Central Nervous System Diseases Clinical Trial
Official title:
A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Crossover, Phase 3 Study to Determine the Safety and Efficacy of Gadobutrol 1.0 Molar (Gadavist) in Patients Referred for Contrast-enhanced MRI of the Central Nervous System (CNS)
Verified date | December 2014 |
Source | Bayer |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | United States: Food and Drug Administration |
Study type | Interventional |
This study involves the use of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) contrast agents called gadobutrol (Gadavist) Injection and ProHance Injection. The purpose of this study is to look at the safety (what are the side effects) and efficacy (how well does it work) of gadobutrol when used for taking MR images of the brain and spine. The results of the MRI with gadobutrol Injection will be compared to the results of MR images taken without contrast and with the results of the MR images taken with ProHance.
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 402 |
Est. completion date | April 2009 |
Est. primary completion date | April 2009 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | Both |
Age group | 18 Years and older |
Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: - Is at least 18 years of age - Is referred for a contrast-enhanced MRI of the CNS based on current clinical symptoms or results of a previous imaging procedure - Has been fully informed about the study, including provisions of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) as applicable, and has consented to participate Exclusion Criteria: - Has any contraindication to the MRI examinations or the use of Gd-containing contrast agents - Has a history of severe allergic or anaphylactoid reaction to any allergen including drugs and contrast agents - Has severe cardiovascular disease (eg, known long QT syndrome, acute myocardial infarction [< 14 days], unstable angina, congestive heart failure New York Heart Association class IV) or acute stroke (< 48 hours)- Patients with acute renal insufficiency of any severity due to hepato-renal syndrome or in the perioperative liver transplantation period |
Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Crossover Assignment, Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor), Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Australia | Royal Prince Alfred Hospital | Camperdown | New South Wales |
Australia | Monash Medical Centre | Clayton | Victoria |
Australia | St George Hospital | Kogarah | New South Wales |
Australia | Westmead Hospital | Westmead | New South Wales |
Austria | Medizinische Universität Graz | Graz | Steiermark |
Austria | LNK Wagner Jauregg | Linz | Oberösterreich |
Austria | Landeskrankenhaus Donauregion Tulln | Tulln | Niederösterreich |
Austria | Allgemeines Krankenhaus der Stadt Wien Universitätskliniken | Wien | |
Colombia | Fundación Santa Fe de Bogotá - Hospital Universitario | Bogotá | Cundinamarca |
Colombia | DIME Clinica Neurocardiovascular S.A. | Cali | Valle del Cauca |
Colombia | Centro de Diagnostico Medico | Medellín | |
Colombia | Fundación Instituto de Alta tecnología médica de Antioquia | Medellín | Antioquia |
Germany | Zentralklinikum Augsburg | Augsburg | Bayern |
Germany | Universitätsklinikum Charite zu Berlin | Berlin | |
Germany | Medizinische Einrichtungen der Universität Bonn | Bonn | Nordrhein-Westfalen |
Germany | Medizinisches Versorgungszentrum Prof. Dr. D. Uhlenbrock | Dortmund | Nordrhein-Westfalen |
Germany | Medizinische Fakultät Carl Gustav Carus | Dresden | Sachsen |
Germany | HELIOS Klinikum Erfurt GmbH | Erfurt | Thüringen |
Germany | Universitätsklinikum Erlangen | Erlangen | Bayern |
Germany | Krankenhaus Nordwest | Frankfurt | Hessen |
Germany | Universitätsklinikum Hamburg Eppendorf (UKE) | Hamburg | |
Germany | Kliniken der Medizinischen Hochschule Hannover | Hannover | Niedersachsen |
Germany | Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum | Heidelberg | Baden-Württemberg |
Germany | Universitätskliniken des Saarlandes | Homburg | Saarland |
Germany | Städtisches Klinikum Karlsruhe gGmbH | Karlsruhe | Baden-Württemberg |
Germany | Klinikum der Christian-Albrechts-Universität | Kiel | Schleswig-Holstein |
Germany | Universitätsklinikum Köln | Köln | Nordrhein-Westfalen |
Germany | Universitätsklinikum Leipzig AöR | Leipzig | Sachsen |
Germany | Klinikum Mannheim gGmbH | Mannheim | Baden-Württemberg |
Germany | Klinikum rechts der Isar | München | Bayern |
Germany | LMU Klinikum der Universität München - Großhadern | München | Bayern |
Germany | Klinikum Ernst von Bergmann | Potsdam | Brandenburg |
India | CT /MRI centre | Indore | Madhya Pradesh |
India | Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences | Lucknow | |
India | Bombay Hospital, Institute of Medical sciences | Mumbai | |
India | Piramal Diagnostic- Jankharia Imaging | Mumbai | Maharashtra |
Japan | Himeji Central Hospital | Himeji | Hyogo |
Japan | Himeji Medical Center | Himeji | Hyogo |
Japan | Kishiwada Tokushukai Hospital | Kishiwada | Osaka |
Japan | Institute of Biomedical Research and Innovation | Kobe | Hyogo |
Japan | Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital | Kobe | Hyogo |
Japan | Shinsuma Hospital | Kobe | Hyogo |
Japan | Utano National Hospital | Kyoto | |
Japan | Nagoya Kyoritsu Clinic | Nagoya | Aichi |
Japan | Nagoya Kyoritsu Hospital | Nagoya | Aichi |
Japan | Social Insurance Chukyo Hospital | Nagoya | Aichi |
Japan | Osaka General Medical Center | Osaka | |
Japan | Osaka Medical Center for Cancer and Cardiovascular Diseases | Osaka | |
Japan | Osaka National Hospital | Osaka | |
Japan | Shimonoseki Kosei Hospital | Shimonoseki | Yamaguchi |
Switzerland | Universitätsspital Basel | Basel | Basel-Stadt |
Switzerland | Inselspital Bern | Bern | |
Switzerland | Hôpital Cantonal Universitaire de Genève | Genève | |
Switzerland | Luzerner Kantonsspital | Luzern | |
Switzerland | Kantonsspital St. Gallen | St. Gallen | Sankt Gallen |
United States | University of New Mexico School of Medicine | Alburquerque | New Mexico |
United States | Atchison Hospital | Atchison | Kansas |
United States | Johns Hopkins Hospital/Health System | Baltimore | Maryland |
United States | University of Maryland Hospital System | Baltimore | Maryland |
United States | West Alabama Research, Inc. | Birmingham | Alabama |
United States | Shields MRI - Brockton | Brockton | Massachusetts |
United States | Medical University of South Carolina | Charleston | South Carolina |
United States | The Cleveland Clinic | Cleveland | Ohio |
United States | Duke University Medical Center | Durham | North Carolina |
United States | NorthShore University HealthSystem-Evanston Hospital | Evanston | Illinois |
United States | University of Florida - Jacksonville | Jacksonville | Florida |
United States | Kingston Neurological Associates, PC | Kingston | New York |
United States | Los Gatos MRI | Los Gatos | California |
United States | Aurora Saint Luke's Medical Center | Milwaukee | Wisconsin |
United States | NYU Hospital for Joint Diseases | New York | New York |
United States | Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian | Newport Beach | California |
United States | Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania | Philadelphia | Pennsylvania |
United States | Allegheny General Hospital | Pittsburgh | Pennsylvania |
United States | Rhode Island Hospital | Providence | Rhode Island |
United States | Redwood Regional Medical Group, Inc. | Santa Rosa | California |
United States | University of Washington Medical Center | Seattle | Washington |
United States | Washington University School of Medicine | St. Louis | Missouri |
