Clinical Trials Logo

Cholecystitis, Acute clinical trials

View clinical trials related to Cholecystitis, Acute.

Filter by:

NCT ID: NCT05502159 Completed - Cholecystitis Clinical Trials

M-Tapa Block vs External Oblique Intercostal Block for Laparoscopic Cholesistectomy

Start date: August 23, 2022
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Ultrasound (US)-guided Modified Perichondral Approach Thoracoabdominal Nerve (M-TAPA) block is a novel block that provides effective analgesia in the anterior and lateral abdominal walls after laparoscopic surgery, and local anesthetic is applied only to the lower side of the perichondral surface. M-TAPA block is a good alternative for analgesia of the upper dermatome levels and the abdominal lateral wall and may be an opioid-sparing strategy with good quality recovery in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery. US-guided External oblique intercostal block (EOB) is a block performed by injection of local anesthetic between the external and internal oblique muscles. This block provides abdominal analgesia between T6-T10 levels. There are studies in the literature showing that it provides effective analgesia. However, there is no study comparing M-TAPA and EOB yet. In this study, our aim is to compare the effectiveness of US-guided M-TAPA block and EOB for postoperative analgesia management after laparoscopic cholecystectomy surgery. Our primary aim is to compare patient recovery scores (QoR15 Turkish version), our secondary aim is to compare postoperative pain scores (24-hour NRS), postoperative rescue analgesic use (opioid), and opioid-related side effects (allergic reaction, nausea, vomiting).

NCT ID: NCT05267860 Completed - Clinical trials for Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

The Efficacy and Safety of Using Prophylactic Abdominal Drainage After Cholecystectomy

Start date: February 1, 2022
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Investigators want to assess the safety and efficacy of using abdominal drainage with not using any drainage, by estimating different outcomes after laparoscopic cholecystectomy for different reasons. Patients are seen at the Accident and Emergency Department or in the surgical wards at Aleppo University Hospital (AUH) over 12 months period.

NCT ID: NCT05179629 Completed - Cholecystitis Clinical Trials

M-Tapa Block for Laparoscopic Cholesistectomy

Start date: January 6, 2022
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Modified Perichondral Approach Thoracoabdominal Nerve (M-TAPA) block is a novel block that provides effective analgesia of the anterior and lateral thoracoabdominal walls during laparoscopic surgery, in which local anesthetic is applied only to the lower side of the perichondral surface. M-TAPA block is a good alternative for analgesia of the upper dermatome levels and the abdominal lateral wall, and may be an opioid-sparing strategy with satisfactory quality improvement in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery.

NCT ID: NCT05164159 Completed - Acute Cholecystitis Clinical Trials

The Comparison of Hemodynamic Effects Between Remimazolam-remifentanil and Propofol-remifentanil in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

Start date: February 20, 2022
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

This study is conducted to determine whether the occurrence of hypotension is reduced by the combined use of remimazolam and remifentanil compared to the conventional combination use of propofol and remifentanil. Patients enrolled in the study are infused continuously with either propofol or remimazolam from the start of anesthesia to the end of surgery.

NCT ID: NCT05153031 Completed - Acute Cholecystitis Clinical Trials

Impact of Percutaneous Cholecystostomy in the Management of Acute Cholecystitis.

Start date: January 1, 2016
Phase:
Study type: Observational

Percutaneous cholecystostomy (PC) is an increasingly performed procedure for acute cholecystitis (AC), safe and less invasive than laparoscopic cholecystectomy, very useful in selected patients (severe comorbidities, not suitable for surgery/general anesthesia,..) The investigators conduct a retrospective observational study. Period: 2016-2021. Inclusion criteria: Patients treated with PC for AC. Tokyo guidelines TG13/18 the investigators algorithm to treat AC. The characteristics of the sample undergoing Percutaneous Cholecystostomy, main indications, evolution and clinical results were reported in an initial observational study. Subsequently, a retrospective analytical study was designed to compare various cohorts: lithiasic vs alithiasic Acute Cholecystitis, elective vs emergency surgery or management with PC alone.

NCT ID: NCT05135299 Completed - Clinical trials for Acute Calculous Cholecystitis

