Chondrosarcoma Clinical Trial
Official title:
Phase II Clinical Trial of Low-intervention Using Hypofractionated Protontherapy in Chordomas and Chondrosarcomas of the Skull Base
The project is planned as a phase II clinical trial with a low level of intervention, for the prospective evaluation of the clinical results of radical or adjuvant treatment by proton therapy in chordomas and chondrosarcomas of the skull base using hypofractionation schemes in 5 fractions, with the aim of consolidating the scientific evidence that exists with high-precision techniques with photons, increasing this evidence by adapting this treatment scheme to the proton technique. In addition, a cross-sectional prospective evaluation of the quality parameters of the dosimetry of hypofractionated proton therapy and an evaluation of the quality of life of these patients will be carried out. - Primary Objective 1. - Toxicity according to CTCAE-v5 criteria 2. - Local control determined by Magnetic Resonance with Gadolinium. - Secondary Objectives 1. To evaluate the quality of life of the patients, 3 months after the end of the treatment, using a specific questionnaire. 2. To evaluate the dosimetric benefits using techniques that allow an improvement in the dose gradient, improving the coverage of the CTV (Clinical Tumor Volume) and decreasing the dose in surrounding risk organs.
Chordomas are rare, slow-growing tumors that develop from remnants of the embryonic notochord in the clivus, sacrococcygeal region, and mobile spine. Although the frequency of distant metastases is low, these tumors are locally aggressive and have an extremely high local recurrence rate. Similarly, chondrosarcomas have a potential for slow growth with a tendency to recur locally. They usually arise at the base of the skull or spine from mesenchymal cells or from the primitive cartilaginous matrix. Although chordomas are considered clinically more aggressive than chondrosarcomas, their tendency to settle in similar anatomical locations and the high risk of local recurrence of both diagnostic entities have conditioned a similar therapeutic approach. Standard treatment includes surgical resection that is as radical as possible; however, complete resection is feasible in less than 50% of cases, as it can be associated with significant postoperative morbidity and mortality, since these tumors frequently invade or contact critical structures (vascular, cranial nerves or spinal roots). Therefore, adjuvant or exclusive irradiation have a fundamental role in long-term local control. Therefore, optimization of the efficacy of radiotherapy represents a critical step in the management of these patients. Given their tendency to local recurrence, chordomas require the prescription of high doses for their local control, which are associated with potentially critical adverse effects if conventional photon irradiation techniques are used. The α/β ratio, according to the linear-quadratic model, represents a measure of the sensitivity of a tumor to variable dose-per-fraction regimens. Tumors with a low coefficient (<4 Gy) are considered more sensitive to the effects of hypofractionated treatments, which involve the administration of higher irradiation doses per session in fewer sessions. After analyzing historical studies and institutional experiences, different publications suggest that the α/β ratio of chordomas is 2.45 Gy and it is assumed to be very similar for chondrosarcomas. Therefore, the administration of hypofractionated schedules could be associated with an increase in the sensitivity of these tumors to radiotherapy treatment. Conventional normofractionated radiation therapy administered adjuvantly after resection has historically been used with median doses of 60 to 66.6 Gy to 2 Gy per fraction, offering 5-year local control rates ranging from 23% to 50%. Technological advances in the field of image-guided intensity-modulated radiotherapy have led to an improvement in the precision of treatments, allowing the dose for chordomas to be scaled up to 76 Gy (the biological equivalent dose (BED) taking into account the α/ β of 2.45Gy is 138 Gy) and for chondrosarcomas up to 70 Gy (BED of 127 Gy), achieving and improvement in 5-year local control rates of 65% and 88%, respectively for each diagnostic entity. Although promising, the use of high-dose photons is limited by the lower ability to protect nearby critical organs. Therefore, particle therapy (protons and carbon ions) has established its role as a standard technique, due to its potential to achieve greater conformation and better dose distribution. The main studies with proton therapy for these tumors appear to show statistically significant results in favor of increased survival when dose escalation above 70 Gy to 2 Gy per fraction (BED >127 Gy) is compared with techniques using irradiation with