Cervical Ripening Clinical Trial
Official title:
Foley Catheter Versus Double-balloon Catheter for Cervical Ripening in Women With a High-risk Pregnancy
Verified date | January 2022 |
Source | Etlik Zubeyde Hanim Women's Health Care, Training and Research Hospital |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Observational |
The objective of this study is to compare pregnancy results which were used foley catheter or double-balloon catheter for cervical ripening among high-risk pregnant women.
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 222 |
Est. completion date | November 30, 2020 |
Est. primary completion date | November 30, 2020 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | Accepts Healthy Volunteers |
Gender | Female |
Age group | 18 Years to 40 Years |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: - Age between 18 and 40 - Singleton pregnancy - Vertex presentation - Bishop score <6 - Using a Foley catheter or cook balloon for cervical ripening - High-risk pregnancy (Oligohydramnios, polyhydramnios, intrauterine growth retardation, pregestational or gestational diabetes, hypertensive disorders) Exclusion Criteria: - Being younger than 18 or over 40 - Communication problems (foreign national) - Bishop score >6 - Being at active labor - Multifetal pregnancy - Non-vertex presentation - Scarred uterus (cesarean or myomectomy) - Fetal structural or chromosomal anomaly - Non-reassuring fetal cardiotocography before cervical ripening - Regional anesthesia during the first stage |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Turkey | University of Health Sciences, Etlik Zubeyde Hanim Women's Health Care, Training and Research Hospital | Ankara |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Etlik Zubeyde Hanim Women's Health Care, Training and Research Hospital |
Turkey,
Pennell CE, Henderson JJ, O'Neill MJ, McChlery S, Doherty DA, Dickinson JE. Induction of labour in nulliparous women with an unfavourable cervix: a randomised controlled trial comparing double and single balloon catheters and PGE2 gel. BJOG. 2009 Oct;116(11):1443-52. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2009.02279.x. Epub 2009 Jul 28. Erratum in: BJOG. 2011 Mar;118(4):521. McCleery, S [corrected to McChlery, S]. — View Citation
Sayed Ahmed WA, Ibrahim ZM, Ashor OE, Mohamed ML, Ahmed MR, Elshahat AM. Use of the Foley catheter versus a double balloon cervical ripening catheter in pre-induction cervical ripening in postdate primigravidae. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2016 Nov;42(11):1489-1494. doi: 10.1111/jog.13086. Epub 2016 Jul 19. — View Citation
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | bishop score | bishop score >6 is accepted as successful ripening. (max. 10, and the higher bishop score means better ripening has been occurred.) | at the time of removing the cervical ripening catheter or when the balloon was expelled spontaneously | |
Primary | vaginal delivery rate | the difference in vaginal birth rate between groups | until the patient gives birth | |
Primary | vaginal delivery within 24 hours | the difference in vaginal delivery within 24 hours rate between groups | from the time of cervical ripening catheter insertion to the 24 hours |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Recruiting |
NCT04949633 -
Oxytocin vs Prostaglandins for Labor Induction of Women With an Unfavorable Cervix After 24h of Cervical Ripening
|
Phase 3 | |
Withdrawn |
NCT00953641 -
Vaginal Misoprostol for Cervical Ripening Prior to Endometrial Biopsy
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT01127581 -
Efficacy & Safety Study Comparing Misoprostol Vaginal Insert (MVI) Versus Dinoprostone Vaginal Insert (DVI) for Reducing Time to Vaginal Delivery
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT00374621 -
Trial of Cervical Ripening and Labor Induction Using Misoprostol With or Without Intravaginal Isosorbide Mononitrate
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02732522 -
Comparison Between Vaginal and Sublingual Misoprostol 50 µg for Cervical Ripening Prior to Induction of Labor
|
Phase 4 | |
Recruiting |
NCT05864326 -
Heated Saline in Cervical Balloon for Labor Induction, a RCT
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT02975167 -
Patient Satisfaction During Outpatient Versus Inpatient Foley Catheter Induction of Labor
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT02738177 -
Misoprostol Versus Effox as Cervical Ripening Agent Prior Surgical Evacuation
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT03138252 -
Study of the Effectiveness of Cervical Ripening Balloon With and Without Oxytocin
|
Phase 3 | |
Recruiting |
NCT01720394 -
Efficacy of Induction of Labor on Term Using a Double Balloon Catheter Compared to Dinoprostone Vaginal-insert
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT00468520 -
Adjuvant Oxytocin for Preinduction Ripening With a Foley catheter--a Clinical Trial
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT02762942 -
Comparison of Vaginal Misoprostol Plus Supracervical Balloon Versus Vaginal Misoprostol Alone for Induction of Labor
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT01283022 -
Pharmacokinetic (PK) Study of the 200 Microgram (mcg) Misoprostol Vaginal Insert (MVI 200) in Women at Term Gestation (The MVI-PK Study)
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT00886860 -
The Comparison of Efficacy for Cervical Ripening in Labor Induction Between Titrated and Conventional Oral Misoprostol
|
Phase 4 | |
Recruiting |
NCT01156948 -
Misoprostol For Nulliparous Women Before Hysteroscopy
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT00504465 -
Combined Agent Randomized Trial of Induction of Labor
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01428037 -
Safety and Efficacy Study of Vaginal Misoprostol for Cervical Ripening and Induction of Labor
|
Phase 3 | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT00815542 -
Induction of Labor in Oligohydramnios
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT01170819 -
Double Balloon Catheter Versus Dinoprostone Vaginal Insert for Cervical Ripening.
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT00346840 -
Safety and Efficacy Study of Misoprostol Vaginal Insert for Induction of Labour
|
Phase 2 |