Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT03633695
Other study ID # SAIL-101-UNI
Secondary ID
Status Completed
Phase N/A
First received
Last updated
Start date December 4, 2018
Est. completion date October 15, 2020

Study information

Verified date September 2022
Source AcuFocus, Inc.
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The purpose of this study is to determine the safety and effectiveness of the IC-8 IOL implanted in one eye and a monofocal or monofocal toric IOL implanted in the fellow eye in accordance with the indication.


Description:

Eligible patients will complete up to 12 study visits over a 12-month period. All subjects will complete a preoperative examination of both eyes to assess study eligibility: operative visit (each eye) and up to 9 postoperative visits (Day 1 - each eye, Week 1 - each eye, Month 1 - each eye or combined, Month 3 - both eyes, Month 6 - both eyes, and Month 12 - both eyes). The first eye must meet specific qualification criteria in order to proceed with IOL implantation in the second eye. The second eye should be implanted within 45 days of the first eye.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 453
Est. completion date October 15, 2020
Est. primary completion date October 15, 2020
Accepts healthy volunteers Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Gender All
Age group 22 Years and older
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria: 1. Minimum 22 years of age; 2. Able to comprehend and have signed a statement of informed consent; 3. Availability, willingness, ability and sufficient cognitive awareness to comply with examination procedures and study visits; 4. Planned crystalline lens removal by phacoemulsification, with or without femtosecond laser-assisted extraction, and posterior chamber IOL implantation in both eyes; 5. Cataractous lens changes as demonstrated by best-corrected visual acuity (BCDVA) of 20/40 or worse either with or without a glare source present; 6. Potential for postoperative BCDVA of 20/25 or better in each eye 7. Clear intraocular media, other than cataract. Exclusion Criteria: 1. Requiring an IC-8 intraocular lens outside the available spherical power range 2. Pharmacologically dilated pupil size less than 6 mm in either eye; 3. Inability to achieve stable keratometric readings for contact lens wearers 4. Irregular astigmatism in either eye; 5. Preoperative corneal astigmatism > 1.50 diopters in either eye 6. Active or recurrent anterior segment pathology 7. Presence of ocular abnormalities other than cataract as specified in the protocol 8. Diagnosis of dry eye in which patients are unable to maintain eye comfort or adequate vision even with dry eye medication; 9. Congenital cataracts; 10. Previous corneal or intraocular surgery 11. History of ocular trauma or ocular conditions expected to require retinal laser treatment or other surgical intervention; 12. Systemic conditions as specified in the protocol; 13. Patient is pregnant, plans to become pregnant, or is lactating 14. Concurrent participation or participation in any clinical trial up to 30 days prior to preoperative visit.

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Device:
IC-8 IOL Group
A monofocal IOL (TECNIS ZCB00, ZCT150 or ZCT225 or AcrySof IQ SA60WF, SA6AT3 or SA6AT4) implanted in the first eye for use over the lifetime of the patient. The IC-8 IOL implanted in the second eye for use over the lifetime of the patient.
Control Group
A monofocal IOL (TECNIS ZCB00, ZCT150 or ZCT225 or AcrySof IQ SA60WF, SA6AT3 or SA6AT4) bilaterally implanted for lifetime use of the patient.

Locations

Country Name City State
United States Empire Eye & Laser Center Bakersfield California
United States Chu Vision Institute Bloomington Minnesota
United States Cleveland Eye Clinic Brecksville Ohio
United States Hoopes Vision Draper Utah
United States Eye Center of Northern Colorado Fort Collins Colorado
United States Physicians Protocol Greensboro North Carolina
United States Baylor College of Medicine Houston Texas
United States Harvard Eye Associates Laguna Hills California
United States Altos Eye Physicians Los Altos California
United States Advanced Vision Care Los Angeles California
United States Virginia Eye Consultants Norfolk Virginia
United States Utah Eye Centers Ogden Utah
United States Kugler Vision Omaha Nebraska
United States Eye Center of North Florida Panama City Florida
United States Philadelphia Eye Associates Philadelphia Pennsylvania
United States Alterman, Modi & Wolter Poughkeepsie New York
United States Pepose Vision Institute Saint Louis Missouri
United States Parkhurst NuVision San Antonio Texas
United States Vance Thompson Vision Sioux Falls South Dakota
United States Fishkind, Bakewell, Maltzman, Hunter & Associates Eye Care & Surgery Center Tucson Arizona
United States Bucci Laser Vision Wilkes-Barre Pennsylvania

