Cervical Dystonia Clinical Trial
Official title:
A Phase 3b, Multicentre, Randomised, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of DYSPORT® Using 2mL Dilution in Adults With Cervical Dystonia.
Verified date | July 2019 |
Source | Ipsen |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
The purpose of the protocol is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Dysport® using 2 mL dilution compared with placebo for the treatment of Cervical Dystonia.
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 134 |
Est. completion date | January 2015 |
Est. primary completion date | October 2014 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years and older |
Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: - Primary diagnosis of Cervical Dystonia at least 9 months since onset and either previously untreated with botulinum toxin or currently treated with Botox at a total dosing range of 100-200 U and =60 U in the sternocleidomastoid muscle at the last injection cycle, and having had a satisfactory treatment response in the principal investigator's judgment during the last two sequential Botox treatment cycles. - TWSTRS total score= 20; TWSTRS-severity subscale score> 10; Exclusion Criteria: - In apparent remission from Cervical Dystonia - Diagnosis of pure retrocollis or pure anterocollis - For non-naïve subjects, previous poor response to either of the last two Botox treatments - Known requirement of <100U or >200U of Botox injected into the neck muscles |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
United States | Emory University | Atlanta | Georgia |
United States | NeuroTrials Research Inc. | Atlanta | Georgia |
United States | University of Colorado at Denver Health Sciences | Aurora | Colorado |
United States | North Texas Movement Disorders Institute | Bedford | Texas |
United States | East Bay Physician's Group | Berkeley | California |
United States | University of Alabama at Birmingham | Birmingham | Alabama |
United States | Parkinson's & Movement Disorders Center of Boca Raton | Boca Raton | Florida |
United States | Tufts Medical Center | Boston | Massachusetts |
United States | Rush University Medical Center | Chicago | Illinois |
United States | University of Cincinnati Physicians Company, LLC | Cincinnati | Ohio |
United States | Rehabilitation Consultants PA | Eagan | Minnesota |
United States | Associated Neurologists of Southern Connecticut | Fairfield | Connecticut |
United States | Advanced Neurosciences Research | Fort Collins | Colorado |
United States | Parkinson's and Movement Disorder Institute | Fountain Valley | California |
United States | University of Florida Center for Movement Disorders and Neurorestoration | Gainesville | Florida |
United States | Guilford Neurologic Associates; Cone Health Medical Group | Greensboro | North Carolina |
United States | Penn State Hershey Neurology | Hershey | Pennsylvania |
United States | Baylor College of Medicine | Houston | Texas |
United States | University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston | Houston | Texas |
United States | Kansas City Bone & Joint Clinic | Kansas City | Kansas |
United States | Kingston Neurological Associates | Kingston | New York |
United States | Loma Linda University Healthcare, Department of Neurology | Loma Linda | California |
United States | USC Keck School of Medicine | Los Angeles | California |
United States | Fazzini Parkinson's Disease & Dystonia Center | New York | New York |
United States | The Ichan School of Medicine at Mount Sinai | New York | New York |
United States | International Clinical Research Institute | Overland Park | Kansas |
United States | Emerald Coast Center for Neurological Disorders | Pensacola | Florida |
United States | Island Neurological Associates | Plainview | New York |
United States | PD Treatment Center of SW FL | Port Charlotte | Florida |
United States | Coastal Neurology | Port Royal | South Carolina |
United States | OHSU Center for Health and Healing | Portland | Oregon |
United States | UC Davis Medical Center | Sacramento | California |
United States | Movement Disorders Center of Arizona, LLC | Scottsdale | Arizona |
United States | University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey | Stratford | New Jersey |
United States | Atlantic Neuroscience Institute | Summit | New Jersey |
United States | Puget Sound Neurology | Tacoma | Washington |
United States | University of South Florida | Tampa | Florida |
United States | University of Arizona | Tucson | Arizona |
United States | Georgetown University Hospital | Washington | District of Columbia |
United States | Guilford Neurologic Associates | West Palm Beach | Florida |
United States | Premiere Research Institute at Palm Beach Neurology | West Palm Beach | Florida |
United States | Wake Forest School of Medicine | Winston-Salem | North Carolina |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Ipsen |
United States,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Change From Baseline in Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS) Total Score at Week 4. | The change from baseline in the TWSTRS total score at Week 4 was determined for the subjects who received a single dose of Dysport® or placebo by intramuscular injection at the baseline visit (Day 1), and is expressed as weighted overall treatment difference. The TWSTRS is an assessment scale used to measure the impact of CD on subjects, and comprises 3 subscales: severity, disability and pain, each of which is scored independently. The total score from the 3 subscales gives the TWSTRS total score with a value from 0 to 85 (best to worst). The score was assessed by the investigator prior to study treatment at baseline and at all post-treatment visits. | 4 weeks post-treatment | |
Secondary | Change From Baseline in TWSTRS Total Score at Week 2. | The change from baseline in the TWSTRS total score at Week 2 was determined for the subjects who received a single dose of Dysport® or placebo by intramuscular injection at the baseline visit (Day 1), and is expressed as weighted overall treatment difference. The TWSTRS is an assessment scale used to measure the impact of CD on subjects, and comprises 3 subscales: severity, disability and pain, each of which is scored independently. The total score from the 3 subscales gives the TWSTRS total score with a value from 0 to 85 (best to worst). The score was assessed by the investigator prior to study treatment at baseline and at all post-treatment visits. | 2 weeks post-treatment | |
