Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Summary

The goal of this study is to determine if rapid outpatient evaluation vs hospitalization management is the best strategy (based on patient-centered measures and safe, equitable, and efficient resource use) for evaluating patients with acute chest pain who are at moderate risk for acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Patients will be randomized in the Emergency Department to either an outpatient evaluation (CARE-CP) or hospitalization evaluation for their symptoms.


Clinical Trial Description

Current care patterns for the 7 million patients visiting Emergency Departments (EDs) in the United States with chest pain are heterogeneous and not sustainable from a healthcare quality or economic perspective. Chest pain is the second most common cause of ED visits and the most common reason for short-stay hospitalizations. During these hospitalizations patients undergo in-depth evaluations (stress testing, computed tomography coronary angiography, or invasive angiography), but ultimately <10% are diagnosed with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). These evaluations cost $3 billion annually and strain health system resources without clear evidence of improved health outcomes or patient experience. The preliminary data suggest that moderate risk patients (35% of patients with chest pain) can be safely managed as outpatients using a cardiovascular ambulatory rapid evaluation (CARE-CP) strategy as an alternative to hospitalization. In the CARE-CP strategy, patients are discharged from the ED and receive outpatient clinic follow-up within 72 hours focused on medical management for cardiovascular risk factors (e.g., hypertension, diabetes) and determining whether further cardiac testing is needed. This strategy aims to enhance patient-centered outcomes while safely and equitably decreasing hospital resource utilization. However, equipoise exists between outpatient and hospitalization strategies for moderate risk patients. There is a paucity of prospective data evaluating the efficacy and patient-centeredness of outpatient chest pain evaluation strategies in moderate risk patients. Thus, it is unclear whether use of an outpatient chest pain management strategy (CARE-CP) will safely reduce healthcare utilization and be preferred by patients compared to a traditional hospitalization strategy. To address this key evidence gap, the study proposes the first prospective multisite randomized trial testing outpatient vs hospitalization strategies in moderate risk patients. The research teams will randomize 502 patients 1:1 to the CARE-CP or hospitalization management arms at three ED sites with a history of high recruitment rates and productive collaborations in cardiovascular clinical trials. The primary outcome will be hospital-free days (HFD) over a 30-day period. This novel trial addresses a key evidence gap by providing guidance on how best to evaluate moderate risk ED patients with acute chest pain. Without this guidance care patterns are likely to remain heterogeneous, inefficient, non-patient-centered, and unguided by the highest level of evidence. We hypothesize that data from this trial will support widespread implementation of a CARE-CP strategy, which could improve the quality and value of care for millions of patients in the U.S. and beyond. ;


Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


NCT number NCT05897632
Study type Interventional
Source Wake Forest University Health Sciences
Contact Lauren Koehler
Phone 336-716-4646
Email lekoehle@wakehealth.edu
Status Recruiting
Phase N/A
Start date October 2, 2023
Completion date October 2026

See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT04153006 - Comparison of Fingerstick Versus Venous Sample for Troponin I.
Recruiting NCT03664973 - Serratus Plane Block for Rib Fractures N/A
Completed NCT02905383 - The Effect of Exercise on Physical Function and Health in Older People After Discharge From Hospital N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT05649891 - Checklists Resuscitation Emergency Department N/A
Withdrawn NCT03906812 - A Randomized Trial of Telemetry Compared With Unmonitored Floor Admissions in ED Patients With Low-Risk Chest Pain N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT02892903 - In the Management of Coronary Artery Disease, Does Routine Pressure Wire Assessment at the Time of Coronary Angiography Affect Management Strategy, Hospital Costs and Outcomes? N/A
Completed NCT02538861 - Acute Chest Pain Imaging in the ED With the Combine CCTA and CT Perfusion
Completed NCT02538770 - Rapid Viral Diagnostics in Adults to Reduce Antimicrobial Consumption and Duration of Hospitalization N/A
Completed NCT02440893 - Understanding the Effect of Metformin on Corus CAD (or ASGES)
Completed NCT01931852 - Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging Strategy for the Management of Patients With Acute Chest Pain and Detectable to Elevated Troponin N/A
Completed NCT01665521 - Efficacy Evaluation of the HEART Pathway in Emergency Department Patients With Acute Chest Pain N/A
Recruiting NCT01542086 - Comparison of the Cost-Effectiveness of Coronary CT Angiography Versus Myocardial SPECT in Patients With Intermediate Risk of Coronary Heart Disease N/A
Terminated NCT01836211 - High-Sensitivity Troponin T and Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography for Rapid Diagnosis of Emergency Chest Pain N/A
Completed NCT01604655 - ProspEctive First Evaluation in Chest Pain Trial N/A
Completed NCT01486030 - Effect of Exercise Stress Testing on Peripheral Gene Expression Using Corus CAD (or ASGES) Diagnostic Test
Completed NCT01163019 - 2D Strain Echocardiography for Diagnosing Chest Pain in the Emergency Room N/A
Completed NCT00709670 - ComParative Diagnostic Study Between Multislice Computed Tomography (MSCT) and Stress Echography in Coronarin Patients. N/A
Completed NCT00536224 - Chest Pain Observation Unit Risk Reduction Trial N/A
Terminated NCT00221182 - Stem Cell Study for Patients With Heart Disease Phase 1/Phase 2
Completed NCT00075088 - Tele-Electrocardiography in Emergency Cardiac Care Phase 3