Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung Clinical Trial
— GEOMETRY-EOfficial title:
A Phase III Randomized, Controlled, Open-label, Multicenter, Global Study of Capmatinib in Combination With Osimertinib Versus Platinum - Pemetrexed Based Doublet Chemotherapy in Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic NSCLC Harboring EGFR Activating Mutations Who Have Progressed on Prior Generation EGFR-TKI Therapy and Whose Tumors Are T790M Mutation Negative and Harbor MET Amplification (GEOMETRY-E)
Verified date | March 2024 |
Source | Novartis |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
This study aimed to evaluate the anticancer activity of capmatinib in combination with osimertinib compared to platinum-pemetrexed based doublet chemotherapy as second line treatment in patients with advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation, T790M negative, mesenchymal-to-epithelial transition factor (MET) amplified who progressed following EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs).
Status | Terminated |
Enrollment | 6 |
Est. completion date | December 27, 2022 |
Est. primary completion date | December 27, 2022 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years and older |
Eligibility | Key Inclusion Criteria: - Histologically or cytologically confirmed diagnosis of NSCLC with EGFR mutations known to be associated with EGFR TKI sensitivity, EGFR T790M negative and MET gene amplification - Stage IIIB/IIIC or IV NSCLC - Participants must have progressed on one prior line of therapy (1st/2nd generation EGFR TKIs, osimertinib or other third generation EGFR TKIs) for advanced/metastatic disease (stage IIIB/IIIC and must be candidates for platinum (cisplatin or carboplatin) - pemetrexed doublet based chemotherapy - Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) of 0 or 1 - Participants must have recovered from all toxicities related to prior systemic therapy to grade = 1 Common Terminology Criteria Adverse Event 5.0 (CTCAE v 5.0) - At least one measurable lesion as defined by RECIST 1.1 - Participants must have adequate organ function Key Exclusion Criteria: - Prior treatment with any MET inhibitor or HGF-targeting therapy - Participants with symptomatic central nervous system (CNS) metastases who were neurologically unstable or had required increasing doses of steroids within the 2 weeks prior to study entry to manage CNS symptoms - Carcinomatous meningitis - Presence or history of a malignant disease other than NSCLC that had been diagnosed and/or required therapy within the past 3 years - Presence or history of interstitial lung disease or interstitial pneumonitis, including clinically significant radiation pneumonitis - Long QT syndrome, family history of idiopathic sudden death or congenital long QT syndrome - Clinically significant, uncontrolled heart diseases - known druggable molecular alterations that may render participants eligible for alternative targeted therapies |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Japan | Novartis Investigative Site | Kashiwa | Chiba |
Japan | Novartis Investigative Site | Sunto Gun | Shizuoka |
Korea, Republic of | Novartis Investigative Site | Seoul | |
Singapore | Novartis Investigative Site | Singapore |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Novartis Pharmaceuticals |
Japan, Korea, Republic of, Singapore,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Run-in Part: Number of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLTs) | A DLT was defined as an adverse event (AE) or abnormal laboratory value assessed as unrelated to disease, progressive disease, inter-current illness, or concomitant medications, that despite optimal therapeutic intervention that occurred within the first 21 days of treatment with capmatinib in combination with osimertinib. | Up to 21 Days | |
Primary | Randomized Part: Progression Free Survival (PFS) Based on BIRC Assessment | PFS was defined as time from date of randomization to the date of first documented disease progression (PD) based on Blinded Independent Review Committee (BIRC) as per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1), or death from any cause, whichever occurred first. Progression was defined as a =20% increase in sum of longest diameters (SLD) compared to smallest SLD in the study, or progression of non-target lesions or new lesions. | From randomization to first documented progression or deaths, planned to be assessed up to 37 months | |
Secondary | Run-in Part: Number of Participants With at Least One Dose Interruption and Dose Reduction of Each Study Drug | Number of participants with at least one dose interruption and dose reduction were reported for each study drug. | From the first dose until last dose of study treatment, assessed up to 39 weeks | |
Secondary | Run-in Part: Dose Intensity of Each Study Drug | Dose intensity was computed as the ratio of actual cumulative dose (milligrams) received and actual duration of exposure (weeks) to study drug. | From the first dose until last dose of study treatment, assessed up to 39 weeks | |
Secondary | Run-in Part: Median Duration of Exposure to Each Study Drug | Duration of exposure is defined as the time (in weeks) between the first and the last dose of study treatment. | From the first dose until last dose of study treatment, assessed up to 39 weeks | |
Secondary | Run-in Part: Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Capmatinib | Blood samples were collected. Cmax of capmatinib was calculated from plasma concentration-time data using non-compartmental methods and summarized using descriptive statistics.
