Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT04729270
Other study ID # tDCS
Secondary ID
Status Completed
Phase N/A
First received
Last updated
Start date February 6, 2023
Est. completion date November 20, 2023

Study information

Verified date April 2024
Source University of Cadiz
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

This study aim to investigate the effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for improving pressure pain thresholds (PPTs), range of motion,Neck Disability Index, the multidimensional health related quality of life (SF-12) and the multidimensional health related quality of life and pain in patients with mechanical neck pain (NP).


Description:

Fifty-four participants with NP will randomly allocated to either an Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (ten sessions) or transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation (TENS) (ten sessions) during two weeks. . Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), Neck Disability Index ( NDI), range of motion and (CROM), Questionnaire SF-12 and PPTs in sub-occipital and upper trapezius muscles were measured at baseline, at the end of treatment and at 1 month follow-up. T-tests and a repeated-measures multivariate analysis of variance (RM-MANOVA) were used for VAS, CROM and PPTs, respectively.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 30
Est. completion date November 20, 2023
Est. primary completion date March 15, 2023
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 18 Years to 60 Years
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria: - Patients of both sexes, - Aged between 18 and 60 years, in an - Active state of pain and diagnosed with a month of evolution. Exclusion Criteria: - Patients who are pregnant, have pacemaker and those Surgically operated cervical spine - Patients who have been treated with Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation a month earlier.

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Procedure:
Physiotherapy treatment with physium device.
The intervention for this group consisted of 10 sessions with Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for a month.
Conventional physiotherapy treatment.
The intervention for this group consisted of 10 sessions with Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) for a month.

Locations

Country Name City State
Spain Policlínica Santa María Cadiz Cádiz

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
University of Cadiz

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Spain, 

References & Publications (17)

Andrade SM, de Brito Aranha REL, de Oliveira EA, de Mendonca CTPL, Martins WKN, Alves NT, Fernandez-Calvo B. Transcranial direct current stimulation over the primary motor vs prefrontal cortex in refractory chronic migraine: A pilot randomized controlled trial. J Neurol Sci. 2017 Jul 15;378:225-232. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2017.05.007. Epub 2017 May 3. — View Citation

Auvichayapat P, Janyacharoen T, Rotenberg A, Tiamkao S, Krisanaprakornkit T, Sinawat S, Punjaruk W, Thinkhamrop B, Auvichayapat N. Migraine prophylaxis by anodal transcranial direct current stimulation, a randomized, placebo-controlled trial. J Med Assoc Thai. 2012 Aug;95(8):1003-12. — View Citation

Blanpied PR, Gross AR, Elliott JM, Devaney LL, Clewley D, Walton DM, Sparks C, Robertson EK. Neck Pain: Revision 2017. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2017 Jul;47(7):A1-A83. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2017.0302. — View Citation

Caulfield KA, Badran BW, DeVries WH, Summers PM, Kofmehl E, Li X, Borckardt JJ, Bikson M, George MS. Transcranial electrical stimulation motor threshold can estimate individualized tDCS dosage from reverse-calculation electric-field modeling. Brain Stimul. 2020 Jul-Aug;13(4):961-969. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2020.04.007. Epub 2020 Apr 21. — View Citation

Charvet LE, Shaw MT, Bikson M, Woods AJ, Knotkova H. Supervised transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) at home: A guide for clinical research and practice. Brain Stimul. 2020 May-Jun;13(3):686-693. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2020.02.011. Epub 2020 Feb 10. — View Citation

Cohen SP, Hooten WM. Advances in the diagnosis and management of neck pain. BMJ. 2017 Aug 14;358:j3221. doi: 10.1136/bmj.j3221. — View Citation

Cohen SP. Epidemiology, diagnosis, and treatment of neck pain. Mayo Clin Proc. 2015 Feb;90(2):284-99. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2014.09.008. — View Citation

Cote P, Yu H, Shearer HM, Randhawa K, Wong JJ, Mior S, Ameis A, Carroll LJ, Nordin M, Varatharajan S, Sutton D, Southerst D, Jacobs C, Stupar M, Taylor-Vaisey A, Gross DP, Brison RJ, Paulden M, Ammendolia C, Cassidy JD, Loisel P, Marshall S, Bohay RN, Stapleton J, Lacerte M. Non-pharmacological management of persistent headaches associated with neck pain: A clinical practice guideline from the Ontario protocol for traffic injury management (OPTIMa) collaboration. Eur J Pain. 2019 Jul;23(6):1051-1070. doi: 10.1002/ejp.1374. Epub 2019 Feb 28. — View Citation

