stiffness, LSPS score
(LS measurement × spleen diameter / platelet count), Platelet count to spleen diameter
ratio (PSR) will be calculated. Patient will also undergo upper gastrointestinal
endoscopy. HVPG will be done if indicated.
- Statistical Analysis: Data will be entered into Microsoft Excel and will be analyzed
using SPSS version 22. Stastical test applied will be student t test or Mann Whitney
test to compare continuous data among patients with and without high-risk esophageal
varices. Categorical data will be analyzed using Chi square test or Fisher Exact test
whichever applicable. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression will be applied
for finding the predictor of esophageal varices needing treatment. Composite score model
will be formed using liver stiffness, splenic stiffness and radiological / laboratory
tests to predict esophageal varices needing treatment keeping negative predictive value
at least 0.95. Diagnostic test will be applied to find the cutoff value for liver
stiffness and splenic stiffness by using AUROC. The correlation of liver and splenic
stiffness with HVPG will be studied with Pearson's correlation coefficient.
- Adverse effects: No
- Stopping rule of study: No
Expected outcome of the project:
1. Utility of liver and splenic stiffness will be assessed to form a composite score to
predict presence of esophageal varices needing treatment in patients of NASH related
cACLD.
2. Correlation of the liver and splenic stiffness with HVPG in patients of NASH related
cACLD will be assessed.
3. Utility of various noninvasive tests will be assessed in predicting presence of
esophageal varices needing treatment in patients of HBV or HCV related cACLD.