Actual recorded sampling times were considered for the calculations |
Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, and 8 hours post-dose on Days 1 and 15 of Cycle 1 (Cycle = 21 days) | |
Secondary | Run-in Part: Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Osimertinib and Its Metabolites (AZ5104 and AZ7550) | Blood samples were collected. Cmax of osimertinib and its metabolites (AZ5104 and AZ7550) was calculated from plasma concentration-time data using non-compartmental methods and summarized using descriptive statistics. | Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8 and 24 hours post-dose on Days 1 and 15 of Cycle 1 (Cycle = 21 days) | |
Secondary | Run-in Part: Time to Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of Capmatinib | Blood samples were collected. Tmax of capmatinib was calculated from plasma concentration-time data using non-compartmental methods and summarized using descriptive statistics.
Actual recorded sampling times were considered for the calculations |
Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, and 8 hours post-dose on Days 1 and 15 of Cycle 1 (Cycle = 21 days) | |
Secondary | Run-in Part: Time to Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of Osimertinib and Its Metabolites (AZ5104 and AZ7550) | Blood samples were collected. Tmax of osimertinib and its metabolites (AZ5104 and AZ7550) was calculated from plasma concentration-time data using non-compartmental methods and summarized using descriptive statistics.
Actual recorded sampling times were considered for the calculations |
Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8 and 24 hours post-dose on Days 1 and 15 of Cycle 1 (Cycle = 21 days) | |
Secondary | Run-in Part: Area Under the Curve to the Last Measurable Concentration (AUClast) of Capmatinib | Blood samples were collected. AUClast of capmatinib was calculated from plasma concentration-time data using non-compartmental methods and summarized using descriptive statistics. | Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, and 8 hours post-dose on Days 1 and 15 of Cycle 1 (Cycle = 21 days) | |
Secondary | Run-in Part: Area Under the Curve to the Last Measurable Concentration (AUClast) of Osimertinib and Its Metabolites (AZ5104 and AZ7550) | Blood samples were collected. AUClast of osimertinib and its metabolites (AZ5104 and AZ7550) was calculated from plasma concentration-time data using non-compartmental methods and summarized using descriptive statistics. | Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8 and 24 hours post-dose on Days 1 and 15 of Cycle 1 (Cycle = 21 days) | |
Secondary | Run-in Part: Overall Response Rate (ORR) as Per Investigator Assessment | ORR was defined as the percentage of participants with a confirmed best overall response (BOR) of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR), as per investigator judgment and according to RECIST v1.1. Criteria for CR: Disappearance of all lesions and pathologic lymph nodes; PR: =30% decrease in the SLD of the target lesions or no new lesions or no progression of non-target lesions. | Up to end of study, assessed up to 39 weeks | |
Secondary | Run-in Part: Duration of Response (DOR) as Per Investigator Assessment | DOR was defined as the time from first documented response of CR or PR to the date of first documented PD or death due to any cause. Criteria for CR: Disappearance of all lesions and pathologic lymph nodes; PR: =30% decrease in the SLD of the target lesions or no new lesions or no progression of non-target lesions; PD: =20% increase in SLD compared to the smallest SLD in the study, or progression of non-target lesions or new lesions. | Up to disease progression or death or end of study, assessed up to 39 weeks | |
Secondary | Run-in Part: Time to Response (TTR) as Per Investigator Assessment | TTR was defined as the duration of time between the date of fist dose of treatmwnr and the date of the first documented response of either CR or PR as per investigator judgment and according to RECIST v1.1 criteria. Criteria for CR: Disappearance of all lesions and pathologic lymph nodes; PR: =30% decrease in SLD of the target lesions or no new lesions or no progression of non-target lesions. | From first dose of treatment up to end of study, assessed up to 39 weeks | |
