Central Venous Pressure Guided Hydration Prevention for Contrast-Induced Nephropathy

Cardio-Renal Syndrome Clinical Trial

Official title:

Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT02405377
• Other study ID #: 14KMM02
• Status: Completed
• Phase: N/A
• First received: March 23, 2015
• Last updated: March 31, 2015
• Start date: February 2014
• Est. completion date: February 2015

Study information

• Verified date: March 2015
• Source: Chinese PLA General Hospital
• Contact: n/a
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Health authority: China: National Health and Family Planning Commission
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

Patients at moderate and high risk for contrast induced nephropathy (CIN) should receive sufficient hydration before application of contrast to prevent CIN, but hydration could obviously increase the preload for congestive heart failure (CHF) patients. It is important to make an individual hydration protocol for patients with dysfunction of heart and renal to reduce the incidence rate of CIN. This prospective, randomized, double-blind, comparative clinical trial randomly selected 264 patients with estimated glomerular filtration rate, (eGFR) <60 ml/min per 1.73 m2 and CHF undergoing coronary angiography to receive either the convention hydration (n=132) or the central venous pressure (CVP) guided hydration (n=132).

Description:

Investigators enrolled 264 patients from February 2014 to February 2015, the principal inclusion criterion included CHF: left ventricular eject fraction (LVEF) <= 50%; moderate to severe CKD was diagnosed as an eGFR 15 to 59 mL/min per 1.73 m2, calculated via the abbreviated Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) study equation from SCr obtained within 72 hours of enrollment, patients were scheduled to undergo diagnostic cardiac angiography or percutaneous coronary interventions. We randomly assigned eligible patients in a 1:1 ratio to either CVP guided therapy or a standard hydration administration protocol. Investigators used the same fluid type commercially available 0.9% sodium chloride in all patients. Investigators monitored the CVP by placing an 5-French catheter in the jugular vein. Investigators recorded the CVP with commercially available haemodynamic monitoring software. In the CVP guided group the fluid rate was adjusted according to the CVP as follows: 3 mL/kg/h for CVP lower than 6 mmHg, 1.5 mL/kg/h for pressure of 6-12 mmHg, and 1mL/kg/h for pressure higher than 12 mmHg. The control group was hydrated at 1 mL/kg per h. The fluid rate was set at the start of the procedure (before contrast exposure). Thus, both study groups received intravenous fluids for the same duration but at different rates. All study participants received intra-arterial Visipaque(320 mg I/ml; GE Healthcare) iso-osmolar contrast medium.

Primary end point of the study was the incidence of CIN: The median peak increase in serum creatinine concentration between day 0 (when contrast was administered) and day 7. Definition of CIN was an absolute increase in serum creatinine (SCr) >0.5 mg/dl or a relative increase >25% compared to baseline SCr. Definition of non-Q-wave myocardial infarction was a creatine kinase-myocardial band enzyme elevation 3 times the upper normal value without new Q waves on the electrocardiogram. Definition of Q-wave myocardial infarction was presence of new pathologic Q waves on an electrocardiogram in conjunction with an elevation in creatine kinase greater than 3 times the normal value. All adverse clinical events as well as study end points were monitored and adjudicated by the independent event committee. Each patient was contacted in every week after administration of the contrast, investigated if dialysis or main cardiovascular events (myocardial infarction,acute heart failure and death), and record any adverse events.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Completed
• Enrollment: 264
• Est. completion date: February 2015
• Est. primary completion date: February 2015
• Accepts healthy volunteers: No
• Gender: Both
• Age group: 18 Years to 80 Years

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

1. congestive heart failure: objective evidences for decreased left ventricular eject fraction (LVEF) <= 50%;

2. moderate to severe chronic kidney disease was defined as an eGFR 15 to 59 mL/min per 1.73 m2, calculated via the abbreviated Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) study equation from SCr obtained within 72 hours of enrollment;

3. patients were scheduled to undergo diagnostic cardiac angiography or percutaneous coronary interventions.

