Challenging Behaviour Clinical Trial
Official title:
Effects of a Web-based Training Programme for Professional Carers Working With People With Learning Disabilities Who Exhibit Challenging Behaviour
Verified date | November 2019 |
Source | Umeå University |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
The interaction between people with intellectual disabilities and professional carers is
often influenced by communicative difficulties contributing challenging behaviours.
Aim: The aim of this study is to evaluate a web-based training program aimed at improving
carers' abilities to interact with people with learning disabilities who exhibit challenging
behaviours and to explore carers' experiences of participating in such a program.
Method: This study has a cross-sectional design. Sample: The study will be conducted in
twenty special community-based accommodations, group-homes, in Sweden that each houses 4-8
residents. The staff in the group-homes is working independently with the manager located at
distance.The staff (N=221) in this study works with people with intellectual disabilities who
has different functional levels, from moderate to profound intellectual disabilities. They
have different educational backgrounds: from basic nursing education at the college level to
university degree.
Intervention: The intervention consists of a web-based training program, available for all
staff working in special accommodations for people with intellectual disabilities. The
web-based training program focuses on strengthening the carers' communication skills.
Procedure: The social Services authorities and the managers from each home agreed to the
project. The carers have given their informed consent to attend the study. The participants
will by their own during working hour go through the web-based program. The time to complete
the web-based training program is estimated at approximately ten hours.
Data-analysis: Descriptive statistics will be used for demographic data. Proportions will be
compared to the chi-square test. The mean values between the groups will be compared by
t-test or Mann-Whitney's U-test, as appropriate. Changes in the mean between and in the
groups will be compared with paired t-test. Double-sided significance test will be used
throughout. Data will be presented at a group level.
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 212 |
Est. completion date | November 15, 2018 |
Est. primary completion date | October 15, 2018 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years to 67 Years |
Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: - staff working at special accommodation for people with intellectual disabilities. - Language: swedish Exclusion Criteria: - staff working short-term temporary agencies at the accommodation for people with intellectual disabilities. |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Sweden | University West | Trollhattan |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Umeå University | University West, Sweden |
Sweden,
Antonsson H, Graneheim UH, Isaksson U, Åström S, Lundström MO. Evaluation of a Web-Based Training Program for Professional Carers Working With People With Learning Disabilities and Challenging Behavior: A Pilot Study with SSED-Design. Issues Ment Health Nurs. 2016 Oct;37(10):734-743. Epub 2016 Jun 28. — View Citation
Dagnan D, Hull A, McDonnell A. The controllability beliefs scale used with carers of people with intellectual disabilities: psychometric properties. J Intellect Disabil Res. 2013 May;57(5):422-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2012.01554.x. Epub 2012 Apr 4. — View Citation
Dagnan, D., Grant, F., & McDonnell, A. (2004). Understanding challenging behaviour in older people; the development of the Controllability Beliefs Scale. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 32, 501-506.
Farrell GA, Salmon P. Challenging behaviour: an action plan for education and training. Contemp Nurse. 2009 Dec-2010 Jan;34(1):110-8. — View Citation
Farrell GA, Shafiei T, Salmon P. Facing up to 'challenging behaviour': a model for training in staff-client interaction. J Adv Nurs. 2010 Jul;66(7):1644-55. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2010.05340.x. Epub 2010 May 21. Review. — View Citation
Folkman S, Lazarus RS. The relationship between coping and emotion: implications for theory and research. Soc Sci Med. 1988;26(3):309-17. Review. — View Citation
Folkman S, Moskowitz JT. Coping: pitfalls and promise. Annu Rev Psychol. 2004;55:745-74. Review. — View Citation
Gore, N., & Umizawa, H. (2011). Challenging behavior training for teaching staff and family carers of children with intellectual disabilities: A preliminary evaluation. Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities, 8, 266-275.