United States | Achieve Clinical Research, LLC | Tuscaloosa | Alabama |
United States | VA Boston Healthcare System-West Roxbury Division | West Roxbury | Massachusetts |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Bayer |
United States, Australia, Austria, Colombia, Germany, India, Japan, Switzerland,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Scores for Three Visualization Parameters (Contrast Enhancement, Border Delineation and Internal Morphology) for Combined Unenhanced/Gadobutrol-enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Compared to Unenhanced MRI by Blinded Reader 1 (BR1) | BR1 evaluated the images from the unenhanced MRI in one session and the images from the combined unenhanced and gadobutrol-enhanced MRIs in another. Contrast enhancement was scored on a 4-point scale where 1 = no enhancement and 4 = excellent enhancement. Border delineation was scored on a 4-point scale where 1 = no or unclear delineation and 4 = excellent delineation. Internal morphology was scored on a 3-point scale where 1 = poorly visible and 3 = sufficiently visible. | Up to 2 hours after injection of gadobutrol | No |
Primary | Scores for Three Visualization Parameters (Contrast Enhancement, Border Delineation and Internal Morphology) for Combined Unenhanced/Gadobutrol-enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Compared to Unenhanced MRI by Blinded Reader 2 (BR2) | BR2 evaluated the images from the unenhanced MRI in one session and the images from the combined unenhanced and gadobutrol-enhanced MRIs in another. Contrast enhancement was scored on a 4-point scale where 1 = no enhancement and 4 = excellent enhancement. Border delineation was scored on a 4-point scale where 1 = no or unclear delineation and 4 = excellent delineation. Internal morphology was scored on a 3-point scale where 1 = poorly visible and 3 = sufficiently visible. | Up to 2 hours after injection of gadobutrol | No |
Primary | Scores for Three Visualization Parameters (Contrast Enhancement, Border Delineation and Internal Morphology) for Combined Unenhanced/Gadobutrol-enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Compared to Unenhanced MRI by Blinded Reader 3 (BR3) | BR3 evaluated the images from the unenhanced MRI in one session and the images from the combined unenhanced and gadobutrol-enhanced MRIs in another. Contrast enhancement was scored on a 4-point scale where 1 = no enhancement and 4 = excellent enhancement. Border delineation was scored on a 4-point scale where 1 = no or unclear delineation and 4 = excellent delineation. Internal morphology was scored on a 3-point scale where 1 = poorly visible and 3 = sufficiently visible. | Up to 2 hours after injection of gadobutrol | No |
Primary | Scores for Three Visualization Parameters (Contrast Enhancement, Border Delineation and Internal Morphology) for Combined Unenhanced/Gadobutrol-enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Compared to Unenhanced MRI by Average Reader (AR) | The AR analysis used the mean of the values for the 3 blinded readers. The 3 BRs evaluated the images from the unenhanced MRI in one session and the images from the combined unenhanced and gadobutrol-enhanced MRIs in another. Contrast enhancement was scored on a 4-point scale where 1 = no enhancement and 4 = excellent enhancement. Border delineation was scored on a 4-point scale where 1 = no or unclear delineation and 4 = excellent delineation. Internal morphology was scored on a 3-point scale where 1 = poorly visible and 3 = sufficiently visible. | Up to 2 hours after injection of gadobutrol | No |
Primary | Number of Lesions for Combined Unenhanced/Gadobutrol-enhanced MRI Compared to Unenhanced MRI by Blinded Readers | The blinded readers evaluated the images from the unenhanced MRI in one session and the images from the combined unenhanced and gadobutrol-enhanced MRIs in another to determine the total number of lesions. | Up to 2 hours after injection of gadobutrol | No |
Primary | Scores for Three Visualization Parameters (Contrast Enhancement, Border Delineation and Internal Morphology) for Normal Structures for Combined Unenhanced/Gadobutrol-enhanced MRI Compared to Unenhanced MRI by Blinded Reader 1 (BR1) | BR1 evaluated the images from the unenhanced MRI in one session and the images from the combined unenhanced and gadobutrol-enhanced MRIs in another. Contrast enhancement was scored on a 4-point scale where 1 = no enhancement and 4 = excellent enhancement. Border delineation was scored on a 4-point scale where 1 = no or unclear delineation and 4 = excellent delineation. Internal morphology was scored on a 3-point scale where 1 = poorly visible and 3 = sufficiently visible. | Up to 2 hours after injection of gadobutrol | No |
Primary | Scores for Three Visualization Parameters (Contrast Enhancement, Border Delineation and Internal Morphology) for Normal Structures for Combined Unenhanced/Gadobutrol-enhanced MRI Compared to Unenhanced MRI by Blinded Reader 2 (BR2) | BR2 evaluated the images from the unenhanced MRI in one session and the images from the combined unenhanced and gadobutrol-enhanced MRIs in another. Contrast enhancement was scored on a 4-point scale where 1 = no enhancement and 4 = excellent enhancement. Border delineation was scored on a 4-point scale where 1 = no or unclear delineation and 4 = excellent delineation. Internal morphology was scored on a 3-point scale where 1 = poorly visible and 3 = sufficiently visible. | Up to 2 hours after injection of gadobutrol | No |
Primary | Scores for Three Visualization Parameters (Contrast Enhancement, Border Delineation and Internal Morphology) for Normal Structures for Combined Unenhanced/Gadobutrol-enhanced MRI Compared to Unenhanced MRI by Blinded Reader 3 (BR3) | BR3 evaluated the images from the unenhanced MRI in one session and the images from the combined unenhanced and gadobutrol-enhanced MRIs in another. Contrast enhancement was scored on a 4-point scale where 1 = no enhancement and 4 = excellent enhancement. Border delineation was scored on a 4-point scale where 1 = no or unclear delineation and 4 = excellent delineation. Internal morphology was scored on a 3-point scale where 1 = poorly visible and 3 = sufficiently visible. | Up to 2 hours after injection of gadobutrol | No |
Primary | Scores for Three Visualization Parameters (Contrast Enhancement, Border Delineation and Internal Morphology) for Normal Structures for Combined Unenhanced/Gadobutrol-enhanced MRI Compared to Unenhanced MRI by Average Reader (AR) | The AR analysis used the mean of the values for the 3 blinded readers. The 3 BRs evaluated the images from the unenhanced MRI in one session and the images from the combined unenhanced and gadobutrol-enhanced MRIs in another. Contrast enhancement was scored on a 4-point scale where 1 = no enhancement and 4 = excellent enhancement. Border delineation was scored on a 4-point scale where 1 = no or unclear delineation and 4 = excellent delineation. Internal morphology was scored on a 3-point scale where 1 = poorly visible and 3 = sufficiently visible. | Up to 2 hours after injection of gadobutrol | No |
Primary | Scores for Three Visualization Parameters (Contrast Enhancement, Border Delineation and Internal Morphology) for Lesions for Combined Unenhanced/Gadobutrol-enhanced MRI Compared to Unenhanced MRI by Blinded Reader 1 (BR1) | BR1 evaluated the images from the unenhanced MRI in one session and the images from the combined unenhanced and gadobutrol-enhanced MRIs in another. Contrast enhancement was scored on a 4-point scale where 1 = no enhancement and 4 = excellent enhancement. Border delineation was scored on a 4-point scale where 1 = no or unclear delineation and 4 = excellent delineation. Internal morphology was scored on a 3-point scale where 1 = poorly visible and 3 = sufficiently visible. | Up to 2 hours after injection of gadobutrol | No |
