Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Summary

To analyze whether there is a statistically significant difference in the modifications present in the uterine cervix 6 hours after administration of misoprostol 50 µg through vaginal versus sublingual routes.


Clinical Trial Description

A randomized, single blind clinical trial, was performed. Inclusion criteria were all pregnant women admitted at Pereira Rossell Hospital Center with gestational ages between 32/0 and 41/6 according to first trimester sonogram, with a viable fetus in cephalic presentation, with estimated fetal weight lower than 4000 gr, without contraindications for vaginal birth, to whom induction of labor with misoprostol had been previously indicated, from 8 to 20 hours 7 days a week. Protocol counted with approval of the Ethics Commission of the Pereira Rossell Hospital. All participants gave written informed consent before the study began. Once there was confirmation that the patient met the inclusion criteria, information was given and consent form was signed, the patient entered the study and the intervention was randomized. Randomization was computer generated in permuted blocks of 2 by an epidemiologist from our Service, and the result was in a sealed and opaque envelope which was opened at the time of administering the medication. Prior to administration of the medication, an Obstetrician or Obstetrics resident who was not familiar with the administration route assigned to the patient assessed through vaginal examination the characteristics of the cervix in terms of Bishop score. Afterwards, a technician from the investigation team administered the misoprostol according to the assigned route (50 µg misoprostol vaginal or sublingual).

Tachysystole was defined as the presence of at least 6 uterine contractions in 10 minutes.

Primary result was defined as the clinically significant variation (of at least 2 points) of the Bishop score at 6 hours after administration of 50 µg misoprostol. Secondary results were defined as the presence of tachysystole, frequency of vaginal birth and cesarean section, frequency in which new doses were needed to continue with induction of labor and frequency with which labor was diagnosed at 6 hours of administration of misoprostol. Neonatal results included Apgar score at 1 and 5 minutes and pH value in umbilical cord gasometry. Final analysis was made according to intention to treat.

In order to detect a difference in the mean of Bishop score of 2 points, using a standard deviation of 2, with a 90% power, reaching a confidence interval of 95%, a population of 49 patients was required for each group.

Randomization was done in permuted blocks of 2, using a table of randomized numbers. Group 1 included those patients who received sublingual misoprostol and group 2 those patients who received vaginal misoprostol. Analysis was done in statistical package SPSS (reg) V16. For continuous variables a mean and standard deviation were described; for categorical variables absolute frequency and percentage were described. For statistical analysis a 2-tiled independent t-test was used, in order to compare the mean of the two groups. Also, chi-squared test and Fisher´s exact test were used to compare proportions among the two groups where it corresponds. ;


Study Design

Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Single Blind (Investigator), Primary Purpose: Treatment


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


NCT number NCT02732522
Study type Interventional
Source Universidad de la Republica
Contact
Status Completed
Phase Phase 4
Start date October 2014
Completion date January 2016

See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Recruiting NCT04949633 - Oxytocin vs Prostaglandins for Labor Induction of Women With an Unfavorable Cervix After 24h of Cervical Ripening Phase 3
Withdrawn NCT00953641 - Vaginal Misoprostol for Cervical Ripening Prior to Endometrial Biopsy Phase 3
Completed NCT01127581 - Efficacy & Safety Study Comparing Misoprostol Vaginal Insert (MVI) Versus Dinoprostone Vaginal Insert (DVI) for Reducing Time to Vaginal Delivery Phase 3
Completed NCT00374621 - Trial of Cervical Ripening and Labor Induction Using Misoprostol With or Without Intravaginal Isosorbide Mononitrate N/A
Recruiting NCT05864326 - Heated Saline in Cervical Balloon for Labor Induction, a RCT N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT02975167 - Patient Satisfaction During Outpatient Versus Inpatient Foley Catheter Induction of Labor N/A
Recruiting NCT02738177 - Misoprostol Versus Effox as Cervical Ripening Agent Prior Surgical Evacuation Phase 2
Completed NCT03138252 - Study of the Effectiveness of Cervical Ripening Balloon With and Without Oxytocin Phase 3
Recruiting NCT01720394 - Efficacy of Induction of Labor on Term Using a Double Balloon Catheter Compared to Dinoprostone Vaginal-insert Phase 4
Completed NCT00468520 - Adjuvant Oxytocin for Preinduction Ripening With a Foley catheter--a Clinical Trial N/A
Recruiting NCT02762942 - Comparison of Vaginal Misoprostol Plus Supracervical Balloon Versus Vaginal Misoprostol Alone for Induction of Labor Phase 4
Completed NCT01283022 - Pharmacokinetic (PK) Study of the 200 Microgram (mcg) Misoprostol Vaginal Insert (MVI 200) in Women at Term Gestation (The MVI-PK Study) Phase 2
Completed NCT00886860 - The Comparison of Efficacy for Cervical Ripening in Labor Induction Between Titrated and Conventional Oral Misoprostol Phase 4
Recruiting NCT01156948 - Misoprostol For Nulliparous Women Before Hysteroscopy Phase 3
Completed NCT00504465 - Combined Agent Randomized Trial of Induction of Labor N/A
Completed NCT01428037 - Safety and Efficacy Study of Vaginal Misoprostol for Cervical Ripening and Induction of Labor Phase 3
Not yet recruiting NCT00815542 - Induction of Labor in Oligohydramnios Phase 3
Completed NCT01170819 - Double Balloon Catheter Versus Dinoprostone Vaginal Insert for Cervical Ripening. Phase 4
Completed NCT00346840 - Safety and Efficacy Study of Misoprostol Vaginal Insert for Induction of Labour Phase 2
Completed NCT00442663 - Trial of Foley Catheter With and Without Extra-Amniotic Saline Infusion for Labor Induction N/A