Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT00323661
Other study ID # BA079
Secondary ID
Status Completed
Phase Phase 4
First received May 8, 2006
Last updated February 10, 2012
Start date May 2006
Est. completion date March 2011

Study information

Verified date February 2012
Source Biotronik SE & Co. KG
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority Germany: Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the influence of accelerometer-based rate adaptation and Closed Loop Stimulation on cognitive performance and quality of life in pacemaker patients.


Description:

Within the scope of a usual follow-up schedule the influence of the mode of rate-adaptation on cognitive performance of pacemaker patients will be analysed. Accelerometer sensor will be compared with Closed Loop Stimulation over 2 years. The cognitive performance will be measured by means of a standardized psychometric test. The occurrence of atrial fibrillation and serious adverse events, patient self-assessment and quality of life will be evaluated. An analysis of the telemonitored (Home Monitoring) data will be performed in order to identify predictors of changes or differences in cognitive performance.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 405
Est. completion date March 2011
Est. primary completion date November 2010
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender Both
Age group 55 Years and older
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria:

- Patients with a CYLOS pacemaker (implantation within the last 3 to 6 weeks)

- Closed Loop Stimulation mode activated since pre-hospital discharge

- Patients with chronotropic incompetence according to physician's judgment

- Maximum sinus rate < 100 beats per minute (bpm) OR percentage of atrial pacing = 25%

- Patients suitable for rate-adaptive pacing for at least 2 years

- Patient informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

- Age under 55

- Pregnant and breast-feeding women

- Patients who are already enrolled in another study

Study Design

Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Single Blind (Subject), Primary Purpose: Treatment


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Device:
Rate-adaptive pacemaker: accelerometer
Accelerometer based pacing rate adaptation
Rate-adaptive pacemaker: Closed Loop Stimulation
Closed Loop Stimulation (CLS) is a unique concept in rate-adaptive pacing that uses the natural cardiovascular control loop to determine the appropriate pacing rate. Closed Loop Stimulation is the only rate-adaptive system responding to mental stress and thereby assuring optimal cerebral perfusion in everyday activity.

Locations

Country Name City State
Australia Sydney Adventist Hospital Sydney
Austria A.ö. Krankenhaus der Stadt Linz Linz
Austria Krankenhaus der Barmherzigen Schwestern Ried Ried
Austria A. ö. Landeskrankenhaus Steyr Steyr
Austria Wilhelminenspital der Stadt Wien Wien
Brazil Hospital Anchieta, Instituto do Coracao de Taguatinga Brasilia - DF
Brazil Hospital Sao Francisco Porto Alegre
Brazil Hospital Real e Benemerita Sociedade Portuguesa de Beneficencia Sao Paulo
Canada Practice Dr. Bloomberg Burnaby, B.C.
Canada Kelowna Cardiology Research Kelowna BC
Canada Hopital Sacre-Coeur Montreal
Canada Dr. Dante Manyauri Surrey BC
Canada Scarborough Cardiology Research Toronto, Ontario
Czech Republic Fakultni Nemocnice u Svety Anny Brno
Germany Universitätsklinik der RWTH Aachen Aachen
Germany Städtische Kliniken Bielefeld, Klinikum Mitte Bielefeld
Germany St. Agnes Hospital GmbH, 1. Medizinische Klinik-Kardiologie Bocholt
Germany Klinikum Coburg Coburg
Germany Klinikum Lippe-Detmold Detmold
Germany Med. Klinik/Kardiologie, Herzzentrum, Universitätsklinik an der Technischen Universität Dresden Dresden
Germany Kreisklinik Ebersberg GmbH Ebersberg
Germany Marien-Hospital Erftstadt-Frauenthal Erftstadt-Frauenthal
Germany Klinken Erlabrunn GmbH Erlabrunn
Germany Westdeutsches Herzzentrum Essen; Klinik für Kardiologie und Thorax-Kardiovaskuläre Chirurgie des Universitätsklinikums Essen Essen
Germany Kardiologisches Zentrum am Zoo Frankfurt
Germany St. Elisabeth-Hospital Gütersloh
Germany Klinikum der Medizinischen Fakultät Halle-Wittenberg Halle
Germany AK Altona Hamburg
Germany Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf Hamburg
Germany Zentrum für Kardiologische und Angiologische Medizin Hamburg Hamburg
Germany St. Vinzenz-Krankenhaus Hanau gGmbH Hanau
Germany Medizinische Hochschule Hannover Hannover
Germany Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg Heidelberg
Germany Klinikum Herford Herford
Germany Evangelisches Krankenhaus Holzminden Holzminden
Germany Klinikum der Universität Jena Klinik für Innere Medizin I Jena
Germany Kardiologische Gemeinschaftspraxis Kiel
Germany Städtisches Klinikum St. Georg Leipzig
Germany Universitätsklinikum Lübeck Lübeck
Germany Krankenhaus St. Franziskus, Medizinische Klinik II Mönchengladbach
Germany St. Vincenz-Krankenhaus GmbH Paderborn
Germany Kardiologische Praxis Papenburg
Germany Christl. Krankenhaus Quakenbrück Quakenbrück
Germany Elisabeth Krankenhaus GmbH Recklinghausen
Germany St. Adolf-Stift Reinbek
Germany Gemeinschaftspraxis Dr. Stenzel/Dr. Ebert Riesa
Germany Evangelisches Elisabeth Krankenhaus Trier
Germany Gemeinschaftspraxis Drs. Schley, Burkhard-Meier, Schemeitat Viersen
Germany Universitätsklinikum Würzburg Würzburg
Hong Kong Princess Margaret Hospital Hong Kong
Hong Kong Yan Chai Hospital Hong Kong
Israel Wolfson Medical Center Holon
Slovakia Nemocnica Ministerstva Obrany Bratislava
Slovakia VUSCH East Slovak Cardiology Institute, Arytmology Kosice
Spain Hospital Universitario La Fé Valencia