intensity modulated photons (IMRT). The 5-year local control rate is above 60% for chordomas and above 80% for chondrosarcomas with moderate toxicity and preservation of critical structures. However, the limited availability of these facilities together with the administration of very long treatment schedules, often of seven weeks or more, poses a significant problem for patients and remains an obstacle to the widespread adoption of this technique as a therapeutic standard. Due to all these limitations and the important advances in terms of precision and dose distribution, the concept of hypofractionation has gained weight within radiation oncology thanks to its potential benefits in terms of reducing the duration of treatment and costs. The first publications on the hypofractionated treatment of chordomas, mainly of the skull base, go hand in hand with photon radiosurgery systems, using dedicated equipment such as the GammaKnife or CyberKnife. In the last 15 years, single-dose or hypofractionated treatment schemes have been explored as a therapeutic alternative to escalate the dose, improve the protection of organs at risk and reduce treatment time. Some studies have evaluated single fraction stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) in the management of chordomas and chondrosarcomas mainly located in the skull base with results comparable to proton therapy. The most relevant studies included series of 22 to 71 patients treated with median doses of SRS ranging from 12.7-24 Gy (BED 78.5-259 Gy). Five-year local control rates ranged from 21-85%, depending on the doses prescribed (higher doses, ≥15 Gy, were associated with better relapse-free survival). However, based on the experience of Kano et al., for single-dose treatments, irradiation of volumes > 7 cc is associated with a significant worsening of tumor control. It is essential to emphasize that the tumor volumes that are usually treated in chordomas and chondrosarcomas, both at the base of the skull and, to a greater extent, in the spine, exceed, in most cases, 7 cc, since the entire clivus or affected vertebral bodies must be included in the majority of cases, in order to reduce the risk of marginal recurrence. For this reason, the role of single-dose radiosurgery loses weight in favor of hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (HFSRT), which has theoretical advantages compared to single-dose treatment in volumes greater than 7 cc, including a lower risk of radiation-induced toxicity in nearby critical structures and the possibility of safely treating larger tumor volumes with multiple fractions (usually 5). Several publications evaluate HFSRT for chordomas and chondrosarcomas. The number of cases included in these series ranged from 9 to 24 patients. The median follow-up was 24 to 46 months. Most patients were treated with 5 fractions with a prescription dose of 24-43 Gy (BED 52.7-194 Gy), depending on histology and therapeutic setting (radical, adjuvant, or reirradiation). The best local control results at 3 and 5 years obtained were 90 and 60% for chordomas, respectively, and 100% for chondrosarcomas. The most widely used regimen was 37.5 Gy in 5 fractions of 7.5 Gy (BED 152.3 Gy equivalent to 80 Gy at 2 Gy per fraction) for chordomas and 35 Gy in 5 fractions of 7 Gy per fraction in Chondrosarcomas (BED of 135 Gy equivalent to 74 Gy at 2 Gy per fraction). The toxicity described in most of these studies does not register worse data than those published with conventional fractionation in proton therapy, when it comes to primary treatments. This growing evidence, which is described as a justification for the implementation of hypofractionated regimens, demonstrates that the standard implementation of these therapeutic modalities in patients who meet the appropriate characteristics can suppose a great advantage to improve accessibility and comfort for patients, potentially reduce acute side effects during treatment and increase therapeutic cost-efficiency. Proton therapy, today, remains a limited resource, with only 99 facilities currently in operation worldwide in 2021, of which two new centers are in Spain, active since 2020. In addition, many patients must travel to access to this technology, so reducing the time a patient is away from home and their support network can have significant financial and psychosocial implications. Added to all this are the aforementioned radiobiological advantages of high doses per fraction, in tumors with a low α/β coefficient, such as chordomas and chondrosarcomas. That is why the implementation of hypofractionation within proton therapy has gained weight in the last 10 years, increasing the number of publications in this regard, which reflects the interest in this treatment approach. Cao et al. presented a dosimetric study comparing different hypofractionated