Cesarean Section Complications Clinical Trial
Official title:
Quality of Life and Pain Pressure Threshold in Response to Myofascial Induction Therapy and Direct Scar Release Techniques for Chronic Lower Transverse Abdominal Scar
Postoperative scarring is one of the most common concerns among surgical patients. The incidence of abnormal scarring, i.e. keloid or hypertrophic scar formation after caesarean section (CS) is reported to be 41% .That can lead to functional limitations, pruritus, pain and cosmetic issues. so, the purpose of this study is to investigate quality of life and pain pressure threshold in response to myofascial induction and direct scar release techniques for lower transverse abdominal scar
Status | Not yet recruiting |
Enrollment | 40 |
Est. completion date | November 1, 2023 |
Est. primary completion date | October 1, 2023 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | Accepts Healthy Volunteers |
Gender | Female |
Age group | 25 Years to 35 Years |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: - Women with a well healed, old , transverse cesarean section scar (more than 6 months resulted in chronic scar pain). - Pain can be intermittent or constant at rest or with activity, and it is reported to be at least at a level of about 3/ 10 on visual analogue scale at recording sites will be marked on the C-section scar at 2.5 cm intervals (Wasserman et al., 2018). - Women identified that the pain is either located in the cesarean section scar or caused by palpation of scar and it presents since the time of surgery not prior to the cesarean section. - Their ages will range from 25-35 years old. - Their BMI will be 18.5-29.9 kg/ m². Exclusion Criteria: - Acute and subacute cesarean section. - Delayed wound healing. - History of abdominal or pelvic cancer. - Active pelvic or abdominal infection. - Skin irritation/inflammation at the site of scar. - Currently pregnant women. |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
n/a |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Cairo University |
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Pain pressure threshold (PPT) | A pressure algometer will be used to measure pressure pain threshold for all participating women in both groups. ?
PPT recording sites will be marked on the C-section scar at 2.5 cm intervals. This resulted in from 5 to 8 measurement points along the scar. Following, the marked points will be used to record PPTs in all time points for the PPT assessment; a 1-cm2 pressure probe will be positioned perpendicularly to the skin and pressed at a rate of 30kPa/s.Two measures will be collected for each area, with 30 seconds rest between point testing . Average pressure pain threshold (pressure points across worst 3 points on scar averaged) will be used to analyze the PPT data . |
within 4 weeks | |
Primary | scar mobility | lower transverse abdominal scar mobility will be assessted by an adheremeter for both groups (A and B)before and after the end of treatment program.
The adheremeter as described by Ferriero et al. has a radius of approximately 1.75 cm with concentric circles 2 mm apart . A mark will be made on the tightest part of the scar in four directions (superior, inferior, right and left). As there is no a contralateral side to abdominal tissue to be used as a reference range, we will use multi-directional scar mobility. Scar mobility measurements across the points will be averaged for each participating women and will be performed at the initial evaluation after 2 weeks (the end of the treatment) and at fourth week as follow up |
within 4 weeks | |
Primary | Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) | It includes subjective symptoms of pain and pruritus. It consists of 2 numerical numeric scales,it assesses vascularity, pigmentation, thickness, relief, pliability, and surface area, and it incorporates patient assessments of pain, itching, color, stiffness, thickness, and relief . The observer scar assessment scale rated five variables, each variable used a 10-point scoring system, summed to obtain a total score ranging from 5 to 50, with 5 representing normal skin with no associated symptoms. The patient scar assessment scale consisted of six items on scar-related pain, itchiness, color, stiffness, thickness, and irregularity. Each item used a 10-point scoring system, summed to obtain a total score ranging from 6 to 60, with 6 representing normal skin with no associated symptoms. | within 4 weeks | |
Secondary | quality of life assessment | Short form 36 (SF-36) questionnaire will be used to assess the health-related quality of life .for all women in both groups (A and B)before and after the end of the treatment program.
It measures health on eight multi-item dimensions, covering functional status, well-being, and overall health evaluation, each associated with 2-10 possible answers. The answer to each question is extrapolated to a standardized set of answers, and the results are transferred to a scale of 0-100, where 0 represents the worst state of health, and 100 represents the best state of health measured. |
within 4 weeks |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Terminated |
NCT04377984 -
Impact of a Strategy Combining Morphine Savings and Anesthesia Technique on the Quality of Post-operative Rehabilitation
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT03248817 -
Phenylephrine Infusion in Cesarean Delivery
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT05037383 -
Motion and Viewing Analysis of Surgeons During Minimally Invasive Gynecological Interventions
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05933993 -
Mothers Experience of Pain Following Elective Cesarean Section. A Qualitative Study.
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT05021315 -
Vaginal Cleaning Using Povidone Iodine Before CS to Reduce Postoperative Wound Infection
|
Phase 3 | |
Terminated |
NCT03246919 -
Ideal Time of Oxytocin Infusion During Cesarean Section
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT06403215 -
Effect of Chewing Gum and Drinking Fennel Tea
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT06446258 -
Assessment of the Impact of Soft Tissue Mobilization on the Scar in Patients After Cesarean Section
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT06247852 -
Persistent Pain After Cesarean Delivery - A Danish Multicenter Cohort Study
|
||
Not yet recruiting |
NCT06017076 -
Effect of Preoperative Oral Energy Drinks Compared to Warming Matress on Body Temperature During Combined Spinal-epidural Anesthesia for Elective Cesarean Delivery.
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05005871 -
Comparison of Quadratus Lumborum Intramuscular and Transmuscular in Postoperative Pain
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT04518176 -
Bilateral Uterine Artery Ligation During the Cesarean Delivery of Twins
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT04505644 -
Lidocaine Patch Versus Intravenous Lidocaine in Pain Relief After Cesarean Section
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT03985618 -
The MODE Trial: Planned Caesarean Section Versus Induction of Labour for Women With Class III Obesity
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04046510 -
Comparaison of 3 Protocols of Ocytocin Administration in C Section
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03302039 -
Three Protocols for Phenylephrine Administration in Cesarean Delivery
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT03318536 -
Effect of Granisetron on Usage of Sympathomimetics During Caesarean Section
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT03682510 -
B-Lynch Transverse Compression Suture Versus a Sandwich Technique (N&H Technique) for Complete Placenta Previa
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT03651076 -
Traxi Panniculus Retractor for Cesarean Delivery
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT06060327 -
Comparing Tranexamic Acid Versus Ecbolics in Preventing Hemorrhage During and After Cesarean Section
|
N/A |