Secondary | Run-in Part: Disease Control Rate (DCR) as Per Investigator Assessment | DCR was defined as the percentage of participants with a BOR of CR, PR, and stable disease (SD) as per investigator judgment and according to RECIST v1.1. Criteria for CR: Disappearance of all lesions and pathologic lymph nodes; PR: =30% decrease in SLD of the target lesions or no new lesions or no progression of non-target lesions; SD: Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR or CR nor and increase in lesions which would qualify for PD. PD: =20% increase in SLD compared to the smallest SLD in the study, or progression of non-target lesions or new lesions. | From randomization up to end of study, assessed up to 39 weeks | |
Secondary | Run-in Part: Progression-Free Survival (PFS) as Per Investigator Assessment | PFS was defined as the time (in months) from first dose of treatment to the date of the first documented progression or death due to any cause as per investigator judgment and according to RECIST v1.1. Progression was defined as a =20% increase in SLD compared to smallest SLD in the study, or progression of non-target lesions or new lesions. PFS was censored if no PFS event (progression or death) was observed. | From first dose of treatment until first documented progression or death or end of study, assessed up to 39 weeks | |
Secondary | Randomized Part: Overall Response Rate (ORR) as Per BIRC Assessment | ORR was defined as the percentage of participants with confirmed BOR of CR or PR, as per BIRC by RECIST v1.1. Criteria for CR: Disappearance of all lesions and pathologic lymph nodes; PR: =30% decrease in SLD of the target lesions or no new lesions or no progression of non-target lesions. | Planned to be assessed up to 37 months | |
Secondary | Randomized Part: Overall Intracranial Response Rate (OIRR) as Per BIRC Assessment | OIRR was defined as the percentage of participants with a confirmed best overall intracranial response (BOIR) of CR or PR as per BIRC according to Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology Brain Metastases (RANO-BM) criteria. Criteria for CR: Disappearance of all CNS target and non-target lesions sustained for at least 4 weeks, with no new lesions, and no use of corticosteroids. PR: =30% decrease in the SLD of CNS target lesions or no new lesions or and stable to decreased corticosteroid dose. | Planned to be assessed up to 37 months | |
Secondary | Randomized Part: Duration of Response (DOR) as Per BIRC Assessment | DOR was defined as the time from the first documented response of CR or PR to the date of first documented progression or death as per BIRC according to RECIST v1.1 criteria. Criteria for CR: Disappearance of all lesions and pathologic lymph nodes; PR: =30% decrease in SLD of the target lesions or no new lesions or no progression of non-target lesions; PD: =20% increase in SLD compared to the smallest SLD in the study, or progression of non-target lesions or new lesions. | From first documented response to first documented progression or death, planned to be assessed up to 37 months | |
Secondary | Randomized Part: Time to Response (TTR) as Per BIRC Assessment | TTR was defined as duration of time between the date of randomization and the date of first documented response of either CR or PR as per BIRC according to RECIST v1.1 criteria. Criteria for CR: Disappearance of all lesions and pathologic lymph nodes; PR: =30% decrease in SLD of the target lesions or no new lesions or no progression of non-target lesions. | From randomization to first documented response, planned to be assessed up to 37 months | |
Secondary | Randomized Part: Disease Control Rate (DCR) as Per BIRC Assessment | DCR was defined as the percentage of participants with CR or PR or SD as per BIRC according to RECIST v1.1 criteria. Criteria for CR: Disappearance of all lesions and pathologic lymph nodes; PR: =30% decrease in SLD of the target lesions or no new lesions or no progression of non-target lesions; SD: Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR or CR nor and increase in lesions which would qualify for PD. PD: =20% increase in SLD compared to the smallest SLD in the study, or progression of non-target lesions or new lesions. | Planned to be assessed up to 37 months | |
Secondary | Randomized Part: Progression-Free Survival After Next Line of Treatment (PFS2) as Per Investigator Assessment | PFS2 was defined as the time from date of randomization to the first documented progression on the next line therapy as per investigator judgment according to RECIST v1.1 response criteria or death due to any cause. | Planned to be assessed up to 37 months | |
