View clinical trials related to Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung.
Filter by:Evaluate the efficacy and safety of Anlotinib plus Icotinib as the first-line treatment in patients with sensitive EGFR mutations advanced non-small cell lung cancer.
The proposed study will evaluate the safety and feasibility of preoperative administration nivolumab in patients with high-risk resectable NSCLC, and will facilitate a comprehensive exploratory characterization of the tumor immune milieu and circulating immune cells and soluble factors in these patients. Data obtained in this study will provide valuable information for planning further prospective clinical trials of anti-PD-1 or anti-PD-L1 in NSCLC, both in the peri-operative and advanced disease setting.
This is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter phase III study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of CS1001 in subjects with locally advanced/unresectable (Stage III) non-small cell lung cancer that has not progressed after prior concurrent/sequential chemoradiotherapy.
This is a single arm open-label multi-center phase II study, investigating disease control rate after 18 weeks of treatment with afatinib/cetuximab combination therapy in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring an EGFR exon 20 insertion.
The study will evaluate progression-free survival, overall survival, best response and duration of treatment in patients with advanced ALK- and ROS1-positive non-small cell lung cancer who received lorlatinib as part of the French expanded access program.
This large multinational, non-interventional study (NIS), will retrospectively collect data derived from established medical records over a period of up to approximately 6 years (2013 to 2018), building a platform to capture and consolidate information on treatment patterns, Overall Survival (OS) and treatment effectiveness outcomes in the real-world setting.
Evaluate molecular testing and treatment patterns for EGFR mutation in two different cohorts of stage IV NSCLC, at diagnosis (treatment naïve) and at the moment of progression to EGFR-TKIs. This study is non-indication seeking (NIS), descriptive in nature and does not attempt to test any specific a priori hypotheses.
The main purpose of the study was to investigate the clinical activity and safety of avelumab in combination with cetuximab plus gemcitabine and cisplatin in participants with treatment-naïve advanced squamous non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
In this study, a pragmatic, open labelled, multi-center randomized controlled trial will be conducted. The study population are stage II and IIIA NSCLC patients undergoing R0 resection and will be scheduled for adjuvant chemotherapy. Potentially eligible patients will be screened by the research clinicians and requested to complete and sign a consent form before enrolment. Eligible patients who consent to participate will be randomly assigned to the intervention group (patients receive conventional treatment and Shenlingcao oral liquid) and the control group (patients only receive conventional treatment) designed dynamic stratified block randomized algorithm via a central randomization system for clinical research using 1:1 ratio. The intervention and control group will be enrolled before the first chemoradiation. Non-allelic follow-up will be conducted in this study and terminated when the last enrolled patient follow up to 24 months. Prospectively collected information from patients, including baseline, chemoradiation, use of Shenlingcao Oral Liquid and the other complementary drugs, and various outcome measures (the questionnaire of EORTC QLQ, death, tumor recurrence, tumor metastasis, and chemotherapy-induced side effects of the blood system, etc.). Follow-up points included: Baseline (before giving chemotherapy), 2-3 days after each chemotherapy cycle, and 6,12,18,24,30,36 months after enrollment.
Currently, it is the standard of care practice to perform daily routine CXR when a chest tube is in situ following pulmonary resection. However, previous research as well as experience of thoracic surgeons suggested this kind of management has poor diagnostic and therapeutic value. Eliminating daily routine CXR for adult patients having undergone pulmonary surgery might decrease the frequency of radiation exposure and hospitalization costs per patient without increasing reintervention rates, length of hospital stays, readmission rates or any adverse events.