Primary | Scores for Three Visualization Parameters (Contrast Enhancement, Border Delineation and Internal Morphology) for Lesions for Combined Unenhanced/Gadobutrol-enhanced MRI Compared to Unenhanced MRI by Blinded Reader 2 (BR2) | BR2 evaluated the images from the unenhanced MRI in one session and the images from the combined unenhanced and gadobutrol-enhanced MRIs in another. Contrast enhancement was scored on a 4-point scale where 1 = no enhancement and 4 = excellent enhancement. Border delineation was scored on a 4-point scale where 1 = no or unclear delineation and 4 = excellent delineation. Internal morphology was scored on a 3-point scale where 1 = poorly visible and 3 = sufficiently visible. | Up to 2 hours after injection of gadobutrol | No |
Primary | Scores for Three Visualization Parameters (Contrast Enhancement, Border Delineation and Internal Morphology) for Lesions for Combined Unenhanced/Gadobutrol-enhanced MRI Compared to Unenhanced MRI by Blinded Reader 3 (BR3) | BR3 evaluated the images from the unenhanced MRI in one session and the images from the combined unenhanced and gadobutrol-enhanced MRIs in another. Contrast enhancement was scored on a 4-point scale where 1 = no enhancement and 4 = excellent enhancement. Border delineation was scored on a 4-point scale where 1 = no or unclear delineation and 4 = excellent delineation. Internal morphology was scored on a 3-point scale where 1 = poorly visible and 3 = sufficiently visible. | Up to 2 hours after injection of gadobutrol | No |
Primary | Scores for Three Visualization Parameters (Contrast Enhancement, Border Delineation and Internal Morphology) for Lesions for Combined Unenhanced/Gadobutrol-enhanced MRI Compared to Unenhanced MRI by Average Reader (AR) | The AR analysis used the mean of the values for the 3 blinded readers. The 3 BRs evaluated the images from the unenhanced MRI in one session and the images from the combined unenhanced and gadobutrol-enhanced MRIs in another. Contrast enhancement was scored on a 4-point scale where 1 = no enhancement and 4 = excellent enhancement. Border delineation was scored on a 4-point scale where 1 = no or unclear delineation and 4 = excellent delineation. Internal morphology was scored on a 3-point scale where 1 = poorly visible and 3 = sufficiently visible. | Up to 2 hours after injection of gadobutrol | No |
Secondary | Scores for Three Visualization Parameters (Contrast Enhancement, Border Delineation and Internal Morphology) for Combined Unenhanced/Gadoteridol-enhanced MRI Compared to Unenhanced MRI by Average Reader | The AR analysis used the mean of the values for the 3 blinded readers. The 3 BRs evaluated the images from the unenhanced MRI in one session and the images from the combined unenhanced and gadobutrol-enhanced MRIs in another. Contrast enhancement was scored on a 4-point scale where 1 = no enhancement and 4 = excellent enhancement. Border delineation was scored on a 4-point scale where 1 = no or unclear delineation and 4 = excellent delineation. Internal morphology was scored on a 3-point scale where 1 = poorly visible and 3 = sufficiently visible. | Up to 2 hours after injection of gadoteridol | No |
Secondary | Number of Lesions for Combined Unenhanced/Gadoteridol-enhanced MRI Compared to Unenhanced MRI by Average Reader | The AR analysis used the mean of the values for the 3 blinded readers | Up to 2 hours after injection of gadoteridol | No |
Secondary | Scores for Three Visualization Parameters (Contrast Enhancement, Border Delineation and Internal Morphology) for Combined Unenhanced/Gadobutrol-enhanced MRI Compared to Combined Unenhanced/Gadoteridol-enhanced MRI by Average Reader | The AR analysis used the mean of the values for the 3 blinded readers. | Up to 2 hours after injection of gadobutrol or gadoteridol | No |
Secondary | Number of Lesions for Combined Unenhanced/Gadobutrol-enhanced MRI Compared to Combined Unenhanced/Gadoteridol-enhanced MRI by Average Reader | The AR analysis used the mean of the values for the 3 blinded readers | Up to 2 hours after injection of gadobutrol or gadoteridol | No |
Secondary | Percentage of Participants With More Lesions Detected for Combined Unenhanced/Gadobutrol-enhanced MRI or for Unenhanced MRI by Blinded Readers | The AR analysis used the mean of the values for the 3 blinded readers. The 3 BRs evaluated the images from the unenhanced MRI in one session and the images from the combined unenhanced and gadobutrol-enhanced MRIs in another and determined the number of lesion from each. | Up to 2 hours after injection of gadobutrol | No |
Secondary | Percentage of Participants With More Lesions Detected for Combined Unenhanced/Gadoteridol-enhanced MRI or for Unenhanced MRI by Average Reader | The AR analysis used the mean of the values for the 3 blinded readers. The 3 BRs evaluated the images from the unenhanced MRI in one session and the images from the combined unenhanced and gadoteridol-enhanced MRIs in another and determined the number of lesion from each. | Up to 2 hours after injection of gadoteridol | No |
Secondary | Percentage of Participants With More Lesions Detected for Combined Unenhanced/Gadobutrol-enhanced MRI or for Combined Unenhanced/Gadoteridol-enhanced MRI by Average Reader | The AR analysis used the mean of the values for the 3 blinded readers. The 3 BRs evaluated the images from the combined unenhanced and gadobutrol-enhanced MRIs in one session and the images from the combined unenhanced and gadoteridol-enhanced MRIs in another and determined the number of lesion from each. | Up to 2 hours after injection of gadobutrol or gadoteridol | No |
Secondary | Scores for Two Visualization Parameters (Border Delineation and Internal Morphology) for Combined Unenhanced/Gadobutrol-enhanced MRI Compared to Unenhanced MRI by Clinical Investigator | The clinical investigators evaluated the images from the unenhanced MRI and the images from the combined unenhanced and gadobutrol-enhanced MRIs. Border delineation was scored on a 4-point scale where 1 = no or unclear delineation and 4 = excellent delineation. Internal morphology was scored on a 3-point scale where 1 = poorly visible and 3 = sufficiently visible. | Up to 2 hours after injection of gadobutrol | No |
Secondary | Number of Lesions for Combined Unenhanced/Gadobutrol-enhanced MRI Compared to Unenhanced MRI by Clinical Investigator | The clinical investigators evaluated the images from the unenhanced MRI and the images from the combined unenhanced and gadobutrol-enhanced MRIs in another to determine the total number of lesions. | Up to 2 hours after injection of gadobutrol | No |
Secondary | Scores for Two Visualization Parameters (Border Delineation and Internal Morphology) for Normal Structures for Combined Unenhanced/Gadobutrol-enhanced MRI Compared to Unenhanced MRI by Clinical Investigator | The clinical investigators evaluated the images from the unenhanced MRI and the images from the combined unenhanced and gadobutrol-enhanced MRIs. Border delineation was scored on a 4-point scale where 1 = no or unclear delineation and 4 = excellent delineation. Internal morphology was scored on a 3-point scale where 1 = poorly visible and 3 = sufficiently visible. | Up to 2 hours after injection of gadobutrol | No |
