Chest Pain Syndrome Clinical Trial
Official title:
Diagnostic Value of Comprehensive Cardiothoracic Dual Source CT for the Early Triage of Patients With Undifferentiated Acute Chest Pain
The purpose of this research is to determine the efficiency of a single dual source computed tomography (CT-DSCT) protocol to establish or exclude acute coronary syndrome (ACS), pulmonary embolism (PE) or aortic dissection (AD) as compared to the individual protocols. Endpoints aim to compare the rate of emergency department (ED) discharge, length of hospital stay, the diagnostic imaging test utilization, and the costs between the comprehensive and the standard protocol strategy in patients with undifferentiated chest discomfort or shortness of breath with a component of chest discomfort.
Undifferentiated chest pain is one of the most common complaints in the acute care setting,
accounting for over five million emergency department (ED) visits in the U.S. each year.
Moreover, early and accurate triage of these patients remains difficult as neither the chest
pain history, a single set of biochemical markers for myocardial necrosis, or the initial
12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG), alone or in combination, identify a group of patients that
can be safely discharged without further diagnostic testing. As a result, patients presenting
to the ED with undifferentiated chest pain are often evaluated with multiple examinations to
exclude the presence of myocardial infarction (MI),pulmonary embolism (PE), and/or aortic
dissection (AD).
While contrast-enhanced spiral computed tomography angiography (CTA) has become a standard
procedure in the evaluation of the presence of PE and AD, it was only within the past few
years that noninvasive detection of coronary artery stenosis with CTA has become feasible.
Coronary CTA has been proven to be an effective tool to rule out CAD with reported
sensitivities of 93-99% and specificities of 95-97% as compared to invasive coronary
angiography.
Recent data from our Rule Out Myocardial Infarction by Computer Assisted Tomography (ROMICAT)
study indicates that coronary CTA accurately rules out acute coronary syndrome (ACS) in
patients with acute chest pain and therefore may enhance the diagnostic work up of chest pain
patients in the ED. Moreover, this study demonstrated the distribution of several
CT-angiographic patterns of CAD which may change management of subjects with inconclusive
initial ED evaluation admitted to the hospital. For example, CTA demonstrated the absence of
any CAD in 50% of the patients. None of the subjects without any CAD on CTA developed
unstable angina or had an MI during index hospitalization. Furthermore, none of these
patients had any MACE over the next six months, confirming previous observations in ACS
patients. These data suggest that 50% of hospital admissions could be saved. Another recent
study our group has demonstrated that an individually tailored ECG-gated CT protocol with a
single contrast injection permits simultaneous visualization of the coronary arteries,
thoracic aorta, and pulmonary arteries with excellent image quality.
The very recent introduction of dual source CT (DSCT) technology offers a two-fold
improvement in temporal resolution as compared to the standard 64-slice CTA that was used for
these studies (83ms vs. 165ms, respectively). This significant improvement in temporal
resolution allows for the acquisition of diagnostic images with higher and irregular heart
rates, precluding the need for intravenous beta blockade. Given the improved temporal
resolution and faster acquisition time, the amount of radiation exposure can be markedly
reduced in many patients.
With the need to improve triage of patients with undifferentiated chest pain and the
advantages offered by DSCT technology, several observational case series have suggested the
feasibility of a comprehensive thoracic DSCT (CT-DSCT) to simultaneously evaluate the
coronary arteries, thoracic aorta, and pulmonary arteries. Whether this will result in an
improvement of patient management and test utilization remains unclear as compared to a
standard ED evaluation protocol needs to be evaluated.
Thus, the purpose of this research is to determine the efficiency of a single CT-DSCT
protocol to establish or exclude MI, PE, or AD as compared to the individual protocols.
Endpoints aim to compare the rate of ED discharge, length of hospital stay, the diagnostic
imaging test utilization, and the costs between the comprehensive and the standard protocol
strategy in patients with undifferentiated chest discomfort or shortness of breath with a
component of chest discomfort.
;