Secondary | Randomized Part: Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Capmatinib | Cmax of capmatinib calculated from plasma concentration-time data using non-compartmental methods and summarized using descriptive statistics. | Pre-dose on Day 1 of Cycles 1, 2, 3, 4 and 6 (Cycle = 21 days) | |
Secondary | Randomized Part: Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Osimertinib and Its Metabolites | Cmax of osimertinib and its metabolites (AZ5104 and AZ7550) calculated from plasma concentration-time data using non-compartmental methods and summarized using descriptive statistics. | Pre-dose on Day 1 of Cycles 1, 2, 3, 4 and 6 (Cycle = 21 days) | |
Secondary | Randomized Part: Overall Survival (OS) | OS was defined as the time from date of randomization to date of death due to any cause. | From randomization to date of death, planned to be assessed up to 37 months | |
Secondary | Randomized Part: Change From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Core Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | EORTC QLQ-C30 is a questionnaire developed to assess the quality of life of cancer patients. It contains 30 items and is composed of both multi-item scales and single-item measures based on the participant's experience over the past week. These include five scales (physical, role, emotional, cognitive, and social functioning), three symptom scales (fatigue, nausea/vomiting, and pain), six single items (dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea, and financial impact) and a global health status/quality of life scale (QoL) scale. All of the scales and single-item measures range in score from 0 to 100. A high score for a functional scale represents a high /healthy level of functioning; a high score for the global health status / QoL represents a high QoL, but a high score for a symptom scale / item represents a high level of symptomatology/problems. | Cycle 1 Day 1, Cycle 3 Day 1, then every 6 weeks for the 18 months after Cycle 1 Day 1 and every 12 weeks thereafter, until end of treatment, end of treatment and 6, 12 and 18 weeks post-progression (Cycle = 21 days) | |
Secondary | Randomized Part: Change From Baseline in the EORTC QLQ Lung Cancer Module (EORTC QLQ-LC13) Score | EORTC QLQ-LC13 is used in conjunction with the EORTC QLQ-C30 and provides information on an additional 13 items specifically related to lung cancer. The five domains of the LC13 include pain, dyspnea, coughing and hemoptysis, and are based on their presence over the past week. All but the pain domain are scored on a 4 point Likert scale ranging from "not at all" to "very much". Pain score is based on its presence, hence yes or no. Scores are averaged and transformed to 0 to 100. A higher score indicates a higher presence of symptoms. | Cycle 1 Day 1, Cycle 3 Day 1, then every 6 weeks for the 18 months after Cycle 1 Day 1 and every 12 weeks thereafter, until end of treatment, end of treatment and 6, 12 and 18 weeks post-progression (Cycle = 21 days) | |
Secondary | Randomized Part: Change From Baseline in the EuroQoL-5 Dimension-5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) Score | EQ-5D-5L is a standardized measure of health status developed by the EuroQol (EQ) Group in order to provide a simple, generic measure of health for clinical and economic appraisal. The EQ-5D-5L consists of 2 pages - the descriptive system and the EQ visual analogue scale (EQ VAS). The descriptive system comprises 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression). For each of these dimensions, the participant self-assigned a score: from 1 (no problems) to 5 (extreme problems). The questionnaire also includes a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), where the participant is asked to rate current health status on a scale of 0 to 100, with 0 being the worst imaginable health state. | Cycle 1 Day 1, Cycle 3 Day 1, then every 6 weeks for the 18 months after Cycle 1 Day 1 and every 12 weeks thereafter, until end of treatment, end of treatment and 6, 12 and 18 weeks post-progression (Cycle = 21 days) | |