Secondary | Scores for Two Visualization Parameters (Border Delineation and Internal Morphology) for Lesions for Combined Unenhanced/Gadobutrol-enhanced MRI Compared to Unenhanced MRI by Clinical Investigator | The clinical investigators evaluated the images from the unenhanced MRI and the images from the combined unenhanced and gadobutrol-enhanced MRIs. Border delineation was scored on a 4-point scale where 1 = no or unclear delineation and 4 = excellent delineation. Internal morphology was scored on a 3-point scale where 1 = poorly visible and 3 = sufficiently visible. | Up to 2 hours after injection of gadobutrol | No |
Secondary | Scores for Two Visualization Parameters (Border Delineation and Internal Morphology) for Combined Unenhanced/Gadoteridol-enhanced MRI Compared to Unenhanced MRI by Clinical Investigator | The clinical investigators evaluated the images from the unenhanced MRI and the images from the combined unenhanced and gadoteridol-enhanced MRIs. Border delineation was scored on a 4-point scale where 1 = no or unclear delineation and 4 = excellent delineation. Internal morphology was scored on a 3-point scale where 1 = poorly visible and 3 = sufficiently visible. | Up to 2 hours after injection of gadoteridol | No |
Secondary | Number of Lesions for Combined Unenhanced/Gadoteridol-enhanced MRI Compared to Unenhanced MRI by Clinical Investigator | The clinical investigators evaluated the images from the unenhanced MRI and the images from the combined unenhanced and gadoteridol-enhanced MRIs in another to determine the total number of lesions. | Up to 2 hours after injection of gadoteridol | No |
Secondary | Scores for Two Visualization Parameters (Border Delineation and Internal Morphology) for Normal Structures for Combined Unenhanced/Gadoteridol-enhanced MRI Compared to Unenhanced MRI by Clinical Investigator | The clinical investigators evaluated the images from the unenhanced MRI and the images from the combined unenhanced and gadoteridol-enhanced MRIs. Border delineation was scored on a 4-point scale where 1 = no or unclear delineation and 4 = excellent delineation. Internal morphology was scored on a 3-point scale where 1 = poorly visible and 3 = sufficiently visible. | Up to 2 hours after injection of gadoteridol | No |
Secondary | Scores for Two Visualization Parameters (Border Delineation and Internal Morphology) for Lesions for Combined Unenhanced/Gadoteridol-enhanced MRI Compared to Unenhanced MRI by Clinical Investigator | The clinical investigators evaluated the images from the unenhanced MRI and the images from the combined unenhanced and gadoteridol-enhanced MRIs. Border delineation was scored on a 4-point scale where 1 = no or unclear delineation and 4 = excellent delineation. Internal morphology was scored on a 3-point scale where 1 = poorly visible and 3 = sufficiently visible. | Up to 2 hours after injection of gadoteridol | No |
Secondary | Scores for Three Visualization Parameters (Contrast Enhancement, Border Delineation and Internal Morphology) for Combined Unenhanced/Gadobutrol-enhanced MRI Compared to Combined Unenhanced/Gadoteridol-enhanced MRI by Clinical Investigator | The clinical investigators evaluated the images from the combined unenhanced and gadobutrol-enhanced MRIs and the images from the combined unenhanced and gadoteridol-enhanced MRIs. Contrast enhancement was scored on a 4-point scale where 1 = no enhancement and 4 = excellent enhancement. Border delineation was scored on a 4-point scale where 1 = no or unclear delineation and 4 = excellent delineation. Internal morphology was scored on a 3-point scale where 1 = poorly visible and 3 = sufficiently visible. | Up to 2 hours after injection of gadobutrol or gadoteridol | No |
Secondary | Number of Lesions for Combined Unenhanced/Gadobutrol-enhanced MRI Compared to Combined Unenhanced/Gadoteridol-enhanced MRI by Clinical Investigator | The clinical investigators evaluated the images from the combined unenhanced and gadobutrol-enhanced MRIs and the combined unenhanced and gadoteridol-enhanced MRIs in another to determine the total number of lesions. | Up to 2 hours after injection of gadobutrol or gadoteridol | No |
Secondary | Scores for Contrast Enhancement, Border Delineation and Internal Morphology for Normal Structures for Combined Unenhanced/Gadobutrol-enhanced MRI Compared to Combined Unenhanced/Gadoteridol-enhanced MRI by Clinical Investigator | The clinical investigators evaluated the images from the combined unenhanced and gadobutrol-enhanced MRIs and the images from the combined unenhanced and gadoteridol-enhanced MRIs. Contrast enhancement was scored on a 4-point scale where 1 = no enhancement and 4 = excellent enhancement. Border delineation was scored on a 4-point scale where 1 = no or unclear delineation and 4 = excellent delineation. Internal morphology was scored on a 3-point scale where 1 = poorly visible and 3 = sufficiently visible. | Up to 2 hours after injection of gadobutrol or gadoteridol | No |
Secondary | Scores for Contrast Enhancement, Border Delineation and Internal Morphology for Lesions for Combined Unenhanced/Gadobutrol-enhanced MRI Compared to Combined Unenhanced/Gadoteridol-enhanced MRI by Clinical Investigator | The clinical investigators evaluated the images from the combined unenhanced and gadobutrol-enhanced MRIs and the images from the combined unenhanced and gadoteridol-enhanced MRIs. Contrast enhancement was scored on a 4-point scale where 1 = no enhancement and 4 = excellent enhancement. Border delineation was scored on a 4-point scale where 1 = no or unclear delineation and 4 = excellent delineation. Internal morphology was scored on a 3-point scale where 1 = poorly visible and 3 = sufficiently visible. | Up to 2 hours after injection of gadobutrol or gadoteridol | No |
Secondary | Percentage (Per.) of the Exact Diagnostic Matches (Accuracy of Diagnosis) for Combined Unenhanced/Gadobutrol-enhanced MRI Compared to Unenhanced MRI by Majority Reader | The majority reader diagnosis was the diagnosis provided by at least 2 of the BRs. The final clinical diagnosis was provided by an independent truth committee following evaluation of findings from referral through a 3-month follow-up period, not including the study-specific MR image sets. The accuracy of the majority reader diagnoses for the combined unenhanced/gadobutrol-enhanced and the unenhanced MR images were evaluated for consistency with the final clinical diagnosis. | Up to 2 hours after injection of gadobutrol | No |
Secondary | Percentage (Per.) of the Exact Diagnostic Matches (Accuracy of Diagnosis) for Combined Unenhanced/Gadobutrol-enhanced MRI Compared to Unenhanced MRI by Clinical Investigator | The final clinical diagnosis was provided by an independent truth committee following evaluation of findings from referral through a 3-month follow-up period, not including the study-specific MR image sets. The accuracy of the investigator diagnoses for the combined unenhanced/gadobutrol-enhanced and the unenhanced MR images were evaluated for consistency with the final clinical diagnosis. | Up to 2 hours after injection of gadobutrol | No |
Secondary | Percentage (Per.) of the Exact Diagnostic Matches (Accuracy of Diagnosis) for Combined Unenhanced/Gadoteridol-enhanced MRI Compared to Unenhanced MRI by Majority Reader | The majority reader diagnosis was the diagnosis provided by at least 2 of the BRs. The final clinical diagnosis was provided by an independent truth committee following evaluation of findings from referral through a 3-month follow-up period, not including the study-specific MR image sets. The accuracy of the majority reader diagnoses for the combined unenhanced/gadoteridol-enhanced and the unenhanced MR images were evaluated for consistency with the final clinical diagnosis. | Up to 2 hours after injection of gadoteridol | No |