Complications in Acute Calculous Cholecystitis

Start date: January 2011
Phase:
Study type: Observational

Acute calculous cholecystitis (ACC) is the second most frequent surgical condition in emergency departments, the complication rate of ACC is 8-20%, and the mortality rate is 0.5-6% in recent series. The Tokyo Guidelines (TG) advocate for different risk factors and initial treatments of ACC with no clear evidence that all patients will benefit from them. The objective of the study is to identify the risk factors for complications in ACC. It is a retrospective cohort study conducted from January 2011 to December 2016 in a single center with a dedicated surgical emergency unit in a Metropolitan University Hospital in Barcelona, Spain. The analysis of the data was finished in March 2020. The study candidates comprised 963 consecutive patients with a diagnosis of ACC according to the TG18 and/or received a diagnosis of ACC in the Pathology report in those that an emergent cholecystectomy was performed. The study case definition was a 'Pure Acute Cholecystitis' (pure ACC); therefore, patients with any other concomitant diagnosis potentially influencing outcome (Postoperative cholecystitis, Acute Cholangitis, Acute Pancreatitis, Incidental Cholecystectomy, Acalculous Cholecystitis, Chronic Cholecystitis/Persistent Colic, Post-endoscopic retrograde pancreato-cholangiography, or Neoplasia) were excluded from the final analysis. Variables: Primary data were available from a prospective database maintained in File Maker v.12 (Mountainview, CA, USA), which included basic demographic data, type of interventions, sex, days of admission, and complications. Every record was completed by browsing the electronic patient record, adding laboratory and microbiology data, as well as antibiotic therapy, duration of procedure, additional procedures, and grade of acute cholecystitis according to the TG18 diagnostic criteria. Preoperative comorbidities were assessed using the Charlson Comorbidity Index and surgical risk by ASA classification. The type of initial treatment was classified as Surgical Treatment (Cholecystectomy either by laparoscopy or laparotomy) or Non-Surgical Treatment, which was either percutaneous cholecystostomy or intravenous antibiotics alone. The main outcome measure was the mortality after the diagnostic of ACC. In the patients that were discharged, 30 days after the diagnosis, if the patients was not discharged in 30 days, at any time during the same admission. Interventions: All patients received intravenous antibiotic therapy from the moment the diagnosis was formulated, according to a fixed protocol. Ultrasound-guided cholecystostomy was performed percutaneously with an 8-Fr catheter (SKATER ™, Argon Medical Devices, Rochester, NY, USA) by either transhepatic or transperitoneal insertion, at the discretion of the radiologist. Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy was performed according to the French technique using 4 trochars. The content of the gallbladder was evacuated by Veress needle puncture when necessary. Statistical Analysis: The discrimination power of the model was assessed by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and was compared with the DeLong method. Legal and Ethical considerations This study was approved by the clinical research ethical committee of the Hospital del Mar and was classified as a non-clinical trial.

NCT ID: NCT05125653 Completed - Cholecystitis Clinical Trials

Indocyanine Green Fluorescent Cholangiography and Intraoperative Angiography With Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

Start date: January 1, 2020
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

This was a double blinded, randomized, controlled trial involved patients underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy

NCT ID: NCT05041686 Completed - Clinical trials for Cholecystitis, Acute

Usefulness of the CADISS® System for the Cleavage of Severe Adhesions in Cholecystectomy

Start date: May 30, 2019
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Acute cholecystitis is the most common complication of cholelithiasis. Acute cholecystitis is inflammation of the gallbladder that develops over hours, usually due to an obstruction of the cystic duct by a gallstone. Removal of the gallbladder (Cholecystectomy) is the only definitive treatment for acute cholecystitis, with laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) considered the gold standard. Serious complications that may occur with laparoscopic cholecystectomy, including bile duct injury, bile leaks, bleeding, and bowel injury, result in part from the anatomy, disease related pathology and structural misidentification due to inflammatory process (Gupta 2019). The CADISS® System, Chemically Assisted mechanical DISSection, is intended for the selective detachment of pathological tissue layers and/or fibrotic tissues in various surgical procedures without using cutting instruments. It is based on the property of the drug mesna (Sodium 2-mercaptoethane sulfonate) to cleave the disulfide bonds responsible for the adherence of pathological tissues and for the strength of fibrosis. This study is a prospective, multi-sites, open label, single cohort clinical trial evaluating the use of CADISS® system to facilitate dissection of severe adhesions in cholecystectomy and to allow better identification of different structure.

NCT ID: NCT04995380 Completed - Acute Cholecystitis Clinical Trials

Validation and Comparison of Scores for Prediction of RIsk for Post-operative Major Morbidity After Cholecystectomy in Acute Calculous Cholecystitis (SPRIMACC)

SPRIMACC
Start date: September 1, 2021
Phase:
Study type: Observational

The SPRIMACC study is a prospective multicenter observational study with the primary endpoint to prospectively validate the Chole-Risk score in predicting a complicated postoperative course (post-operative major complications (Clavien-Dindo>=3a), length of stay (LOS) > 10 days or need of readmission within 30 days from the discharge) in patients undergoing Early Cholecystectomy (EC) for Acute Calculous Cholecystitis (ACC). The secondary endpoints of the study are to prospectively validate and compare other wellknown risk prediction models (the POSSUM/P-POSSUM score, the Modified Frailty Index (mFI), the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score and the APACHE II score) in predicting a complicated post-operative course in patients undergoing EC.

NCT ID: NCT04979936 Completed - Acute Cholecystitis Clinical Trials

Early Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Versus Percutaneous Cholecystostomy in Grade II Acute Cholecystitis Guidelines

PC
Start date: January 1, 2016
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The aim of this study is to compare between early laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus percutaneous cholecystostomy followed by delayed interval laparoscopic cholecystectomy as regards the operative and postoperative complications