Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT01121393
Other study ID # 1200.34
Secondary ID
Status Completed
Phase Phase 3
First received
Last updated
Start date April 19, 2010
Est. completion date November 26, 2017

Study information

Verified date December 2018
Source Boehringer Ingelheim
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

To investigate the efficacy and safety of BIBW 2992 compared to standard first-line chemotherapy in patients with stage IIIB or IV adenocarcinoma of the lung harbouring an EGFR activating mutation


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 364
Est. completion date November 26, 2017
Est. primary completion date November 23, 2017
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 18 Years and older
Eligibility Inclusion criteria:

1. pathologically confirmed diagnosis of stage IIIB or stage IV adenocarcinoma of the Lung

2. EGFR(Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor) mutation detected by central laboratory analysis of tumor biopsy material

3. Measurable disease according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST)1.1

4. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score of 0 or 1.

5. Age>=18 years

6. life expectancy of at least three months

7. Written informed consent that is consistent with International Conference on Harmonisation-Good Clinical Practice (ICH-GCP) guidelines.

Exclusion criteria:

1. Prior chemotherapy for relapsed and/or metastatic NSCLC.

2. Prior treatment with EGFR targeting small molecules or antibodies.

3. Radiotherapy or surgery(other than biopsy) within 4 weeks prior to randomization

4. Active brain metastases

5. Any other current malignancy or malignancy diagnosed within the past 5 years

6. Known pre-existing interstitial lung disease

7. Significant or recent acute gastrointestinal disorders with diarrhoea as a a major symptoms.

8. History or presence of clinically relevant cardiovascular abnormalities

9. Cardiac left ventricular function with resting ejection fraction of less than 50%.

10. Any other concomitant serious illness or organ system dysfunction which in the opinion of the investigator would either compromise patient safety or interfere with the evaluation of the safety of the test drug.

11. Absolute neutrophil count(ANC)<1500/mm3

12. Platelet count<100,000/mm3

13. Creatinine clearance<60ml/min or serum creatinine>1.5 times Upper Limit of Normal (ULN).

14. Bilirubin>1.5 times ULN

15. Aspartate Amino Transferase (AST) or Alanine Amino Transferase (ALT) > 3 times ULN

16. Women of childbearing potential, or men who are able to father a child, unwilling to use a medically acceptable method of contraception during the trial

17. Pregnancy of breast-feeding

18. Patients unable to comply with the protocol

19. Active hepatitis B infection, active hepatitis C infection or known HIV(Human Immunodeficiency Virus) carrier.

20. Known or suspected active drug or alcohol abuse.

21. requirement for treatment with any of the prohibited concomitant medications listed in section 4.2.2

22. Any contraindications for therapy with gemcitabine/cisplatin

23. Known hypersensitivity to BIBW2992 or the excipient of any of the trial drugs

24. Use of any investigational drug within 4 weeks of randomization.

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Drug:
Gemcitabine+Cisplatin
Gemcitabine d1,8, Cisplatin d1, 21 days as a course, up to 6 courses.
BIBW 2992
starting dose is 40 mg, in the event of no or minimal drug-related adverse events after one course, the dose will be increased to 50mg. in the event of certain drug related Adverse Event (AE), dose reduction will be increments of 10 mg, with the lowest dose being 20mg.

Locations

Country Name City State
China 307 Hospital of PLA Beijing
China Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital Beijing
China Beijing Chest Hospital Beijing
China Peking Union Medical College Hospital Beijing
China First Hospital of Jilin University Changchun
China Hunan Province Tumor Hospital Changsha
China Xiangya Hospital, Central South University Changsha
China West China Hospital Chengdu
China Fujian Provincial Tumor Hospital Fuzhou
China Guangdong General Hospital Guangzhou
China Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Disease Guangzhou
China NanFang Hosptial Guangzhou
China The Third Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University Haerbin
China Zhejiang Cancer Hospital Hangzhou
China Hubei Cancer Hospital HongShan
China Yunnan Provincial Tumor Hospital Kunming
China Lin Yi Tumor Hospital Linyi
China The Affiliated Cancer Hospital, Guangxi Medical University Nan Ning
China Jiangsu Cancer Hospital Nanjing
China the 81th Hospital of PLA Nanjing
China The affiliated hospital of medicalcollege qingdao university Qingdao
China Changhai Hospital Shanghai
China Shanghai Changzheng Hospital Shanghai
China Shanghai Chest Hospital Shanghai
China Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital Shanghai
China Zhongshan Hospital Fudan University Shanghai
China The First Hospital of Chinese Medical University Shenyang
China Hebei Provincial Tumor Hospital Shijiazhuang
China Tangdu Hospital Xi'An
China Northern Jiangsu People's Hospital Yangzhou
Korea, Republic of Kosin University Gospel Hospital Busan
Korea, Republic of Chungbuk National University Hospital Cheongju
Korea, Republic of Yeungnam University Medical Center Daegu
Korea, Republic of Konkuk University Medical Center Seoul
Korea, Republic of Korea University Guro Hospital Seoul
Thailand Songklanagarind Hospital Songkla