Secondary | Percentage (Per.) of the Exact Diagnostic Matches (Accuracy of Diagnosis) for Combined Unenhanced/Gadoteridol-enhanced MRI Compared to Unenhanced MRI by Clinical Investigator | The final clinical diagnosis was provided by an independent truth committee following evaluation of findings from referral through a 3-month follow-up period, not including the study-specific MR image sets. The accuracy of the investigator diagnoses for the combined unenhanced/gadoteridol-enhanced and the unenhanced MR images were evaluated for consistency with the final clinical diagnosis. | Up to 2 hours after injection of gadoteridol | No |
Secondary | Percentage (Per.) of the Exact Diagnostic Matches (Accuracy of Diagnosis) for Combined Unenhanced/Gadobutrol-enhanced MRI Compared to Combined Unenhanced/Gadoteridol-enhanced MRI by Majority Reader | The majority reader diagnosis was the diagnosis provided by at least 2 of the BRs. The final clinical diagnosis was provided by an independent truth committee following evaluation of findings from referral through a 3-month follow-up period, not including the study-specific MR image sets. The accuracy of the majority reader diagnoses for the combined unenhanced/gadobutrol-enhanced and the combined unenhanced/gadoteridol-enhanced MR images were evaluated for consistency with the final clinical diagnosis. | Up to 2 hours after injection of gadobutrol or gadoteridol | No |
Secondary | Percentage (Per.) of the Exact Diagnostic Matches (Accuracy of Diagnosis) for Combined Unenhanced/Gadobutrol-enhanced MRI Compared to Combined Unenhanced/Gadoteridol-enhanced MRI by Clinical Investigator | The final clinical diagnosis was provided by an independent truth committee following evaluation of findings from referral through a 3-month follow-up period, not including the study-specific MR image sets. The accuracy of the clinical investigator diagnoses for the combined unenhanced/gadobutrol-enhanced and the combined unenhanced/gadoteridol-enhanced MR images were evaluated for consistency with the final clinical diagnosis. | Up to 2 hours after injection of gadobutrol or gadoteridol | No |
Secondary | Accuracy of Detection of Normal/Abnormal Brain Tissue for Combined Unenhanced/Gadobutrol-enhanced MRI Compared to Unenhanced MRI by Majority Reader Using T1-weighted (T1w) Images | The majority reader diagnosis was the diagnosis provided by at least 2 of the 3 BRs for the T1w assessment (normal or abnormal). The final clinical diagnosis was provided by an independent truth committee following evaluation of findings from referral through a 3-month follow-up period, not including the study-specific MR image sets. Accuracy = percentage of participants for which the imaging modality (unenhanced or Gadobutrol-enhanced) matches the standard of truth for the presence or absence of abnormal brain tissue. | Up to 2 hours after injection of gadobutrol | No |
Secondary | Sensitivity of Detection of Normal/Abnormal Brain Tissue for Combined Unenhanced/Gadobutrol-enhanced MRI Compared to Unenhanced MRI by Majority Reader Using T1-weighted (T1w) Images | The majority reader diagnosis was the diagnosis provided by at least 2 of the 3 BRs for the T1w assessment (normal or abnormal). The final clinical diagnosis was provided by an independent truth committee following evaluation of findings from referral through a 3-month follow-up period, not including the study-specific MR image sets. Sensitivity = percentage of participants for which the imaging modality (unenhanced or Gadobutrol-enhanced) correctly detects abnormal brain tissue as defined by the independent truth committee. | Up to 2 hours after injection of gadobutrol | No |
Secondary | Specificity of Detection of Normal/Abnormal Brain Tissue for Combined Unenhanced/Gadobutrol-enhanced MRI Compared to Unenhanced MRI by Majority Reader Using T1-weighted (T1w) Images | The majority reader diagnosis was the diagnosis provided by at least 2 of the 3 BRs for the T1w assessment (normal or abnormal). The final clinical diagnosis was provided by an independent truth committee following evaluation of findings from referral through a 3-month follow-up period, not including the study-specific MR image sets. Specificity = percentage of participants for which the imaging modality (unenhanced or Gadobutrol-enhanced) correctly excludes abnormal brain tissue as defined by the independent truth committee. | Up to 2 hours after injection of gadobutrol | No |
Secondary | Accuracy of Detection of Normal/Abnormal Brain Tissue for Combined Unenhanced/Gadoteridol-enhanced MRI Compared to Unenhanced MRI by Majority Reader Using T1-weighted (T1w) Images | The majority reader diagnosis was the diagnosis provided by at least 2 of the 3 BRs for the T1w assessment (normal or abnormal). The final clinical diagnosis was provided by an independent truth committee following evaluation of findings from referral through a 3-month follow-up period, not including the study-specific MR image sets. Accuracy = percentage of participants for which the imaging modality (unenhanced or Gadoteridol-enhanced) matches the standard of truth for the presence or absence of abnormal brain tissue. | Up to 2 hours after injection of gadoteridol | No |
Secondary | Sensitivity of Detection of Normal/Abnormal Brain Tissue for Combined Unenhanced/Gadoteridol-enhanced MRI Compared to Unenhanced MRI by Majority Reader Using T1-weighted (T1w) Images | The majority reader diagnosis was the diagnosis provided by at least 2 of the 3 BRs for the T1w assessment (normal or abnormal). The final clinical diagnosis was provided by an independent truth committee following evaluation of findings from referral through a 3-month follow-up period, not including the study-specific MR image sets. Sensitivity = percentage of participants for which the imaging modality (unenhanced or Gadoteridol-enhanced) correctly detects abnormal brain tissue as defined by the independent truth committee. | Up to 2 hours after injection of gadoteridol | No |
Secondary | Specificity of Detection of Normal/Abnormal Brain Tissue for Combined Unenhanced/Gadoteridol-enhanced MRI Compared to Unenhanced MRI by Majority Reader Using T1-weighted (T1w) Images | The majority reader diagnosis was the diagnosis provided by at least 2 of the 3 BRs for the T1w assessment (normal or abnormal). The final clinical diagnosis was provided by an independent truth committee following evaluation of findings from referral through a 3-month follow-up period, not including the study-specific MR image sets. Sensitivity = percentage of participants for which the imaging modality (unenhanced or Gadoteridol-enhanced) correctly excludes abnormal brain tissue as defined by the independent truth committee. | Up to 2 hours after injection of gadoteridol | No |
Secondary | Accuracy of Detection of Normal/Abnormal Brain Tissue for Combined Unenhanced/Gadobutrol-enhanced MRI Compared to Combined Unenhanced/Gadoteridol-enhanced MRI by Majority Reader Using T1-weighted (T1w) Images | The majority reader diagnosis was the diagnosis provided by at least 2 of the 3 BRs for the T1w assessment (normal or abnormal). The final clinical diagnosis was provided by an independent truth committee following evaluation of findings from referral through a 3-month follow-up period, not including the study-specific MR image sets. Accuracy = percentage of participants for which the imaging modality (Gadobutrol-enhanced or Gadoteridol-enhanced) matches the standard of truth for the presence or absence of abnormal brain tissue. | Up to 2 hours after injection of gadobutrol or gadoteridol | No |
