Subcutaneous Drains And Cesarean Section

Status Completed

Clinical Trial Summary

A randomized controlled trial that aimed at studying the values (if any) of subcutaneous drains use in lean women during Cesarean section.

Clinical Trial Description

Cesarean section (CS) is one of the most common operative procedures performed in modern obstetrics. Despite being that, common, surgical techniques and steps do widely vary. These variations depend on many factors including surgeons preferences, patient s characteristics and available facilities and circumstances .

The most common complications of Cesarean section are superficial surgical site complications including sepsis, seroma formation and breakdown.

One of the common, yet debatable, practices in Cesarean section is to use a subcutaneous drain for the wound .The advantage of such a practice is to drain any blood or serous fluid that may accumulate in the subcutaneous space, which cause post-operative pain or provide a good medium for microbial growth and infection.

Thus, it is assumed that drains can reduce the burden of surgical site infection. Some surgeons, however, have raised much argument about the value of subcutaneous drains and emerging evidence raised concerns about its effectiveness. Despite this, it is evident that it is still widely used in the clinical practice.

Most randomized controlled trials on this issue, from which we draw the current evidence, were conducted in the developed countries, mainly the United States, with readily available facilities and optimum level of care. This fact raises concerns about how this evidence can be applicable in developing countries with weak health care systems and low level of awareness. In addition, Cesarean section rates are greatly higher in developing countries due to its abuse, which emphasize how the current evidence can't be applicable and in need for further updates .

The current gap between the current practice and lack of evidence has to be filled. In this study, investigators aim at providing answers for this critical issue, thus investigators can ensure women's health and provide the best quality of care following Cesarean section. ;

Study Design

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

Cesarean Section

Clinical Trial Details

NCT number	NCT03114332
Study type	Interventional
Source	Menoufia University
Contact
Status	Completed
Phase	N/A
Start date	December 2015
Completion date	September 2016

View Details

See also
Status	Clinical Trial	Phase
Terminated	`NCT03772886` - Reducing Cesarean Delivery Rate in Obese Patients Using the Peanut Ball	N/A
Completed	`NCT03631329` - Predictability of Preoperative Carotid Artery Corrected Flow Time for Hypotension After Spinal Anesthesia in Patients Undergoing Cesarean Section
Completed	`NCT03244540` - Regional Analgesia After Cesarean Section	Phase 4
Active, not recruiting	`NCT03760718` - Chloroprocaine Lavage to Improve Outcomes Related to Operative Cesarean Delivery	Early Phase 1
Active, not recruiting	`NCT04965779` - The Effect of Abdominal Binder Use on Postpartum Pain, Bleeding, and Breastfeeding Success in Cesarean Delivery Women	N/A
Terminated	`NCT01687972` - INSORB Versus Subcuticular Sutures at Cesarean Section	Phase 1
Withdrawn	`NCT01211431` - Post-cesarean Pain Control Via Continuous Infusion of Ropivacain et Diclogenac Into the Wound Versus Intathecal Morphine	Phase 4
Completed	`NCT00987701` - Perineuraxial Anesthesia Fluid Management and Infant Neurobehaviors	N/A
Completed	`NCT00991627` - Different Approaches to Maternal Hypotension During Cesarean Section	Phase 4
Completed	`NCT01049477` - The Effects of Music Therapy on Women's Anxiety Before and During Cesarean Delivery	N/A
Terminated	`NCT00524511` - Comparison Study of Wound Closure at Time of Cesarean Delivery: Dermabond Glue Versus Surgical Staples	N/A
Terminated	`NCT00386477` - Vaginal Cleansing at Cesarean Delivery to Reduce Infection: A Randomized, Controlled Trial	N/A
Completed	`NCT00375986` - A Comparison of Manual vs. Spontaneous Removal of the Placenta at Cesarean Section	N/A
Completed	`NCT00517140` - Vaginal Birth After Caesarean Section - Effect on Maternal Psychosocial Function	N/A
Terminated	`NCT05051150` - Epinephrine Infusion for Prophylaxis Against Maternal Hypotension During Caesarean Section	Phase 4
Terminated	`NCT03695172` - Comparison of TAP, Anterior QL, or ESP Block for Elective Cesarean Section	Phase 4
Recruiting	`NCT06247852` - Persistent Pain After Cesarean Delivery - A Danish Multicenter Cohort Study
Completed	`NCT06012747` - Pain After Cesarean Section - A Danish Multicenter Cohort Study.
Not yet recruiting	`NCT05187520` - Naldebain for Control of Post-Cesarean Section Pain	Phase 2
Not yet recruiting	`NCT04999670` - Fascial Closure and Post-caesarean Pain	N/A

Clinical trials are conducted in a series of steps, called phases - each phase is designed to answer a separate research question.

Phase 1: Researchers test a new drug or treatment in a small group of people for the first time to evaluate its safety, determine a safe dosage range, and identify side effects.
Phase 2: The drug or treatment is given to a larger group of people to see if it is effective and to further evaluate its safety.
Phase 3: The drug or treatment is given to large groups of people to confirm its effectiveness, monitor side effects, compare it to commonly used treatments, and collect information that will allow the drug or treatment to be used safely.
Phase 4: Studies are done after the drug or treatment has been marketed to gather information on the drug's effect in various populations and any side effects associated with long-term use.