Cardiac Electrophysiology Clinical Trial
Official title:
Evaluation of the Ongoing Safety and Preliminary Efficacy of the Tetanizing Burst Therapy (TBT) System in Subjects Undergoing ICD Replacement Due to End-of-battery Life
Verified date | September 2019 |
Source | EP Sciences |
Contact | Jane Wilson |
Phone | 8457218210 |
janew[@]databean.com | |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
This study evaluates whether the addition of tetanizing burst therapy reduces the pain associated with ICD shocks
Status | Recruiting |
Enrollment | 50 |
Est. completion date | December 1, 2020 |
Est. primary completion date | September 1, 2020 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years to 80 Years |
Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: - Male or Female age 18-80 years, inclusive - Ability to understand and provide written informed consent - Normal sinus rhythm - Standard transvenous left-sided ICD referred for device replacement due to end of battery life Exclusion Criteria: - Heart rate <40 or >90 bpm - Atrial fibrillation or pacemaker dependent - NYHA Class III/IV symptoms of HF - MI within 90 days of enrollment - Severe cardiac ischemia manifested by chest pain at rest or with minimal exercise - History stroke or TIAs - History of prior ICD pocket infection - ICD lead resistance that is too high or too low in the opinion of the investigator - Female who is pregnant or breastfeeding - Prior heart transplant - Serum electrolytes out of normal range at participating institution |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
United States | Johns Hopkins Hospital | Baltimore | Maryland |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
EP Sciences |
United States,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Less pain after TBT impulse with ICD shock compared to ICD shock alone | Each subject will receive 2 therapies in random order delivered 5 minutes apart: Tetanizing Burst Therapy + shock; and Pure shock alone. Using the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NRS) after each shock, the subject will be asked to provide a verbal score between 1 and 10, where 1 is no pain and 10 is the worst pain imaginable. |
5 minutes | |
Secondary | The efficacy of tetanizing burst therapy in subjects undergoing ICD replacement as assessed by NRS verbal score | After each shock, a blinded assessor will ask the subject to provide an NRS verbal score between 1 and 10, where 1 is no pain and 10 is the worst pain imaginable. The percent change in the NRS score will be calculated for each subject along with the change in skeletal muscle force waveform | 5 minutes | |
Secondary | The safety of tetanizing burst therapy in subjects undergoing ICD replacement as assessed by adverse events | Incidence rates of all adverse events will be calculated and compared to event rates in the literature. They will also be analyzed by severity and relationship to the device and/or study procedures. | 7 days | |
Secondary | The device performance of tetanizing burst therapy in subjects undergoing ICD replacement as assessed degree of muscle contraction (Rate of Force Development) | The force of contraction is recorded at the patient's left elbow with a myometer | 5 minutes |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT04577430 -
Effects of Dexmedetomidine on Cardiac Electrophysiology in Patients Under General Anesthesia During Perioperative Period
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04138797 -
Evaluation of Non-invasive Measurement of Electrophysiological "HV" Interval Using a High-density and High-fidelity Signal Averaging ECG Device
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03688412 -
Transvenous Lead Removal Post-Market Clinical Study
|
||
Completed |
NCT02779998 -
Prophylactic Non-invasive Ventilation During Surgical Procedure in Rhythmology
|
N/A |