Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Withdrawn

Administrative data

NCT number NCT02091297
Other study ID # D14074
Secondary ID
Status Withdrawn
Phase N/A
First received March 10, 2014
Last updated August 4, 2016
Start date April 2014
Est. completion date April 2014

Study information

Verified date August 2016
Source Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority United States: Institutional Review Board
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

More and more women are on buprenorphine or methadone during pregnancy for a history of opioid addiction. Currently, pain control after cesarean section for women already on these medications, if they need operative delivery, is a challenge due to the pharmacology of those drugs. They have higher pain scores and 45-47% higher opiates requirement. To improve pain control, some unique regional anesthesia techniques have been employed, besides opioid and non-opioid medication management through the oral, intravenous, and/or neuraxial (spinal or epidural) route. One is a TAP block ( transversus abdominis plane block), a regional anesthesia procedure in which long acting local anesthetic, such as ropivacaine, is injected on both sides of the patient's abdomen to numb the nerves supplying the abdominal wall, or the surgical site. Another is a patient - controlled epidural, a small flexible catheter that is inserted in the back into the epidural space near the spine, which bathes the spinal nerve roots with long acting local anesthetic, such as bupivacaine, and with an opioid, such as fentanyl, to numb the nerves going to the surgical site. Through an epidural pump, the patient receives a continuous infusion of local anesthetic and can delivery more medication as needed through a bolus feature. There have case reports, or case by case accounts, of these techniques, and it is suspected these techniques result in better pain control with minimal side effects. No clinical, human or animal, has evaluated these techniques in a controlled and through manner, either comparing the two techniques to each other or comparing them to the common care of opioid and non-opioid medication management through the oral, intravenous, and/or neuraxial route, including neuraxial hydromorphone or morphine.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Withdrawn
Enrollment 0
Est. completion date April 2014
Est. primary completion date April 2014
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender Female
Age group 18 Years and older
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria:

- Anesthesiology Society of Anesthesiologist's Status of II or III

- Maintenance methadone or buprenorphine during pregnancy

- Regional anesthesia staff to perform a TAP block

- Elective, non-urgent cesarean delivery via a Pfannenstiel incision under regional anesthesia

Exclusion Criteria:

- Emergency cesarean section

- Laboring patients who are now having to delivery operatively

- Patients with a BMI over 50

- Patients with allergies to any of the study medications

- Patients under 18 years old

- Patients with multiple gestations

- Patients undergoing general anesthesia

- Patients who had contraindications for either an epidural or a TAP block as in coagulopathies, chronic back pain, skin conditions, or existing neuropathies

- Patients who cannot understand the use of a patient controlled epidural analgesia

Study Design

Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Single Group Assignment, Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Caregiver), Primary Purpose: Treatment


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Drug:
TAP Block
This intervention of a TAP block will be compared to the intervention of Common Care and to the intervention of Patient Controlled Epidural Analgesia
Ropivacaine
The intervention of the Patient Controlled Epidural Analgesia will be compared to the intervention of a TAP block and the intervention of Common Care
Acetaminophen
Common ways to treat pain control after Cesarean Section include oral and IV opioids, non-narcotic adjuncts such as non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and acetaminophen, and long-acting spinal or epidural opioids such as morphine. Due to the potential issues such as ineffectiveness and fear of respiratory depression, increasing the dosing of these opioids may not be ideal. The intervention of Common Care will be compared to the intervention of a TAP block and the intervention of Patient Controlled Epidural Analgesia
Morphine


Locations

Country Name City State
United States Brigham & Women's Hospital Boston Massachusetts
United States Massachusetts General Hospital Boston Massachusetts
United States Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center Lebanon New Hampshire

Sponsors (3)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center Brigham and Women's Hospital, Massachusetts General Hospital

Country where clinical trial is conducted

United States, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Acute pain by narcotic use after cesarean section Directly compare narcotic use in patients who have a TAP block, who have a patient - controlled epidural analgesia, or common care ( neuraxial opioid alone) while in the hospital / acute pain after Cesarean Section
Will use morphine equivalents
0-48 hours after surgery No
Primary Acute pain by pain scores after cesarean section Directly compare pain scores in patients who have a TAP block, who have a patient - controlled epidural analgesia, or common care ( neuraxial opioid alone) while in the hospital / acute pain after Cesarean Section
Will use VAS (0-10), pain at rest, pain with movement
0-48 hours No
Secondary Chronic pain by narcotic use Directly compare narcotic use in the three groups at the six week visit, evaluating for chronic pain after Cesarean Section.
Will use dose of buprenorphine and/or methadone Will use morphine equivalents
6 weeks post-partum No
Secondary Respiratory depression Oxygen requirement, narcan use (yes / no), rapid response or code blue called 0-48 hours Yes
Secondary Perception of Quality in Anesthesia / Maternal Satisfaction Using the validated, "Perception of Quality in Anaesthesia (PQA) questionnaire", the patients assessed their overall experience of the cesarean section and post-operative pain management and anesthetic care 0-48 hours No
Secondary Pruritus Is a positive to pruritus if the patients answers yes to the question, "have you experienced any itching" or if a drug was specifically used to treat itching via a review of the MAR 0-48 hours No
Secondary Nausea Is a positive to nausea if the patients answers yes to the question, "have you experienced any nausea" or if a drug was specifically used to treat nausea via a review of the MAR 0-48 hours No
Secondary Vomiting Is a positive to vomiting if the patients answers yes to the question, "have you experienced any vomiting" or if a drug was specifically used to treat vomiting via a review of the MAR 0-48 hours No
Secondary Chronic pain by pain scores Directly compare pain scores in the three groups at the six week visit, evaluating for chronic pain after Cesarean Section.
Will use VAS score (0-10), pain at rest and pain with movement
6 weeks post-partum No
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT01542346 - Subcutaneous Adaption and Cosmetic Outcome Following Caesarean Delivery N/A