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
AcuFocus, Inc.

Country where clinical trial is conducted

United States, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Mean Binocular Photopic Uncorrected Intermediate (66 cm) Visual Acuity (UCIVA) Visual acuity (VA) was tested binocularly (both eyes) at a distance of 66 cm, without manifest refraction, using an Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart presenting on a self-calibrating monitor in a computerized testing system. Visual acuity was measured in logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR), with a 0.02 logMAR increment corresponding to a single letter on the ETDRS chart. 6 Months (160-210 days post second eye operative visit)
Primary Mean Binocular Photopic Uncorrected Near (40 cm) Visual Acuity (UCNVA) Visual acuity (VA) was tested binocularly (both eyes) at a distance of 40 cm, without manifest refraction, using an Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart presenting on a self-calibrating monitor in a computerized testing system. Visual acuity was measured in logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR), with a 0.02 logMAR increment corresponding to a single letter on the ETDRS chart. 6 Months (160-210 days post second eye operative visit)
Primary Mean Binocular Photopic Uncorrected Distance (4 m) Visual Acuity (UCDVA) Visual acuity (VA) was tested binocularly (both eyes) at a distance of 4 m, with +0.25 D infinity adjustment lens in front of the eyes, using an Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart presenting on a self-calibrating monitor in a computerized testing system. Visual acuity was measured in logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR), with a 0.02 logMAR increment corresponding to a single letter on the ETDRS chart. 6 Months (160-210 days post second eye operative visit)
Primary Mean Monocular Photopic Distance-Corrected Intermediate (66 cm) Visual Acuity (DCIVA) in IC-8™ IOL Eyes Visual acuity (VA) was tested monocularly (each eye) at a distance of 66 cm, with the distance manifest refraction (with infinity adjustment) in place for that eye, using an Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart presenting on a self-calibrating monitor in a computerized testing system. Visual acuity was measured in logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR), with a 0.02 logMAR increment corresponding to a single letter on the ETDRS chart. 6 Months (160-210 days post second eye operative visit)
Primary Mean Monocular Photopic Depth of Focus (DOF) in IC-8™ IOL Eyes Depth of focus was performed monocularly in the IC-8™ IOL Group at the far to near range of vision (+2.00 to -5.00 D), using 100% contrast ETDRS charts in a computerized testing system calibrated for a 4 m test distance, with manifest refraction (no infinity adjustment) in place for the eye(s) being tested. The defocus power was progressively introduced in 0.50 D increments from +2.00 D to +0.50 D and from -0.50 D to -5.00 D, then in 0.25 D increments from +0.50 D to -0.50 D, while visual acuity was measured at each successive defocus step. The depth of focus was estimated as the defocus range between zero defocus and the first point on the negative lens induced mean defocus curve that crosses the 0.2 logMAR using a linear interpolation. 3 Months (60-110 days post second eye operative visit)
Primary Mean Monocular Best-corrected Distance (4 m) Visual Acuity (BCDVA) Visual acuity (VA) was tested monocularly (each eye) at a distance of 4 m, in photopic conditions, with manifest refraction in place (no infinity adjustment) using an Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart presenting on a self-calibrating monitor in a computerized testing system. Visual acuity was measured in logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR), with a 0.02 logMAR increment corresponding to a single letter on the ETDRS chart. 12 Months (300-420 days post second eye operative visit)
