Caries Class II Clinical Trial
Official title:
Evaluation of Performance and Occlusal Wear of Low Shrinkage Giomer Compared to Nanohybrid Resin Composite in Proximal Restorations After Two Years: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
A clinical trial, comparing the clinical performance and occlusal wear resistance of two different restorative materials in restoring proximal caries in permanent posterior teeth. One is based on giomer technology and the other is nano-hybrid resin composite.
Status | Not yet recruiting |
Enrollment | 26 |
Est. completion date | February 2026 |
Est. primary completion date | December 2025 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | Accepts Healthy Volunteers |
Gender | All |
Age group | 19 Years to 30 Years |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: - Inclusion criteria for patients - Patient's age ranging from 19-30 - Good oral hygiene. - Patients who have stable occlusion. - Patients who could be present for further periodic follow-ups. - Possibility for application of rubber dam during restoration. - Patient compliance. - Inclusion criteria for Teeth - Vital first and second molars, with compound Class II lesions. - The selected teeth should be in occlusion with natural dentition and having proximal contact with adjacent teeth. - Healthy periodontium. Exclusion Criteria: - Exclusion criteria for patients - Poor oral hygiene. - Patients with high caries index or high plaque index. - Patients with periodontal problems. - Heavy bruxism habit or presence of any parafunctional habits. - Any allergic reactions against any components of the materials to be used in the study. - History of severe medical complications such as xerostomia. - Pregnant or lactating women. - Participating in another clinical trial. - Exclusion criteria for teeth - Fractured or evidently cracked teeth. - Defective restorations adjacent or opposite the selected tooth for research. - Atypical extrinsic staining of teeth. - Teeth with defects or lesions requiring other operative interventions. - Teeth with pulpal pain. - Teeth with periapical lesions. - Root Canal treated teeth. - Mobile Teeth. - Non-functioning teeth with no opposing tooth. - Signs of severe attrition. - Heavy occlusion. - Periodontally affected teeth. |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
n/a |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Cairo University |
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Functional properties (F1) Fracture of material and retention according to revised FDI (World Dental Federation) criteria. Measured by visual examination and short air drying. | Method of aggregation is frequency and percentage. Measuring unit is scoring system (Ordinal, scores 1-5). (1) Clinically excellent. (sufficient). (5) Clinically poor (entirely insufficient). | 24 months | |
Secondary | Quantitative occlusal restoration wear by Digital Intra-oral scanner and Geometrical subtraction software. | Method of aggregation is Mean (SD) (parametric) or Median (Range) (Non-parametric). Measuring unit is Microns. | 24 months. | |
Secondary | Functional properties according to revised FDI (World Dental Federation) criteria. | Functional properties:
F2: Marginal adaptation measured by visual examination, short air drying, 250 µm probe. F3:Proximal contact point measured by visual examination and 25/50/100 µm blades. F4: Form and contour measured by visual examination. F5: Occlusion and occlusal wear measured by visual examination and articulation paper. Method of aggregation is frequency and percentage. Measuring unit is scoring system (Ordinal, scores 1-5). (1) Clinically excellent. (sufficient). (5) Clinically poor (entirely insufficient). |
24 months. | |
Secondary | Biological properties according to revised FDI criteria. | Biological properties:
B1: Caries at restoration margin (CAR) measured by visual examination, short air drying, and 250 µm probe. B2: Dental hard tissue defects at restoration margin measured by visual examination. B3: Postoperative hypersensitivity reported by patient and pulp status tested with cold stimulus. Method of aggregation is frequency and percentage. Measuring unit is scoring system (Ordinal, scores 1-5). (1) Clinically excellent. (sufficient). (5) Clinically poor (entirely insufficient). |
24 months. | |
Secondary | Aesthetic properties according to revised FDI criteria. | Aesthetic properties:
A1: Surface luster and surface texture measured by visual examination and short air drying. A2: Marginal staining measured by visual examination and short air drying. A3: color match measured by visual examination. Method of aggregation is frequency and percentage. Measuring unit is scoring system (Ordinal, scores 1-5). (1) Clinically excellent. (sufficient). (5) Clinically poor (entirely insufficient). |
24 months. |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Recruiting |
NCT05020093 -
Clinical Performance of Injection-Molding Vs. Incremental Packing of Resin Composite in Cavitated Posterior Teeth
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04019145 -
Clinical Evaluation of Fiber Reinforced Resin Composite Base Versus Incremental Packing of Nanohybrid Resin Composite
|
Early Phase 1 | |
Completed |
NCT03669224 -
Effect of Nano Care Gold on Marginal Integrity of Resin Composite
|
Phase 1 | |
Recruiting |
NCT04720638 -
Clinical Performance of Short Fiber Reinforced Flowable Resin Composite Restorations 2y RCT
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT04900246 -
Evaluation of Different Methods for the Diagnosis of Primary Caries Lesions
|
Phase 1 | |
Recruiting |
NCT04790383 -
Clinical Performance of Advanced Self- Adhesivee Resin Composite Hybrid Restorations.
|
N/A |