Secondary | Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC) in CD at Week 2. | The CGIC is an investigator-reported assessment of the global clinical change in CD since study treatment administration. The CGIC uses a seven-point Likert scale ranging from +3 (very much improved) to -3 (very much worse), and was assessed by the investigator at the Week 2 and Week 4 visits. | 2 weeks post-treatment | |
Secondary | TWSTRS Responders at Week 2. | Treatment response was determined as the number of responders at Week 2 relative to the baseline TWSTRS total score. A treatment responder is defined as a subject who had at least a 30% reduction in the TWSTRS total score after treatment. This was calculated as ([Week 2 score - baseline score]/baseline score) * 100. | 2 weeks post-treatment | |
Secondary | Change From Baseline in CGIC in CD at Week 4. | The CGIC is an investigator-reported assessment of the global clinical change in CD since study treatment administration. The CGIC uses a seven-point Likert scale ranging from +3 (very much improved) to -3 (very much worse), and was assessed by the investigator at the Week 2 and Week 4 visits. | 4 weeks post-treatment | |
Secondary | TWSTRS Responders at Week 4. | Treatment response was determined as the number of responders at Week 4 relative to the baseline TWSTRS total score. A treatment responder is defined as a subject who had at least a 30% reduction in the TWSTRS total score after treatment. This was calculated as ([Week 4 score - baseline score]/baseline score) * 100. | 4 weeks post-treatment | |
Secondary | Change From Baseline in Cervical Dystonia Impact Profile-58 (CDIP-58) Total Score at Week 4. | The CDIP-58 scale is a subject-based rating scale measuring the health impact of CD measured in 8 health dimensions including head and neck symptoms, pain and discomfort, upper limb activities, walking, sleep, annoyance, mood and psychosocial functioning. Subscale scores were transformed to a common theoretical range of 0 (no impact) to 100 (most impact). Negative changes from the baseline total score indicate improvement in the impact of CD on health whereas postive changes indicate worsening. | 4 weeks post-treatment | |
Secondary | Change From Baseline in CDIP-58 Total Score at Week 2. | The CDIP-58 scale is a subject-based rating scale measuring the health impact of CD measured in 8 health dimensions including head and neck symptoms, pain and discomfort, upper limb activities, walking, sleep, annoyance, mood and psychosocial functioning. Subscale scores were transformed to a common theoretical range of 0 (no impact) to 100 (most impact). Negative changes from the baseline total score indicate improvement in the impact of CD on health whereas postive changes indicate worsening. The hierarchical testing procedure would only be conducted if the previous secondary efficacy endpoint (change from baseline in CDIP-58 total score at Week 4) reached a statistically significant treatment effect. This secondary efficacy endpoint (change from baseline in CDIP-58 total score at Week 2) was performed to characterise the full clinical effect. | 2 weeks post-treatment |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT03617367 -
Long-Term Safety and Efficacy of Repeat Treatments of DaxibotulinumtoxinA for Injection in Adults With Isolated Cervical Dystonia (ASPEN-OLS)
|
Phase 3 | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT04057911 -
A Trial of Non-invasive Stimulation in Cervical Dystonia
|
N/A | |
Withdrawn |
NCT02180139 -
tDCS in Cervical Dystonia
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT00541905 -
Daily Dystonia Practice - A Trial to Investigate NT 201, the Duration of Treatment Effect After One Injection Session and in Long-term Treatment in Cervical Dystonia
|
Phase 4 | |
Unknown status |
NCT00418925 -
Efficacy of Dronabinol for the Treatment of Cervical Dystonia
|
Phase 2 | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT05715138 -
Comparison of Pallidal With Subthalamic Deep Brain Stimulation for Cervical Dystonia
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02131467 -
Safety and Tolerability of Perampanel in Cervical Dystonia
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT02959645 -
Assessment of Brain Activities in Cervical Dystonia
|
||
Completed |
NCT03805152 -
Abobotulinum Toxin and Neubotulinum Toxin Injection in Cerivical Dystonia
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT04949594 -
Relief of Pain in Patients With Cervical Dystonia Through the Use of Transcutaneous Electric Nerve Stimulation (TENS)
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT01664013 -
The Impact of Botulinum Toxin Treatment in Quality of Life of Cervical Dystonia Patients
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT00447772 -
Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Dysport® in Cervical Dystonia
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT00210431 -
Post Marketing Surveillance Study of Dysport
|
||
Completed |
NCT05157100 -
Clinical Study of Ingrezza (Valbenazine) for the Treatment of Cervical Dystonia
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT00257660 -
Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Study of AbobotulinumtoxinA (Dysport®) for the Treatment of Cervical Dystonia
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT05103202 -
Efficacy and Safety of 10-Week or Shorter vs 12-Week or Longer Injection Intervals of Botulinum Toxin
|
||
Terminated |
NCT00760318 -
Keppra for Cervical Dystonia
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT00323765 -
Plasticity in Cervical Dystonia
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04171258 -
Clinical Trial to Compare the Safety and Efficacy of Botulax® Versus Botox® in Patients With Cervical Dystonia
|
Phase 1 | |
Completed |
NCT04849988 -
A Phase 2 Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of ABP-450 in the Treatment of Cervical Dystonia
|
Phase 2 |