stereotactic treatment schemes in the treatment of intracranial tumors > 3 cm in greatest diameter. Treatment plans with GammaKnife, Cyberknife and VMAT were generated compared with proton therapy plans with or without modulated intensity. The authors suggest that proton therapy represents a desirable alternative to advanced photon techniques for treating large, irregularly shaped volumes near critical structures, such as chordomas and chondrosarcomas. For all these reasons, a fundamental and necessary challenge today consists of increasing the scientific evidence of hypofractionated schemes in the treatment of chordomas and chondrosarcomas, adapting them to protontherapy, to increase clinical experience and combine the benefits of high-precision hypofractionated treatments to the dosimetric advantages of protontherapy (ability to treat volumes > 7 cc with a homogeneity index close to 1 and a decrease in the integral dose in healthy tissue). In summary, considering the growing scientific evidence available from other studies on different therapeutic entities, we have a solid basis to reinforce hypofractionation protocols with protontherapy in the treatment of chordomas and chondrosarcomas. The research project is based on the performance of a phase II clinical trial with a low level of intervention, which consists of the prospective evaluation of the clinical and radiological response after the administration of a treatment using radical or adjuvant hypofractionated proton therapy in 5 sessions in patients diagnosed with chordoma or chondrosarcoma of the skull base. In addition, a cross-sectional evaluation of the quality parameters of the dosimetry of the hypofractionated proton therapy treatments administered to the patients included in the study and an evaluation of the quality of life by means of specific questionnaires, 3 months after treatment, will be carried out. ;
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Recruiting |
NCT05039801 -
IACS-6274 With or Without Bevacizumab and Paclitaxel for the Treatment of Advanced Solid Tumors
|
Phase 1 | |
Recruiting |
NCT04553692 -
Phase 1a/1b Study of Aplitabart (IGM-8444) Alone or in Combination in Participants With Relapsed, Refractory, or Newly Diagnosed Cancers
|
Phase 1 | |
Recruiting |
NCT06029218 -
Analysis of the Toxicity and Efficacy of Daily 1 vs 2 Beam Proton Therapy
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT04040205 -
Abemaciclib for Bone and Soft Tissue Sarcoma With Cyclin-Dependent Kinase (CDK) Pathway Alteration
|
Phase 2 | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT06029478 -
Understanding Engagement Trends in Chondrosarcoma Clinical Trials
|
||
Completed |
NCT01553539 -
Therapeutic Angiotensin-(1-7) in Treating Patients With Metastatic Sarcoma That Cannot Be Removed By Surgery
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT00004241 -
17-N-Allylamino-17-Demethoxygeldanamycin in Treating Patients With Advanced Epithelial Cancer, Malignant Lymphoma, or Sarcoma
|
Phase 1 | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT04521686 -
Study of LY3410738 Administered to Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors With IDH1 or IDH2 Mutations
|
Phase 1 | |
Recruiting |
NCT03715933 -
Phase 1 Study of INBRX-109 in Subjects With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors Including Sarcomas
|
Phase 1 | |
Completed |
NCT02496741 -
Metformin And Chloroquine in IDH1/2-mutated Solid Tumors
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT04028479 -
The Registry of Oncology Outcomes Associated With Testing and Treatment
|
||
Terminated |
NCT00543712 -
A Study of PRO95780 in Patients With Advanced Chondrosarcoma (APM4171g)
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT00464620 -
Trial of Dasatinib in Advanced Sarcomas
|
Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT04278781 -
AG-120 in People With IDH1 Mutant Chondrosarcoma
|
Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT04055220 -
Efficacy and Safety of Regorafenib as Maintenance Therapy After First-line Treatment in Patients With Bone Sarcomas
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT04673942 -
A Study of AdAPT-001 in Subjects With Sarcoma and Refractory Solid Tumors
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT01609179 -
IPI-926 Extension Protocol for Continuation of Treatment With IPI-926
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01560260 -
Linsitinib in Treating Patients With Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors
|
Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT06387485 -
A Study to Evaluate the Utilization of 3D Printed Models in Pre-Operative Planning
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02073994 -
Study of Orally Administered AG-120 in Subjects With Advanced Solid Tumors, Including Glioma, With an IDH1 Mutation
|
Phase 1 |