Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT03035292
Other study ID # 159569
Secondary ID REC17/EE/0010
Status Completed
Phase
First received
Last updated
Start date February 1, 2017
Est. completion date September 1, 2017

Study information

Verified date January 2023
Source Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Observational

Clinical Trial Summary

Sensitivity and specificity of current screening methods for childhood cataracts is poor. This results in delayed diagnosis and management which can decrease the visual prognosis following cataract surgery. It also results in many false positives with resultant unnecessary healthcare costs in specialist paediatric ophthalmology services. This study compares the accuracy of cataract screening using infrared light compared to white light in a population of children attending eye clinic.


Description:

All babies born in the United Kingdom (UK) undergo eye screening to enable the early diagnosis and management of childhood cataract, a treatable but potentially blinding condition affecting 1 in 2000 newborns. The current technique involves the assessment of the "red-reflex" - the orange/red glow in the pupil seen during ophthalmoscopy (or flash photography) due to reflectance of light from the back of the eye. In reality, testing can be technically difficult because the pupil constricts to light during the examination and, particularly in babies of Asian and Afro-Caribbean ancestry, the red-reflex can be dim due to the effect of ocular pigmentation. As a result less than 50% of congenital cataracts are currently identified up by screening. Early visual experience is required for good visual development and a delay in the surgical management of cataracts results in sub-optimal visual development and visual impairment. There are theoretical advantages to using Infrared (IR) light rather than white light to assess choroidal reflectance, including avoidance of pupil constriction. The study aims to determine if the assessment of the IR-reflex, using a prototype device, rather than the red-reflex, using a direct ophthalmoscope, improves screening accuracy in the detection of ocular media opacities in a pathology enriched childhood cohort. Eligible children attending an eye clinic will be screened for cataract by a medical student (masked to the pathology) using the existing standard direct ophthalmoscope technique for red-reflex assessment and IR-reflex assessment using the prototype imaging device. A gold standard examination by an ophthalmologist will follow the screening examinations. Sensitivity and specificity of each screening technique will be calculated and compared.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 110
Est. completion date September 1, 2017
Est. primary completion date September 1, 2017
Accepts healthy volunteers Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Gender All
Age group 1 Month to 5 Years
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria: - All children between 1 month and 5 years of age attending paediatric ophthalmology clinic Exclusion Criteria: - Parents / carers with poor conversant English

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Diagnostic Test:
Red-reflex assessment
The red reflex was examined in the standard manner using direct ophthalmoscope by medical student examiner
Infrared-reflex assessment
The infrared reflex was examined using a modified smart phone camera by a medical student examiner

Locations

Country Name City State
United Kingdom Addenbrooke's Hospital Cambridge Cambridgeshire

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust

Country where clinical trial is conducted

United Kingdom, 

References & Publications (3)

Duret A, Humphries R, Ramanujam S, Te Water Naude A, Reid C, Allen LE. The infrared reflex: a potential new method for congenital cataract screening. Eye (Lond). 2019 Dec;33(12):1865-1870. doi: 10.1038/s41433-019-0509-9. Epub 2019 Jul 2. — View Citation

Mndeme FG, Mmbaga BT, Kim MJ, Sinke L, Allen L, Mgaya E, Bastawrous A, MacLeod D, Burton MJ, Gilbert C, Bowman R. Red reflex examination in reproductive and child health clinics for early detection of paediatric cataract and ocular media disorders: cross-sectional diagnostic accuracy and feasibility studies from Kilimanjaro, Tanzania. Eye (Lond). 2021 May;35(5):1347-1353. doi: 10.1038/s41433-020-1019-5. Epub 2020 Jun 16. — View Citation

Rahi JS, Dezateux C. National cross sectional study of detection of congenital and infantile cataract in the United Kingdom: role of childhood screening and surveillance. The British Congenital Cataract Interest Group. BMJ. 1999 Feb 6;318(7180):362-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.318.7180.362. — View Citation

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Results of Red-reflex and Infrared-reflex Tests Compared to Gold Standard True positives: the number of eyes with cataract correctly identified True negatives: the number of eyes without cataract correctly identified False positives: the number of eyes without cataracts incorrectly identified as having cataract False negatives positives: the number of eyes with cataract incorrectly identified as not having cataract 1 day
Primary Sensitivity and Specificity of Red-reflex and Infrared-reflex Testing Sensitivity (percentage of eyes with cataract correctly identified) and specificity (percentage of eyes without cataract correctly identified) of red-reflex and infrared-reflex testing in percentage terms with 95% Confidence Intervals. Sensitivity and specificity are recorded as a percentage, with 100% indicating best accuracy. 1 day
Secondary Results of Red-reflex and Infrared-reflex Tests Compared to Gold Standard Stratified by Ethnicity True positives: the number of eyes with cataract correctly identified in caucasian children's eyes and in BAME children's eyes. True negatives: the number of eyes without cataract correctly identified in caucasian children's eyes and in BAME children's eyes. False positives: the number of eyes without cataract incorrectly identified as having cataract in caucasian children's eyes and in BAME children's eyes. False negatives: the number of eyes with cataract incorrectly identified as not having cataract in caucasian children's eyes and in BAME children's eyes. 1 day
Secondary Sensitivity and Specificity of Red-reflex and Infrared-reflex Testing Stratified by Ethnicity Sensitivity (percentage of eyes with cataract correctly identified) and specificity (percentage of eyes without cataract correctly identified) of red-reflex and infrared-reflex testing in percentage terms with 95% Confidence Intervals. Sensitivity and specificity are recorded as a percentage, with 100% indicating best accuracy. 1 day
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT03692728 - Increased Risk of ADHD Among Children With Bilateral Congenital Cataracts
Completed NCT03640780 - Practical Pattern of Surgical Timing of Childhood Cataract in China