Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Not yet recruiting

Administrative data

NCT number NCT05817864
Other study ID # 2022073
Secondary ID
Status Not yet recruiting
Phase
First received
Last updated
Start date June 2023
Est. completion date December 2025

Study information

Verified date April 2023
Source Chinese University of Hong Kong
Contact Janita Pak Chun Chau, PhD
Phone +852 3949 6226
Email janitachau@cuhk.edu.hk
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Observational

Clinical Trial Summary

A prospective observational diagnostic study will be conducted to assess the sensitivity and specificity of using capnography in detecting the correct placement of nasogastric tubes using the reference standards of radiography and measurement of aspirates for pH value.


Description:

A prospective observational diagnostic study will be conducted. Patients ≥ 18-year-old and requiring the insertion of an nasogastric tube will be recruited using a convenience sampling method from general medical and geriatric wards, intensive care units (ICUs), accident and emergency departments (AEDs), and subacute/rehabilitation/infirmary wards in 21 acute or subacute/convalescent/extended care hospitals. End-tidal carbon dioxide (ETCO2) detection by sidestream capnography, which indicates airway intubation of an nasogastric tube when a capnogram waveform or an ETCO2 level > 10 mmHg, will serve as the index test. The reference standards will be the pH value of gastric content aspiration (pH ≤ 5.5 indicates gastric placement) and X-ray performed after the index test. Each participant will be included only once. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of capnography will be calculated to assess the diagnostic performance of capnography. The variability in diagnostic accuracy in participants with different characteristics will be compared. The time spent and the cost of the index test and the reference test will be compared. This study will provide evidence on the diagnostic accuracy of capnography in verifying nasogastric tube placement and inform the update of clinical practice guidelines and stakeholders' decisions regarding the adoption of ETCO2 detection as a routine method for verifying nasogastric tube placement.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Not yet recruiting
Enrollment 390
Est. completion date December 2025
Est. primary completion date June 2025
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 18 Years and older
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria: - 18 years old or above; - Admitted to the general medical and geriatric wards, ICUs, or subacute/rehabilitation/infirmary wards in subacute/convalescent/extended care hospitals or visiting AEDs in acute hospitals; - Requiring the insertion of an nasogastric tube into the stomach for assessment, nutritional support and medication administration during the study period. Exclusion Criteria: - Participants receiving life-saving intervention at the time of recruitment.

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Diagnostic Test:
Capnography
Index test: Capnography, which monitors ETCO2, the percentage concentration, or partial pressure of CO2 at the end of exhalation, will serve as the index test. It will be performed by connecting the end of the nasogastric tube with the sensor of the bedside sidestream capnography device. Placement within the airway is defined as detecting a capnogram waveform or an ETCO2 level > 10 mmHg. Reference standard: This study will use radiography (chest/abdominal X-ray) as the reference standard for determining the correct placement of nasogastric tubes. Radiology will be performed as soon as possible and interpreted by a physician. A repeat radiography will be performed if necessary. We will also use pH-Fix-4.5-10 to determine the pH value, and its accuracy is +/- 0.2 pH with minimum increments of 0.5. A pH of 5.5 or below indicates gastric placement.

Locations

Country Name City State
China The Chinese University of Hong Kong Hong Kong Hong Kong SAR

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Chinese University of Hong Kong

Country where clinical trial is conducted

China, 

References & Publications (3)

Chau JP, Lo SH, Thompson DR, Fernandez R, Griffiths R. Use of end-tidal carbon dioxide detection to determine correct placement of nasogastric tube: a meta-analysis. Int J Nurs Stud. 2011 Apr;48(4):513-21. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2010.12.004. Epub 2011 Jan 7. — View Citation

Chau JP, Thompson DR, Fernandez R, Griffiths R, Lo HS. Methods for determining the correct nasogastric tube placement after insertion: a meta-analysis. JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(16):679-760. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907160-00001. — View Citation

Chau JPC, Liu X, Choi KC, Lo SHS, Lam SKY, Chan KM, Zhao J, Thompson DR. Diagnostic accuracy of end-tidal carbon dioxide detection in determining correct placement of nasogastric tube: An updated systematic review with meta-analysis. Int J Nurs Stud. 2021 Nov;123:104071. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2021.104071. Epub 2021 Aug 24. — View Citation

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Sensitivity of Capnography True Positive / (True Positive + False Negative) × 100% Through study completion, an average of 2 year
Primary Specificity of Capnography True Negative / (True Negative + False Positive) × 100% Through study completion, an average of 2 year
Primary Positive Predictive Value of Capnography True Positive / (True Positive + False Positive) × 100% Through study completion, an average of 2 year
Primary Negative Predictive Value of Capnography True Negative / (True Negative + False Negative) × 100% Through study completion, an average of 2 year
Primary Overall diagnostic performance of Capnography Measured by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC). The test accuracy level is considered high when the AUROC value is = 0.9. Through study completion, an average of 2 year
Secondary Difference in the time spent of index test and reference test Compare the time spent of index test (i.e., capnography) and reference test (i.e., radiography) Through study completion, an average of 2 year
Secondary Difference in the cost of index test and reference test Compare the cost of index test (i.e., capnography) and reference test (i.e., radiography) Through study completion, an average of 2 year
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT03279458 - Non-invasive Tidal Volume Monitoring Using the Linshom Respiratory Monitoring Device N/A
Completed NCT02889770 - Dead Space Monitoring With Volumetric Capnography in ARDS Patients N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT05696860 - Microstream® Capnography in Endobronchial Ultrasonography Applications Under Sedation N/A
Completed NCT03554629 - A Comparison of Capnography Sampling Lines N/A
Completed NCT04962581 - A Prospective Descriptive Study of the Individualized Capnography of Both Lungs During One-lung Ventilation With Double-lumen Tube
Not yet recruiting NCT03025490 - The Use of Capnography and Integrated Pulmonary Index in the Electrophysiology Laboratory N/A
Completed NCT04316988 - Ultrasonography Versus Capnography in Detecting Endotracheal Tube Placement During Intubation in a Tertiary Hospital.
Completed NCT03370081 - Effects of Capnometry Monitoring in Post Anesthesia Care Unit N/A
Recruiting NCT03768973 - Pulmonary Effects of Diabetes Mellitus
Recruiting NCT04839419 - Obesity-hypoventilation in Metabolic Syndrom Patients