Clinical Trial Details
— Status: Enrolling by invitation
Administrative data
NCT number |
NCT05852262 |
Other study ID # |
20230205-01T |
Secondary ID |
|
Status |
Enrolling by invitation |
Phase |
Phase 4
|
First received |
|
Last updated |
|
Start date |
August 30, 2023 |
Est. completion date |
August 1, 2026 |
Study information
Verified date |
June 2024 |
Source |
Ottawa Hospital Research Institute |
Contact |
n/a |
Is FDA regulated |
No |
Health authority |
|
Study type |
Interventional
|
Clinical Trial Summary
Cellulitis is a common condition diagnosed and managed in the ED that carries significant
burden on healthcare systems globally. Cellulitis is the 8th most common reason patients
present to an ED in Canada. Among middle-aged patients (45-64 years) it is the 5th most
common reason to visit an ED. This disease is responsible for significant healthcare system
burden due to high hospitalization rates and subsequent costs. The Investigators conducted a
health records review at two large urban EDs in Ottawa, and found that 29.6% of patients with
cellulitis are admitted to hospital. In a separate study, The investigators found that the
mean cost of care to hospitalize cellulitis patients for IV antibiotics was $10,145 CDN.
Description:
Background Non-purulent cellulitis is a bacterial skin and soft tissue infection of the
subcutaneous tissue. Group A streptococcus (Streptococcus pyogenes), beta-hemolytic
streptococci and methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus are the most common bacteria
causing non-purulent cellulitis. Patients typically present to the emergency department (ED)
with pain, redness, swelling and induration (skin hardening due to inflammation) of the
affected skin. A minority of patients may have fever or tachycardia. The diagnosis of
cellulitis is clinical. Once the diagnosis is made, antibiotic treatment is initiated. The
emergency physician must select the appropriate agent, oral versus intravenous (IV) route,
dose, frequency and duration.
Rationale For ED adult patients with cellulitis, how does high-dose (1000 mg QID) cephalexin
compare with standard-dose (500 mg QID) cephalexin with respect to antibiotic treatment
failure, adverse events and health service utilization (i.e., need for IV antibiotics,
unscheduled return ED visits and hospitalization)? Hypotheses (superiority): Treatment with
high-dose cephalexin will lead to lower rates of oral antibiotic treatment failure than using
standard-dose cephalexin.
Methods:
Study Design & Setting The investigators will conduct a multicentre, parallel-arm
double-blind, individually randomized trial comparing high-dose (1000 mg) cephalexin to
standard-dose (500 mg) cephalexin to treat ED adult patients with cellulitis. This is a
superiority trial. The trial will be conducted at 8 Canadian EDs. A total sample size of 446
patients (223 per group) will be required.
Study Population Inclusion Criteria The Investigators will include adults (age ≥18 years)
diagnosed with non-purulent cellulitis and determined by the treating emergency physician to
be eligible for outpatient oral antibiotics.
Trial Intervention The study interventions are two accepted doses of oral cephalexin. The
interventions will begin following randomization.
1. High-dose cephalexin. Patients randomized to this arm will receive a seven-day
medication package of cephalexin 1000 mg (two 500 mg tablets per dose) to be taken four
times daily. A duration of seven days was selected as this was the most common
prescription duration in a survey of Canadian emergency physicians.32 The antibiotic
pills will be provided in a dosette organized by dose and day.
2. Standard-dose cephalexin. Patients randomized to this arm will receive a seven-day
medication package of cephalexin 500 mg (one 500 mg tablet and one placebo tablet per
dose) to be taken four times daily.
3. Blinding. Both cephalexin and placebo will be encased in identical capsules, prepared
and packaged independently by an external pharmacy. The patients, treating physician and
research team (including outcome adjudicators) will be blinded.
Primary Outcome: Oral Antibiotic Treatment Failure The primary outcome is outpatient oral
antibiotic treatment failure, defined as a change in antibiotic (change in class of oral
antibiotic or step up to IV therapy) within 7 days due to worsening infection.
Secondary Outcomes
1. Clinical cure, defined as absence of treatment failure criteria, evaluated at day 8 and
30
2. Clinical response, defined as a reduction in lesion size ≥20% compared to baseline,
evaluated at the day 3 and day 8 follow-up assessments
3. Unplanned visits to a healthcare provider (ED, family doctor) within 30 days
4. Unplanned hospitalization within 30 days.
5. Adverse events will be classified as serious or other and will be assessed at day 30
follow up. Serious adverse events will include anaphylaxis to study medication,
development of Clostridium difficile colitis or unexpected deaths related to the
infection or treatment. Other adverse events include nausea, vomiting, diarrhea,
abdominal pain and rash.
6. Antibiotic intolerance, defined as change in treatment due to adverse events.
7. Antibiotic allergy, defined as change in treatment due to skin, respiratory,
cardiovascular, or gastrointestinal symptoms requiring treatment with an antihistamine
and/or epinephrine.
8. Medication adherence, with full adherence defined as patients who report taking all
study medication over 7 days
9. Health-related quality of life measured using the EuroQoL-5D-5L36 instrument
IMPORTANCE Cellulitis is a common cause of ED visits, and many patients are hospitalized.
Current evidence is lacking regarding the optimal management of cellulitis. If high-dose
cephalexin is found to be superior to standard-dose cephalexin, this will change practice,
with the potential to reduce unnecessary IV antibiotic use, hospitalization, and costs. The
results will help inform future skin and soft tissue infection treatment guidelines.