DaSilva AF, Truong DQ, DosSantos MF, Toback RL, Datta A, Bikson M. State-of-art neuroanatomical target analysis of high-definition and conventional tDCS montages used for migraine and pain control. Front Neuroanat. 2015 Jul 15;9:89. doi: 10.3389/fnana.2015.00089. eCollection 2015. — View Citation

Fitzgibbon BM, Schabrun SM. Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Pain Disorders: Challenges and New Frontiers. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2019 Oct;106(4):717-719. doi: 10.1002/cpt.1544. Epub 2019 Jul 15. No abstract available. — View Citation

Martelletti P, Jensen RH, Antal A, Arcioni R, Brighina F, de Tommaso M, Franzini A, Fontaine D, Heiland M, Jurgens TP, Leone M, Magis D, Paemeleire K, Palmisani S, Paulus W, May A; European Headache Federation. Neuromodulation of chronic headaches: position statement from the European Headache Federation. J Headache Pain. 2013 Oct 21;14(1):86. doi: 10.1186/1129-2377-14-86. — View Citation

Nitsche MA, Paulus W. Transcranial direct current stimulation--update 2011. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2011;29(6):463-92. doi: 10.3233/RNN-2011-0618. — View Citation

Przeklasa-Muszynska A, Kocot-Kepska M, Dobrogowski J, Wiatr M, Mika J. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and its influence on analgesics effectiveness in patients suffering from migraine headache. Pharmacol Rep. 2017 Aug;69(4):714-721. doi: 10.1016/j.pharep.2017.02.019. Epub 2017 Mar 1. — View Citation

Schwartz DP, Robbins MS. Primary headache disorders and neuro-ophthalmologic manifestations. Eye Brain. 2012 Sep 13;4:49-61. doi: 10.2147/EB.S21841. eCollection 2012. — View Citation

Straudi S, Buja S, Baroni A, Pavarelli C, Pranovi G, Fregni F, Basaglia N. The effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) combined with group exercise treatment in subjects with chronic low back pain: a pilot randomized control trial. Clin Rehabil. 2018 Oct;32(10):1348-1356. doi: 10.1177/0269215518777881. Epub 2018 May 21. — View Citation

Whiteford CM, Steinbeck L, Dommerholt J. On "Clinical Practice Guideline for Physical Therapy Assessment and Treatment in Patients With Nonspecific Neck Pain," Bier JD, Scholten-Peeters WGM, Staal JB, et al. Phys Ther. 2018;98:162-171. Phys Ther. 2018 Sep 1;98(9):819-820. doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzy078. No abstract available. — View Citation

Yalinay Dikmen P, Yavuz BG, Aydinlar EI. The relationships between migraine, depression, anxiety, stress, and sleep disturbances. Acta Neurol Belg. 2015 Jun;115(2):117-22. doi: 10.1007/s13760-014-0312-0. Epub 2014 Jun 3. — View Citation

* Note: There are 17 references in allClick here to view all references

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary The intensity of cervical pain A 10-point Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS; 0: no pain, 10: maximum pain) will be used to assess the patients' current level of cervical pain, and the worst and lowest level of pain experienced in the preceding week in the cervical area. Baseline
Secondary The intensity of cervical pain A 10-point Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS; 0: no pain, 10: maximum pain) will be used to assess the patients' current level of cervical pain, and the worst and lowest level of pain experienced in the preceding week in the cervical area. Four weeks
Secondary The intensity of cervical pain A 10-point Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS; 0: no pain, 10: maximum pain) will be used to assess the patients' current level of cervical pain, and the worst and lowest level of pain experienced in the preceding week in the cervical area. Twelve weeks
Secondary Active cervical range of motion Measured by goniometer type crom Baseline,four weeks and Twelve weeks.
Secondary Pressure pain thresholds in cervical trigger points Pressure pain thresholds (PPTs) will be measured with a pressure algometer (Baseline, Baseline,four weeks and Twelve weeks.
Secondary Neck Disability Index (NDI). Questionnaire Neck Disability Index (NDI). Baseline,four weeks and Twelve weeks.
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT03184220 - Treatment of Cervical Syndrome With Myofascial Therapies N/A
Completed NCT03322683 - Treatment of Cervical Syndrome With Physium Therapy N/A