Primary Proportion of IC-8™ IOL Eyes Achieving Best-corrected Distance Visual Acuity (BCDVA) 0.3 logMAR or Better Compared to the Safety and Performance Endpoints (SPE) Rates Visual acuity (VA) was tested monocularly (each eye) at a distance of 4 m, in photopic conditions, with manifest refraction in place (no infinity adjustment) using an Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart presenting on a self-calibrating monitor in a computerized testing system. Visual acuity was measured in logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR), with a 0.02 logMAR increment corresponding to a single letter on the ETDRS chart. 12 Months (300-420 days post second eye operative visit)
Primary Proportion of Best-Case IC-8™ IOL Eyes Achieving Best-corrected Distance Visual Acuity (BCDVA) 0.3 logMAR or Better Compared to the Safety and Performance Endpoints (SPE) Rates Visual acuity (VA) was tested monocularly (each eye) at a distance of 4 m, in photopic conditions, with manifest refraction in place (no infinity adjustment) using an Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart presenting on a self-calibrating monitor in a computerized testing system. Visual acuity was measured in logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR), with a 0.02 logMAR increment corresponding to a single letter on the ETDRS chart. Monocular BCDVA for the IC-8™ IOL eyes of subjects in the Best-Case population was compared to the safety and performance endpoints (SPE) rate for posterior chamber IOLs. 12 Months (300-420 days post second eye operative visit)
Primary Rates of IC-8™ IOL Eyes With Cumulative Ocular Serious Adverse Events The rates of cumulative ocular serious adverse events (SAEs) for IC-8™ IOL eyes were calculated from the time of second eye (IC-8™ IOL eye) implantation through Month 12. Through 12 Months (300-420 days post second eye operative visit)
Primary Rates of IC-8™ IOL Eyes With Cumulative Postoperative Ocular Adverse Events (Secondary Surgical Interventions) The rates of cumulative ocular adverse events for IC-8™ IOL eyes were calculated from the time of second eye (IC-8™ IOL eye) implantation through Month 12. Through 12 Months (300-420 days post second eye operative visit)
Primary Rates of IC-8™ IOL Eyes With Persistent Ocular Serious Adverse Events The rates of persistent (defined as being unresolved at final scheduled visit) ocular adverse events (AEs) for IC-8™ IOL eyes were calculated from the time of second eye (IC-8™ IOL eye) implantation through Month 12. Through 12 Months (300-420 days post second eye operative visit)
Primary Rates of IC-8™ IOL Eyes With IC-8™ IOL Removals The rates of cumulative ocular adverse events for IC-8™ IOL eyes were calculated from the time of second eye (IC-8™ IOL eye) implantation through Month 12. Through 12 Months (300-420 days post second eye operative visit)
Primary Rates of Eyes With Postoperative Ocular Adverse Events (Other Than Secondary Surgical Intervention), Related to Device (Serious and Non-Serious Combined) The rates of cumulative ocular adverse events (AEs) for IC-8™ IOL eyes were calculated from the time of second eye (IC-8™ IOL eye) implantation through Month 12. Through 12 Months (300-420 days post second eye operative visit)
Secondary Tolerance to Preoperative Corneal Astigmatism in IC-8™ IOL Eyes With BCDVA 20/25 at 3 Months Uncorrected-distance visual acuity (UCDVA) in IC-8™ IOL eyes achieving best-corrected distance visual acuity (BCDVA) of 20/25 or better was compared between eyes with preoperative corneal astigmatism < 1.0 D to eyes with 1.0 D to 1.5 D of preoperative corneal astigmatism. 3 Months (60-110 days post second eye operative visit)
Secondary Mean Monocular Photopic Contrast Sensitivity Without Glare Contrast sensitivity (the ability to distinguish between an object and it's background) was evaluated in a subgroup of subjects and was tested monocularly (each eye) in photopic (well-lit) conditions, without a glare source, using sine waving gratings in a computerized testing system. The photopic spatial frequencies tested were 3, 6, 12, 18 cycles per degree (cpd). When a subject was unable to see the highest contrast grating, the highest contrast score was assigned. Raw scores (0 to 9) from contrast sensitivity testing were transformed to log units. Better contrast sensitivity results are reflected by a higher numeric value. 6 Months (160-210 days post second eye operative visit)