Secondary | Sensitivity of Detection of Normal/Abnormal Brain Tissue for Combined Unenhanced/Gadobutrol-enhanced MRI Compared to Combined Unenhanced/Gadoteridol-enhanced MRI by Majority Reader Using T1-weighted (T1w) Images | The majority reader diagnosis was the diagnosis provided by at least 2 of the 3 BRs for the T1w assessment (normal or abnormal). The final clinical diagnosis was provided by an independent truth committee following evaluation of findings from referral through a 3-month follow-up period, not including the study-specific MR image sets. Sensitivity = percentage of participants for which the imaging modality (Gadobutrol-enhanced or Gadoteridol-enhanced) correctly detects abnormal brain tissue as defined by the independent truth committee. | Up to 2 hours after injection of gadobutrol or gadoteridol | No |
Secondary | Specificity of Detection of Normal/Abnormal Brain Tissue for Combined Unenhanced/Gadobutrol-enhanced MRI Compared to Combined Unenhanced/Gadoteridol-enhanced MRI by Majority Reader Using T1-weighted (T1w) Images | The majority reader diagnosis was the diagnosis provided by at least 2 of the 3 BRs for the T1w assessment (normal or abnormal). The final clinical diagnosis was provided by an independent truth committee following evaluation of findings from referral through a 3-month follow-up period, not including the study-specific MR image sets. Specificity = percentage of participants for which the imaging modality (Gadobutrol-enhanced or Gadoteridol-enhanced) correctly excludes abnormal brain tissue as defined by the independent truth committee. | Up to 2 hours after injection of gadobutrol or gadoteridol | No |
Secondary | Accuracy of Detection of Malignant Lesions (ML) for Combined Unenhanced/Gadobutrol-enhanced MRI Compared to Unenhanced MRI by Majority Reader | The presence of malignant lesions was derived from the diagnoses given on the evaluation of the unenhanced image set and the combined unenhanced/enhanced image sets. The majority reader diagnosis was the diagnosis provided by at least 2 of the 3 BRs. The final clinical diagnosis was provided by an independent truth committee not using the study-specific MR image sets. Accuracy = percentage of participants for which the imaging modality (unenhanced or Gadobutrol-enhanced) matches the standard of truth for the presence or absence of malignant lesions. | Up to 2 hours after injection of gadobutrol | No |
Secondary | Sensitivity of Detection of Malignant Lesions (ML) for Combined Unenhanced/Gadobutrol-enhanced MRI Compared to Unenhanced MRI by Majority Reader | The presence of malignant lesions was derived from the diagnoses given on the evaluation of the unenhanced image set and the combined unenhanced/enhanced image sets. The majority reader diagnosis was the diagnosis provided by at least 2 of the 3 BRs. The final clinical diagnosis was provided by an independent truth committee not using the study-specific MR image sets. Sensitivity = percentage of participants for which the imaging modality (unenhanced or Gadobutrol-enhanced) correctly detects malignant lesions as defined by the independent truth committee. | Up to 2 hours after injection of gadobutrol | No |
Secondary | Specificity of Detection of Malignant Lesions (ML) for Combined Unenhanced/Gadobutrol-enhanced MRI Compared to Unenhanced MRI by Majority Reader | The presence of malignant lesions was derived from the diagnoses given on the evaluation of the unenhanced image set and the combined unenhanced/enhanced image sets. The majority reader diagnosis was the diagnosis provided by at least 2 of the 3 BRs. The final clinical diagnosis was provided by an independent truth committee not using the study-specific MR image sets. Specificity = percentage of participants for which the imaging modality (unenhanced or Gadobutrol-enhanced) correctly excludes malignant lesions as defined by the independent truth committee. | Up to 2 hours after injection of gadobutrol | No |
Secondary | Accuracy of Detection of Malignant Lesions (ML) for Combined Unenhanced/Gadobutrol-enhanced MRI Compared to Unenhanced MRI by Clinical Investigator | The presence of malignant lesions was derived from the diagnoses given by the investigator on the evaluation of the unenhanced image set and the combined unenhanced/enhanced image sets. The final clinical diagnosis was provided by an independent truth committee following evaluation of findings from referral through a 3-month follow-up period, not including the study-specific MR image sets. Accuracy = percentage of participants for which the imaging modality (unenhanced or Gadobutrol-enhanced) matches the standard of truth for the presence or absence of malignant lesions. | Up to 2 hours after injection of gadobutrol | No |
Secondary | Sensitivity of Detection of Malignant Lesions (ML) for Combined Unenhanced/Gadobutrol-enhanced MRI Compared to Unenhanced MRI by Clinical Investigator | The presence of malignant lesions was derived from the diagnoses given by the investigator on the evaluation of the unenhanced image set and the combined unenhanced/enhanced image sets. The final clinical diagnosis was provided by an independent truth committee following evaluation of findings from referral through a 3-month follow-up period, not including the study-specific MR image sets. Sensitivity = percentage of participants for which the imaging modality (unenhanced or Gadobutrol-enhanced) correctly detects malignant lesions as defined by the independent truth committee. | Up to 2 hours after injection of gadobutrol | No |
Secondary | Specificity of Detection of Malignant Lesions (ML) for Combined Unenhanced/Gadobutrol-enhanced MRI Compared to Unenhanced MRI by Clinical Investigator | The presence of malignant lesions was derived from the diagnoses given by the investigator on the evaluation of the unenhanced image set and the combined unenhanced/enhanced image sets. The final clinical diagnosis was provided by an independent truth committee following evaluation of findings from referral through a 3-month follow-up period, not including the study-specific MR image sets. Specificity = percentage of participants for which the imaging modality (unenhanced or Gadobutrol-enhanced) correctly excludes malignant lesions as defined by the independent truth committee. | Up to 2 hours after injection of gadobutrol | No |
Secondary | Accuracy of Detection of Malignant Lesions (ML) for Combined Unenhanced/Gadoteridol-enhanced MRI Compared to Unenhanced MRI by Majority Reader | The presence of malignant lesions was derived from the diagnoses given on the evaluation of the unenhanced image set and the combined unenhanced/enhanced image sets. The majority reader diagnosis was the diagnosis provided by at least 2 of the 3 BRs. The final clinical diagnosis was provided by an independent truth committee not using the study-specific MR image sets. Accuracy = percentage of participants for which the imaging modality (unenhanced or Gadoteridol-enhanced) matches the standard of truth for the presence or absence of malignant lesions. | Up to 2 hours after injection of gadoteridol | No |
Secondary | Sensitivity of Detection of Malignant Lesions (ML) for Combined Unenhanced/Gadoteridol-enhanced MRI Compared to Unenhanced MRI by Majority Reader | The presence of malignant lesions was derived from the diagnoses given on the evaluation of the unenhanced image set and the combined unenhanced/enhanced image sets. The majority reader diagnosis was the diagnosis provided by at least 2 of the 3 BRs. The final clinical diagnosis was provided by an independent truth committee not using the study-specific MR image sets. Sensitivity = percentage of participants for which the imaging modality (unenhanced or Gadoteridol-enhanced) correctly detects malignant lesions as defined by the independent truth committee | Up to 2 hours after injection of gadoteridol | No |