Secondary | Randomized Part: Change From Baseline in the National Comprehensive Cancer Network Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (NCCN FACT)-Brain Symptom Index Version 2.0 (FBrSI) | The NCCN FACT-Brain Symptom Index version 2.0 (FBrSI) is a questionnaire used to explore changes in symptoms associated with potential brain metastases (BM). The symptoms module contains 12 items with a recall period of the past 7 days. The participant responds to 12 statements and indicates to what extent it applies to them on a 5-point Likert response scale from "not at all"=0 to "very much"=4. Higher scores indicates a greater impact of symptoms on the participant's quality of life. | Cycle 1 Day 1, Cycle 3 Day 1, then every 6 weeks for the 18 months after Cycle 1 Day 1 and every 12 weeks thereafter, until end of treatment, end of treatment and 6, 12 and 18 weeks post-progression (Cycle = 21 days) | |
Secondary | Randomized Part: Time to Symptom Deterioration for EORTC QLQ-C30 Questionnaire | Time to symptom deterioration from baseline from baseline for participant scores from the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire. EORTC QLQ-C30 is a questionnaire developed to assess the quality of life of cancer patients. It contains 30 items and is composed of both multi-item scales and single-item measures based on the participant's experience over the past week. These include five scales (physical, role, emotional, cognitive, and social functioning), three symptom scales (fatigue, nausea/vomiting, and pain), six single items (dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea, and financial impact) and a global health status/quality of life scale (QoL) scale. All of the scales and single-item measures range in score from 0 to 100. A high score for a functional scale represents a high /healthy level of functioning; a high score for the global health status / QoL represents a high QoL, but a high score for a symptom scale / item represents a high level of symptomatology/problems. | From baseline to symptom deterioration, planned to be assessed up to 37 months | |
Secondary | Randomized Part: Time to Symptom Deterioration for EORTC QLQ-LC13 Questionnaire | Time to symptom deterioration from baseline for participant scores from EORTC QLQ-LC13 questionnaire. EORTC QLQ-LC13 is used in conjunction with the EORTC QLQ-C30 and provides information on an additional 13 items specifically related to lung cancer. The five domains of the LC13 include pain, dyspnea, coughing and hemoptysis, and are based on their presence over the past week. All but the pain domain are scored on a 4 point Likert scale ranging from "not at all" to "very much". Pain score is based on its presence, hence yes or no. Scores are averaged and transformed to 0 to 100. A higher score indicates a higher presence of symptoms. | From baseline to symptom deterioration, planned to be assessed up to 37 months | |
Secondary | Randomized Part: Time to Symptom Deterioration for NCCN FBrSl Questionnaire | Time to symptom deterioration from baseline for participant scores from the NCCN FBrSl questionnaire. The NCCN FACT-Brain Symptom Index version 2.0 (FBrSI) is a questionnaire used to explore changes in symptoms associated with potential brain metastases (BM). The symptoms module contains 12 items with a recall period of the past 7 days. The participant responds to 12 statements and indicates to what extent it applies to them on a 5-point Likert response scale from "not at all"=0 to "very much"=4. Higher scores indicates a greater impact of symptoms on the participant's quality of life. | From baseline to symptom deterioration, planned to be assessed up to 37 months | |
Secondary | Randomized Part: Duration of Intracranial Response (DOIR) Based on BIRC | DOIR was defined as the time from the date of first documented intracranial response of either CR or PR to the date of the first documented intracranial progression per RANO-BM criteria as assessed by BIRC review or the date of death due to any cause. Criteria for CR: Disappearance of all CNS target and non-target lesions sustained for at least 4 weeks, with no new lesions, and no use of corticosteroids; PR: =30% decrease in the SLD of CNS target lesions or no new lesions, and stable to decreased corticosteroid dose. | From the date of first documented intracranial response to first documented intracranial progression or death, planned to be assessed up to 37 months | |
Secondary | Randomized Part: Time to Intracranial Response (TTIR) Based on BIRC | TTIR was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of the first documented intracranial response of either CR or PR as per BIRC according to RANO-BM criteria. Criteria for CR: Disappearance of all CNS target and non-target lesions sustained for at least 4 weeks, with no new lesions, and no use of corticosteroids; PR: =30% decrease in the SLD of CNS target lesions or no new lesions, and stable to decreased corticosteroid dose. | From randomization to first documented response, planned to be assessed up to 37 months | |
