Cellulitis of Leg Clinical Trial
Official title:
Radiofrequency Microneedling With Multi-Depth Targeting Per Insertion for The Treatment of Cellulite
NCT number | NCT06283056 |
Other study ID # | DO611073A |
Secondary ID | |
Status | Recruiting |
Phase | N/A |
First received | |
Last updated | |
Start date | June 16, 2022 |
Est. completion date | June 1, 2025 |
The aim of the study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of Morpheus 8 Body 40-pin tip up to 7mm depth Applicator for subdermal treatment of cellulite appearance, skin laxity, and subcutaneous fat deposits.
Status | Recruiting |
Enrollment | 40 |
Est. completion date | June 1, 2025 |
Est. primary completion date | June 1, 2024 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | Accepts Healthy Volunteers |
Gender | Female |
Age group | 18 Years to 65 Years |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: - Female subjects aged 18-65 (inclusive) - BMI interval: 18.5 = BMI = 30 (normal to overweight, but not obese). - Subject having cellulite grade 1-4 as graded using the Clinician Reported Photonumeric Cellulite Severity Scale (CR-PCSS)7. - The patients should understand the information provided about the treatment, possible benefits and side effects, and sign the Informed Consent Form, (including the permission to use photography). - The patients should be willing to comply with the study procedure and schedule, including the follow up visit, and will refrain from using any other aesthetic treatment methods (i.e liposuction, any cellulite/circumference reduction treatments using medical devices, etc.) in the treatment area for the last 6 months and during the entire study period. - Females of Childbearing potential must be using an approved method of birth control. Subjects who are capable of becoming pregnant will undergo a urine pregnancy test. Exclusion Criteria: - Pacemaker or internal defibrillator, or any other active electrical implant anywhere in the body. - Superficial permanent implant in the treated area such as metal plates and screws, metal piercing, silicone implants or an injected chemical substance. - Known sensitivity/allergy to Lidocaine - Current or history of skin cancer (remission of 5 years), or current condition of any other type of cancer, or pre-malignant moles. - Severe concurrent conditions, such as cardiac disorders, epilepsy, uncontrolled hypertension, and liver or kidney diseases. - Pregnancy and nursing or lactating. - History of bleeding coagulopathies or use of anticoagulants. - Chronic or current use of NSAIDs or other anti-inflammatory therapies (e.g., Ibuprofen, etc.) - Impaired immune system due to immunosuppressive diseases such as AIDS and HIV or use of immunosuppressive medications. - Any uncontrolled medical condition (i.e., endocrine disorders, diabetes, thyroid disfunction or hormonal virilization) that in the opinion of the investigator, the subject's safety may be compromised. - Any active condition in the treatment area, such as sores, psoriasis, eczema, and rash. - History of skin disorders, keloids, abnormal wound healing, as well as very dry and fragile skin. - Use of Isotretinoin (Accutane®) within 6 months prior to treatment. - Any surgery or treatment such as laser or chemicals in treated area within 3-6 months prior to treatment or before complete healing. - Any medical condition that in the opinion of the investigator, such condition would compromise the safety of the subject or quality of the study data. - Current, or past participation in a clinical trial within the past 30 days. |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
United States | Dallas Plastic Surgeon | Dallas | Texas |
United States | Dermatology & Laser Surgery Center of New York | New York | New York |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
InMode MD Ltd. |
United States,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Other | Adverse Event rate | Rate of all device and procedure related adverse events (AE's) and serious adverse events (SAE's) occurring during the study | For the duration of the study | |
Other | Pain Scale | Pain assessment will be performed immediately post treatment using Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) from 0 to 10. 0 = no pain 10 - worst possible pain | Immediately post each procedure | |
Primary | Cellulite assessment based on Clinician Reported Photonumeric Cellulite Severity Scale | Cellulite assessment based on Clinician Reported Photonumeric Cellulite Severity Scale (using pre (baseline) and post treatment Standard medical photography, having at least mean of one-unit improvement (1-point score reduction).
0 - None - No evident cellulite - Almost none - A few superficial dimples or ridges - Mild - Several dimples or ridges, of which most are superficial - Moderate - Many dimples or ridges, of which more are somewhat deep - Severe - A lot of dimples or ridges, of which many are deep, covering most of the skin area |
6 Months | |
Primary | Cellulite assessment based on DiBernardo Photonumeric Cellulite Severity Scale | Cellulite assessment based on DiBernardo Photonumeric Cellulite Severity Scale using pre (baseline) and post-treatment Standard medical photography, having at least a mean of one-unit improvement (1-point score reduction).