Exclusion Criteria:

1. hemodialysis-dependent patients;

2. complicated with severe short-term progressive disease;

3. Patients < 18 years;

4. pregnancy;

5. emergency cardiac catheterisation (eg, primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction);

6. exposure to radiographic contrast media within the previous 7 days;

7. acute decompensated heart failure.

Study Design

Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor), Primary Purpose: Prevention

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Cardio-Renal Syndrome

Intervention

Procedure:
• hydration
Before the coronary procedures, investigators used the same 0.9% sodium chloride for hydration in all patients. Investigator monitored the central venous pressure (CVP) by placing an 5-French catheter in the jugular vein in the intervention group, and administration fluid rate was adjusted according to the CVP as follows: 3 ml/kg/h for CVP lower than 6 mmHg, 1.5 ml/kg/h for pressure of 6-12 mmHg, and 1ml/kg/h for pressure higher than 12 mmHg. The control group was hydrated with 0.9% sodium chloride at 1 ml/kg/h, continued for the duration of 12 h post-procedure in both groups. Thus, both study groups received intravenous fluids for the same duration but at different rates. All study participants received intra-arterial Visipaque(320 mg I/ml; GE Healthcare) iso-osmolar contrast medium.

Drug:
• Visipaque
All study participants received intra-arterial (320 mg I/ml; GE Healthcare)
• 0.9% sodium chloride ?uid administration

Device:
• 5-French catheter

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
China	Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital	Peking	Beijing

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
Chinese PLA General Hospital

Country where clinical trial is conducted

China, 

References & Publications (7)

Balemans CE, Reichert LJ, van Schelven BI, van den Brand JA, Wetzels JF. Epidemiology of contrast material-induced nephropathy in the era of hydration. Radiology. 2012 Jun;263(3):706-13. doi: 10.1148/radiol.12111667. Epub 2012 Apr 24. — View Citation

Brar SS, Aharonian V, Mansukhani P, Moore N, Shen AY, Jorgensen M, Dua A, Short L, Kane K. Haemodynamic-guided fluid administration for the prevention of contrast-induced acute kidney injury: the POSEIDON randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2014 May 24;3 — View Citation

Duan N, Zhao J, Li Z, Dong P, Wang S, Zhao Y, Wang L, Wang H. Furosemide with saline hydration for prevention of contrast-induced nephropathy in patients undergoing coronary angiography: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Med Sci Monit. 2015 Jan 23;21:292-7. doi: 10.12659/MSM.892446. — View Citation

Marenzi G, Ferrari C, Marana I, Assanelli E, De Metrio M, Teruzzi G, Veglia F, Fabbiocchi F, Montorsi P, Bartorelli AL. Prevention of contrast nephropathy by furosemide with matched hydration: the MYTHOS (Induced Diuresis With Matched Hydration Compared to Standard Hydration for Contrast Induced Nephropathy Prevention) trial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2012 Jan;5(1):90-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2011.08.017. — View Citation

Mehran R, Aymong ED, Nikolsky E, Lasic Z, Iakovou I, Fahy M, Mintz GS, Lansky AJ, Moses JW, Stone GW, Leon MB, Dangas G. A simple risk score for prediction of contrast-induced nephropathy after percutaneous coronary intervention: development and initial validation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004 Oct 6;44(7):1393-9. — View Citation

Schilp J, de Blok C, Langelaan M, Spreeuwenberg P, Wagner C. Guideline adherence for identification and hydration of high-risk hospital patients for contrast-induced nephropathy. BMC Nephrol. 2014 Jan 6;15:2. doi: 10.1186/1471-2369-15-2. — View Citation

Torigoe K, Tamura A, Watanabe T, Kadota J. 20-Hour preprocedural hydration is not superior to 5-hour preprocedural hydration in the prevention of contrast-induced increases in serum creatinine and cystatin C. Int J Cardiol. 2013 Sep 1;167(5):2200-3. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2012.05.122. Epub 2012 Jun 19. — View Citation

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	Contrast induced nephropathy postoperation	a peak serum creatinine increase of either 0.5 mg/dl or 25% from day 0 through day 7	7 days	Yes
Secondary	Composite measure of dialysis or main cardiovascular events	dialysis, myocardial infarction, heart failure and all-cause death	90 days	Yes