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Boehringer Ingelheim

Countries where clinical trial is conducted

China,  Korea, Republic of,  Thailand, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Progression-free Survival The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) as assessed by central independent review according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST) version 1.1. Progression-free survival was defined as the time from randomisation to disease progression or death whichever occurs earlier. A pre-defined set of censoring rules were used for patients who did not have a PFS.
Only data collected up until the analysis cut-off date (27 December 2013) were considered. Median time results from unstratified Kaplan-Meier estimates.
Tumour assessment were performed at screening, week 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48 and then every 12 weeks until progression or death whichever occurs first up to week 168
Secondary Objective Response (OR) OR is defined as a best overall response of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) assessed by central independent review according to RECIST version 1.1 and will be presented as the percentage of patients with OR.
CR is defined as the disappearance of all target lesions and non-target lesions and no new lesions.
PR is defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of longest diameter (LD) of target lesions taking as reference the baseline sum LD, non-Progressive Disease or non evaluation of all non-target lesions and no new lesions.
(Exact 95% Confidence interval by Clopper and Pearson.)
Tumour assessment were performed at screening, week 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48 and then every 12 weeks until progression or death whichever occurs first up to week 374
Secondary Disease Control (DC) DC is defined as a patient with objective response (OR) or stable disease (SD) assessed by central independent review according to RECIST version 1.1 and will be presented as the percentage of patients with DC. Tumour assessment were performed at screening, week 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48 and then every 12 weeks until progression or death whichever occurs first up to week 374
Secondary Overall Survival (OS) OS is defined as the time from randomisation to death. For patients who had not died until 7 December 2017, the date they were last known to be alive was derived from patient status records, the trial completion record, radiological imaging assessments, the study treatment termination record, and the randomisation date.
Median time results from unstratified Kaplan-Meier estimates.
From randomisation up to 374 weeks
Secondary Time to Objective Response (OR) OR is defined as a best of overall response of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) assessed by central independent review according to RECIST version 1.1.
For patients with an objective response, time to objective response was defined as the time from randomisation to the first objective response.
Outcome data are the percentage of patients with OR by each scheduled tumour assessment.
Tumour assessment were performed at screening, week 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48 and then every 12 weeks until progression or death whichever occurs first up to week 374
Secondary Duration of Objective Response OR is defined as a best of overall response of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) assessed by central independent review according to RECIST version 1.1.
For patients with an objective response, duration of objective response was defined as the time from the first objective response to disease progression or death whichever occurs earlier. A pre-defined set of censoring rules were used for patients who did not progress/die. The Median values are Kaplan-Meier estimates.
Tumour assessment were performed at screening, week 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48 and then every 12 weeks until progression or death whichever occurs first up to week 374
Secondary Duration of Disease Control For patients with disease control, duration of disease control was defined as the time from randomisation to progression or death whichever occurs first. A pre-defined set of censoring rules were used for patients who did not progress/die. The Median values are Kaplan-Meier estimates. Tumour assessment were performed at screening, week 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48 and then every 12 weeks until progression or death whichever occurs first up to week 374
Secondary Tumour Shrinkage Tumour shrinkage is calculated as the minimum post-baseline sum of longest diameters of target lesions (longest for non-nodal lesions, short axis for nodal lesions) (SLD), as assessed by central independent review. The mean of these minimum values are presented after adjusting for baseline sum of longest diameters and EGFR mutation category. Only data collected up until the analysis cut-off date (27 Dec 2013) were considered. A negative value means the smallest post-baseline SLD was smaller than baseline (decreased since baseline); a positive value means tumor size increased since baseline.