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Biotronik SE & Co. KG

Countries where clinical trial is conducted

Australia,  Austria,  Brazil,  Canada,  Czech Republic,  Germany,  Hong Kong,  Israel,  Slovakia,  Spain, 

References & Publications (1)

Wiegand U, Nuernberg M, Maier SK, Weiss C, Sancho-Tello MJ, Hartmann A, Schuchert A, Maier P, Chan NY. The COGNITION study rationale and design: influence of closed loop stimulation on cognitive performance in pacemaker patients. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2008 Jun;31(6):709-13. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2008.01075.x. — View Citation

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Cognitive performance assessed by the Number Connection Test 24 months No
Secondary Quality of life assessed by the SF-08 12 months and 24 months No
Secondary occurrence of atrial fibrillation 12 months and 24 months No
Secondary occurrence of serious adverse events 12 months and 24 months No
Secondary self-assessment of general well-being, mental and physical performance assessed by Visual Analogue Scales 12 months and 24 months No
Secondary Home Monitoring data 24 months No
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT04505384 - Acute Effects of LBBP Versus BVP for CRT N/A
Recruiting NCT04258228 - Transcoronary Pacing and Myocardial Viability
Completed NCT00399594 - Effect of Targeting Left Ventricular Lead Position on the Rate of Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy. Phase 2/Phase 3
Recruiting NCT03184233 - Rapid Ventricular Pacing During Cerebral Aneurysm Surgery: a Study Concerning the Safety for Heart and Brain N/A
Completed NCT03388281 - Morbidity, Mortality and Gender Differences in Patients With Pacemakers N/A
Terminated NCT00422669 - Optimize RV Selective Site Pacing Clinical Trial N/A
Completed NCT00541541 - Acoustic Cardiographic Assessment of Heart Function and the Role of Phrenic Nerve Stimulation N/A
Completed NCT03281395 - Rapid Ventricular Pacing During Cerebral Aneurysm Surgery: a Retrospective Study Concerning the Safety for Heart and Brain N/A
Terminated NCT00116987 - Dual Chamber Versus Single Chamber Cardiac Pacing in People 80 Years of Age and Older N/A
Completed NCT03452462 - Electrical Resynchronization and Acute Hemodynamic Effects of Direct His Bundle Pacing Compared to Biventricular Pacing N/A