Secondary | Specificity of Detection of Malignant Lesions (ML) for Combined Unenhanced/Gadoteridol-enhanced MRI Compared to Unenhanced MRI by Majority Reader | The presence of malignant lesions was derived from the diagnoses given on the evaluation of the unenhanced image set and the combined unenhanced/enhanced image sets. The majority reader diagnosis was the diagnosis provided by at least 2 of the 3 BRs. The final clinical diagnosis was provided by an independent truth committee not using the study-specific MR image sets. Specificity = percentage of participants for which the imaging modality (unenhanced or Gadoteridol-enhanced) correctly excludes malignant lesions as defined by the independent truth committee. | Up to 2 hours after injection of gadoteridol | No |
Secondary | Accuracy of Detection of Malignant Lesions (ML) for Combined Unenhanced/Gadoteridol-enhanced MRI Compared to Unenhanced MRI by Clinical Investigator | The presence of malignant lesions was derived from the diagnoses given by the investigator on the evaluation of the unenhanced image set and the combined unenhanced/enhanced image sets. The final clinical diagnosis was provided by an independent truth committee following evaluation of findings from referral through a 3-month follow-up period, not including the study-specific MR image sets. Accuracy = percentage of participants for which the imaging modality (unenhanced or Gadoteridol-enhanced) matches the standard of truth for the presence or absence of malignant lesions. | Up to 2 hours after injection of gadoteridol | No |
Secondary | Sensitivity of Detection of Malignant Lesions (ML) for Combined Unenhanced/Gadoteridol-enhanced MRI Compared to Unenhanced MRI by Clinical Investigator | The presence of malignant lesions was derived from the diagnoses given by the investigator on the evaluation of the unenhanced image set and the combined unenhanced/enhanced image sets. The final clinical diagnosis was provided by an independent truth committee following evaluation of findings from referral through a 3-month follow-up period, not including the study-specific MR image sets. Sensitivity = percentage of participants for which the imaging modality (unenhanced or Gadoteridol-enhanced) correctly detects malignant lesions as defined by the independent truth committee. | Up to 2 hours after injection of gadoteridol | No |
Secondary | Specificity of Detection of Malignant Lesions (ML) for Combined Unenhanced/Gadoteridol-enhanced MRI Compared to Unenhanced MRI by Clinical Investigator | The presence of malignant lesions was derived from the diagnoses given by the investigator on the evaluation of the unenhanced image set and the combined unenhanced/enhanced image sets. The final clinical diagnosis was provided by an independent truth committee following evaluation of findings from referral through a 3-month follow-up period, not including the study-specific MR image sets. Specificity = percentage of participants for which the imaging modality (unenhanced or Gadoteridol-enhanced) correctly excludes malignant lesions as defined by the independent truth committee. | Up to 2 hours after injection of gadoteridol | No |
Secondary | Accuracy of Detection of Malignant Lesions (ML) for Combined Unenhanced/Gadobutrol-enhanced MRI Compared to Combined Unenhanced/Gadoteridol-enhanced MRI by Majority Reader | The presence of malignant lesions was derived from the diagnoses given on the evaluation of the unenhanced image set and the combined unenhanced/enhanced image sets. The majority reader diagnosis was the diagnosis provided by at least 2 of the 3 BRs. The final clinical diagnosis was provided by an independent truth committee not using the study-specific MR image sets. Accuracy = percentage of participants for which the imaging modality (Gadobutrol-enhanced or Gadoteridol-enhanced) matches the standard of truth for the presence or absence of malignant lesions. | Up to 2 hours after injection of gadobutrol or gadoteridol | No |
Secondary | Sensitivity of Detection of Malignant Lesions (ML) for Combined Unenhanced/Gadobutrol-enhanced MRI Compared to Combined Unenhanced/Gadoteridol-enhanced MRI by Majority Reader | The presence of malignant lesions was derived from the diagnoses given on the evaluation of the unenhanced image set and the combined unenhanced/enhanced image sets. The majority reader diagnosis was the diagnosis provided by at least 2 of the 3 BRs. The final clinical diagnosis was provided by an independent truth committee not using the study-specific MR image sets. Sensitivity = percentage of participants for which the imaging modality (Gadobutrol-enhanced or Gadoteridol-enhanced) correctly detects malignant lesions as defined by the independent truth committee. | Up to 2 hours after injection of gadobutrol or gadoteridol | No |
Secondary | Specificity of Detection of Malignant Lesions (ML) for Combined Unenhanced/Gadobutrol-enhanced MRI Compared to Combined Unenhanced/Gadoteridol-enhanced MRI by Majority Reader | The presence of malignant lesions was derived from the diagnoses given on the evaluation of the unenhanced image set and the combined unenhanced/enhanced image sets. The majority reader diagnosis was the diagnosis provided by at least 2 of the 3 BRs. The final clinical diagnosis was provided by an independent truth committee not using the study-specific MR image sets. Specificity = percentage of participants for which the imaging modality (Gadobutrol-enhanced or Gadoteridol-enhanced) correctly excludes malignant lesions as defined by the independent truth committee. | Up to 2 hours after injection of gadobutrol or gadoteridol | No |
Secondary | Accuracy of Detection of Malignant Lesions (ML) for Combined Unenhanced/Gadobutrol-enhanced MRI Compared to Combined Unenhanced/Gadoteridol-enhanced MRI by Clinical Investigator | The presence of malignant lesions was derived from the diagnoses given by the investigator on the evaluation of the unenhanced image set and the combined unenhanced/enhanced image sets. The final clinical diagnosis was provided by an independent truth committee following evaluation of findings from referral through a 3-month follow-up period, not including the study-specific MR image sets. Accuracy = percentage of participants for which the imaging modality (Gadobutrol-enhanced or Gadoteridol-enhanced) matches the standard of truth for the presence or absence of malignant lesions. | Up to 2 hours after injection of gadobutrol or gadoteridol | No |
Secondary | Sensitivity of Detection of Malignant Lesions (ML) for Combined Unenhanced/Gadobutrol-enhanced MRI Compared to Combined Unenhanced/Gadoteridol-enhanced MRI by Clinical Investigator | The presence of malignant lesions was derived from the diagnoses given by the investigator on the evaluation of the unenhanced image set and the combined unenhanced/enhanced image sets. The final clinical diagnosis was provided by an independent truth committee following evaluation of findings from referral through a 3-month follow-up period, not including the study-specific MR image sets. Sensitivity = percentage of participants for which the imaging modality (Gadobutrol-enhanced or Gadoteridol-enhanced) correctly detects malignant lesions as defined by the independent truth committee. | Up to 2 hours after injection of gadobutrol or gadoteridol | No |