The means are adjusted for baseline sum of lesions and EGFR mutation category.
Tumour assessment were performed at screening, week 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48 and then every 12 weeks until progression or death whichever occurs first up to week 374
Secondary Change From Baseline in Body Weight The change from baseline to the lowest and the last body weight recorded or during the the study. Baseline and throughout the study (every 3 weeks) until progression or death (whichever occurs first) up to 374 weeks.
Secondary Change From Baseline in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) The last ECOG performance score category recorded during the study. Outcome data are the percentage of patients with an shift of ECOG performance status from baseline to the last ECOG performance status.
ECOG PS measured on 6 point scale to assess participant's performance status. 0=Fully active, able to carry on all pre-disease activities without restriction;
Restricted in physically strenuous activity, but ambulatory and able to carry out light or sedentary work;
Ambulatory (>50 percent of waking hours), capable of all selfcare, unable to carry out any work activities;
Capable of only limited self care, confined to bed or chair more then 50 percent of waking hours;
Completely disabled, cannot carry on any selfcare, totally confined to bed or chair;
Dead
Baseline and throughout the study (every 3 weeks) until progression or death (whichever occurs first) up to 374 weeks.
Secondary Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL): Time of Deterioration in Coughing HRQOL as measured by standardised questionnaires (EuropeanOrganisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC)) quality of life questionaires (OLQ-C30) and its lung cancer module (QLQ-LC13). Analysis for cough: QLQ-LC13, question 1.
Time to deterioration was defined as the time from randomisation to a score increase (i.e. worsened) of at least 10 points from baseline (0 to 100 point scale). Patients without deterioration (including those with disease progression) were censored at the date of the last available HRQOL assessment; patients without post-baseline assessments were censored at the date of randomisation. Patients were considered as having deteriorated at the time of death. The median is Kaplan-Meier estimates.
Baseline and throughout the study (every 3 weeks) until progression or death (whichever occurs first) up to 374 weeks.
Secondary Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL): Time of Deterioration in Dyspnoea HRQOL as measured by OLQ-C30 and its lung cancer module (QLQ-LC13). Analysis for dyspnoea: composite of QLQ-LC13, questions 3 to 5; individual item from QLQ-C30, question 8.
Time to deterioration was defined as the time from randomisation to a score increase (i.e. worsened) of at least 10 points from baseline (0 to 100 point scale). Patients without deterioration (including those with disease progression) were censored at the date of the last available HRQOL assessment; patients without post-baseline assessments were censored at the date of randomisation. Patients were considered as having deteriorated at the time of death. The median is Kaplan-Meier estimates.
Baseline and throughout the study (every 3 weeks) until progression or death (whichever occurs first) up to 374 weeks.
Secondary Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL): Time of Deterioration in Pain HRQOL as measured by OLQ-C30 and its lung cancer module QLQ-LC13. Analysis for pain: composite of QLQ-C30, questions 9 and 19; individual items from QLQ-LC13, questions 10, 11 and 12.
Time to deterioration was defined as the time from randomisation to a score increase (i.e. worsened) of at least 10 points from baseline (0 to 100 point scale). Patients without deterioration (including those with disease progression) were censored at the date of the last available HRQOL assessment; patients without post-baseline assessments were censored at the date of randomisation. Patients were considered as having deteriorated at the time of death. The median is Kaplan-Meier estimates.
Baseline and throughout the study (every 3 weeks) until progression or death (whichever occurs first) up to 374 weeks.
Secondary Pharmacokinetics of Afatinib at Day 22 Outcome data are the trough plasma concentrations of afatinib at day 22 after multiple daily dosing of 40mg afatinib and after dose escalation to 50mg or dose reduction to 30mg afatinib (no patient dose reduced to 20mg during the Pharmacokinetics (PK) assessment period). Day 22 (course 2, visit 1)
Secondary Pharmacokinetics of Afatinib at Day 29 Outcome data are the trough plasma concentrations of afatinib at day 29 after multiple daily dosing of 40mg afatinib and after dose escalation to 50mg or dose reduction to 30mg afatinib (no patient dose reduced to 20mg during the PK assessment period). Day 29 (course 2, visit 2)
