Comparison of Tendon Transfer, Botox Injections & Ongoing Treatment in

Status Terminated

Clinical Trial Summary

Doctors use different treatments for people with Cerebral Palsy. Surgery is one option. Botulinum toxin injections are another option; these are given directly into spastic muscles to weaken them temporarily. Regular ongoing treatment (splinting, stretching and exercises) is another option. The investigators want to find out if surgery works better than Botulinum Toxin (Botox) injections or regular ongoing treatment (therapy), and if the effects of Botulinum Toxin injections last for longer than six months.

Clinical Trial Description

The specific aims of this study and the methodology for achieving them are:

1. To determine if tendon surgery for the forearm, wrist and thumb deformities of UECP is more effective than Botulinum toxin injections or regular ongoing treatment at improving function and quality of life for children with UECP. Children who are candidates for tendon surgery will be prospectively randomized to one of three treatment groups: standard tendon surgery, a series of three Botulinum toxin injections over a period of 12 months, and regular ongoing treatment. Validated tests of cognition, function and quality of life with tests of stereognosis and range of motion will be administered before, during and after treatment in order to compare outcomes of the three treatment groups.

2. To determine if serial Botulinum toxin injections have long-term beneficial effects on upper extremity function which outlast their paralytic effects.

Botulinum toxin has been shown to have beneficial effects on UE function while the muscles injected remain weakened by the toxin. Clinicians have theorized that improvements in UE function are maintained after the toxin wears off, but this has not been proven. Children randomized to the Botulinum toxin injection group will receive 3 injections. Their function will be tested before the first injection, while the paralytic results of the second injection are still in effect, and after the paralytic effects of the third injection have worn off, and the results compared in order to determine if functional improvements outlast the medicinal effects. ;

Study Design

Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Open Label

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

Cerebral Palsy

Clinical Trial Details

NCT number	NCT00250081
Study type	Interventional
Source	Shriners Hospitals for Children
Contact
Status	Terminated
Phase	N/A
Start date	February 2005
Completion date	May 2013

View Details

See also
Status	Clinical Trial	Phase
Recruiting	`NCT05317234` - Genetic Predisposition in Cerebral Palsy	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT05576948` - Natural History of Cerebral Palsy Prospective Study
Completed	`NCT04119063` - Evaluating Wearable Robotic Assistance on Gait	Early Phase 1
Completed	`NCT03264339` - The Small Step Program - Early Intervention for Children With High Risk of Developing Cerebral Palsy	N/A
Completed	`NCT05551364` - Usability and Effectiveness of the ATLAS2030 Exoskeleton in Children With Cerebral Palsy	N/A
Completed	`NCT03902886` - Independent Walking Onset of Children With Cerebral Palsy
Recruiting	`NCT05571033` - Operant Conditioning of the Soleus Stretch Reflex in Adults With Cerebral Palsy	N/A
Not yet recruiting	`NCT04081675` - Compliance in Children With Cerebral Palsy Supplied With AFOs
Completed	`NCT02167022` - Intense Physiotherapies to Improve Function in Young Children With Cerebral Palsy	N/A
Completed	`NCT04012125` - The Effect of Flexible Thoracolumbar Brace on Scoliosis in Cerebral Palsy	N/A
Enrolling by invitation	`NCT05619211` - Piloting Movement-to-Music With Arm-based Sprint-Intensity Interval Training Among Children With Physical Disabilities	Phase 1
Completed	`NCT04489498` - Comparison of Somatometric Characteristics Between Cerebral Palsy and Normal Children, Cross-sectional, Multi Center Study
Completed	`NCT03677193` - Biofeedback-enhanced Interactive Computer-play for Youth With Cerebral Palsy	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT06450158` - Robot-assisted Training in Children With CP	N/A
Completed	`NCT04093180` - Intensive Neurorehabilitation for Cerebral Palsy	N/A
Completed	`NCT02909127` - The Pediatric Eating Assessment Tool
Not yet recruiting	`NCT06377982` - Human Umbilical Cord Blood Infusion in Patients With Cerebral Palsy	Phase 1
Not yet recruiting	`NCT06007885` - Examining Capacity Building of Youth With Physical Disabilities to Pursue Participation Following the PREP Intervention.	N/A
Not yet recruiting	`NCT03183427` - Corpus Callosum Size in Patients With Pineal Cyst	N/A
Active, not recruiting	`NCT03078621` - Bone Marrow-Derived Stem Cell Transplantation for the Treatment of Cerebral Palsy	Phase 1/Phase 2

Clinical trials are conducted in a series of steps, called phases - each phase is designed to answer a separate research question.

Phase 1: Researchers test a new drug or treatment in a small group of people for the first time to evaluate its safety, determine a safe dosage range, and identify side effects.
Phase 2: The drug or treatment is given to a larger group of people to see if it is effective and to further evaluate its safety.
Phase 3: The drug or treatment is given to large groups of people to confirm its effectiveness, monitor side effects, compare it to commonly used treatments, and collect information that will allow the drug or treatment to be used safely.
Phase 4: Studies are done after the drug or treatment has been marketed to gather information on the drug's effect in various populations and any side effects associated with long-term use.

Comparison of Tendon Transfer, Botox Injections and Ongoing Treatment in Hemiplegic Cerebral Palsy — UECP

Clinical Trial Summary

Clinical Trial Description

Study Design

Related Conditions & MeSH terms