Secondary Mean Monocular Photopic Contrast Sensitivity With Glare Contrast sensitivity (the ability to distinguish between an object and it's background) was evaluated in a subgroup of subjects, and was tested monocularly (each eye) in photopic (well-lit) conditions, with a glare source, using sine waving gratings in a computerized testing system. The photopic spatial frequencies tested were 3, 6, 12, 18 cycles per degree (cpd). When a subject was unable to see the highest contrast grating, the highest contrast score was assigned. Raw scores (0 to 9) from contrast sensitivity testing were transformed to log units. Better results are reflected by a higher numeric value. 6 Months (160-210 days post second eye operative visit)
Secondary Mean Monocular Mesopic Contrast Sensitivity Without Glare Contrast sensitivity (the ability to distinguish between an object and it's background) was evaluated in a subgroup of subjects and was tested monocularly (each eye) in mesopic (low-light) conditions, without a glare source, using sine waving gratings in a computerized testing system. The mesopic spatial frequencies tested were 1.5, 3, 6, 12 cycles per degree (cpd). When a subject was unable to see the highest contrast grating, the highest contrast score was assigned. Raw scores (0 to 9) from contrast sensitivity testing were transformed to log units. Better results are reflected by a higher numeric value. 6 Months (160-210 days post second eye operative visit)
Secondary Mean Monocular Mesopic Contrast Sensitivity With Glare Contrast sensitivity (the ability to distinguish between an object and it's background) was evaluated in a subgroup of subjects and was tested monocularly (each eye) in mesopic (low-light) conditions, with a glare source, using sine waving gratings in a computerized testing system. The mesopic spatial frequencies tested were 1.5, 3, 6, 12 cycles per degree (cpd). When a subject was unable to see the highest contrast grating, the highest contrast score was assigned. Raw scores (0 to 9) from contrast sensitivity testing were transformed to log units. Better results are reflected by a higher numeric value. 6 Months (160-210 days post second eye operative visit)
Secondary Mean Binocular Photopic Contrast Sensitivity Without Glare Contrast sensitivity (the ability to distinguish between an object and it's background) was evaluated in a subgroup of subjects and was tested binocularly (both eyes) in photopic (well-lit) conditions, without a glare source, using sine waving gratings in a computerized testing system. The photopic spatial frequencies tested were 3, 6, 12, 18 cycles per degree (cpd). When a subject was unable to see the highest contrast grating, the highest contrast score was assigned. Raw scores (0 to 9) from contrast sensitivity testing were transformed to log units. Better results are reflected by a higher numeric value. 6 Months (160-210 days post second eye operative visit)
Secondary Mean Binocular Photopic Contrast Sensitivity With Glare Contrast sensitivity (the ability to distinguish between an object and it's background) was evaluated in a subgroup of subjects and was tested binocularly (both eyes) in photopic (well-lit) conditions, with a glare source, using sine waving gratings in a computerized testing system. The photopic spatial frequencies tested were 3, 6, 12, 18 cycles per degree (cpd). When a subject was unable to see the highest contrast grating, the highest contrast score was assigned. Raw scores (0 to 9) from contrast sensitivity testing were transformed to log units. Better results are reflected by a higher numeric value. 6 Months (160-210 days post second eye operative visit)