Secondary Pharmacokinetics of Afatinib at Day 43 Outcome data are the trough plasma concentrations of afatinib at day 43 after multiple daily dosing of 40mg afatinib and after dose escalation to 50mg or dose reduction to 30mg afatinib (no patient dose reduced to 20mg during the PK assessment period). Day 43 (course 3, visit 1)
Secondary Safety of Afatinib as Indicated by Intensity and Incidence of Adverse Events Safety of Afatinib as indicated by intensity and incidence of adverse events graded according to the US National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 3.0. Presented as the percentage of patients with an Adverse Events during the on-treatment period by highest CTCAE grade. From first administration of study medication up to 28 days after the last administration of study medication up to 374 weeks.
Secondary Changes in Safety Laboratory Parameters Outcome data presented are the percentage of patients by worst CTCAE grade (only Grades 2 to 4 presented) on treatment for the following laboratory parameters: Potassium, Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST), Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT), Creatine and Creatine Kinase.
For Potassium; only CTCAE grades resulting from hypokalemia (low values) are presented.
From first administration of study medication up to 28 days after the last administration of study medication up to 374 weeks.
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT04879849 - A Study of TAK-676 With Pembrolizumab After Radiation Therapy to Treat a Number of Cancers Phase 1
Completed NCT04426825 - A Study of Atezolizumab in Combination With Bevacizumab in Patients With EGFR Mutation Positive Stage IIIB-IV Non-Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Phase 2
Terminated NCT03166631 - A Trial to Find the Safe Dose for BI 891065 Alone and in Combination With BI 754091 in Patients With Incurable Tumours or Tumours That Have Spread Phase 1
Completed NCT02810457 - Evaluation of FKB238 and Avastin in Patients With Advanced/Recurrent Non-squamous Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Phase 3
Completed NCT02864394 - Study of Pembrolizumab Versus Docetaxel in Participants Previously Treated for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (MK-3475-033/KEYNOTE-033) Phase 3
Recruiting NCT04592523 - A Study of Usage of Brigatinib in the Treatment of Adult Participants for Approved Indications In South Korea
Recruiting NCT04838548 - A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of MRG003 in Patients With EGFR-Positive Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Phase 2
Recruiting NCT04077463 - A Study of Lazertinib as Monotherapy or in Combination With Amivantamab in Participants With Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Phase 1
Recruiting NCT04603807 - A Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Entrectinib and Crizotinib in Participants With Advanced or Metastatic ROS1 Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) With and Without Central Nervous System (CNS) Metastases Phase 3
Recruiting NCT05167604 - Clinical Value of MRD Monitoring for Adjuvant Therapy in Postoperative NSCLC
Completed NCT04948411 - Durvalumab as Maintenance in Patients Who Received Chemoradiotherapy for Unresectable Stage III NSCLC: Real World Data From an Expanded Access Program in Brazil
Active, not recruiting NCT04487080 - A Study of Amivantamab and Lazertinib Combination Therapy Versus Osimertinib in Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Phase 3
Not yet recruiting NCT04255836 - Durvalumab Combined With Chemotherapy and Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) in Patients With Oligometastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Phase 2
Completed NCT01953913 - Afatinib (BIBW 2992) in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients With EGFR Mutation Phase 3
Recruiting NCT05715229 - Immune Profile Selection By Fraction of ctDNA in Patients With Advanced NSCLC Treated With Immunotherapy Phase 2
Recruiting NCT04931654 - A Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of AZD7789 in Participants With Advanced or Metastatic Solid Cancer Phase 1/Phase 2
Suspended NCT05421936 - Osimertinib for NSCLC With Uncommon EGFR Mutations
Completed NCT02847377 - A Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Imaging Agent [18F]-ODS2004436 as a Marker of EGFR Mutation in Subjects With NSCLC N/A
Completed NCT04427072 - Study of Capmatinib Efficacy in Comparison With Docetaxel in Previously Treated Participants With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Harboring MET Exon 14 Skipping Mutation Phase 3
Recruiting NCT04823377 - Impact of a Process Optimizing the Decision to Continue or Stop Cancer Treatments in Patients With Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer. N/A

External Links