Cancer Pain Clinical Trial
Official title:
Patient Controlled Analgesia (PCA) vs Non-PCA Intravenous Hydromorphone Titration for Severe Cancer Pain: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled, Multi-center, Phase III Trial
Verified date | April 2020 |
Source | Fujian Cancer Hospital |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
A large number of studies have shown that patients feel more satisfied with hydromorphone in the pain management. and a systematic review found that hydromorphone may be better suited than morphine for titration of acute analgesia. However, current researches on intravenous opioid titration for cancer pain such as hydromorphone are relatively insufficient in China. Therefore, a prospective, multi-center, randomized controlled study is conducted to assess the efficacy and safety of comparing patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) versus non-PCA intravenous hydromorphone titration for severe cancer pain.
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 214 |
Est. completion date | January 10, 2020 |
Est. primary completion date | December 10, 2019 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years to 70 Years |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: 1. With written informed consent signed voluntarily by patients themselves. 2. Cancer patients aged 18-70 years old. 3. Patients with cancer pain more than or equal to NRS 7 during previous 24 hours. 4. Patients who will not be treated with radiotherapy within 7 days prior to randomization and during study. 5. Patients who need chemotherapy, long term administration of hormone, targeted therapy, or bisphosphonates therapy should undergo a stable anti- tumor therapy prior to randomization. 6. Patients or his/her caregivers who are able to fill out the questionnaire forms. 7. Ability to correctly understand and cooperate with medication guidance of doctors and nurses. 8. Without a history of anaphylaxis of narcotic drugs. 9. Without psychiatric problems. 10. ECOG performance status =3. 11. Not participated in another drug clinical trial within one month before inclusion(including hydromorphone). Exclusion Criteria: 1. Patients diagnosed with non-cancer pain or unexplained pain. 2. Patients suffered with post-op pain. 3. Patients having paralytic ileus. 4. Patients who have hypersensitivity to hydromorphone. 5. There are abnormal lab results, with obvious clinical significance, such as the creatinine = 2 fold of upper limit of normal value, or ALT or AST = 2.5 fold of upper limit of normal value (= 5 fold,to the patients with liver metastasis or primary liver cancer), or liver function of Child C grade. 6. Patients having a incoercible Nausea and vomiting. 7. Monoamine oxidase inhibitor (MAOI) was administrated two week before randomization. 8. Patients who are pregnant or lactating,who plans to be pregnant within one month after the trial(including male). 9. Patients who are opioid abuse. 10. Patients who are alcohol abuse. 11. Patients who are cognitive dysfunction. 12. Patients having a severe psychotic depression. 13. Patients with any other medical condition or reason, in that investigator's opinion, makes the patient unable to participate in a clinical trial. |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
China | Rongbo Lin | Fuzhou | Fujian |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Fujian Cancer Hospital |
China,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | The time of successful titration in 24 hours | The satisfied pain control was defined NRS pain score = 3 at rest in at least 2 consecutive assessment (15 minutes interval). The time needed to successful titration was extended to achieve satisfied pain control again if NRS pain score = 7 after satisfied pain control within 24 hours. The failure of successful titration was defined that satisfied pain control does not achieve within 24 hours. | In 24 hours | |
Secondary | The percentage of patients titrated successfully within 60 minutes | The percentage of patients who titrated successfully within 60 minutes | Up to 60 minutes | |
Secondary | The percentage of patients titrated successfully within 24 hours | The percentage of patients who titrated successfully within 24 hours | Up to 24 hours | |
Secondary | The mean NRS pain score of 24 hours | The Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) is used to assess the severity of pain. The scale represents pain levels in 0-10 numbers, with 0 indicating no pain and 10 indicating the most severe pain. Ask the patient to choose the number that best represents his or her pain level, or ask the patient to ask: How severe is participant's pain? The health care provider selects the appropriate number based on the patient's description of the pain. 1-3 points indicate mild pain, 4-6 points indicate moderate pain, and 7-10 points indicate severe pain. "The mean NRS pain score of 24 hrs" is defined as the sum of the scores within 24 hours divided by the number of evaluations within 24 hours. | Up to 24 hours | |
Secondary | The total dose of hydromorphone titrated from start of titration to TST | The total dose of hydromorphone titrated from start of titration to TST | Up to 24 hours | |
Secondary | The total dose of hydromorphone titrated within 24 hrs | The total dose of hydromorphone titrated within 24 hrs | Up to 24 hours | |
Secondary | Improvement of patient symptoms | The change from baseline in questionnaire: Chinese version of the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System | Up to 24 hours | |
Secondary | Adverse Events | treatment-related Adverse Events: | Up to 7 days |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Recruiting |
NCT03431922 -
Endovascular Denervation in Patients With Cancer Pain
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT05265052 -
3D1002 in Combination With Oxycodone Hydrochloride Sustained-release Tablets in Patients With Moderate to Severe Cancer Pain
|
Phase 2 | |
Withdrawn |
NCT05325164 -
Methadone for 'Adenocarcinopathic' Pain Treatment
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT02664987 -
Analgesic Treatment for Cancer Pain in South East Asia
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01946555 -
Prospective Longitudinal Observational Study to Evaluate the Clinical Characteristics and Opioids Treatments in Patients With Breakthrough Cancer Pain
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT04095234 -
Integrative Medicine for Pain in Patients With Advanced Cancer Trial (IMPACT)
|
Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT05800834 -
Benefits of Morphine Gel for Pain Reduction in Patients With Cancer Wounds
|
Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT04907643 -
Virtual Reality for GI Cancer Pain to Improve Patient Reported Outcomes
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02609828 -
Phase 3 Study on the Efficacy and Safety of Tanezumab in Patients With Cancer Pain Due to Bone Metastasis Who Are Taking Background Opioid Therapy
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT03331055 -
PENS or TENS for Pain in Pancreatic Cancer
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05506878 -
Auriculo-Nerve Stimulation on Post-Operative Opioid Requirement
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT00766831 -
An Efficacy and Safety Study of Hydromorphone Oral Osmotic System (OROS) in Korean Participants With Cancer Pain
|
Phase 4 | |
Recruiting |
NCT05051735 -
PARASTOP - Paracetamol With Strong Opioids
|
Phase 3 | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT05348174 -
Randomized Controlled Trial of Virtual Reality Assisted Guided Imagery (VRAGI) for Pain in Advanced Cancer Patients.
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05209906 -
An Observation Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Proportional Doses of Painkyl® in Patients With Breakthrough Cancer Pain
|
||
Completed |
NCT03031938 -
Protocol to Monitor the Neurological Development of Infants With Exposure in Utero From Birth to 15 Months in Tanezumab Clinical Studies
|
Phase 3 | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT05594459 -
Early Treatment With Invasive Technique in Cancer Pain Management
|
N/A | |
Withdrawn |
NCT04666623 -
Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Intranasal Esketamine in Chronic Opioid Refractory Pain
|
Phase 2 | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT05049811 -
Effects of Mobile Medicine on Cancer Patients
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02660229 -
An Interventional Study for Patient With Cancer Pain to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of OxyNorm® Compared to Morphine Sulfate Through the IV Continuous Infusion.
|
Phase 4 |