Harris, P., Humphreys, J., & Thomson, G. (1994). A checklist of challenging behaviour: The development of a survey instrument. Mental Handicap Research, 7, 118-133
Jenkins R, Rose J, Jones T. The Checklist of Challenging Behaviour and its relationship with the Psychopathology Inventory for Mentally Retarded Adults. J Intellect Disabil Res. 1998 Aug;42 ( Pt 4):273-8. — View Citation
Joyce T, Ditchfield H, Harris P. Challenging behaviour in community services. J Intellect Disabil Res. 2001 Apr;45(Pt 2):130-8. — View Citation
Karasek, R., & Theorell, T. (1992). Healthy work: Stress, productivity and the reconstruction of working life. New York, NY: Basic Books.
Mills S, Rose J. The relationship between challenging behaviour, burnout and cognitive variables in staff working with people who have intellectual disabilities. J Intellect Disabil Res. 2011 Sep;55(9):844-57. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2011.01438.x. Epub 2011 Jul 5. — View Citation
Padyab, Backteman-Erlanson & Brulin. Burnout, Coping, Stress of Conscience and Psychosocial Work Environment among Patrolling Police Officers Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology December 2016, Volume 31, Issue 4, pp 229-237|
Pellfolk TJ, Gustafson Y, Bucht G, Karlsson S. Effects of a restraint minimization program on staff knowledge, attitudes, and practice: a cluster randomized trial. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2010 Jan;58(1):62-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2009.02629.x. — View Citation
Sanne B, Mykletun A, Dahl AA, Moen BE, Tell GS. Testing the Job Demand-Control-Support model with anxiety and depression as outcomes: the Hordaland Health Study. Occup Med (Lond). 2005 Sep;55(6):463-73. Epub 2005 Apr 21. — View Citation
* Note: There are 16 references in all — Click here to view all references
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Changes in communication- and interactivity skills and ability to handle challenging behaviour after web-based training program | Changes in communication- and interactivity skills and ability to handle challenging behaviour after web-based training program with The checklist of Challenging Behaviour | Before intervention, at intervention completion an average of 12 weeks, and for a 3 month follow up after completed intervention. | |
Secondary | Ways of Coping Questionnaire | Change in coping strategies and practical problem solving with Ways of Coping Questionnaire (WOCQ). Measuring use of coping strategies employed by the carers. The instrument was used in this study to measure the intervention's effects in reducing feelings such as shame and guilt in the carers and in strengthening professional care. In this 40-item version participants were asked to reflect upon how they would manage specific challenging situations. The items were divided into emotion-focused coping skills and problem-focused coping skills. Each subscale was answered on a 4-point Likert scale ranging from (0) does not apply to (3) used a great deal. | Before intervention, at intervention completion an average of 12 weeks, and for a 3 month follow up after completed intervention. | |
Secondary | The Job Demand-Control and Social Support | The Job Demand-Control and Social Support (JDC-S). The instrument has three major dimensions. First, it measures job demands, which includes psychological stressors such as time pressure, and item scores range from 1 to 4, with higher values indicating higher demands. Second, it measures job control on a scale of 1 to 4, with higher values indicating more perceived control over the job situation. Third, it measures social support, again on a scale of 1 to 4, with higher values indicating higher perceived support from co-workers and managers. In the JDC-S, high demands and low control indicate a high job strain. | Before intervention, at intervention completion an average of 12 weeks, and for a 3 month follow up after completed intervention. | |
Secondary | The Controllability Belief Scale | Changes in values and approaches to reduce challenging behavior with The Controllability Belief Scale. The Controllability Beliefs Scale (CBS) is a 15-item instrument measuring the attribution of control in situations with CB. This instrument was used to measure carers' values and approaches to people with LD. Items were scored on a 5-point scale with anchored ratings from strongly agree (1) to strongly disagree (5). A two-factor structure, suggesting positive and negative attributions of control, and good internal reliability (Cronbach's alpha for total score = 0.89, 0.92 for the negative subscale and 0.73 for the positive subscale). | Before intervention, at intervention completion an average of 12 weeks, and for a 3 month follow up after completed intervention. |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Active, not recruiting |
NCT01680276 -
Clinical and Cost Effectiveness of Positive Behaviour Support: a Trial
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT03086876 -
Evaluation of Parent Intervention for Challenging Behaviour in Children With Intellectual Disabilities (EPICC-ID)
|
N/A |