This 5-point photo numeric scale rates cellulite severity from "0" (none) to "4" (severe) from a clinician's perspective |
6 Months | |
Secondary | Subject assessment of improvement | Subject assessment of improvement using 0 - 4 -points Likert scale at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months follow up visits:
4 = Significantly marked improvement; 3 = Marked improvement; 2 = Moderate improvement; 1 = Slight improvement; 0 = No change |
1 month | |
Secondary | Subject assessment of improvement | Subject assessment of improvement using 0 - 4 -points Likert scale at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months follow up visits:
4 = Significantly marked improvement; 3 = Marked improvement; 2 = Moderate improvement; 1 = Slight improvement; 0 = No change |
3 months | |
Secondary | Subject assessment of improvement | Subject assessment of improvement using 0 - 4 -points Likert scale at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months follow up visits:
4 = Significantly marked improvement; 3 = Marked improvement; 2 = Moderate improvement; 1 = Slight improvement; 0 = No change |
6 months | |
Secondary | Subject assessment of satisfaction | Subject assessment of satisfaction will be filled-out by subjects only using 4-points Likert scale at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months follow up visits:
+2 = Very satisfied; +1 = Satisfied; -1 = Dissatisfied; -2 = Very Dissatisfied |
1 month | |
Secondary | Subject assessment of satisfaction | Subject assessment of satisfaction will be filled-out by subjects only using 4-points Likert scale at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months follow up visits:
+2 = Very satisfied; +1 = Satisfied; -1 = Dissatisfied; -2 = Very Dissatisfied |
3 months | |
Secondary | Subject assessment of satisfaction | Subject assessment of satisfaction will be filled-out by subjects only using 4-points Likert scale at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months follow up visits:
+2 = Very satisfied; +1 = Satisfied; -1 = Dissatisfied; -2 = Very Dissatisfied |
6 months | |
Secondary | Investigator assessment of the skin appearance improvemen | Investigator assessment of the skin appearance improvement comparing pre and post treatment using Global aesthetic improvement 4-point grading scale (0=No tightening/firmness, 1= Slightly visible tightening/firmness, 2= Visible tightening/firmness, 3= Very visible tightening/firmness) at all follow up visits. | 1 month | |
Secondary | Investigator assessment of the skin appearance improvement | Investigator assessment of the skin appearance improvement comparing pre and post treatment using 0 - 4 -points Likert scale at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months follow up visits:
4 = Significantly marked improvement; 3 = Marked improvement; 2 = Moderate improvement; 1 = Slight improvement; 0 = No difference |
3 months | |
Secondary | Investigator assessment of the skin appearance | Investigator assessment of the skin appearance improvement comparing pre and post treatment using 0 - 4 -points Likert scale at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months follow up visits:
4 = Significantly marked improvement; 3 = Marked improvement; 2 = Moderate improvement; 1 = Slight improvement; 0 = No difference |
6 months | |
Secondary | Investigator assessment of the cellulite following subdermal Morpheus8 treatment | Statistically significant improvement in global aesthetic appearance of cellulite, as assessed by PI using Global aesthetic improvement 5-point grading scale (0=No change, 1=1%-24%%, 2=25%-49%, 3=50%-74% improvement, and 4=75%-100%) | 1 Month | |
Secondary | Investigator assessment of the cellulite following subdermal Morpheus8 treatment | Statistically significant improvement in global aesthetic appearance of cellulite, as assessed by PI using Global aesthetic improvement 5-point grading scale (0=No change, 1=1%-24%%, 2=25%-49%, 3=50%-74% improvement, and 4=75%-100%) | 3 Months | |
Secondary | Investigator assessment of the cellulite following subdermal Morpheus8 treatment | Statistically significant improvement in global aesthetic appearance of cellulite, as assessed by PI using Global aesthetic improvement 5-point grading scale (0=No change, 1=1%-24%%, 2=25%-49%, 3=50%-74% improvement, and 4=75%-100%) | 6 Months |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Recruiting |
NCT05661123 -
Effect of Modified Complete Decongestive Therapy on Lower Limbs Fibrosis Post Cellulitis
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT06231940 -
Efficacy of Complex Decongestive Therapy (CDT) in Patients With Venous Insufficiency: a Experimental Study
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT03199781 -
Motorized Mechanical Massage Associated With Cosmetics in Improving Body Contour and Appearance of Gynoid Lipodystrophy
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05023200 -
The Personalised Antibiotic Duration for Cellulitis (PAD-C) Study
|
||
Not yet recruiting |
NCT05584007 -
Cellulitis Optimal Antibiotic Treatment
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT05624216 -
Radiofrequency and Targeted Pressure Energy for Cellulite Reduction
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03846635 -
Handheld Infrared Thermometer to Evaluate Cellulitis
|