Secondary Mean Binocular Mesopic Contrast Sensitivity Without Glare Contrast sensitivity (the ability to distinguish between an object and it's background) was evaluated in a subgroup of subjects and was tested binocularly (both eyes) in mesopic (low-light) conditions, without a glare source, using sine waving gratings in a computerized testing system. The mesopic spatial frequencies tested were 1.5, 3, 6, 12 cycles per degree (cpd). When a subject was unable to see the highest contrast, the highest contrast grating, the highest contrast score was assigned. Raw scores (0 to 9) from contrast sensitivity testing were transformed to log units. Better results are reflected by a higher numeric value. 6 Months (160-210 days post second eye operative visit)
Secondary Mean Binocular Mesopic Contrast Sensitivity With Glare Contrast sensitivity (the ability to distinguish between an object and it's background) was evaluated in a subgroup of subjects and was tested binocularly (both eyes) in mesopic (low-light) conditions, with a glare source, using sine waving gratings in a computerized testing system. The mesopic spatial frequencies tested were 1.5, 3, 6, 12 cycles per degree (cpd). When a subject was unable to see the highest contrast grating, the highest contrast score was assigned. Raw scores (0 to 9) from contrast sensitivity testing were transformed to log units. Better results are reflected by a higher numeric value. 6 Months (160-210 days post second eye operative visit)
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT04685538 - Chloroprocaine 3% Gel Eye Drop as Topical Anestheticsin Phacoemulsification. Phase 3
Recruiting NCT06060041 - IC-8 Apthera IOL New Enrollment Post Approval Study
Recruiting NCT05518539 - Evaluation of Quality of Vision and Visual Outcomes With Bilateral Implantation of the Clareon PanOptix Intraocular Lens
Recruiting NCT05271942 - Tilt and Tumble vs Divide and Conquer - a Unique Comparison of the Two Cataract Surgery Methods N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT04778501 - PMCF Study on Monofocal Toric IOL (PODEYE TORIC) in Asia N/A
Completed NCT05062564 - Efficacy of LipiFlow in Patients Affected by Meibomian Gland Dysfunction in Reducing Post-cataract Surgery Dry Eye N/A
Completed NCT03751033 - Influence of DisCoVisc Ophthalmic Viscosurgical Device (OVD) on Intraoperative Aberrometry Readings N/A
Completed NCT02529488 - Investigation of AcrySof® IQ PanOptix™ Presbyopia-Correcting Intraocular Lens (IOL) Model TFNT00 N/A
Completed NCT04539548 - A Study Assessing the Safety and Efficacy of Dextenza® for the Treatment of Ocular Pain and Inflammation Following Surgery for Pediatric Cataract Phase 3
Completed NCT03740659 - Evaluation Of Aqueous Humor Of Levofloxacin-Dexamethasone Eye Drops And Of Its Components In Patients Undergoing Cataract Surgery Phase 2
Completed NCT03494257 - Effect of Fixed Brinzolamide-brimonidine Combination on Intraocular Pressure After Phacoemulsification N/A
Completed NCT05119127 - Rotational Stability of Acrysof IQ Vivity Extended Vision Toric IOL and Refractive Visual Outcome. N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT04271709 - Manhattan Vision Screening and Follow-Up Study (NYC-SIGHT) N/A
Recruiting NCT03713268 - Intraoperative OCT Guidance of Intraocular Surgery II
Completed NCT03739528 - Levo-Dexa vs. Tobra+Dexa for Prevention and Treatment of Inflammation and Prevention of Infection in Cataract Surgery Phase 3
Completed NCT02888210 - A Study Assessing Safety and Efficacy of MD-15 Intraocular Lens in Patients With Aphakic Eye After Cataract Surgery Phase 3
Completed NCT03356847 - Evaluation of the Rotational Stability of the Monofocal SISA Implant Following Cataract Surgery N/A
Completed NCT04332640 - Clinical Evaluation of the Next Generation Phaco System N/A
Recruiting NCT03638726 - Subconjunctival Atropine and Intracameral Epinephrine for Pupil Dilation in Phacoemulsification Phase 4
Completed NCT03050697 - Evaluation of the Safety and Performance of the HARMONI® Toric Lens N/A

External Links