Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Summary

Background:

More than two thirds of sudden cardiac arrests are witnessed by bystanders. Bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) doubles survival from cardiac arrest. Importantly, even in witnessed cardiac arrests only 20% of the bystanders commence basic life support. Common reasons for not commencing include panicking and the perceived inability to perform CPR correctly. A meta-analysis could demonstrate that a simplification of the algorithm (compression-only dispatcher-assisted bystander CPR) led to a 22% increase in survival-to-hospital discharge. A recently published trial of the research group could demonstrate that the presence of a flowchart has a positive effect on the quality of BLS while at the same time increasing the rescuers' confidence. Nonetheless, performing CPR is exhausting. Previous publications have emphasized increasing fatigue with the duration of CPR efforts in both, standard and chest compressions-only CPR. Consequently, the investigators wanted to test the hypothesis that chest compressions (CC) are delivered more correctly regarding the depth when utilizing the standard Basic Life Support (BLS) algorithm with the aid of a flowchart as compared to the CC only algorithm utilizing an adapted CPR flowchart in a manikin resuscitation model.

Methods:

After consent of the Research Ethics Board of Medical University of Vienna and obtaining written informed consent of the participants, 84 medically untrained laypersons will be randomised to perform flow-chart assisted CPR for 300s following standard CPR guidelines or CC only CPR. The primary outcome parameter will be the total number of CC achieving the correct depth of 50-60mm. Secondary outcome parameters will be hands-off time, the total number of CC, and the compression rate. The total number of delivered rescue breaths, tidal volume, and time to deliver these will also be evaluated. Furthermore, the subjective point of exhaustion affecting the CPR quality, the reason for discontinuation of CPR if stopped within the 300sec. period and the exhaustion at the end of the CPR measures will be evaluated.


Clinical Trial Description

Volunteers will be invited to participate in the trial by the study personnel. Recruitment will be conducted at a Training Centre of St. John ambulance, Vienna, Austria, before the starts of the lessons. After giving written informed consent, participants will be randomized using a web based randomization program (www.random.org) and allocated to perform standard CPR or CC only. The randomization for group allocation will be kept in opaque and sealed envelopes.

The evaluation will be performed with an independent investigator using a computer attached Resusci-Anne Skillreporter by Laerdal-Medical® and the Laerdal Skillreporter Software with Segstat (Version 2.3.0, Laerdal Medical, Stavanger, Norway).

The participants will be asked to perform BLS for five minutes on a manikin. The participants will then be asked to undertake any action they deem necessary to rescue the person simulated by the resuscitation manikin. Participants will not be informed about the underlying hypothesis or the outcome parameters. The room will be prepared to minimise outside interruptions.

Additionally, participants will be instructed to indicate the point in time during CPR when they feel that their fatigue is affecting the quality of the life support performed. ("During CPR and without stopping your actions, please tell us "NOW" when you perceive your fatigue is affecting the quality of the life support performed.)

Participants in both groups will receive one of the charts right at the beginning of the scenario with the information that "this chart will provide information on how to perform CPR" and with the start of the clock further instructions regarding is content. Both groups will not receive any further introduction or support. At the beginning of the scenario, the manikin will be positioned in a supine position on the floor. There will be no clock visible for the participant while performing CPR. An investigator is acting as bystander able to call the emergency medical service or to be sent to look for an automated external defibrillator (which will not be available in the scenario). Nonetheless, the investigator is instructed not to provide any information on how to perform CPR and does not physically take part in the primary check, CC, or mouth-to-mouth ventilations.

Data of steps performed or left out will be documented in hardcopy on the case report form by an investigator and the exact times and details of chest compressions and ventilations will be documented electronically (Laerdal Skillreporter Software with Segstat (Version 2.3.0, Laerdal Medical, Stavanger, Norway)). Checklists of necessary steps will be created based on the European Resuscitation Council (ERC) BLS Guidelines 2010 in the same manner as published previously [Roessler et al. 2007, Koster et al. 2010].

After the five-minute period has ended, the participants will be informed that the emergency medical service is now taking over and that they can stop performing CPR. Directly thereafter, they will be asked the following questions "How exhausted are you now on a scale from 1 to 10, where 1 indicates no exhaustion at all and 10 maximum exhaustion?" (Lickert Like 1-10). If a participant chooses to abort resuscitation attempts before the five minutes are over, the open-ended question "Why did you discontinue the resuscitation attempts?" will be raised. ;


Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


NCT number NCT04569812
Study type Interventional
Source Medical University of Vienna
Contact
Status Completed
Phase N/A
Start date March 23, 2015
Completion date April 20, 2016

See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT03690102 - The Effect of T-CPR on the Quality of CPR and AED Use N/A
Completed NCT02629939 - Basic Knowledge of CPR Among Close Relatives of Heart Patients-check Status Quo and Attemp to Establish a Potential Plan to Implement This Knowledge N/A
Completed NCT01361919 - Three Different Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) Training Methods N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT05522166 - Digital and Face-to-face Basic Life Support Training for Teacher Candidates N/A
Completed NCT04548934 - Effect of Wearing Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) on CPR Quality in Times of the COVID-19-pandemic N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT03204162 - Optimizing Integration of CPR Feedback Technology With CPR Coaching for Cardiac Arrest N/A
Recruiting NCT03754946 - The Critical Threshold of Pulse Oximetry Plethysmographic Waveform Parameters in High Quality CPR
Terminated NCT00189423 - ResQ Trial: Impact of an ITD and Active Compression Decompression CPR on Survival From Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT04914871 - Readiness for Basic Life Support in Schools N/A
Completed NCT03238287 - Manual and Mechanical Chest Compression During In-hospital Witnessed Cardiac Arrests Using Cerebral Oximetry N/A
Completed NCT03347175 - Pilot Study Comparing Ventilation Modes During CPR With Mechanical Compression Device. N/A
Completed NCT02527473 - Improving Bystander CPR Quality Through Dispatcher-assisted Basic Life Support Education Program N/A
Completed NCT03902873 - The Effect of a Real-time Audiovisual Feedback System on CPR Quality N/A
Recruiting NCT05321459 - Predictive Outcome in Comatose Patients
Completed NCT05992454 - Ventilation in Cardiac Arrest Resuscitation Study
Completed NCT02277951 - Intubation During Resuscitation N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT05343221 - The Effect of Haptic and Highly Fidelity Simulator in Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Training N/A
Completed NCT06209944 - Charlson Comorbidity Index and Outcome of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in Geriatric Patients in Hong Kong
Not yet recruiting NCT03112460 - Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Training Program Based on Quality Control N/A
Completed NCT03065647 - ECPR for Refractory Out-Of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest N/A