Secondary | Specificity of Detection of Malignant Lesions (ML) for Combined Unenhanced/Gadobutrol-enhanced MRI Compared to Combined Unenhanced/Gadoteridol-enhanced MRI by Clinical Investigator | The presence of malignant lesions was derived from the diagnoses given by the investigator on the evaluation of the unenhanced image set and the combined unenhanced/enhanced image sets. The final clinical diagnosis was provided by an independent truth committee following evaluation of findings from referral through a 3-month follow-up period, not including the study-specific MR image sets. Specificity = percentage of participants for which the imaging modality (Gadobutrol-enhanced or Gadoteridol-enhanced) correctly excludes malignant lesions as defined by the independent truth committee. | Up to 2 hours after injection of gadobutrol or gadoteridol | No |
Secondary | Diagnostic Confidence for Combined Unenhanced/Gadobutrol-enhanced MRI Compared to Unenhanced MRI by Average Reader | The BRs recorded his/her confidence in diagnosis for the unenhanced MR image set and the combined unenhanced/enhanced MR image sets. The degree of confidence was rated on a 4-point scale where 1 = not confident and 4 = very confident. The AR score was the mean of the means of the 3 BRs. | Up to 2 hours after injection of gadobutrol | No |
Secondary | Diagnostic Confidence for Combined Unenhanced/Gadoteridol-enhanced MRI Compared to Unenhanced MRI by Average Reader | The BRs recorded his/her confidence in diagnosis for the unenhanced MR image set and the combined unenhanced/enhanced MR image sets. The degree of confidence was rated on a 4-point scale where 1 = not confident and 4 = very confident. The AR score was the mean of the means of the 3 BRs. | Up to 2 hours after injection of gadoteridol | No |
Secondary | Diagnostic Confidence for Combined Unenhanced/Gadobutrol-enhanced MRI Compared to Combined Unenhanced/Gadoteridol-enhanced MRI by Average Reader | The BRs recorded his/her confidence in diagnosis for the combined unenhanced/enhanced MR image sets. The degree of confidence was rated on a 4-point scale where 1 = not confident and 4 = very confident. The AR score was the mean of the means of the 3 BRs. | Up to 2 hours after injection of gadobutrol or gadoteridol | No |
Secondary | Diagnostic Confidence for Combined Unenhanced/Gadobutrol-enhanced MRI Compared to Unenhanced MRI by Clinical Investigator | The investigator recorded his/her confidence in diagnosis for the unenhanced MR image set and the combined unenhanced/gadobutrol-enhanced MR image sets. The degree of confidence was rated on a 4-point scale where 1 = not confident and 4 = very confident. | Up to 2 hours after injection of gadobutrol | No |
Secondary | Diagnostic Confidence for Combined Unenhanced/Gadoteridol-enhanced MRI Compared to Unenhanced MRI by Clinical Investigator | The investigator recorded his/her confidence in diagnosis for the unenhanced MR image set and the combined unenhanced/gadoteridol-enhanced MR image sets. The degree of confidence was rated on a 4-point scale where 1 = not confident and 4 = very confident. | Up to 2 hours after injection of gadoteridol | No |
Secondary | Diagnostic Confidence for Combined Unenhanced/Gadobutrol-enhanced MRI Compared to Combined Unenhanced/Gadoteridol-enhanced MRI by Clinical Investigator | The investigator recorded his/her confidence in diagnosis for the combined unenhanced/gadobutrol-enhanced MR image sets and the combined unenhanced/gadoteridol MR image sets. The degree of confidence was rated on a 4-point scale where 1 = not confident and 4 = very confident. | Up to 2 hours after injection of gadobutrol or gadoteridol | No |
Secondary | Comparison of Image Quality Between Gadobutrol and Gadoteridol by Blinded Readers | The BRs evaluated the relative image quality of the gadobutrol-enhanced T1w MR images and the gadoteridol-enhanced T1w MR images in a paired fashion on a 5-point scale where 1 = image on right was worse, 2 = image on right was slightly worse, 3 = both images were the same, 4 = image on right was slightly better, and 5 = image on right was better. | Up to 2 hours after injection of gadobutrol or gadoteridol | No |
Secondary | Percentage of Participants for Which Blinded Readers Said Image Quality Was Higher | Percentage of participants for which blinded readers said image quality was higher | Up to 2 hours after injection of gadobutrol or gadoteridol | No |
Secondary | Assessment of the Number of Contrast-enhanced Lesions for Gadobutrol and Gadoteridol by Blinded Readers | Two BRs independently provided the number of contrast-enhanced lesions for gadobutrol and gadoteridol. In cases of disagreement between the readers, an independent adjudicator provided the number of contrast-enhanced lesions. The adjudicator results were used in the analysis in the cases of disagreement between the original readers | Up to 2 hours after injection of gadobutrol or gadoteridol | No |
Secondary | Percentage of Lesion Enhancement From Unenhanced to Combined Unenhanced/Enhanced for Gadobutrol and Gadoteridol by Blinded Readers | From the quantitative signal intensity values assessed by the BR, the percentage of lesion enhancement from unenhanced to combined unenhanced/enhanced was calculated. | Up to 2 hours after injection of gadobutrol or gadoteridol | No |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Recruiting |
NCT05778279 -
Role of New High Resolution Ultrasonographic Modalities for Diagnosis of Fetal Nervous System Anomalies
|
||
Completed |
NCT00116337 -
Spinal Cord Stimulation to Restore Cough
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05080777 -
Pilot Pragmatic Clinical Trial to Embed Tele-Savvy Into Health Care Systems
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05590884 -
Gadopiclenol Pharmacokinetics, Safety and Efficacy in Children < 2 Years of Age
|
Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT06010823 -
Safety and Efficacy Evaluation of the Robotic Enhanced Error Training of Upper Limb Function in Post-stroke and Post TBI Participants
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01915368 -
Determining Optimal Post-Stroke Exercise (DOSE)
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01211873 -
Safety and Efficacy Evaluation of DOTAREM® in MRI of Central Nervous System (CNS) Lesions
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT00395460 -
Efficacy and Safety Study to Evaluate Gadavist (Gadobutrol) as Contrast Agent in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) of Brain or Spine Diseases in Chinese Patients
|
Phase 3 | |
Terminated |
NCT03270189 -
Effect of the Visual Information Change in Functional Dystonia
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT03911388 -
HSV G207 in Children With Recurrent or Refractory Cerebellar Brain Tumors
|
Phase 1 | |
Recruiting |
NCT05968976 -
Multicentre RCT of Awake Versus Asleep Tractography Based DBS for ET
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT05892510 -
Post-thrombectomy Intra-arterial Tenecteplase for Acute manaGement of Non-retrievable Thrombus and No-reflow in Emergent Stroke
|
Phase 2/Phase 3 | |
Suspended |
NCT04912115 -
Randomized, Double-Blind, Active Placebo-Controlled Study of Ketamine to Treat Levodopa-Induced Dyskinesia
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT03994822 -
pRESET for Occlusive Stroke Treatment
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04283253 -
Predictors of Response in Chronic Stroke
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02684825 -
Detection of Silent Atrial Fibrillation aFter Ischemic StrOke
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02368223 -
Feasibility of the Portable YouGrabber System
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05815836 -
Precision Medicine in Stroke
|
||
Completed |
NCT01445639 -
Dexmedetomidine in Patients After Intracranial Surgery
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT00995215 -
Sub-study to Spinal Cord Stimulation to Restore Cough
|
N/A |