Secondary | Randomized Part: Intracranial Disease Control Rate (IDCR) Based on BIRC | IDCR was defined as the percentage of participants with a confirmed BOIR of CR or PR or SD as per BIRC according to RANO-BM criteria. Criteria for CR: Disappearance of all CNS target and non-target lesions sustained for at least 4 weeks, with no new lesions, and no use of corticosteroids; PR: =30% decrease in the SLD of CNS target lesions or no new lesions, and stable to decreased corticosteroid dose; SD: Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for partial response nor sufficient increase to qualify for progressive disease. | Planned to be assessed up to 37 months |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT04879849 -
A Study of TAK-676 With Pembrolizumab After Radiation Therapy to Treat a Number of Cancers
|
Phase 1 | |
Completed |
NCT04426825 -
A Study of Atezolizumab in Combination With Bevacizumab in Patients With EGFR Mutation Positive Stage IIIB-IV Non-Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
|
Phase 2 | |
Terminated |
NCT03166631 -
A Trial to Find the Safe Dose for BI 891065 Alone and in Combination With BI 754091 in Patients With Incurable Tumours or Tumours That Have Spread
|
Phase 1 | |
Completed |
NCT02810457 -
Evaluation of FKB238 and Avastin in Patients With Advanced/Recurrent Non-squamous Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT02864394 -
Study of Pembrolizumab Versus Docetaxel in Participants Previously Treated for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (MK-3475-033/KEYNOTE-033)
|
Phase 3 | |
Recruiting |
NCT04592523 -
A Study of Usage of Brigatinib in the Treatment of Adult Participants for Approved Indications In South Korea
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT04838548 -
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of MRG003 in Patients With EGFR-Positive Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
|
Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT04077463 -
A Study of Lazertinib as Monotherapy or in Combination With Amivantamab in Participants With Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
|
Phase 1 | |
Recruiting |
NCT04603807 -
A Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Entrectinib and Crizotinib in Participants With Advanced or Metastatic ROS1 Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) With and Without Central Nervous System (CNS) Metastases
|
Phase 3 | |
Recruiting |
NCT05167604 -
Clinical Value of MRD Monitoring for Adjuvant Therapy in Postoperative NSCLC
|
||
Completed |
NCT04948411 -
Durvalumab as Maintenance in Patients Who Received Chemoradiotherapy for Unresectable Stage III NSCLC: Real World Data From an Expanded Access Program in Brazil
|
||
Active, not recruiting |
NCT04487080 -
A Study of Amivantamab and Lazertinib Combination Therapy Versus Osimertinib in Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
|
Phase 3 | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT04255836 -
Durvalumab Combined With Chemotherapy and Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) in Patients With Oligometastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT01953913 -
Afatinib (BIBW 2992) in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients With EGFR Mutation
|
Phase 3 | |
Recruiting |
NCT05715229 -
Immune Profile Selection By Fraction of ctDNA in Patients With Advanced NSCLC Treated With Immunotherapy
|
Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT04931654 -
A Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of AZD7789 in Participants With Advanced or Metastatic Solid Cancer
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
Suspended |
NCT05421936 -
Osimertinib for NSCLC With Uncommon EGFR Mutations
|
||
Completed |
NCT02847377 -
A Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Imaging Agent [18F]-ODS2004436 as a Marker of EGFR Mutation in Subjects With NSCLC
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04427072 -
Study of Capmatinib Efficacy in Comparison With Docetaxel in Previously Treated Participants With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Harboring MET Exon 14 Skipping Mutation
|
Phase 3 | |
Recruiting |
NCT04823377 -
Impact of a Process Optimizing the Decision to Continue or Stop Cancer Treatments in Patients With Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer.
|
N/A |